'Everything is political' – y/n?

wtf

See: I Love Politics board redux - this time with feeling!

Pomenitroll up to his old tricks, I see.

Trolling is politics.

Pomentiful the Bountiful

Bong rips is political

Poor grammar is political

Kelsey Grammer is definitely political

(rips bong)

Pomenitics

See also: 'Sincerity' in Music

That was not a troll ffs, also will you stop obsessing over that thread, it's actually kind of creepy? Thanks.

Pomerity

The temerity of Pomerity

That was not a troll ffs, also will you stop obsessing over that thread, it's actually kind of creepy? Thanks.

― pomenitul, Wednesday, 20 January 2021 20:07 (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink

😏

everything’s a drum

🥴

Depends on yer epistemology dunnit.
If you have to inspect the minutiae to gauge your decision making process then it can be.
Seems not everybody has the time to do so.
Which may be political in itself consciously or unconsciously.
I am reminded of the idea of the deal breaker point that kept coming up with t and the GOP over the last couple of years. Like what exploitation does the process of production entail. & how much are you willing to accept to make your personal existence that much easier.
Or the Naked Lunch where if everyone suddenly became aware of what was on their fork and what processes it had gone through to get there how many people would stop eating.

i would avoid the impulse to start galaxy-brain threads in the future pom, just some advice from a guy who appreciates you when you're talking about something as opposed to nothing

What can I say, it was a spur-of-the-moment decision. Maybe you had to be there.

This thread is a troll btw, in case anyone was wondering.

The correct answer, however, is no.

Which is why we need an I Love Politics board that is separate from I Love Everything.

Thank you.

Oh shit im glad i didnt post my long screed so

You're presuming intention matters. Did we ever sort that one out?

""trolling""- has the meaning changed?

Intent matters, i never needed it sorted but was """"only asking the question""""

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aP-z03rfj7w

The correct answer, however, is no. Which is why we need an I Love Politics board that is separate from I Love Everything.

By that logic we need a set of 'I Love X' boards to match every sub-category of 'Everything'.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2T7oLbmvx4

ah i see i already made this reference last week

By that logic we need a set of 'I Love X' boards to match every sub-category of 'Everything'.

Correct. Ideally, every thread ought to be a board unto itself.

Of course I have to mention Nashville here.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073440/characters/nm0680836

xp Wow! Controlling which boards appeared in SNA would achieve perfect granularity!

One can dream.

And dreaming is political.

I dream, therefore #onethread

there are people in the world who find my simple existence abhorrent, so as long as I have to continue to defend my rights and freedoms, yes everything is political

Skin otm

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

Run again with no suggestive caps lock imo

no u

Ok

Rn again with no sggestive caps lock imo

нет ты

Ok

Lads it's ilx just keep running polls until you get the answer that pleases you

Tbf that is also how irl works, the five yrs in between dont seem to matter like

Tell that to the heartbroken FBPE kids

Definition 1: x is politics-like if and only if x has as essential properties those and only those properties which are positive

Definition 2: A is an essence of x if and only if for every property B, x has B necessarily if and only if A entails B

Definition 3: x necessarily exists if and only if every essence of x is necessarily exemplified

Axiom 1: If a property is positive, then its negation is not positive

Axiom 2: Any property entailed by—i.e., strictly implied by—a positive property is positive

Axiom 3: The property of being politics-like is positive

Axiom 4: If a property is positive, then it is necessarily positive

Axiom 5: Necessary existence is positive

Axiom 6: For any property P, if P is positive, then being necessarily P is positive

Theorem 1: If a property is positive, then it is consistent, i.e., possibly exemplified

Corollary 1: The property of being politics-like is consistent

Theorem 2: If something is politics-like, then the property of being politics-like is an essence of that thing

Theorem 3: Necessarily, the property of being politics-like is exemplified

Basically, yeah

If anything can be

political

everything is

political

Possibility

is essence

Run again with no suggestive caps lock imo

― Qanondorf (darraghmac), Saturday, January 30, 2021 7:09 PM bookmarkflaglink

no u

― pomenitul, Saturday, January 30, 2021 7:17 PM bookmarkflaglink

Ok

― Qanondorf (darraghmac), Saturday, January 30, 2021 7:36 PM bookmarkflaglink

Rn again with no sggestive caps lock imo

― Qanondorf (darraghmac), Saturday, January 30, 2021 7:36 PM bookmarkflaglink

R u my dad

pom you can spoof the Tractatus as much as you like but I'm not having it, everything (where everything is a subset of events that at least includes all actions and speech acts and definitely shitposting is very much an action) is political as fuck and

ESPECIALLY

everybody's dodgy fretting about the 18th century invention taste, shibboleth for the bourgie hate class

is political as fuck.

Still love you tho

Or in short form hating Tay Tay is reactionary but let's be friends anyhoo

'Everything is theological' – y/n?

'Everything is sociological' – y/n?

'Everything is philosophical' – y/n?

N, Y, N

See also:

Certainty

'Everything is historical' – y/n?

'Everything is chemical' – y/n?

'Everything is psychological' – y/n?

I think you need to mix it up with some c/d efforts tbph

'Everything is meteorological' - y/n?

True. Will comply in exactly five years.

xp y

Where would we be if it hadn't been for the meteor?

Everything is eventual iirc

Lads the problem isn't the bald statement it's the context, everything is context, Ideals is silly

Everything is rhetorical tbf

Everything is panspermia.

Everything is eventual iirc

Statements about everything are unverifiable.

Still love you tho

Presumably Lauryn Hill's 'Everything Is Everything' is equally unverifiable.

This thread is a troll btw, in case anyone was wondering.

― pomenitul, Wednesday, January 20, 2021 8:43 PM (one week ago)

Trolling is politics.

― pomenitul, Wednesday, January 20, 2021 3:02 PM (one week ago)

Trolling is praxis and praxis makes perspex

xps It only appears to be a statement about everything.

pom is bored again, someone reset Canada

Mop up on il3

Teetotaling on a Saturday night, y'know.

So am I but I’m not posting bad threads am I? Just posting on them.

Tbf I posted this thread a week ago, so now we're in the same boat.

If I was teetootal I wouldn't be here 😂

lol, touché.

Teetertle

There are no bad threads only things we have not yet sorted imo

Too turtle

Oh no

🐢

Turtly dood

Splinter groups

I didn't expect this thread to turn turtle.

It makes perfect sense:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Turtle

The turtle is dead

2x ref itt

This thread has turned into a croc

Shell be grand

I groaned

'Everything is chemical' – y/n?

Mmm yes?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I77QslgaugA

everything is pomentiful

Everything

and nothing

Incidentally we've yet to determine whether everything *is* in the first place.

Poll position

pom

log off

or I’ll send you a turtle video

Crocifornia
Knows how to party

I'll take that as a stand in favour of the Nothing.

xp that too.