idk maybe
― treeship., Tuesday, 2 April 2024 01:08 (two months ago) link
even if the price held until he was allowed to sell hed have a hard time cashing much in without driving it down
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 01:13 (two months ago) link
i think he has some sort of scheme running, or someone else does, that will allow this stock to stay high for a long enough time. he has more power behind him now than he did in 2016, as seen in things like project 2025.
― treeship., Tuesday, 2 April 2024 01:14 (two months ago) link
if people want to prop the price up they might as well just give him the money it amounts to the same thing, which shows the problem with him selling hundreds of millions of dollars of it, is there hundreds of millions of dollars out there willing to be transferred to his account
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 01:20 (two months ago) link
hmm is there anything happening in about 6 months time that might affect the value of stock in $DJT?
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 01:29 (two months ago) link
The first presidential debates uh wait
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 01:51 (two months ago) link
Anyway per Forbes via a Bluesky summary:
NEW: Trump secured his $175 million bond with a combination of cash and investment-grade bonds, per Don Hankey, chair of Knight Insurance and the "little-known king of subprime car loans." A supporter of Jeb Bush and then Trump, Hankey says he reached out to Trump with the offer.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 01:56 (two months ago) link
i consider myself a bit of a little-known king of subprime car loans too
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 01:57 (two months ago) link
Elevated circles!
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 01:58 (two months ago) link
"Duke of Saxony" feeling pretty shabby rn
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 02:07 (two months ago) link
MR. HANKEY
― an icon of a worried-looking, long-haired, bespectacled man (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 02:15 (two months ago) link
Abe Froman passed on the opportunity
― immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 12:54 (two months ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQML0_YASCI
― scott seward, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 13:35 (two months ago) link
Apparently not "anything."
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 13:39 (two months ago) link
John Ganz, who I find worthwhile even when I don't totally agree with him, has an interesting post up about a new collection of essays debating the "Is Trump Fascist" question. Ganz is more on the side of "yes" — calling Trump semi- or proto-fascist — but is mostly writing about how dug in some of the liberal intellectuals in the "No he isn't" camp are, and why.
https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/what-happened-here
I've never been sure how much this debate really matters, since I think the actual facts of Trump are pretty plain for everyone to see, whatever you call them. Ganz otm here: "The simple fact is this: Trump would be dictator if he could, but it’s not that easy, and he probably won’t be able to become one. I don’t think anybody can honestly say, 'No, he really doesn’t have that aspiration or will at all.'”
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:02 (two months ago) link
I think Trump is very used to having his word be law in his companies, however much of a sham they are. No doubt, he would like the government be the same way. I can't think of a more obvious example, in this country at least, of someone letting the power of the presidency go to his head.
― immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:04 (two months ago) link
I think he's clearly a fascist, but not like other fascists in history, for example I think he would without a doubt sell out the entire Republican party if it meant ridding him of his legal issues
― frogbs, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:07 (two months ago) link
Perlstein has a related thread:
I said no more, but I think it might be a useful contribution to expand upon a criticism I've had on @coreyrobin's classic everyone has to read, The Reactionary Mind, since it became such a powerful influence on me upon first reading. It ends making the argument that...— Rick Perlstein (@rickperlstein) March 31, 2024
― poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:10 (two months ago) link
...the gist of which is that just because Trump isn't Hitler or Mussolini doesn't mean he isn't a fascist.
― poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:11 (two months ago) link
Americans keep expecting their fascism to be of that of a Golan-Globus movie villain, which is the only reason they deny he's a fascist
"if he was a fascist, he'd tell us!"
― CEO Greedwagon (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:15 (two months ago) link
just like when Lindsay Graham was saying "it wasn't a quid pro quo, he didn't announce he was doing a crime"
― CEO Greedwagon (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:16 (two months ago) link
I wonder if Right Wing intellectuals are arguing right now about whether Biden is really a commie or not.
― President Keyes, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:19 (two months ago) link
right wing intellectuals kinda contradicting itself there
― CEO Greedwagon (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:21 (two months ago) link
"He told the protestors to go to the Capitol peacefully!"
― immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:23 (two months ago) link
Robert O. Paxton got it right:
– A sense of overwhelming crisis beyond the reach of any traditional solutions;
– The primacy of the group, toward which one has duties superior to every right, whether individual or universal, and the subordination of the individual to it;
– The belief that one’s group is a victim, a sentiment that justifies any action, without legal or moral limits, against its enemies, both internal and external;
– Dread of the group’s decline under the corrosive effects of individualistic liberalism, class conflict, and alien influences;
– The need for closer integration of a purer community, by consent if possible, or by exclusionary violence if necessary;
– The need for authority by natural chiefs (always male), culminating in a national chieftain who alone is capable of incarnating the group’s historical destiny;
– The superiority of the leader’s instincts over abstract and universal reason;
– The beauty of violence and the efficacy of will, when they are devoted to the group’s success;
– The right of the chosen people to dominate others without restraint from any kind of human or divine law, right being decided by the sole criterion of the group’s prowess within a Darwinian struggle.
P
― poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:25 (two months ago) link
- Anything is possible.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:29 (two months ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PytXN5guhFw
― a (waterface), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:32 (two months ago) link
the is he a fascist debate is fun cause no one can agree what fascism is the only thing they can agree on is its a hard thing to pin down, i do think hes a fascist fwiw hes just low energy
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:42 (two months ago) link
He’s a lazy fascist
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:43 (two months ago) link
if he were younger and smarter he would be scarier but he's still scary as far as the damage he can inflict.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:43 (two months ago) link
waterface beat me to it
― poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:44 (two months ago) link
hes already done a lot of harm and lord knows what hell get up to if hes elected again
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:44 (two months ago) link
also his fascist-friendly masterminds like stephen miller and bannon aren't exactly geniuses. which also helps.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:44 (two months ago) link
i just think a swifter scary guy - if they had won in 2016 - would have had a complete 4 year plan drawn up and be ready to go. trump's team famously couldn't really figure out how to destroy big government too speedily. luckily. it isn't as easy at it looks in the movies.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:47 (two months ago) link
fascists tend not to be the sharpest most competent guys but they have some insight into power at all costs and riling people up which sometimes is enough
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:48 (two months ago) link
they did their worst though! they definitely broke some of the china. credit where credit is due.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:48 (two months ago) link
tbf america has a pretty robust government its some teetering rinky dink state
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:49 (two months ago) link
*not some
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:50 (two months ago) link
it's what barely got us through 2020
― poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:51 (two months ago) link
having outside forces help you with your *let's wreck america* campaign helps a lot too and i don't see that happening? even people as evil as koch brothers aren't supporting him. he doesn't have a company like IBM like Hitler did. willing to go along with his crazy crap and help him achieve his goals. right wing billionaires just want tax breaks. not death camps. i think...i hope....
― scott seward, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 14:56 (two months ago) link
hes def got his rich guy supporters, and i think generally corporate america is fine with him, but ultimately theyd rather just have a regular predictable politician in there cause they already had a good thing going, but make no mistake if america goes fascist theyll be right there along for the ride with the nytimes et al
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 15:00 (two months ago) link
what's the little-known king of subprime car loans getting in return though?
oh no...
TRUMP-HANKEY 2024
― StanM, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 15:02 (two months ago) link
RFK Jr. got the ball rolling, let's just go full-bore into presidential candidates automatically naming their biggest donors as their VP picks, why not, we still have a long way to go before we reach peak cynicism
― Great-Tasting Burger Perceptions (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 15:11 (two months ago) link
so sad that a kennedy needed some tech arriviste to pay for stuff
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 15:12 (two months ago) link
None of the actual fascists of the past were super-smart either, it takes other skills to be a successful fascist: total lack of shame, complete belief in one's own righteousness, etc.
― Slorg is not on the Slerf Team, you idiot, you moron (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 15:46 (two months ago) link
Being a sociopath obviously helps. I think Trump is definitely one.
― Slorg is not on the Slerf Team, you idiot, you moron (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 15:47 (two months ago) link
hes still got it baby
Former President Donald Trump has sued two of his co-founders at Truth Social in an attempt to acquire their stake in the company, which went public late last month.
In a suit filed on March 24, but first reported by Bloomberg on Tuesday, Trump accused The Apprentice star Andy Litinsky and Wes Moss of failing in their duties to properly set up Truth Social, which resulted in “significant damage” to the company at “a critical time.”
At the time of the lawsuit, Trump owned 90 million shares, or 90% of Trump Media Group. Litinsky and Moss’ company United Atlantic Ventures owned 8,600,000 shares, or 8.6%, while Bradford Cohen owned 1,400,000 shares (1.4%).
https://www.mediaite.com/news/trump-sues-truth-social-co-founders-for-their-stake-in-company/
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 02:33 (two months ago) link
Lol Litinsky is a conservative radio show host. I wonder if it’s awkward talking about how great Trump is while he’s suing you.
― President Keyes, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 02:43 (two months ago) link
I've given up any expectations that anything will happen to this asshole (short of maybe being reelected to the White House, which is of course totally reasonable for a discredited and dangerous con man imbecile), but the latest legal stuff with the classified documents is pretty fascinating, from a strategy standpoint. When last we heard from our hero Eileen Cannon, she gave both prosecution and defense the order to come up with different jury instructions, apparently just for lols/vibes. Trump defense came up with something predictably ad hoc that hinged on BS that the presidential records act allowed Trump to do ... basically anything. Prosecution response calls Cannon on bullshit, saying the Trump jury instruction defense is not based in law, essentially telling her to either rule and dismiss the case (which can be appealed) or forget this dueling jury instruction shit.
Turns out that if the judge fucks up (intentionally or not) and makes a decision mid-trial based on erroneous bullshit and the jury comes back with a not guilty, the prosecution can *not* appeal. So prosecution in this case is, as I understand it, demanding the bullshit games stop, that Cannon rules/dismisses the case so they can appeal or they're going over Cannon's head.
Again, nothing is going to happen to Trump or Cannon or anything or anybody, ever, but it's nice to see some dramatic pushback.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 12:31 (two months ago) link
Question: Assuming he does not win the election to pres this time, isn't he just going to come back again in four years? Until croak or win?
― Mark G, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 13:12 (two months ago) link