i just kicked a drunk woman out of my hotel for calling my gay coworker a fag

http://www.paramountcomedy.com/image_library/shows/main/136.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v201/sevenxviii/hardforahoos.jpg

HOOS the boss
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/1262/hoosbz4.png

lotta people bein assholes on this thread

north american scum

Yeah, but it's ILX. It's like saying "damn this burner is hot."

xpost

Or maybe I'm just on ILM too much.

Kicking the woman out = classic

Boasting about it on ILE = dud

Ripping into the naive dude = lazy

HOOS on first?

I honestly wasn't boasting, I was venting; I can see where the distinction would be blurry though. Lesson learned.

xpost

for future hoos ventage please use this thread

UK Watercooler 26: I Want More (And More, And More, And More...)

shoulda slapped the bitch

Ethan and JW hate when ILXors get self-righteous.

-- da croupier, Sunday, May 27, 2007 2:21 PM (Yesterday]

Ethan and JW hate when ILXors get self-righteous.

Way to go Hoos - I'd like everyone here to post when they kick anyone out of anywhere for hatespeech.

we can have a rolling hatespeech kick-out thread!

here's a thread

He should have kicked her out for being a drunk asshole not for the hate speech.

TS: Censorship vs. Hatespeech.

is it ok to censor somebody just cos they aren't saying something nice, or that the majority of people would disagree with?

i don't like the notion of hatespeech. and the quoted dialogue sounds like bad stephen king.

Haha, yes, censorship in family buffets is a real hot topic right now.

WE CAN MAKE IT HAPPEN, IF ONLY WE BELIEVE ENOUGH DANIEL

He should have kicked her out for being a drunk asshole not for the hate speech.

maybe, but JW on a PC tip smells like teen butthole.

i refuse to even acknowledge the term 'hate speech' which as a concept i find more offensive than a million god hates fags

anyway, what if god really hates fags? i mean, a LOT of people are gonna be feeling pretty sheepish if that turns out to be the case..

'we can never be sure the opinion we are trying to stifle is false, and if we are sure, stifling it would be evil still'

maybe, but JW on a PC tip smells like teen butthole.

-- kenan, Monday, May 28, 2007 11:36 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

is this good or bad?

God Hates Flags- Theists against Nationalism

'hate speech' is a dumb term but if it just equates bigoted abuse how is that an 'offensive concept' as a term?

wish this thread was about race.

big hoos better get workin on that

yawn. does it matter if abuse is bigoted or not? i don't see why certain forms of abuse are more acceptable than others, if the abuse is unjustified to begin with.

'we can never be sure the opinion we are trying to stifle is false, and if we are sure, stifling it would be evil still'

-- and what, Monday, May 28, 2007 1:04 PM (41 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

An intriguing perspective, coming from the guy who posts more threads ridiculing religion/creationism than anyone else. Not that I disagree with ridiculing creationists, but how is telling a pain in the ass to fuck right off 'stifling their opinion'?

i don't think creationism is a matter of opinion..

but then again, that's the point, i suppose.

does it matter if abuse is bigoted or not? i don't see why certain forms of abuse are more acceptable than others

i'm assuming you'd class any abuse based solely on bigotry as unjustifiable?

in america the term 'hate speech' is synonymous with advocating laws to make 'hate speech' an imprisonable offense, which is what disgusts me

xpoxt

no, i'm a horrible horrible person and i don't like gays, minorities, or whatever.

sir, we reserve the right to refuse posting to anyone. My oink administrators, BIG HOOS, and myself will not tolerate your hate speech on our thread. we have not and will not charge you a cent and you're free to take your posting elsewhere. i'd rather not call the police, but if you insist on continuing to disturb our HOOS i will. please leave.

*throws a rose with shining eyes*

in america the term 'hate speech' is synonymous with advocating laws to make 'hate speech' an imprisonable offense, which is what disgusts me

interesting. people in the UK have already been imprisoned for 'preaching hate' (a couple of Islamist 'preachers') and taking the act to what has been deemed a step too far. levels of punishment to fit levels of severity of what is being said (with inevitable inconsistencies).

i think they were locked up on incitement charges, not hate speech charges. i'm not sure where the new laws about discriminating against religions takes us though.

If you threaten violence/killing against another individual or group, or exhort others to do so, then you get nicked, in the UK.

WAHT EVEN WHOOPI GOLDBERG?

No. If you threaten her then you have to marry Ted Danson!

Pre-Frasier Ted Danson!

now that's waht i call haet speech

If you threaten violence/killing against another individual or group, or exhort others to do so, then you get nicked, in the UK.

-- suzy, Monday, May 28, 2007 3:10 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

you do in theory, yeah.

i don't think saying or thinking anything should be a crime.

darraghmac is darramous, right?

i don't think saying or thinking anything should be a crime.

-- darraghmac, Monday, May 28, 2007 3:49 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

really? i mean, if ran a newspaper and printed a headline every day saying you were a paedo/rapist/murderer, would that be okay?

umm, nope. but i may yet be j0hn d@rnielle.

kidding, that's just something my cat told me to say.