EZRA KLEIN v MATT YGLESIAS

I still think about this quote from that WaPo profile of him a few months ago:

"I find it relaxing to work. I put things out. People yell at me. I will write again the next day."

Goals are worth two points if you do it off some cool shit like a bicycle kick.

“You’re a smart guy with interesting things to say but” pic.twitter.com/CcOhlUQzPc

— Jonathan M. Katz theracket.news (@KatzOnEarth) August 6, 2023

lmao at "re-radicalized"

how radical to turn it on and off like a light switch

When a Nazi calls you pure evil it doesn’t sting as much.

since musk turned off the free api matt doesnt auto delete his tweets anymore lol

So did Matty say this after Hananana’s racist and anti semitic group texts were discovered?

no but his official work is also explicitly racist (and it was pseudonymous articles not texts)

Nah, he doesn't give a shit

But what is the error in judgment? Was I running around vouching for Hanania’s good character? Assuring people he’s not racist? He’s clearly quite racist! But I also think he’s written some good pieces and it’s important to read conservatives.

— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) August 6, 2023

The key thing here is that Yglesias thinks of the revanchist & racist right as part of his universe of discourse, people who are wrong on some stuff but worth engaging with. By contrast, for him left & left-liberals beyond the pale. pic.twitter.com/sjUAC4Yw1E

— Jeet Heer (@HeerJeet) August 6, 2023

funny lil baby trick mattys trying to pull there conflating reading the right for educational purposes with thinking theyre good and interesting and complimenting them

cnn should tell matty and a few others that they’re rebooting the crossfire tv show, and then put the soundstage at the bottom of the ocean with no actual broadcast

one thing the huffpost article showed is how much substack has become fulcrum for this shit including the ceo going on podcasts with this guy and others like him, worth reading if youre wondering what the deal is with this racist man https://www.huffpost.com/entry/richard-hanania-white-supremacist-pseudonym-richard-hoste_n_64c93928e4b021e2f295e817

no but his official work is also explicitly racist (and it was pseudonymous articles not texts)

yeah young conservatives are exclusively nazis these days, its not great

that RH guy is like 37 which is probably still below the median conservative age but not super young

also it’s weird he’s so into eugenics when he looks like one of his parents was a toaster oven

its always like that lol

hes also repeatedly talked about how he was a terrible fast food employee when he was young cause he was too smart

https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/64cc26912000001b00f839be.png

Grown ass adults obsessed with their IQs.

and with comma splices

who invented IQ tests anyway. surely not anyone an antisemite would want to cite

Anti-Semites tend to emphasize how high-IQ Jewish people are, as both a backhanded compliment and as an example of how dangerous and a formidable enemy they are to non-Jews.

what a effin shit head

The conservative position on abortion is unpopular but the other thing Republicans need to accept is that the weirdly timed election gimmick now plays into the hands of Democrats’ highly educated neurotic base.

— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) August 9, 2023

still chatting with the nazi

https://i.imgur.com/FT2WdQj.png

Hmmmm wonder what the white nationalist's "theory of crime in American cities" consists of

It’s healthy to listen to different points of view!

These are people for whom the Chapo guys are beyond the pale but actual Nazis have outside the box thinking

Holy shit my brother is sitting across for Matty right now at a cafe what should he ask him??????

I told him he should talk really loudly about how much sweatshops rule

one of the greats

https://i.imgur.com/L19661W.jpg

"Follow Megan McArdle's opinions" no i dont think i will

Fallow Megan McArdle's opinions

"Fellow! Megan McArdle's opinions!"

Seems like the best lace for this:

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/jan/12/casey-newton-quits-substack-nazi-newsletter

Ganz isn't quitting:

https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/an-issue-of-concern

"From a political point of view, if you consider yourself a leftist or progressive, I think the correct strategy would be to compete for reach on all platforms—within reason, of course."

What would within reason be though?

Of the newsletters I subscribe to that were on Substack, two have already left over this (Today in Tabs and Last Week's New Yorker Review), two have committed to leaving soon (Garbage Day and PJ Vogt), one hasn't committed yet but is exploring other options (s1ocki's Something Good), and two have addressed the issue but decided to stay for now (Fran Magazine and Alan Sepinwall).

A few others have spotlighted the issue but without saying anything about what they personally plan to do about it (Culture Study, The Reveal, The Present Age). And others still haven't mentioned it at all.

I guess Newton's decision to leave is notable because he's a leading tech journalist with a lot of subscribers.

yeah hes a guy they recruited and gave a special deal to

had also been pretty wishy washy in his coverage of the nazi newsletter situation up until announcing his departure

that is pretty weak sauce from ganz

I agree with Ganz. Fleeing Substack — which is a tool, not a website, and one of the best tools on the market — because people you disagree with politically also use that tool is typically self-defeating pseudo-leftist bullshit. Where you gonna run to? What blogging platform has explicitly promised that it will always agree with you politically, and will never welcome anyone with whom you disagree? Who could ever make a promise like that? Who would ever expect it to be kept? This whole "campaign" has been unserious and embarrassing from the beginning. And frankly, anybody who'd unsubscribe from a newsletter simply because of where it's hosted isn't a reader you want.

This whole "campaign" has been unserious and embarrassing from the beginning.

damn wow......

as to the question of what substack is, its a company, which profits from nazi newsletters, and its run by right wing shitheads, i dont personally care if people leave it or not, everyones got their own calculations to make, but the fact that there are people who are willing to put their livelihoods at risk in order to not just let nazi and right wing shithead schemes slide is an obvious good

its easy to be all "all the companies are bad" which is true to some extent, however what you cant say is "all the companies profit off explicitly nazi shit" because generally companies try very hard to not deal with nazis, for obvious reasons, except substack

xp is accessibility and availability dependent upon them using substack specifically? are they growing readership principally or even noticeably only because they exist on substack, and people only look for known writers there?

“self limiting” or “useless” ok, but is it really “self-defeating?”

also is this situation mere “political disagreement,” or something more? recruitment? activation? radicalization?

Ganz should be pricing in substack getting a lot worse. Understand he might want to keep the rent money rolling in for a bit but it's weak not to look to other platforms/pitch to other publications. The guy is fairly established...

what you cant say is "all the companies profit off explicitly nazi shit" because generally companies try very hard to not deal with nazis, for obvious reasons, except substack

True today. Not at all guaranteed to be true tomorrow, because capitalism...and particularly because techbro capitalism. Eventually Ghost and Buttondown are going to piss off the people currently pissed off at Substack. I guarantee it.

is accessibility and availability dependent upon them using substack specifically?

It's an email program. You're communicating directly with your subscribers. There is a "recommendations" homepage, but I never even looked at it until just now.

I like Substack because it's easy to use, and because it's free. Ghost and Buttondown would each charge me about $100 a month to reach the roughly 2700 subscribers I currently possess, and only about 60 of those people are paying me $50 a year for their subscriptions, so the math doesn't add up. The platform hasn't bought my loyalty; if it starts to suck in terms of functionality, I'll look for something else. But I will not give up a free tool with good features just because assholes get to use it, too. My list of assholes doesn't begin or end with Nazis; I would probably find the majority of Substack users boring, annoying, or offensive in some way if I bothered to check their shit out. But I haven't, and I won't.

I kinda agree with this guy. There's a difference between Nazis and assholes, and you need to be able to tell the difference and respond accordingly.

might want to reflect on the fact not wanting to bother leaving a newsletter has inspired you to defend nazis

I have done nothing of the kind.

I kinda agree with this guy. There's a difference between Nazis and assholes, and you need to be able to tell the difference and respond accordingly.

the newsletters at the centre of this discussion are pretty openly neo-nazis & white nationalists, they're not victims of the adl's bad faith smears against critics of israel nor are people simply exaggerating in relation to more minor transgressions

substack has long made a point of refusing to enforce their own terms of service in relation to transphobes who blatantly breached it, so the most surprising thing about this whole debacle is that they actually caved to pressure a little bit and have taken action against a few of the most egregious nazi substacks.