the painting, which is protected by glass.
phew!
― ledge, Friday, 14 October 2022 11:18 (one year ago) link
The amount of pearl-clutching on Twitter. Even though I was pretty sure from the off it was behind glass, given JSO's previous gallery protests, I had actually thought about it and would support them even if it wasn't.
― Alba, Friday, 14 October 2022 11:30 (one year ago) link
An interesting observation.
one of the suffragettes who most made a name for herself/spent time in prison for destroying famous paintings was head of the women's section in the british union of fascists 20 yrs later. the most eye catching direct actions are no substitute for a movement's political content.— michael richmond (@Sisyphusa) October 14, 2022
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 14 October 2022 12:31 (one year ago) link
This, however, is stupid.
assassinating a single middle manager at BP would have—conservatively—9 trillion times the impact that throwing soup at a painting behind glass does https://t.co/aSzgsooetg— debdrens (@debdrens) October 14, 2022
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 14 October 2022 14:16 (one year ago) link
do we have to choose
― your original display name is still visible (Left), Friday, 14 October 2022 16:39 (one year ago) link
To really get some press, they should have emulated Istvan Kantor AKA Monty Cantsin.
― Halfway there but for you, Saturday, 15 October 2022 16:59 (one year ago) link
I think Van Gogh would approve
― | (Latham Green), Saturday, 15 October 2022 16:59 (one year ago) link
They should staple sunflowers to Andy Warhol's soup can painting next.
― BrianB, Saturday, 15 October 2022 17:32 (one year ago) link
love art!
― ꙮ (map), Saturday, 15 October 2022 21:42 (one year ago) link
what those people did was awesome and people who feel otherwise should be euthanized by the biden-harris eco-gestapo
― budo jeru, Sunday, 16 October 2022 06:38 (one year ago) link