Fashion Victim

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
What does this mean anyway?

Why, when someone calls me this, do I automatically think they're...well...intellectually suspect, or at the very least using the phrase in a knee-jerk way?

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 12:19 (twenty-three years ago)

My definition of FV is someone who does what's fashionable for no other reason but (ultra)conformity, ie. they've been told to and are only following orders, are on the Monkey See, Monkey Do life plan, or they're putting style over substance on a regular basis.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 12:23 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd limit it to those ppl who follow fashion to the extent that they wear things which are incredibly impractical (extremely tall heels that are impossible to walk in, clothes that are uncomfortably tight and so on).

MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 12:25 (twenty-three years ago)

so it's not to do with me wearing cardigans? phew.

g-kit (g-kit), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 12:31 (twenty-three years ago)

well i am wearing extremely fashion-victimmy shoes at the moment, however the fashion to be the victim of at the moment is kitten-heels which are k-practical so there. and it's not like i'm wearing them with a micro-mini denim skirt, red leggings and yellow fishnets, which seems to be what most of the young FVs out there favour at the moment. i am wearing them with baggy shapeless jeans, ph34r my fashion subversion!

i generally agree with Suzy's definition of fashion victim above but would add that there seem to be some people for whom fashion is a hobby nay a PAssiON (eg that carrie from Sex& the City) and the clothes they wear are as much a part of them as eg. books are for me. are they "victims" (cos lets face it, carrie bradshaw often looks GODAWFUL and chilly to boot, but she's thin enough to get away with it) or are they just utterly cutting edge dahling *mwah*?

katie (katie), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 12:43 (twenty-three years ago)

I tend to use suzy's definition (people who have no sense of style or the evolution of fashion, but just wear the badge-like examples of what they've heard is in). But I think Mark H's is the more common usage. Obviously there is overlap.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 12:52 (twenty-three years ago)

kitten-heels which are k-practical so there

Except on cracked pavements in which case they are K-RUINED.

Madchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 12:53 (twenty-three years ago)

and it's not like i'm wearing them with a micro-mini denim skirt, red leggings and yellow fishnets

Ouch - almost guilty.

Anna (Anna), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 12:53 (twenty-three years ago)

No, SJP-as-Carrie is a FV because Sex In The City uses a STYLIST, Patricia Field. They do stupid things in the name of having this accessory or that skirt first, put their names on waiting lists (my rule is if there is a list for it, I don't want it) and don't really know about fashion beyond the label.

I'm intrigued by this whole leggings revival. I will worry if Olivia Newton-John style headbands come back, but now I've said it, they will.

Bear in mind, ladies and gentlemen, that some of us on the mags are in the habit of sticking any old shit in there to see which fools bite.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 12:57 (twenty-three years ago)

fashion iz dum.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 12:59 (twenty-three years ago)

I would be so pleased if the Xanadu look came back! If only because it would give me hours of "point and laugh" amusement, I wouldn't wear it myself.

SJP in Sex In the City is an embarassment to herself: she wears things like a cape or a stupid necklace with her name on it because she thinks it is trendy, not because she likes it or because it suits her.

Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 13:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Hmm, I've had the fashion victim thing thrown at me a few times. I would never wear something I didn't like just because it was in that season. I enjoy it, but would never let it rule my life (see Carrie Bradshaw, mad fashion harpies, Hoxton stylists etc)and wouldn't put it up there with music, books etc. However I am a frequent wearer of uncomforatble shoes, not enough warm clothes etc. This is probably more to do with the fact I am rather impractical though. I think my approach to getting dressed is more fancy dress sense, 'this morning I want to be ...' Many of my friends consider my clothing choices eccentric.

Dear ILE, am I a fashion victim?

Anna (Anna), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 13:11 (twenty-three years ago)

(um. please all be aware that i wasn't thinking Carrie Bradshaw was a REAL PERSON or anything!)

katie (katie), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 13:14 (twenty-three years ago)

(what? I thought it was a documentary. Ktee, next you'll say there is no Father Christmas.)

Anna (Anna), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 13:16 (twenty-three years ago)

(anna, Father Christmas is indeed real! it's the REINDEER that are the fabrications!)

katie (katie), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 13:18 (twenty-three years ago)

(oh, how does he get about then? Or are the fabricated reindeer made of actual fabric, I would like a quilted Chanel one, or maybe Matthew Williamson, so darling, hem)

Anna (Anna), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 13:24 (twenty-three years ago)

they'd need to be fabricated from those NASA thermotiles so that they don't burn up w/ the speed etc.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 13:27 (twenty-three years ago)

b-but then they wouldn't just have evry shiny noses, they'd be very shiny all over!

MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 13:29 (twenty-three years ago)

RJG is OTM.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 17 December 2002 13:47 (twenty-three years ago)

OTM? That's soooooo '96.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 14:01 (twenty-three years ago)

'96 is where it's at.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 14:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Who is Nick Cave?

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 14:09 (twenty-three years ago)

you are a fashion victim.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 14:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I would never wear something I didn't like just because it was in that season.

But isn't the notion of an FV something to do with this distinction breaking down: what of ppl whose genuine criteria of 'like' include an awareness of or sensitivity to social context/behaviour/industry timing-structures, and who enjoy the sense of being first/contemporary/clued-in? This isn't regarded as a bad thing wrt to other cultural/intellectual interests - so do we just think of those FV ppl as 'fools who bite' or 'victims' because they are:
(a) employing criteria not only heavily focussed on other ppls perceptions of them, but also
(b) heavily determined by material goods, and
(c) goods which are to do with appearance

- and not only do we have ideas that these are all shallow and trivial compared to 'being your own person', but also the idea that there is largely a top-down control mechanism at work here too - the insider movers & shakers deciding what is going to be the case for the high st. plebs (though many would say there's often an element of bubble-up before the trickle-down) : so, even the FV's 'likes' are not really their own - just the result of false consciousness jerked around by semi-invisible strings.
(Given the extent to which some version of this model is applicable to all kinds of mass-consumption goods, maybe we shouldn't feel so comfy in our dismissals?)

haha the absurd logical opposite extreme of an FV is someone who doesn't pay any attention atall to what anyone else is wearing and who doesn't care what they look like either - a schizophrenic piss-stained dirty old tramp for example.....

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 14:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Cape?? Cape?? I wish I had a cape. I found a great one on Saturday which I did not buy cos it was a tenner. I NOW HATE MYSELF BECAUSE I DID NOT BUY IT. *sobs*

Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 14:44 (twenty-three years ago)

I wish I had a gendarme uniform, with the flowy red cape and everything. Now there's a cape.

Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 15:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Dear ILE, am I a fashion victim?

no anna, you're not. i always think you dress v well actually.

otoh i have def been guilty of wearing impractical clothes in the past (and have been freezing my ass off in boston cos i still haven't found a coat that i like), and have something of a habit or wearing clothes that make my friends wince (cf those yellow-pocketed jeans), so i may not be the best person to make this call.

toby (tsg20), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 16:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Thank you.

Return compliament - I like those yellow pocketed jeans. (I think we have had this conversation before)

Anna (Anna), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 16:46 (twenty-three years ago)

yes anna dresses well (nearly as well as me;) )

i got called fasion victim the other day, i'm like yes and.

mind you i gget called Bungle more...i'm waiting for the day when i get called fascist bungle

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 16:59 (twenty-three years ago)

I am a fashion spasito :(

This is more due to low self-esteem :(

Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 17:02 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah we have talked about those jeans before. after the slating they got from my flatmate about nine months ago i haven't worn them, though, and doubt i ever will again.

gareth i will so end up calling you a fascist bungle next time i'm drunk in your presence, i fear.

toby (tsg20), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 17:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Anna is the best dressed troll lookalike murderer I know.

Graham (graham), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 17:10 (twenty-three years ago)

it's about walking the fine line between fashionable and stupid, innit?

chris (chris), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 17:19 (twenty-three years ago)

anna is a murderer?!

is it generally acceptable for heterosexual men to be interested in fashion at all? my best friend C claims that every time i talk about clothes i come across as v gay (but then, she makes this claim about lots of other things about me).

toby (tsg20), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 17:35 (twenty-three years ago)

I threatened to kill Graham on the women are stupid thread for implying I looked like a troll. I think this is fair enough as troll chic is sooo 1997.

Anna (Anna), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 17:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Gareth - if Bungle becomes Glum'n'Lace then you'll have to start dressing like a goth haha

(Alright Ned - I'll just go and look for the noose....)

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 17:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry guys, I had to go transcribe an interview with Corinne Day and file it before I could catch back up with the thread.

Snowy, there are fashion victims and fashion victors. Deep down we all know which we are. And must be said I hate copying looks a lot more than being copied - most of the time what other people are doing with their look is of little or no consequence to me but I have to say I'm not down with the mullet/early 80s stoner-slut look. *SHUDDER* the memories.

Fashion comes from ALL SIDES. The side I hate most is a school clique-like self-appointed in-crowd determining what's hot and parading around in it to impress the clique. And for the most part you can buy your way into that crowd, so I'm not really interested in them.

I've maintained, ALWAYS, that there is a big difference between fashion and style. Fashion is followed, style is something you've just got - or not.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 17:47 (twenty-three years ago)

So fashion is fairer?

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 17:52 (twenty-three years ago)

the new Reese Witherspoon movie has been retitled 'Fashion Victime' in France. Ugh.

Jeff W, Tuesday, 17 December 2002 17:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Leggings are coming back? Oh, dear lord. I hope they're not wearing them with baggy, shapeless T-shirts again. I'd hate to see the most unflattering style of the 20th century come back.

Christine "Green Leafy Dragon" Indigo (cindigo), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 18:19 (twenty-three years ago)

WHAT A FEELING!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 18:28 (twenty-three years ago)

hm, I feel pretty ambivalent about the fashion thing, I have been thrifting a lotta ugly 80s stuff for a while due to - I am certain this is the case - encounters w/NYC scenester FVs about two years ago.. but then, I don't buy anything that looks horrible when worn, except this hot pink bag which amuses the hell out of me.

I guess if I were to define an FV, it would be a.. type of attitude that centers on fashion to the point that they're rude to anyone not in the game, and, in particular, are marked by a partic snide way of talking that acts as if everyone is always already in on the joke, but at the same time, they wouldn't use it around you if they thought you were ! so rolling eyes and an ambiguous statement like "Oh my god, he was in, like, TOTAL LOOK Marc Jacobs" is used to point out to others, I know something you don't know about what it means to wear total look Marc Jacobs. And you can't ask them what w/o sounding like you're *sooo* uncool. Hence the FV trap, if you ask them to fill in the blanks in their empty sentences, they get really defensive.

daria g, Tuesday, 17 December 2002 19:17 (twenty-three years ago)

"fashion victim" = "someone who wears something breathtakingly ugly or unflattering because it is 'in'"

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 20:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I stopped my mother dead in the middle of her last 'you must be kidding, going out in that' rant with the following:

"Hang on, can you tell me about the last article you wrote for Vogue? Oh wait, I forgot. Your idea of fashion is the Evening Gowns segment of the Miss America Pageant and you picked me up from the airport in a yellow terrycloth tracksuit. Defence rests."

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 20:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Yellow terrycloth tracksuits = THE HEIGHT OF MINNESOTA FASHION!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 20:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Apparently my mum spent the early '60s being coolasfuck so let her be a lesson to us all.

Dan, did I mention she arrived in a black Cadillac she'd bought because of a win on Mystic Lake slots, with small black poodle bouncing all over the seats? I'm worried that the transformation into one of Marge Simpson's sisters will be complete when I next see her.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 21:07 (twenty-three years ago)

who is nick cave?

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 21:12 (twenty-three years ago)

You are a fashion victim.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 21:21 (twenty-three years ago)

it isn't me.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 21:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Why is Nick Cave?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 21:35 (twenty-three years ago)

oyu are a fashiyn victim.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 21:40 (twenty-three years ago)

i agree with suzy's def of fashion victim. fortunately i have never been called a fashion victim and thats probably because i've been dressing exactly the same way since about 1998. i have been told that i "dress like a slut to turn boys on" which is dreadfully ridiculous as about 95% of my (50 or so) dresses are below the knee and all of them more-than cover my cleavage.

di smith (lucylurex), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 21:59 (twenty-three years ago)

and anyway turning "boys" on is hardly something that rattles my dags.

di smith (lucylurex), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 22:02 (twenty-three years ago)

leadings for fools

following is cool. i follow better than any leaders could ever have imagined. plus...i look better

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 22:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Fascist! ;-).

Koln THAT good, eh G?

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 22:42 (twenty-three years ago)

you know, my life is kind of like this

:)

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 22:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I am a conformist, but my hair has a mind of its own, hence the falling out.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 22:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually the jeans I'm wearing now are pretty unusual, I used to dress strangely and then I decided to stop. More than one way to skin a cat etc.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 22:48 (twenty-three years ago)

The other day I looked in the mirror on the way out the door and found the Ethiopian Momus staring back at me! (Blue corduroy flares, ropey black turtleneck sweater, big tweedy coat with fuzzy collar, corduroy shoulder-bag, eyepatch.)

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 23:01 (twenty-three years ago)

(Also primarily "baldish head.")

I'll bet certain of my friends think of me as a fashion victim, but that's their fault, not mine.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 23:03 (twenty-three years ago)

they call you fashion victim=they cant dress for shit

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 23:04 (twenty-three years ago)

How much time do you spend in front of the mirror gazing at your baldish head, Nabisco?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 23:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Gareth do you realize that reads as an insult? ("Anyone who'd call you a fashion victim must be done up in Hefty bags!")

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 23:31 (twenty-three years ago)

yip!

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 23:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Hefty v. Wimpy FITE.

[Nabisco, I'm just waiting for skinny Nick to pop up on this thread to say Ethiopians send HIM food these days ;-)]

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 23:38 (twenty-three years ago)

I was actually going to say "a fatter Momus," but then we probably weigh the same -- he just happens to be, like, a foot taller.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 23:45 (twenty-three years ago)

No one has ever called me a fashion victim. I think I am much nearer on the scale mentioned above to the dribbling tramp. Like really quite close sometimes. Those here who have only seen me on weekday FAPs may think that odd - I may pass as a natural suit-wearer, perhaps - but those who've known me a long time know that tatty old stuff that took zero thought is more my style. Occasionally I do think "shall I wear a black or a white t-shirt today?", but that's comfortably the most variation there is in my two outfits (work suits, else jeans/t-shirts).

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 23:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I would be so pleased if the Xanadu look came back!

Dickon to thread!


jamesmichaelward (jamesmichaelward), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 00:16 (twenty-three years ago)

That post Gareth made about what his life is like is the most eloquent, touching thing I've read in years. Does it make me a fashion victim?

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 02:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Leggings are coming back? Oh, dear lord. I hope they're not wearing them with baggy, shapeless T-shirts again.

I did see a woman today wearing leggings with pumps. She had a winter jacket over this ensemble, so I couldn't tell if she'd gone full-on 80s.

That said, if the high-fashion elite is simply recycling one style after another, I would like to see mini-crinolines make a comeback, because I never had the opportunity to wear one during the 80s, and I sort of feel cheated.

j.lu (j.lu), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 02:56 (twenty-three years ago)

I hope they're not wearing them with baggy, shapeless T-shirts again.

Round here they never stopped. (Not that I have any more fashion sense - far from it, I horrify proper fashion victims even on the rare occasions I don't just pull on the nearest sloppy jumper that doesn't have too many curry stains down the front - or anything, I just dislike leggings.)

Was that THEE Dickon Edwards in the Radio Times letters page this week?

Rebecca (reb), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 03:17 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm a fashion victim, except what I wear isn't in style; it's just strange.

Hooray for sweaters with built-in mittenlets!

felicity (felicity), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 13:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Mittenlets? I wonder if they make those in my size? (Hm I wonder if they make anything in my size)

Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 13:38 (twenty-three years ago)

yes i admit it i wear leggings even though i have sturdy eastern european peasant legs totally unsuited to any leg emphasis! cuff me now officer

minna (minna), Wednesday, 18 December 2002 14:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Was that THEE Dickon Edwards in the Radio Times letters page this week?

Well, it was me, if that's what you mean.

How odd that you're talking about ONJ & Xanadu, just after I did in my diary. You fashion victims, you. ;)

In the film, when ONJ turns into a cartoon bird, she is still wearing leggings. That's style.

Dickon Edwards (Dickon Edwards), Sunday, 22 December 2002 09:21 (twenty-three years ago)

I suppose the only surefire way of avoiding being called a FV, if it really is important to you, is to stick with the same look for as long as possible (like me). I get called many things, but FV isn't one of them.

Dickon Edwards (Dickon Edwards), Sunday, 22 December 2002 09:25 (twenty-three years ago)

pg 7 of the pre-christmas Elton John on cover issue

Graham (graham), Sunday, 22 December 2002 16:04 (twenty-three years ago)

i used to live above a coke head who copped all of his style from corey feldman from the lost boys....including, a huge trench coat with a peace sign on the back, majick cards spilling out of his leather duster....etc....

when i hear the words fashion victim, the two coreys always pop into my head.

am i a fashion victim? nah. i'm too tall too worry about fashion.

doom-e, Sunday, 22 December 2002 17:21 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.