come anticipate Miami Vice with me

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (629 of them)

nrq you are apparently the tv series dvd expert. at £45 this seems like a pretty good deal, yes? http://www.amazon.co.uk/Miami-Vice-Complete-Collection-DVD/dp/B000SLW43M/

caek, Saturday, 18 July 2009 03:03 (fourteen years ago) link

fuckin love this movie which is on atm.

call all destroyer, Monday, 27 July 2009 01:38 (fourteen years ago) link

WHAT CHANNEL

meme-first attitude (J0rdan S.), Monday, 27 July 2009 01:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Universal HD. climactic shootout comin up

call all destroyer, Monday, 27 July 2009 01:44 (fourteen years ago) link

the praise heaped on this film on ILX made me watch it for the first time. i'd just like to say 'thankyou ilx!' and also that i'm absolutely flabbergasted this movie wasn't better recived by the critics. it's *brilliant*! wipes the floor with just about any big budget hollywood action movie i can think of from these last few years.
some have noted that the trailers made it look like BAD BOYS or whatever and yet it's an art film in many ways so it got a widespread 'huh?' from shoot-em-up loving teens etc.

the trailer park scene is one of the most tense i've ever seen.

piscesx, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 05:56 (fourteen years ago) link

the saddest thing is that if it had been any kind of hit, Mann wanted to do a sequel.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 07:06 (fourteen years ago) link

I should see this again. I remember just about zero about it, which usually is a sign that it's kind of a forgettable movie. But Mann is easy to underestimate, and I would at the very least enjoy LOOKING at it again.

reared on Shakespeare (kenan), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 07:09 (fourteen years ago) link

Ha! Me, from earlier in the thread:

I won't remember anything about it in a month except for the way it looked, but hey.

I have to agree with myself here, if only for purely practical reasons.

reared on Shakespeare (kenan), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 07:13 (fourteen years ago) link

two months pass...

i just saw this and it is fucking astonishing. so bummed i didn't see it in theatres.

LaMonte, Saturday, 10 October 2009 20:14 (fourteen years ago) link

one month passes...

http://www.leftfieldcinema.com/misunderstood-modern-cinema-miami-vice

piscesx, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 05:47 (fourteen years ago) link

Mann in the past has been well known for some of the ill-conceived music choices he made in his 1980’s films Manhunter and The Keep, in the case of the former in particular the soundtrack was the biggest issue the film has to contend with

absolutely no desire to read any more in an essay that contains this sentence

max, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 14:37 (fourteen years ago) link

lot of run-on sentences in that post

max, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 14:38 (fourteen years ago) link

Thief's score is worse.

Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 14:41 (fourteen years ago) link

i dont remember the score from thief which is usually a good thing w/ mann ficks--collateral and miami vice both had horrendous soundtracks (which i think sort of "worked" with the aesthetic), but manhunter had a rad soundtrack iirc

max, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 14:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Thief had that Tangerine Dream score, which was great.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 14:47 (fourteen years ago) link

omg garda da vida (or however you spell it) is fucking ace!

bracken free ditch (Ste), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 15:08 (fourteen years ago) link

okay that was less of a score, as it was a part in the film. the score was amazing too.

bracken free ditch (Ste), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 15:09 (fourteen years ago) link

That article . . . ugh. It did make one valid point: The film would have been better served if it wasn't named Miami Vice. I suppose it's okay to belittle the audience for expecting to see a rehash or parody or pastiche of the TV show. But it's also hard to blame the audience for those expectations, since they were set by a deliberate choice of the filmmakers, who undoubtedly wanted the film to benefit from a direct association with the show.

The problems with this movie weren't addressed in the article. First, the acting was wooden. Second, Colin Farrell -- who absolutely was the lead, with everyone else, including Foxx, as distant supporting players -- had no presence, charisma, or charm. Third, quite a bit of the dialogue was hamfisted, and it stood out even more because of Mann's effort to make the film gritty and realistic (the dialogue wasn't helped by the acting, e.g., the stiff "I'm a fiend for mojitos" line).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:01 (fourteen years ago) link

i dont get why its weird to call the film miami vice? the aesthetic of the movie and the aesthetic of the show seemed pretty similar to me.

max, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:05 (fourteen years ago) link

There are better articles than that one on the film, seeing as it has been elevated to the level of masterpiece by the blogosophere.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:06 (fourteen years ago) link

seems like whoever wrote that isn't familiar with the original series at all

luol deng (am0n), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:09 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah

max, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:11 (fourteen years ago) link

was thinking maybe piscesx wrote it

SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:17 (fourteen years ago) link

i think the acting style and dialogue is vastly secondary to how the film was shot, scored, edited, and framed. not a criticism, i just think that mann was trying to make an entire picture of nothing but "michael mann moments" (and trying to get some kind of emotion from what some folks might find to be a cold style and story) and he succeeded. it's like 'gaucho' or something.

jØrdån (omar little), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:19 (fourteen years ago) link

i was actually lookin for the miami vice dvd last week and couldnt find it anywhere, i was suddenly overtaken with the urge to listen to the commentary~

i will say that the score of manhunter was super distracting to me for some reason, normally i dig that kind of crap

not readin that gay article tho

NEW YORK DESERVED 9-11 (cankles), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:20 (fourteen years ago) link

i think the commentary is only available on the director's cut, which isn't as good as the theatrical. shame.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:21 (fourteen years ago) link

my man michael mann's manhunter

SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:21 (fourteen years ago) link

watched this again recently---i think omar's kinda right, in that the acting really is secondary to what mann is trying to do visually/etc., and that's basically OK (then again, i really just intensely disliked colin farrell)

but i dunno, it's too long (would rather watch Heat), and i think Collateral did just as well at capturing that aesthetic (or w/e) and was just a tighter, more enjoyable film in general.

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:30 (fourteen years ago) link

it's funny to say something is too long and then say you'd rather watch heat.

omaha deserved 311 (call all destroyer), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:32 (fourteen years ago) link

watched this again recently---i think omar's kinda right, in that the acting really is secondary to what mann is trying to do visually/etc., and that's basically OK (then again, i really just intensely disliked colin farrell)

I don't disagree. But that just means, in the overall scheme of things, acting is secondary to other elements of the film. It doesn't mean that the dialogue has to be bad or the acting stiff and flat.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:34 (fourteen years ago) link

aesthetically it was manns best - in other ways it was one of his worst - but it all kinda worked in a purposely non working style - i enjoyed it immensely - especially the flying parts - so much so i saw it 2 times on teh big screen

SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:35 (fourteen years ago) link

it's funny to say something is too long and then say you'd rather watch heat.

― omaha deserved 311 (call all destroyer), Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:32 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

uh? what i mean is: if i'm gonna watch a long-ass michael mann movie, i'd rather watch Heat

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:36 (fourteen years ago) link

does anyone understand the promise and peril of dv better than mann - no one does - think abt it

SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:36 (fourteen years ago) link

also i think i would've enjoyed this MUCH more if i'd seen it in the theater

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:36 (fourteen years ago) link

soderbergh, maybe? xp

i dunno

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:36 (fourteen years ago) link

lol soderbergh doesnt know shit about shit

NEW YORK DESERVED 9-11 (cankles), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:37 (fourteen years ago) link

i fart on him

NEW YORK DESERVED 9-11 (cankles), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:37 (fourteen years ago) link

was gonna say

SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:38 (fourteen years ago) link

if u say so! i don't think i've seen a soderbergh movie since traffic (lol), just know that he's really "into" dv

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:38 (fourteen years ago) link

i am not a soderbergh guy really but i thank him for telling clooney he sucked, causing him to vastly improve

jØrdån (omar little), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:39 (fourteen years ago) link

but it was spielberg who told him to not move his head around so much

SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:40 (fourteen years ago) link

also obv i am retarded because i have seen all of the ocean's AND solaris (which i don't really remember thx w3333d)

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:41 (fourteen years ago) link

lol out of sight is good - after that naaaaah

SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:41 (fourteen years ago) link

gotta say tho that i really, really love dv/HD when it's done right

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:42 (fourteen years ago) link

mee too

SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:43 (fourteen years ago) link

there were a couple of crazily wonderful scenes in public enemies where i was all wow he just showed me something

SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:44 (fourteen years ago) link

public enemies is frustratin for me, there's stuff in it that's as good as anything he's done since heat but idk if i could even watch it again cuz of the scenes where the feds beat up his old lady, 2 hard 2 watch

NEW YORK DESERVED 9-11 (cankles), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:47 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah that was unpleasant

SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:49 (fourteen years ago) link

totally missed public enemies

will have to see it over the holidays

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:49 (fourteen years ago) link

i dont....really see movies much

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:49 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.