Tomtit in the tilth -- the NY TIMES SPELLING BEE thread

Dan's second one was the last one I needed for QB, but getting it felt pretty hollow.

gt absolute fo with ROMCOM

Any self respecting 80s goth/punker would get BACKCOMB ! :)

lol Robert Smith is the image reference on its Wikipedia page.

Zactly!

lol that grody is accepted today.

and yet porgy, which is an actual fish, is not

But dory is! Im suprised I didnt think to try porgy given my BOTW fandom.

Okay so galangal, hogan, longan, and oolong but not galena.

Or galah or goanna

Todays is killing me, I cant get the 2nd pangram even after looking at the hivemind clues.

...nm I got it. Yet another "I'm not american so it didnt come to mind" one.

Oooooo bold pangrams in the app this morning

i was fully expecting RANDO to be accepted

Nice themed set of answers in today’s!

I guess lardons not a thing in us?

Only if you're a trained professional [profession redacted] I think.

Yeah I'd tried it too. Didnt think it was that niche?

Okay no neoteny or poteen

But thankfully no hoopoe

I never play this because a) it costs money and ii) the idiosyncratic dictionary sounds super annoying. Just found a free version which uses a public domain dictionary: https://freebee.fun/play/

also https://spellingbeegame.org

oh cool! the first uses a full unedited dictionary so might include super obscure words - I also found this which is edited and definitely doesn't include uk slang (e.g. footy, hotty): https://dianthusarts.github.io/Spellbound/ - will see how this other one compares.

I have tried these clones, as well as others, but it's not really the same experience for me.

Personally I crave the validation of nailing the nyt version, using its established grid system, and being in community with others who are trying to attain the same goal.

I also like paying for stuff that I enjoy

ANYHOO was on the NYT word list the other day. c'mon bro

Yesterday's was more frustrating than usual.

No nappy, nanna, nonna/nonno*, nano*, but ANYHOO is allowed? muthafukn.

*I'm almost certain the've allowed thhose before

First one, though it has fairly innocuous meanings in other dialects, has unfortunate racial connotations in the US.

Nano by itself hasn't been accepted AFAIR, though something like nanobot has been. Nana is accepted regularly, though.

There's one I can't get today, even with the hints. Some kind of shoe?

The shoe is BROGAN. Civil War buffs know that one.

The one I absolutely did not know today was BAZOO, allegedly a slang term for a face.. Got the rest with no trouble.

yeah that second one was new to me too

Ah, I know that one from crime dramas.
It always annoys me when the three clue guys all just the same clue for a word. If I didn't know what it was when Kline said it, I'm still not going to know it now. Give me alternatives, dammit!

all just GIVE the same clue. I should go to bed.

I haven't ever reached queen bee on my own without any hints and am probably still a long way from it

Same. I have some rules: I do as much as I can completely unaided. When I start to flail, I refer to the grid/2 letters to jog my mind. Only once I get to Genius am I allowed to read the Hivemind chats for clues. And I hate that the moment I do, I see words that should have been obvious and somehow werent.

Closest Ive got is only having to use clues for one word to get to QB but usually I come up at least 4 or 5 short.

I have similar rules from myself. I at least have to get to Genius, or Genius +1, on my own before going to look at the grids.

Usually I can get to Queen Bee using the two-letter list. I will only check the Forum hints if I have one word left in a particular two-letter sequence.

It's all arbitrary and all pretty silly, but those are my personal rules.

The comments are helpful when I'm out of steam. I'm just not patient enough to spend all day figuring it out on my own

I've gotten to QB a few times recently with just the letter clues

I've been shocked at how often I miss the simple 4-letter words

Most often I miss words that are just not going to come to mind unless you're north american, which is frustrating. I've just had to put such words in the mental bank, like hockey and baseball slang, american spellings, and use of hispanic words.

Mind you yesterday's had one I don't understand how it could be used. Triton? Thats a moon (thus a proper noun) or a God (ditto) so how come it counted?

Also a type of sea snail.

I had a similar thought a while ago when I guessed morocco, and it was accepted unexpectedly. I looked it up and it turned out to be a type of leather.

Sam's very specific interests remain the game's defining characteristic.

If it's a bird or a pasta, it will be accepted. If it's not a bird or a pasta, odds are about 50/50. Witness today's GNOCCHI but not GNOMIC.

I don’t know or care who this Sam guy is and it’s stupid that this word game thinks words aren’t words

I think that in the beginning, the standard was to exclude words that the creator deemed obscure/offensive/foreign/proper. Too much debate over those squishy subjective categories got tiresome.

Lately I am noticing in online talk about the game that the justification has shifted. It's more like, "We don't want to make people find all 200 of the possible words with this letter set, so we're just looking for a subset that is in accordance with 'our list.'"

Is it arbitrary? Yes it is. Deal with it. Is it capricious? Yes it is. Deal with it. Don't like it? Fine. Go do something else, including the various Spelling Bee clones out there that accept everything in a dictionary. In that regard it's very like the NYT crossword, which has a very specific vocabulary and frame of reference. Narrow but deep.

Me, I like the finite and achievable nature of it. I get almost done, then I go to the grids, then (if still stumped) to the hints. It's a pre-breakfast ritual and once I am done I can get on with my day.

A puzzle that included every possible word would take longer and introduce a tedium that I simply don't need.

FOOFARAW?!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dH7zt12Ok8M

Oops, sorry for not hiding.

Yeah that is one of the ones I don't love but will dutifully fill in, just as a matter of tedious completeness.

This category includes stuff like: foofaraw, lollop, lollard, palapa, callaloo. also the various arbitrarily accepted goofy shit like cancan, ahchoo, moola, and all the aforementioned Judaica / pasta / avian trivia.

Okay today's one getting me to pull eidetic out of my brain was unusually satisfying so all is temporarily forgiven.

I don't think this tops foofaraw but I loathe adverbs like yesterday's PG cornily.

I don't mind that word as it is, like, a normally formed word using English morphemes.

If I have a beef with SB it is goofy nonsense shit like pitapat ratatat cancan foofaraw moola. But I am largely inured to that now. Lately I am just gently annoyed by the bird/pasta nexus, and I just sokve it as a puzzle where the parameters are known and I try to work within them.

Those are all dictionary words that have been around for like a century without falling out of usage, it would be dumb to exclude them

I mean it’s dumb to exclude any words but what would even be the rationale behind pretending cancan was obscure? A no dances rule?