Hail us.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 26 January 2018 00:32 (six years ago) link
i think it is to tell caesar not to tax the rich because we're going to help the poor because jesus probably said to do that somewhere without too much of an escape cause built in
― j., Friday, 26 January 2018 00:34 (six years ago) link
If Prez declines toilet Saatchi Gallery should offer him Damien Hirst formaldehyde shark
― Patton Oswalt Defense Lawyer (Hadrian VIII), Friday, 26 January 2018 00:45 (six years ago) link
Matthew 22:21 "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's; and to God the things that are God's, " alternately "give unto Berkshire Hathaway carried interest deduction, and go fuck yourself"
― Patton Oswalt Defense Lawyer (Hadrian VIII), Friday, 26 January 2018 00:48 (six years ago) link
xp: presenting Jesus as apathetic and tractable. While perhaps true of the Christ of Paul, its wholly unrepresentative of the historical Yeshua. The sanhedrin regularly punished heresy with public stoning, but crucifixion was a Roman punishment reserved for sedition.
― Sanpaku, Friday, 26 January 2018 00:49 (six years ago) link
"he never said Roman soldiers should turn the other cheek in battle or that Caesar should allow all the barbarians to be Roman citizens or that Caesar should tax the rich to help poor."
what's extra confusing and sad about this is that all of these appear on first glance to be positive things that romans SHOULD do! but when you look closely, it's clear that he's trying to say that these three things are BAD or ridiculous things that caesar never would have been expected to do. falwell might concede that jesus wanted people to turn the other cheek, but that's why he specifies in battle, where turning the cheek would be unreasonable. by "barbarians" he's referring to immigration, insinuating that today's refugees and immigrants from the parts of the world that aren't norway are like the barbarians of caeasar's time, and so it's understandable that we should want to shut them out too.
at least i think that's what he's trying to say? i mean, is jerry falwell jr a strong proponent of pacifism, increased immigration, and taxing the rich to pay the poor? it's disorienting because that's what it seems a christian would be for, but i'm pretty sure the falwell family got to where they are today by adopting their views to fit conservative beliefs, which would be the opposite of all those things, right?
― Karl Malone, Friday, 26 January 2018 00:54 (six years ago) link
While perhaps true of the Christ of Paul
I don't think so.
― Video reach stereo bog (Tom D.), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:00 (six years ago) link
He is, rather strangely for a supposed Christian, likening the USA to the Roman Empire, isn't he?
― Video reach stereo bog (Tom D.), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:03 (six years ago) link
Like back then, there was Jesus and his followers and, although we like them because we're Christians, they were kind of out there and ahead of their time with some of their beliefs and then there were the Romans, who were non-believers but they were in charge and had all the money and power so they must have been good guys to some extent, then there were barbarians, if you catch my drift.
― Video reach stereo bog (Tom D.), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:09 (six years ago) link
we're all one race - the human race... except for the carthaginians, those guys are freaks man
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:12 (six years ago) link
"no homo" will be in the Bible within the next 3 new editions
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:15 (six years ago) link
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/25/politics/white-house-immigration-framework/index.html
President Donald Trump is proposing giving 1.8 million young undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship in exchange for $25 billion for his long-promised wall and a host of other strict immigration reforms, according to a White House framework proposed Thursday.In what the White House framed as a "dramatic concession" and "compromise," Trump would accept a path to citizenship not just for the roughly 700,000 undocumented immigrants were covered by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program when it was ended. But the proposal would also cover those undocumented immigrants who meet the DACA criteria but did not sign up and even more who would be newly eligible under the proposal's timeframe requirements -- giving legal status and a pathway to citizenship to about 1.8 million people.In return, the White House would like to see a $25 billion investment in a trust for border infrastructure and technology, as well as more funds for personnel, and an end to family migration beyond spouses and minor children. The diversity visa lottery would also be abolished, though the visas would be reallocated so that the backlog of people already waiting for family visas and high-skilled immigration green cards would be processed.In what may end up being the most contentious piece of the proposal, the White House is also looking to close "legal loopholes" that will allow it to deport more immigrants, specifically as it relates to undocumented immigrants from countries that don't border the United States -- which would likely include changes in immigration enforcement authority that would be virtually impossible for Democrats to swallow.The White House official sold the plan as a "compromise position" that it believes would get 60 votes in the Senate -- a point White House officials underscored multiple times on Thursday -- and then could be "sent over to the House for additional improvement and modification."
In what the White House framed as a "dramatic concession" and "compromise," Trump would accept a path to citizenship not just for the roughly 700,000 undocumented immigrants were covered by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program when it was ended. But the proposal would also cover those undocumented immigrants who meet the DACA criteria but did not sign up and even more who would be newly eligible under the proposal's timeframe requirements -- giving legal status and a pathway to citizenship to about 1.8 million people.
In return, the White House would like to see a $25 billion investment in a trust for border infrastructure and technology, as well as more funds for personnel, and an end to family migration beyond spouses and minor children. The diversity visa lottery would also be abolished, though the visas would be reallocated so that the backlog of people already waiting for family visas and high-skilled immigration green cards would be processed.
In what may end up being the most contentious piece of the proposal, the White House is also looking to close "legal loopholes" that will allow it to deport more immigrants, specifically as it relates to undocumented immigrants from countries that don't border the United States -- which would likely include changes in immigration enforcement authority that would be virtually impossible for Democrats to swallow.The White House official sold the plan as a "compromise position" that it believes would get 60 votes in the Senate -- a point White House officials underscored multiple times on Thursday -- and then could be "sent over to the House for additional improvement and modification."
― Righteous wax chaperone, rotating Wingdings (Doctor Casino), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:16 (six years ago) link
oh fuckhttps://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:17 (six years ago) link
...the president began to argue that Mr. Mueller had three conflicts of interest that disqualified him from overseeing the investigation, two of the people said.
First, he claimed that a dispute years ago over fees at Trump National Golf Club...
― Righteous wax chaperone, rotating Wingdings (Doctor Casino), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:18 (six years ago) link
Him and his stupid fucking golf courses
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:21 (six years ago) link
ha, can mueller cite "you tried to fire me" as evidence of obstruction?
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:21 (six years ago) link
he needs his lawyer to fire somebody for him? whassa matter donald?
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:31 (six years ago) link
xpost yes he can, and will
― Patton Oswalt Defense Lawyer (Hadrian VIII), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:33 (six years ago) link
xp as matt yglesias (sorry) pointed out on twitter, "It seems like Mueller’s job was saved by the fact that Trump isn’t really the president."
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:37 (six years ago) link
Very OT aside to Tom D: I think its likely the "INRI” on the crucifix wasn't mockery, but an accurate description of the historical Yeshua's crime. The canonical gospels date from after the sacking of Jerusalem in 70 AD, and devastation of the early Jesus movement that had been led by James, brother to Jesus. Arguably, the historical Yeshua would have only recognized its remnants in the the Ebionite/Nazarene heresy of the Trans-jordan and Hijaz. The movement that ascended to orthodoxy took its theology from Paul, and Bob Eisenman argues that Paul was a member of the Herodian family (Romans 16:11, parallels with a Saulus who was "kinsman of Agrippa" in Josephus), with its pro-Roman sentiments. One can argue that much of the pro-Roman sentiment in the gospels (presenting Pilate as respectful of local sentiment, blaming the crucifiction on Jews, etc) stems from the influence of Paul, and gentile "God-fearers" that attended synagogues throughout the Empire.
Very OT aside to Tracer Hand: Absolutely. Carthaginians [were monsters](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Carthage#Child_sacrifice).
― Sanpaku, Friday, 26 January 2018 01:38 (six years ago) link
"it is easier for a camel to fit through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to go to heaven" = a nice sentiment but sorry it's outweighed by all the other places jesus condemns abortion and gay marriage
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:47 (six years ago) link
Wondering if one of the President's sentries being outed for having a spine, and facing him down, will have a better chance of permeating the FOX forcefield than anything that's come our of the investigation so far, including Flynn/Manafort indictments etc.
Like, is stuff beginning to move now?
― Patton Oswalt Defense Lawyer (Hadrian VIII), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:57 (six years ago) link
our = out
― Patton Oswalt Defense Lawyer (Hadrian VIII), Friday, 26 January 2018 01:58 (six years ago) link
Fox News not picking up this story surprisingly
― frogbs, Friday, 26 January 2018 01:59 (six years ago) link
It’s over.I’m calling it. I have refused to make predictions all this time about what was going to happen. There will be a recommendation in Mueller’s report that Congress consider impeachment proceedings. It’s going to happen. https://t.co/8US0FkCeTq— Bradley P. Moss (@BradMossEsq) January 26, 2018
― Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Friday, 26 January 2018 02:03 (six years ago) link
So we've got his lawyer threatening to quit, Wray threatening to quit ...
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 26 January 2018 02:07 (six years ago) link
The Dems should just threaten to quit, and they can get what they want out of him.
I don’t know, I’ve never gotten past the fact that Trump admitted to firing Comey because he was investigating his campaign yet afterwards evidence of obstruction was still being seeked out for some reason. My understanding is thr defense of how that wasn’t obstruction amounted to “he’s allowed to commit obstruction” so I’ve basically had no hope.
― Nerdstrom Poindexter, Friday, 26 January 2018 02:14 (six years ago) link
It's a legal process. You don't just cry "obstruction!" and then lock him up. They have to gather evidence, make a case for his mindset and intent, and then there is a trial. The same goes for any (esp. white collar) crime. Like, Flynn, Manafort? That stuff will be going on for months.
Pointed out elsewhere, but man, Trump tried to fire him in *June.* That's just a month after Mueller was brought on board but *before* news came out of Don Jr.'s meeting with the Russians in Trump Tower. Why did Trump want to fire him so soon, so quickly?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 26 January 2018 02:23 (six years ago) link
Because he was innocent. Duh.
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Friday, 26 January 2018 02:28 (six years ago) link
Does this leak effectively mean there's no way he could do it now?
This feels huge
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Friday, 26 January 2018 02:31 (six years ago) link
Huge, because Mueller is totally going to exonerate him. That's why Trump didn't fire him, duh.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 26 January 2018 02:31 (six years ago) link
because golf fees
― barreras, Friday, 26 January 2018 02:34 (six years ago) link
Resign. You can blame us broh.
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Friday, 26 January 2018 02:35 (six years ago) link
If I understand correctly, that lawyer-threatening-to-quit showdown was in June, right? An eternity ago in Trump time. Before Kelly was brought in as the "grownup."
― Tippi Sanhedrin (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 26 January 2018 02:41 (six years ago) link
Yea but it was "their lil secret" til now
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Friday, 26 January 2018 02:42 (six years ago) link
pic.twitter.com/sd6qt77rdC— Kevin M. Kruse (@KevinMKruse) January 26, 2018
― frogbs, Friday, 26 January 2018 03:10 (six years ago) link
Reported FBI/Special Counsel activity to date
01/2018 Jeff Sessions -Private interview01/2018 George Nader -Private interview [2]01/2018 George Nader -Private interview [1]01/2018 Steve Bannon -Subpoena12/2017 Robert Arakelian -Private interview12/2017 Don McGahn -Private interview12/2017 Hope Hicks -Private interview (2)12/2017 Hope Hicks -Private interview (1)12/2017 J.D. Gordon -Private interview12/2017 Michael Flynn -Guilty plea11/2017 Michael Flynn -Criminal charge11/2017 KT McFarland -Private interview11/2017 Jared Kushner -Private meeting11/2017 DOJ -Request for documents11/2017 Stephen Miller -Private interview10/2017 Rick Gates -Arrest10/2017 Paul Manafort -Arrest10/2017 Rick Gates -Indictment10/2017 Paul Manafort -Indictment10/2017 Sam Clovis -Private interview10/2017 Sam Clovis -Grand jury testimony10/2017 Matt Tait -Private interview*10/2017 Sean Spicer -Private interview10/2017 Trump campaign -Subpoena10/2017 Reince Priebus -Private interview10/2017 George Papadopoulos -Guilty plea10/2017 Simona Mangiante -Private interview**10/2017 Simona Mangiante -Subpoena (withdrawn)09/2017 Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg -FBI questioning09/2017 Facebook -Search warrant09/2017 Jason Maloni -Grand jury interview09/2017 Michael Flynn -FBI questioningFall/2017 Ann Donaldson -Private interview***Fall 2017 Jared Kushner -Request for documentsFall 2017 Cambridge Analytica -Request for documents08/2017 Paul Manafort's PR executives -Grand jury subpoenas08/2017 General Services Administration -Request for documents08/2017 Melissa Laurenza -Grand jury subpoena08/2017 Jason Maloni -Grand jury subpoena08/2017 General Services Administration -Request for documents08/2017 Rinat Akhmetshin -Grand jury interview08/2017 Rick Gates Bank records -Grand jury subpoenas08/2017 Paul Manafort bank records -Grand jury subpoenas07/2017 People involved in Trump Tower meeting -Grand jury subpoenas07/2017 George Papadopoulos -Arrest07/2017 Paul Manafort’s home -Search warrant07/2017 Sally Yates -Private interview07/2017 Ekim Alptekin -Grand jury subpoena06/2017 Mike Rogers -Private interview06/2017 Dan Coats -Private interview06/2017 Sphere Consulting -Subpoena06/2017 Rod Rosenstein -Private interviewSummer 2017 Nancye Miller Woolsey -FBI questioning****Summer 2017 James Woolsey -FBI questioningSummer 2017 Christopher Steele -Private meetingSummer 2017 Trump Organization -Request for documents05/2017 Ekim Alptekin -Private interview05/2017 Mike Pompeo -Private interview05/2017 James Comey -Private interview04/2017 M. Flynn business associates -Grand jury subpoenas03/2017 Carter Page -FBI questioning02/2017 George Papadopoulos -FBI questioning01/2017 George Papadopoulos -FBI questioning01/2017 Michael Flynn -FBI questioning01/2017 Paul Manafort storage unit -Search under FISA12/2016 Regarding Paul Manafort -Grand jury subpoenas09/2016 Christopher Steele -Private meeting09/2016 Paul Manafort -FISA warrantSummer 2016 Carter Page -FISA warrant
* Cybersecurity expert** Fiancee of George Papadopoulos*** White House Counsel Chief of Staff**** Wife of James Woolsey
― Patton Oswalt Defense Lawyer (Hadrian VIII), Friday, 26 January 2018 03:21 (six years ago) link
MORE theology!
All the clowns commenting on my tweet below with their bowels in an uproar can relax b/c the other side of the coin is Jesus never told Caesar he shouldn’t tax the rich to help the poor either. You can be a good Christian whether you vote conservative or liberal! https://t.co/T3skE1Ewwo— Jerry Falwell (@JerryFalwellJr) January 26, 2018
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 26 January 2018 03:42 (six years ago) link
Very Church of Trump. Lots of clowns in the parish.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 26 January 2018 03:43 (six years ago) link
where did the giant list come from?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 26 January 2018 03:50 (six years ago) link
xpost, “You have heard that people were told in the past, ‘Do not commit murder; anyone who does will be brought to trial.’ But now I tell you: if you are angry with your brother you will be brought to trial, if you call your brother ‘You good-for-nothing!’ you will be brought before the Council, and if you call your brother a clown you will be in danger of going to the fire of hell."
― Wes Brodicus, Friday, 26 January 2018 03:52 (six years ago) link
"As for the rest: antacids."
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 26 January 2018 03:53 (six years ago) link
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/politics/russia-investigations/
― Patton Oswalt Defense Lawyer (Hadrian VIII), Friday, 26 January 2018 03:57 (six years ago) link
This Hannity moment from tonight is so perfect and funny
Sean Hannity: The New York Times is trying to distract you. They say Trump tried to fire Mueller, but our sources aren’t confirming that!Sean Hannity, minutes later: Alright, yeah, maybe our sources confirm Trump wanted to fire Mueller. But so what? That’s his right. Anywho... pic.twitter.com/yUIt7Un56d— Matt Fuller (@MEPFuller) January 26, 2018
― Nerdstrom Poindexter, Friday, 26 January 2018 05:31 (six years ago) link
haha
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Friday, 26 January 2018 05:33 (six years ago) link
i was wondering how they'd deal with that tonight. i love that he seamlessly changes subject to a high speed car crash video
― Karl Malone, Friday, 26 January 2018 06:18 (six years ago) link
― maura, Friday, 26 January 2018 06:55 (six years ago) link
it’s 2018 and people with the last name falwell haven’t been laughed out of polite society
― maura, Friday, 26 January 2018 06:56 (six years ago) link
polite society can kiss my ass
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 26 January 2018 09:09 (six years ago) link