Lord of the Rings

Viggo role that kills me is his carlitos way blink-and-miss-it

Mainly because carlitos way always, always lives in my head as a movie made in 1979 tbh

igh i guffed this part up

Also his style of writing feels confounding at times, like x thing happens that is then retold by other characters in a following chapter, or like starting Two Towers with...walking
Where you’d normally be “well why would a writer do that” but he’s drawing on medieval storytelling and he’s also chronicling

My garbled point was that he is approaching fantasy as a medieval scholar so as a reader my own kneejerk modern desire for narrative & dramatic tension eventually get wrestled to the ground & i really very much enjoy his style where hes almost writing for his own enjoyment & edification, and me the audience just go along for the ride rather than being grabbed by structural tricks etc

again oversimplified but i love him is the upshot

Tolkien a v big walker iirc?

There's something to the heft of the books that many emulators dont manage and the movie misses also in his expertise being language and his hobby being rambling.

Tolkien's days spent on the march, his having bilbo and frodo as walking explorers as a pastime, his orc-driven nightmare runs and the limbo hopelessness of following in its wake, the ashy trudge across mordor which may as well be a continent in the timeless impossibility of it- this is a guy that knows walking like the proverbial eskimo knows snow, this is a guy who could describe gait and step like a wine writer

totally

every now and again he says that the hobbits are “running” and i’m like.. damn. with those packs! just running for hours nbd

he is approaching fantasy as a medieval scholar

Very key. An element which emerges in interesting fashion is his deep love of the Icelandic saga form, which famously generally has its characters and main figures described externally -- IOW, you don't get what makes a character tick from an omniscient narrator sharing internal thoughts, it's all done via outside observation of action and speech, sometimes very flatly. (Characters will die suddenly or brutally and it'll seem like you're just reading along without a change in tone.) Obviously this isn't the entire case -- we get a lot of Sam's internal thoughts the closer we get to the end, for example -- but other characters we're never 'inside' in ways we're more familiar with. Boromir is never a POV character, for instance.

xpost otm

also no one is at his level for giving you specific plant names in any given environment, to the point where if you are up on your botany you can literally see what he’s telling you is being seen

Request lotr board tbh

Someone else do it im cooking

xpost You have reminded me this book is a beautiful indulgence:

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/flora-of-middle-earth-9780190276317?cc=us&lang=en&

Father/son team, dad's the academic botanist, son is the hardcore Tolkien fan, and the whole thing is a detailed but also sober-minded treat, suggesting real world analogues as needed and so forth. I learned a lot!

the Icelandic sagas def helps understand his style of storytelling

re medieval stuff, its funny bc both me and my bookclub friend studied Tolkien’s translation of Gawain in college etc & minored in middle english but until now never really pulled all the threads together between the medieval stuff and LOTR etc #lifelonglearning

wow that Flora book looks awesome

We did the Gawain translation for the podcast back in June -- it was good to go back to that, there was a lot I'd forgotten. A very strange work!

I'd say offhand the key non-Tolkien-written books that serve as useful/informative addenda are Carpenter's biography -- though a deeper and more complete study with material and facts that weren't in there is long overdue -- Foster's Complete Guide to Middle-earth -- Christopher Tolkien used it himself! -- Fonstad's editions of The Atlas of Middle-earth and Wayne Hammond/Christina Scull's editing of Tolkien's artwork and the reader's companion to LOTR. But the Flora book is a real treat too.

i am def interested in reading the biography at some point

Obviously this isn't the entire case -- we get a lot of Sam's internal thoughts the closer we get to the end, for example -- but other characters we're never 'inside' in ways we're more familiar with. Boromir is never a POV character, for instance.

The only POV characters are the hobbits I think? We follow the chase party after Merry & Pippin are kidnapped, but there's nothing internal there, just external description of what's happening. Actually we might get some of Gimli's POV in the Paths of the Dead sequence, but other than that the whole saga really is (largely) written in hobbit-view.

i’ve been reading the nibelungenlied (nbd) and that feels like a big source - german originally but with a scandinavian offshoot that preserves more of its archaic original story than the german version which permuted more. a ring of power, a small creature who forswore love to possess it etc. (lots more women in the nibelung saga tho!)

Tolkien knew it well and translated some portions of it. But when asked about more specific connections he famously replied, "Both rings were round, and that is all."

Yeah but he dismissed everything tbf, i think he rather showily disliked speculation on the meanings of it all

In a few letters i read of his to Auden & others etc, he seemed to have be v self-conscious about his writing, like he was adverse to ascribing highminded motivations & talking about his “craft” bc he didnt want to seem like he was putting on airs

or that was impression i got

at least as far as LOTR etc went

He was definitely cautious, per deems. I think part of him was still surprised the outgrowth of his 'secret vice' turned out to be such a phenomenon. (Which itself is interesting because he'd already had a substantial hit with The Hobbit in the first place.)

for reasons i’m not entirely clear on i started reading the fellowship of the ring the other day.

1 the early conversations between gandalf, bilbo and frodo etc are really charming. i make this observation because of how bad the films are at this tone, managing a sort of imbecile joviality or theatrical menace. one of the pleasant things in the book is the adult to adult conversation between the two and exchanges like this on gollum:

‘

No, and I don’t want to,’ said Frodo. ‘I can’t understand you. Do you mean to say that you, and the Elves, have let him live on after all those horrible deeds? Now at any rate he is as bad as an Orc, and just an enemy. He deserves death.’

‘Deserves it! I daresay he does. Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.

now maybe to read the thread lol. i didn’t realise there were so many posts from today.

nice in a sort of yes! otm! way seeing both deems and VG making the same point about the ambulatory pace (and yes the writing by detailed map is v evident if agree)

Tracer covered the snoozeworthiness of the council of elrond upthread tbf

The cloak-and-dagger feeling of that pre-Rivendell section is some of my favourite stuff - evading the shadowy enemy agents to smuggle the secret weapon out of the country.

The movie absolutely nails it, too

Tracer covered the snoozeworthiness of the council of elrond upthread tbf

Fonstad's editions of The Atlas of Middle-earth

I still have my first edition hardcover of this with the dustjacket. It played such a huge role in my love of Middle Earth because I loved maps and they were so insanely detailed. The white, brown, black scheme also made little me think the maps were somehow insanely old. You could just spend an afternoon looking at the travel maps and it was like reading the trilogy over again in a couple of hours.

Agreed that the flight from the Shire is best part of the books and movies.

Gandalf and then Bilbo in turn leaving the young hobbits totally underprepared works beautifully for the adolescent reader, feeds into the success of the narrative unfolding in a manageable way

I still have my first edition hardcover of this with the dustjacket. It played such a huge role in my love of Middle Earth because I loved maps and they were so insanely detailed.

I had that as well, and what a treasure. I do wish there'd been hardcovers of the updated ones. (Fonstad's other atlases, even for series of less-than-notable stuff, were also treats -- she passed too early but I'm glad she got to see the films and appear in some of the supplements.)

Gandalf and then Bilbo in turn leaving the young hobbits totally underprepared works beautifully for the adolescent reader, feeds into the success of the narrative unfolding in a manageable way

I’d just like to chime in that Ned’s podcast is a delight — some eps are more interesting to me than others bcuz of my stronger connection to Hobbit-world & not so much the Silmarillion & all the apocrypha — but definitely something everyone should check out. It’s a nerdy ‘cast, but the 3 hosts take great pains to keep the conversation moving & not get sucked into whirlpools of ultra-nerdery.

https://www.megaphonic.fm/bythebywater

Well thank you kindly, that's quite nice of you to say! Won't disagree with any of that! If people want to take a dive but aren't sure where to start, I'd suggest the obvious with the first episode just because the three of us introduce ourselves, in essence, and explain why we're fans. But we got better technically after a couple of episodes so beyond that, I might go for:

4 -- Aldarion and Erendis
6 -- Friendship
8 -- Tom Bombadil
11 -- Dwarves
14 -- Tolkien adaptations (our general introduction to our eventual episodes about such things, whenever they appear)
18 -- The Ents
20 -- Eowyn

We have a lot of episodes on more open topics like fanwork as well as non-Middle Earth Tolkien things as well, and I certainly haven't listed all the core episodes as such either. I will say that two of the most fun episodes where I chose the topic were 13 -- my April Fool's to my cohosts where I made them read the most egregious thing ever, Dennis L. McKiernan's LOTR sequel in all but (changed) name The Silver Call Duology -- and 16, which was on the LOTR stage musical from the 2000s.

_Fonstad's editions of The Atlas of Middle-earth_

I still have my first edition hardcover of this with the dustjacket. It played such a huge role in my love of Middle Earth because I loved maps and they were so insanely detailed. The white, brown, black scheme also made little me think the maps were somehow insanely old. You could just spend an afternoon looking at the travel maps and it was like reading the trilogy over again in a couple of hours.

Ned, any First Age esp Children of Hurin (my absolutely favorite Tolkien story)?

We haven't done Turin and company yet -- we definitely will though. But as for the First Age in general, here and there -- episodes 2 and 3 are about death in Middle-earth and about Melian, so you may find things to chew over there though again we hadn't quite figured out our best format until episode 4. 5 on Galadriel and 7 on Ghan-buri-Ghan touch on elements as do others in lesser degrees; at some point we'll get around to grappling with that material more in discussion. It's all down to our continuing whims! (The smartest thing we did out of the gate was decide NOT to simply march through a close reading of any of the books.)

As a teenage fan, I enjoyed bits of Unfinished Tales; I did buy a few of the other posthumous books but I honestly can’t remember a thing about them beyond being bored silly.

Which of the posthumous books are of most interest / contain actual complete stories / aren’t basically drafts of the Silmarillion?

Children of Hurin, for me. As absolutely vicious and devastating as Tolkien got, like Greek myths.

Though it is more an expansion of the Turin Turumbar parts of The Silmarillion. It is absolutely a self-contained story.

xxpost You can ignore the first four books in the History series, then. The fifth one, The Lost Road, is of interest because it's where he was with Middle-earth development right before getting into writing LOTR -- a number of paths not taken, some interesting material there about Numenor. Six through eight cover LOTR but the ninth, Sauron Defeated, has the Notion Club Papers and related material that is as meta as Tolkien ever got, lots of meditations on what exactly he was doing or trying to do. The remaining three books, while covering later Silmarillion material, has a LOT with him late in life starting to question and heavily revise his original mythologies -- the last fifteen years of his life is almost him, not quite pulling a Le Guin with later Earthsea move, but him definitely giving lots of things a rethink. The forthcoming Nature of Middle-earth collection may have more in this vein too.

Yeah, I would emphasize The Silmarillion contains excerpted/summarized/streamlined versions of many finished/unfinished First/Second Age stories. Most of the books that came out over the last couple of years expand The Silmarillion versions into full-fledged versions.

versions>versions

Tracer covered the snoozeworthiness of the council of elrond upthread tbf

yeah we normally do 3 or 4-chapter sections a week for bookclub bc chapters are usually quite short

mid-read that week we realized council of elrond was fuckin HUGE so we called it & just did that one chapter that week lol

But as exposition goes, its what allows the glorious mad "evil comes to derbyshire" of everything after the birthday party to that point

Get through that (and tbh if you dont have to read it aloud selon chez hand its not *that* bad) and you're out the door and headlong to moria again

my lore-obsessed ass loved the council of elrond chapter lol. also love it when bilbo (or another character, but usually bilbo) breaks out into a song that lasts multiple pages.

About 40 pages, to be fair. I think it's fine. It puts the rest of the book on sure footing, and helps the reader to buy into the necessity of the quest.

If anything, three whole chapters in Lothlórien is the slog for me.

I’m reading some Wikipedia pages to confirm some half-remembered things and Jesus Christ

Originally, Tolkien intended for Éowyn to marry Aragorn. Later, however, he decided against it because Aragorn was "too old and lordly and grim." He considered making Éowyn the twin sister of Éomund, and having her die "to avenge or save Théoden". He also considered having Aragorn truly love Éowyn and regret never marrying after her death.

Fantasy stories are easy to start- witness the many, many followers-on to the story in question- but at some stage exposition must come in and you're either balls-out with it or you are dribbing and drabbing it and either way its almost impossible to not be either aping or overaware of Tolkien while doing so rly- the council was prob revolutionary enough in its day as an approach and this way we dont become a fantasy tale so in love with its court intrigues that we're stuck with bloody grandkids before things move on again

xp aragorn is ninety in the film also

Thats just what a ninety yr old aragorn looks like