Loved the cowardice of this movie. Great stuff! 👍
― H.P, Friday, 19 April 2024 13:13 (one month ago) link
it's an accurate headline. Josh, you won't lose much by skipping this movie
― Nhex, Friday, 19 April 2024 13:20 (one month ago) link
yeah reviews like that are, IMO, off base; as I said above, it's like they can't deal with subtext. Subtext is not cowardice.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 19 April 2024 13:20 (one month ago) link
subtext is for cowards, as the Garth Marengi meme frequently reminds us
― Daniel_Rf, Friday, 19 April 2024 13:31 (one month ago) link
Akm otm. Poor reflection on the viewer if they come away from this thinking "wimpy politics".
also apparently Lee dies at the end? I thought kevlar + no blood meant she just got knocked down big time.... kinda the ending I prefer tbh
― H.P, Friday, 19 April 2024 13:32 (one month ago) link
yeah she dies, as it's meant to show how the events of the movie eventually break through her hardened shell. Earlier she implies in the movie that if Jessie was shot and killed, she would shoot it dispassionately like a journalist, so we're meant to see that the earlier events of the film change her a bit when she actually runs to her rescue instead of shooting Jessie's death
― ain't nothin but a brie thing, baby (Neanderthal), Friday, 19 April 2024 13:48 (one month ago) link
I got that, I actually thought it was one of the only groan worthy moments of the film. I just didn't think they made it super clear she died. Think it's less "groany" if she didn't so I'm choosing to believe that's what happened. Kevlar!!!!
― H.P, Friday, 19 April 2024 13:59 (one month ago) link
I thought her breakdown during the siege did enough to clarify "hard exterior broken. Real woman feeling things again". And it did so in a not so tropey way. The sacrifice for the younger version of herself was so telegraphed I wish they missed it. But oh well. Didn't ruin the film, but it was its low point imo
― H.P, Friday, 19 April 2024 14:01 (one month ago) link
can we discuss the film without making little digs at each other? thx
― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 19 April 2024 14:03 (one month ago) link
That's fair, I apologies for my "poor reflection on the viewer" post. Sorry.
― H.P, Friday, 19 April 2024 14:22 (one month ago) link
Nothing could make me interested in seeing this movie
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Friday, 19 April 2024 14:46 (one month ago) link
otm
― budo jeru, Friday, 19 April 2024 14:50 (one month ago) link
Wouldn't go quite that far, if it turns out that at some point a character turns to the camera and goes "what's so civil about war anyway?" that might sway me.
― Daniel_Rf, Friday, 19 April 2024 14:50 (one month ago) link
if Axl Rose made an appearance it might've been worth it
― Nhex, Friday, 19 April 2024 15:26 (one month ago) link
i'm frankly confused by the resistance to viewing this film
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 19 April 2024 15:48 (one month ago) link
It seems stupid and NPR-brained and Garland's previous movies, Annihilation aside, weren't that great?
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Friday, 19 April 2024 15:50 (one month ago) link
I guess I like his work more than you do as I think most of the movies he's written the screenplays for are good. I don't know what "NPR-brained" means.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 19 April 2024 16:00 (one month ago) link
"NPR brained" to Uri Berliner means something different than it probably does to you, and to me.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 19 April 2024 16:01 (one month ago) link
Putting California and Texas on the same side of the fictional war is enough for me to decide that this is a fundamentally unserious work of fiction
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Friday, 19 April 2024 16:04 (one month ago) link
it's actually about ethics in photojournalism
― ivy., Friday, 19 April 2024 16:07 (one month ago) link
I will die on the hill that Men is a very good horror film, and the ending is inspired
― glumdalclitch, Friday, 19 April 2024 16:08 (one month ago) link
lol I watched Annihilation, stuck it in my top 20, and I have no memory of it.
― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 19 April 2024 16:19 (one month ago) link
They say the name of the movie at the end
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Friday, 19 April 2024 16:19 (one month ago) link
More like they are it is the name of the movie
― glumdalclitch, Friday, 19 April 2024 16:22 (one month ago) link
The California-Texas alliance, the president who's coded as a mixture of Biden and Trump, the reference to an "Antifa massacre" without a clarification on whether Antifa was massacred or committed the massacre, the strict avoidance of actual political ideology throughout the film, the general anxiety over partisanship/political tensions without ever taking a side... I do think of this movie as profoundly politically unserious in a particularly American liberal way. It's trying so hard to avoid angering any viewers that it ties itself into incoherent knots. NPR brained is right.
― OneSecondBefore, Friday, 19 April 2024 16:22 (one month ago) link
The movie isn't about the politics that lead to Civil War, it's about a hyperbolic depiction of what it would actually look like.
Offerman didn't code as Biden to me AT ALL. his opening monologue is Trumpian and he disbands the FBI, and illegally stays in office a third term, and drops missiles on Americans, all while insisting he's winning the war even as his own army is surrendering. What exactly about that codes as Biden?
For those itt bragging about how you won't see it, congrats, you want a medal? You can either trust those of us who have seen it and aren't NPR brained or you can keep insisting the movie is what you say it is without ever seeing it. Your choice
― ain't nothin but a brie thing, baby (Neanderthal), Friday, 19 April 2024 16:34 (one month ago) link
Like I'll gladly have discussion with people who have seen it and disagree with me but I ain't gonna debate it with people who haven't and still inexplicably want to say what it is
― ain't nothin but a brie thing, baby (Neanderthal), Friday, 19 April 2024 16:37 (one month ago) link
Neaderthal OTM, I don't see any Biden coding here; the actual states involved in the WF are beside the point; and I don't think it's unclear at all what the 'antifa massacre' meant.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 19 April 2024 16:59 (one month ago) link
but maybe the film is an interesting palimpset that strengthens or amplifies the viewer's biases and preconceived notions?
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 19 April 2024 17:00 (one month ago) link
Just putting this out there: https://newrepublic.com/article/180080/civil-wars-mystifying-vision-american-meltdown
― Are you addicted to struggling with your horse? (Boring, Maryland), Friday, 19 April 2024 18:31 (one month ago) link
it's actually about ethics in photojournalism― ivy., Saturday, 20 April 2024 02:07 (five hours ago) bookmarkflaglink
― ivy., Saturday, 20 April 2024 02:07 (five hours ago) bookmarkflaglink
― H.P, Friday, 19 April 2024 22:02 (one month ago) link
lol Ivy
― Marten Broadcloak, mild-mannered GOP congressman (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 19 April 2024 22:05 (one month ago) link
Also an obvious otm to Neando's post. The problem with the above article (and many like it) is it assumes that the movie is trying to be a political vehicle when that is not the impression I get from it at all. It seemed to me the movie was trying to be a character study, a high-tension thriller, and a look at the ethics/world of war journalism. It does the last two of those well, the first one too if you can put up with a couple lame tropes in the process.
― H.P, Friday, 19 April 2024 22:08 (one month ago) link
Yes, the problem is that it is not trying to be political, in fact trying very hard to be not political
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Friday, 19 April 2024 22:10 (one month ago) link
Well, we disagree on whether that's a problem. I am thankful politics is a tool for art to use, not an inherent essence which defines its worth... but to each their own!
― H.P, Friday, 19 April 2024 22:19 (one month ago) link
silby you haven't even seen the film so I'm not sure how you can say it's trying very hard not to be political.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 19 April 2024 22:58 (one month ago) link
I don't really need a fictional movie (or book, or any art) to just tell me explicitly all the things I already believe. I prefer it when that's backgrounded in service of the characters.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 19 April 2024 23:04 (one month ago) link
otherwise, this is just the Handmaid's Tale (the tv series). which, you know, was good but I gave up on it after a while.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 19 April 2024 23:05 (one month ago) link
if I only posted my opinions about things I'm familiar with that wouldn't be much fun
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Saturday, 20 April 2024 01:28 (one month ago) link
fwiw I think the film being studiously divorced from real politics is a problem because that's stupid, not because that's immoral or something
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Saturday, 20 April 2024 01:31 (one month ago) link
things shouldn't be stupid!
no one is claiming talking about things you have no immediate knowledge of isn't fun! It's a hobby I'm well acquainted with. I just try to not label it a virtue.
― H.P, Saturday, 20 April 2024 01:44 (one month ago) link
hard agree that things shouldn't be stupid tho. n-e-ways, bad posting silby, sorry to say.
― H.P, Saturday, 20 April 2024 01:45 (one month ago) link
I'm not on my A game
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Saturday, 20 April 2024 01:47 (one month ago) link
i don't know why people are saying the film isn't political. it's completely political. it's not polemical. what do people want, someone to give a speech in the middle of the movie explaining why fascism is bad? the movie shows you in practically every frame why fascism is bad. or maybe it should end with the dictator not really being bad at all but we all learn that we were the fascists the entire time as some kind of twist?
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Saturday, 20 April 2024 01:48 (one month ago) link
xp we all have off days.
akm, again, completely otm.
― H.P, Saturday, 20 April 2024 01:49 (one month ago) link
Akm otm throughout.
― your mom goes to limgrave (dog latin), Saturday, 20 April 2024 01:52 (one month ago) link
Neanderthal too. Maybe watch the film?
― your mom goes to limgrave (dog latin), Saturday, 20 April 2024 01:55 (one month ago) link
Spoilers: It's a really good film
― your mom goes to limgrave (dog latin), Saturday, 20 April 2024 02:00 (one month ago) link
Don’t care to
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Saturday, 20 April 2024 02:52 (one month ago) link