From what I gather, "post-left" is like the dirtbag leftists that refused to stop saying the r-word when everyone else did in 2016?
― bruce spr!ngisH3r3 (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 11 May 2021 21:00 (three years ago) link
no. they are reactionaries, basically, who want to have economic leftism without any kind of social liberalism. often they are critical if not hostile to most left wing causes.
― treeship., Tuesday, 11 May 2021 21:05 (three years ago) link
i feel like they are gadflies that orbit the left more than anything. my point was basically that someone like liz bruenig isn't really part of that group
― treeship., Tuesday, 11 May 2021 21:12 (three years ago) link
which Left seemed to be implying. but maybe he wasn't.
also that 'anarcho-nazbol-trots' is one of the most absurd groupings possible
― Joe Bombin (milo z), Tuesday, 11 May 2021 21:12 (three years ago) link
yeah that is what i was trying to say. these are different people .
― treeship., Tuesday, 11 May 2021 21:15 (three years ago) link
Half of them aren't even people, just NSA honeypots.
― Joe Bombin (milo z), Tuesday, 11 May 2021 21:15 (three years ago) link
lol
― intern at pepe le pew research (Simon H.), Tuesday, 11 May 2021 21:17 (three years ago) link
i thought post-left was some nihilist/egoist/primitivist thing, have the red scare people appropriated it, it doesn't suit them
of course i know these various tendencies hate each other i was making the point that you have partisans of conceivable left and quasi left tendency weighing in with variations of the same tune. the main group is clearly just liberal though sometimes with marxist pretensions
― Left, Tuesday, 11 May 2021 21:36 (three years ago) link
i may have spread my net too wide since this shit is not limited to whatever specific clique this was about but it's hard not to see it all as connected when they're all on the same anti-PC anti-radical left-IDW trip
― Left, Tuesday, 11 May 2021 21:41 (three years ago) link
Twitter makes it difficult to parse political subcultures/trends, no doubt.
― intern at pepe le pew research (Simon H.), Tuesday, 11 May 2021 21:43 (three years ago) link
also these ppl who supposedly want to centre labour issues instead of social issues (because you can separate those things apparently) also seem to think reproductive labour and emotional labour are fake things made up by liberal academics and that social reproduction just happens naturally somehow. matt bruenig literally said "the home" is "outside of labor relations" or some shit which speaks volumes about the limits of these ppl's politics xps
― Left, Tuesday, 11 May 2021 21:48 (three years ago) link
i'm well aware i'm all over the place here
― Left, Tuesday, 11 May 2021 21:49 (three years ago) link
xp maybe people should just do podcasts when they have something to say, i guess.
― in twelve parts (lamonti), Tuesday, 11 May 2021 22:14 (three years ago) link
I’m pretty sure the post left is three people addicted to podcast drama and 4chan memes, I refuse to believe they have any engagement with the world beyond incessant posting.
― JoeStork, Tuesday, 11 May 2021 22:15 (three years ago) link
yeah it's not post as in after it's post as in posting
― intern at pepe le pew research (Simon H.), Tuesday, 11 May 2021 22:17 (three years ago) link
best out of the current-ish crop of posting leftists
― the mai tai quinn (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 11 May 2021 22:25 (three years ago) link
“Post-left” is a real thing, but I think it’s only like 10 people online. I think they get a shit ton of attention because so many leftists online seem insecure as fuck and keep trying to root out those who aren’t True Believers, those who are betrayers, and the mythic “red-brown alliance.”
I think this is why Liz Bruenig gets so much hate and ire, because she may or may not hold a bad idea in her inner heart of hearts that she has never espoused publicly or from her platform.
― Glower, Disruption & Pies (kingfish), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:00 (three years ago) link
If Bruenig's anti-abortion view leads her to favor more safety net policies to support poor mothers rather than favoring restriction of access then people's objections to it are really more in the rooting out thought-crime realm. See folks in this thread calling it "indefensible."
― Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:13 (three years ago) link
Yeah, a lot of it seems like leftover pathology of powerlessness stuff, where you have a bunch of folks who survived in their subculture for so long they can’t switch it from just being a subculture.
It’s like hardcore punk kids freaking out about keeping the scene pure, not trying to build a mass movement to actually change things
― Glower, Disruption & Pies (kingfish), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:24 (three years ago) link
"thought crime" fuck you
― Left, Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:28 (three years ago) link
ha
― Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:29 (three years ago) link
basically the message is misogyny is ok as long as you support (reformist, imperialist, US-nationalist) socialism
remember when i brought up the russell brand thing a while back, it was because this is the same shit that keeps happening. the idea that certain people are just too important to be called out on their bullshit. it's SWP logic
― Left, Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:36 (three years ago) link
these reactions are just standard right wing anti-PC bullshit
― Left, Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:38 (three years ago) link
ok dude
― Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:41 (three years ago) link
this language is *routinely* used to defend rapists on the left
― Left, Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:49 (three years ago) link
fuck you
Tangential to yesterday's discussion, one of the problems with twitter is that you are expected to have the entire history/feed of every twitter personality memorized and engrained. So often you see someone engage, typically in earnest, with a specific tweet and they subsequently get minorly dragged with, "how could you respond to this person abt your favorite movie, don't you know they tweeted something transphobic three years ago?". Which isn't to say that it's a bad thing that people keep receipts and remember awful things people tweet, but it can be exhausting having to know that you aren't just replying to a tweet, you are replying the whole "persona".
― soaring skrrrtpeggios (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:53 (three years ago) link
the better response to that would be "thank you for telling me" or "sorry i didn't know about that" not "oh yeah so where's the evidence" or "you wreckers are destroying our movement" or "woke thought police" or
― Left, Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:55 (three years ago) link
asking for evidence is bad?
― intern at pepe le pew research (Simon H.), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:56 (three years ago) link
― Left, Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:57 (three years ago) link
it's obvious if someone really wants to know or if they just want to dissemble
― Left, Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:58 (three years ago) link
certain keys on your keyboard are getting a lot of use today
― Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 17:59 (three years ago) link
I didn't suggest a response? Just saying there is a lot of weight in interactions on twitter and sometimes it's just an earnest reply and not a wholehearted endorsement of everything a different person has ever tweeted. NB I'm not defending anyone specific in this thread, just something I've noticed about how fraught twitter interactions have become.
― soaring skrrrtpeggios (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 18:01 (three years ago) link
posting on ILX otoh
― intern at pepe le pew research (Simon H.), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 18:03 (three years ago) link
well this has become a pretty fraught thread tbh
― soaring skrrrtpeggios (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 18:05 (three years ago) link
this is how social media works it's how you respond to being informed about who you're interacting with
when i used twitter i was sometimes informed of shitty things said or done by people or orgs i'd retweeted or interacted with. i was not cancelled for having done that and i was grateful for the information
― Left, Wednesday, 12 May 2021 18:07 (three years ago) link
Never heard of 'post-left' but aren't NazBols leftists who think Tucker Carlson is based because he says negative things about corporations sometimes?
― anvil, Wednesday, 12 May 2021 18:11 (three years ago) link
You are responding to things in my posts that I didn't say. I never said anyone was "cancelled", I never argued that it was a bad thing to get educated. I was simply saying that not every twitter user has an index of the tweeting history of everyone they may potentially interact with and maybe it's not the best look to automatically assume the worst possible intent behind every interaction.
But you are just looking to get aggro on everyone today, so I'm sorry I brought it up in the first place.
― soaring skrrrtpeggios (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 18:13 (three years ago) link
― Washington Generals D-League affiliate (will), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 18:27 (three years ago) link
now-feudalismneo-feudalism
― Washington Generals D-League affiliate (will), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 18:28 (three years ago) link
Jimmy Dore has almost a million subscribers so there's more than a dozen! I feel their effect isn't insignificant, this is part of the nihilism thats designed to turn people away from AOC because she didn't do M4A yet
― anvil, Wednesday, 12 May 2021 18:32 (three years ago) link
I mean tbh I’ve never listened to Jimmy Dore and I’m not sure what he stands for, but is he legitimately nazbol/ white nationalist?
― Washington Generals D-League affiliate (will), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 18:38 (three years ago) link
There are a lot of the various kinds of asshole being discussed here (a lot in the sense they could sell out a MLB stadium) but they’re not doing anything. They aren’t even trying to do entryism to take over the (itself pretty irrelevant) DSA, much less unions or putting up primary candidates.
― Joe Bombin (milo z), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 18:47 (three years ago) link
Liz B being anti-choice is “unacceptable” but she’s neither a politician nor an activist. She’s a token soft left NYT op-Ed writer. There’s no value in being mad at her for her shitty belief (not even plural!). As with Ezra Klein, you’ll never lose by completely ignoring Time op-ed writers (except for the guy who roasted Petey Butts).
― Joe Bombin (milo z), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 18:49 (three years ago) link
Him personally? More of a nihilist/narcissist than anything more strictly defined I think. But Greenwald, Dore, BJG, general Strasserite class reductionism. But none of this is an entryism of any kind, its more of a nihilst exitism (from broad progressivism)
― anvil, Wednesday, 12 May 2021 18:54 (three years ago) link
you’ll never lose by completely ignoring Time op-ed writers
moved to The Atlantic as of today (lol)
― rob, Wednesday, 12 May 2021 19:01 (three years ago) link
Left's posting style not making any friends here per usual, but I disagree that we should shrug off anti-abortion rhetoric from someone with a decently prominent media profile who is perceived to be a voice of the left (however bullshit we all think that perception is). As I'm sure you all know, abortion rights & access are continually being eroded in the US, and the normalizing of "religious" objections to it is obvs a huge part of that. And personally, I have zero use for a non-feminist leftist opiner
― rob, Wednesday, 12 May 2021 19:07 (three years ago) link
she hasn't written any articles about being anti-abortion or posted about it on twitter iirc.
― 《Myst1kOblivi0n》 (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 12 May 2021 19:10 (three years ago) link