"Fairytales, even by Perrault, are difficult to evoke in three-dimensions"

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

i just subbed a review containing this claim, which i think is interesting and true — but is it the case and if so why?

(charles perrault put together the classic collection of fairytales which is even today fairly closely adhered to...)

― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 14:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Was it a review of sculpture?

― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 14:04 (twenty-three years ago)

jewellery (i better not say whose as the issue doesn't come out for a month)

― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 14:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Peter Pan the play!

The pendantic (ha!) response is there is nothing in two dimensions in our world, so that even a cinema screen showing is a three dimensional object.

A better answer is that things which are not corporeal require imagination to start with.

No hang on, tomorrow's Halloween, this is all bollocks.

― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 14:39 (twenty-three years ago)

And isn't it about time we had some Randy Constan in our lives?

― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 14:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I was going to say Freeway was a really good evocation of little Red Riding Hood - but then I realised it is a filum so 2D.

― Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 30 October 2002 14:59 (twenty-three years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.