very neat explanation of how to make people in magazines look better than they actually do

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (107 of them)
don't they know about Proactive?

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 15:41 (eighteen years ago) link

the problem in cd's case is supposed to be compounded by bad scarring. i don't think proactiv takes care of that.

lauren (laurenp), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 15:43 (eighteen years ago) link

The other thing is that apart from celebrity-spokespeople types, ads aren't ever claiming to depict a "real person," so theoretically there's nothing stranger about retouching faces than there is about retouching the sunsets behind them, or whatever.

what about dove's "real women" ads? the first time i saw them, i thought, "those are not the kind of "real women" i see every day," because they're all still gorgeous and i doubt any of them was over a size 12, but i'm sure they've been retouched, etc, so i don't feel quite so bad.

the coolest example of the unretouched woman was when jamie lee curtis did that spread with no makeup in her underwear and showed everyone how imperfect she was.

tres letraj (tehresa), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 22:11 (eighteen years ago) link

Did it show her male genitalia?

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 22:16 (eighteen years ago) link

what about dove's "real women" ads? the first time i saw them, i thought, "those are not the kind of "real women" i see every day," because they're all still gorgeous and i doubt any of them was over a size 12, but i'm sure they've been retouched, etc, so i don't feel quite so bad.

They were all on Oprah in their underwear over the holidays and still looked exactly like that ad, so I think it's mostly makeup as opposed to hardcore retouching.

Dan (Also The Largest Woman I Think Is A 10) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 22:29 (eighteen years ago) link

oprah's makeup artist could make my dog look like julia roberts!

tres letraj (tehresa), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 22:39 (eighteen years ago) link

Funny how they changed the girl's features, but didn't touch the dude.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 22:40 (eighteen years ago) link

i would have lowered the waistband on his jeans... looking a bit urkelish. well, like stephan urkelle, not steve urkel.

tres letraj (tehresa), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 22:45 (eighteen years ago) link

conventional attractiveness = make the butt smaller

on this one, they added to the ass!
http://www.glennferon.com/portfolio1/portfolio02.html

tres letraj (tehresa), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 23:03 (eighteen years ago) link

four months pass...
what about dove's "real women" ads? the first time i saw them, i thought, "those are not the kind of "real women" i see every day," because they're all still gorgeous and i doubt any of them was over a size 12, but i'm sure they've been retouched, etc, so i don't feel quite so bad.

I liked the Shanghai incarnation of this ad campaign the Banterist guy posted:

http://www.banterist.com/archivefiles/images/dove2.jpg

Abbott (Abbott), Monday, 5 June 2006 21:07 (eighteen years ago) link

My cat is bigger than those girls!

Abbott (Abbott), Monday, 5 June 2006 21:07 (eighteen years ago) link

oprah's makeup artist could make my dog look like julia roberts!

-- tres letraj (boringstandardaddres...), January 11th, 2006 9:39 AM.

I'm sure no one's dog could look that hideous.

S- (sgh), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 00:45 (eighteen years ago) link

Also The Largest Woman I Think Is A 10

Please tell me US sizes are way different to AU's - a size 10 here is someone who weighs 90 pounds soaking wet.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 05:07 (eighteen years ago) link

Ha ha, we were taught actual proper Heat Magazine modelling tricks on Sunday as to how to look better in magazines. It's all about the angle of your upper torso to your neck. and bloody uncomfortable to stand like that, too.

harmonic generator, haircuts are for losers (kate), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 08:27 (eighteen years ago) link

US sizes are very, very different from AU's.

Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 13:44 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.