Hey how come it is cool to hate christianity?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not that I'm saying I don't find a lot of Christians annoying, and their logic idiotic. But how come in places like this board - generally full with quite intellectual people - the hate a prejudice of all things Christian is quite acceptable, whereas if someone had chosen to direct the same wrath towards, say, Muslims (who can be equally or more annoying and illogical), they would probably be frowned apon and if not flamed, then at least be not treated with much respect.

So how come it's trendy to hate Christians?
(I'm wondering the same thing about Americans too, except the two groups seem to be in two different situations, America is getting more powerful while at the same time Christianity is dying out...)

GOD I HATE THOSE FUCKING JEWS

webber (webber), Friday, 20 December 2002 03:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Perhaps you'd like to cite some specific examples?

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 20 December 2002 03:50 (twenty-three years ago)

you are totally wrong.
hate is not trendy or cool in any form.
unless its directed at me or ryan adams (which is usually justified.)

chaki (chaki), Friday, 20 December 2002 03:51 (twenty-three years ago)

It is acceptable to hate Christianity (in the Western world) for the same reasons it is acceptable to hate capitalism, America, and consistently winning sports teams.

You don't hate somebody who's down already, what's the point? Thus people who hate Jews, immigrants, etc. are usually frowned upon as idiotic.

You don't hate something you have no understanding of- you can't back it up! Thus few intelligent people hate Muslims- they aren't qualified and they know it.

But you can easily hate the status quo that you've grown up with your entire life without fear of backlash or scathing criticism. And I'm not saying this is the thought process that goes on when people 'decide' what they dislike - but this is basically why it's 'acceptable' to generally deride Christianity etc.

Tom Millar (Millar), Friday, 20 December 2002 03:53 (twenty-three years ago)

I assume your quote about the Jews is supposed to be ironic?

I don't hate Christians. I find the prostlytizing annoying, but I just tend to ignore it the older I get (there was a time I'd be outraged). I also don't hate Muslims, though some of them don't like us Americans and Jews much in return.

mike a (mike a), Friday, 20 December 2002 03:54 (twenty-three years ago)

How come Christians tend to take any criticism or "Non-Word-of-God" comments towards their dogma as being "hate and prejudice"? Since we're dealing in huge sweeping generalizations - I'd like to know.

I'm assuming that this has been started by the comments in the Christmas thread, none of which I remembered as being hateful or predjudical at all (and quite frankly it seems blatantly obvious to me that calling people cockfarmers for not celebrating Christmas is like the definition of predjudice if we want to be picky and not take things as jokes), and Anthony's very specific rage.

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 20 December 2002 03:56 (twenty-three years ago)

All religions love to be persecuted. They feed off of it. So there's part of your answer.

Tom Millar (Millar), Friday, 20 December 2002 04:05 (twenty-three years ago)

"Perhaps you'd like to cite some specific examples?"

From one of the three threads I read today:
"But now that you've got me started thinking about it, I really do rather resent the implication that there's something wrong with not celebrating a holiday that originates in a belief system I would rather see wither away. "

I don't really see anything wrong with that comment, just the last thing sounds pretty negative. I mean, if the same thing was talking about say, the Middle Eastern culture it would be pretty offensive, so why not this?
I noticed it a bunch more before, but I can't be bothered looking for other examples. I was just wondering why I see this sort of thing far more than negative comments about, say, Jews (I have seen comments like that, however they seem to be always in jest, which I think you'll agree, is a different kettle of fish?).

"How come Christians tend to take any criticism or "Non-Word-of-God" comments towards their dogma as being "hate and prejudice"? Since we're dealing in huge sweeping generalizations - I'd like to know."

Why do you assume I'm Christian?
Also, this wasn't started by the christmas thread thingy, since I only read the first few comments. Although it did remind me of this subject which has me curious, and I did get the example above from it.
In any case, don't think I am just trying to whine about some sort of persecution treatment. I'm not offended or moved by any of these comments, I was just curious as to why people that say these sort of things do not seem to lose as much respect as they would if they had been talking about religions other than christianity. This is not just on this board, but in real life. I don't give a shit about it, it was just something I've always wondered the reasons to.
This is long winded as I can't think properly right now. Sorry.

"I assume your quote about the Jews is supposed to be ironic?"

Does it matter?

webber (webber), Friday, 20 December 2002 04:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Perhaps people are sick of a religion that supports anti - abortion, anti- gay, anti - stopping pedaphiles -from -touching -kids- sentiments. Maybe because Christianity is often the religion of choice for conservative bigots like Jerry Falwell, who thinks Tinky -winky is a secret ploy of the gays to make kids gay.Could they think its unfair that there cannot be female preists? Are they up in arms because Christians hate condoms? Maybe people are annoyed that Christian groups see stem cell research as murder, thus increasing the suffering of people who would benefit from the research. Or maybe they just dont like the Pope.

Mike Hanle y (mike), Friday, 20 December 2002 05:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Not all Christians hate condoms or are anti-gay or are anti-abortion or follow the Pope.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 20 December 2002 05:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Hanle y - I think the point is why is do the people who attack Christianity for these reasons never attack Judaism or Islam? Why is hatred okay in one case but not in others?

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 December 2002 06:07 (twenty-three years ago)

The KKK hated Catholics as much as it ever hated Jews - was it okay because, hey, the pope sucks?

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 December 2002 06:09 (twenty-three years ago)

And I'm not sure why I used the past tense there.

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 December 2002 06:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Hey Webber, I personally admire Christians a lot, but I imagine that most of the people who post here come from a Christian background themselves, so when they criticise it they're pointing at their own culture, not alienating other people. Many people find that kind of criticism acceptable.

maryann (maryann), Friday, 20 December 2002 06:16 (twenty-three years ago)

i hate the indigneous sufis of northern siberia

Queen G (Queeng), Friday, 20 December 2002 06:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Anyway the one line you quoted expressed a hatred for the belief system not for the believers.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 20 December 2002 06:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Christianity is the only religion I get shoved down my throat.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 20 December 2002 07:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Really?

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 December 2002 07:11 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah. back in berekely i hated new-age spirtualism more and serious wiccan wackos but then i don't see them round anymore.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 20 December 2002 07:24 (twenty-three years ago)

But if you lived in a predominantly Jewish neighborhood would that make it okay to hate Jews? Hatred's hatread even if it does come with the 'you don't have to live with 'em' caveat

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 December 2002 07:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Hatread?

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 December 2002 07:39 (twenty-three years ago)

I hate using ILEisms, but up there James was completely OTM. I'm not trying to say christianity shouldnt be criticised, or indeed hated by some people, but everything you say is so wrong about it could also be levelled at all the other major religions. So why only this one?

Pretty good responses so far though, thanks a lot. Tom Millar's views make a lot of sense, in particular.

"Anyway the one line you quoted expressed a hatred for the belief system not for the believers."

Oh hey I really think the Indian culture is retarded and lame and should cease to exist. Anyone with Indian roots and/or values should immediately stop being different and start acting like me in every way.

It's a pretty ignorant thing to say, at least in my opinion.

webber (webber), Friday, 20 December 2002 08:52 (twenty-three years ago)

But if you lived in a predominantly Jewish neighborhood would that make it okay to hate Jews?

Criticism doesn't equal hate. But if those Jews were attempting to pass legislation that enforced their own beliefs over your own, then yes, you are allowed to be pissed off. A lot of people mistakenly accept that the far right Christians represent the entire religon. But then that's also the fault of the more moderate side for not speaking up often enough.

bnw (bnw), Friday, 20 December 2002 09:18 (twenty-three years ago)

Those damn moderate a-rabs don't speak up enough either! Therefore they need a good roasting.
Also many people believe that Jews control all/a sizeable portion of the media, and use it to push their own insidious agendas. Generally these people aren't given an awful amount of respect by the rest of us.

webber (webber), Friday, 20 December 2002 09:26 (twenty-three years ago)

I hate initiates of the Seven Mothers. Death to the Reaching Moon!

DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 20 December 2002 10:17 (twenty-three years ago)

i very much dislike christianity judaism and islam (i dont dislike people of that religion but i have no time for the religions), i dislike new age amorphous spirituality more, but i mind hinduism and buddhism less. i dislike them all, but i freely admit to different levels, this is partly my prejudice, partly what is rammed down my throat more, and partly related to how oppressive and anti-humanist i perceive (rightly or wrongly) these religions to be...

christianity in america is the dominant religion, that underpins the social fabric, it seems ok to resent this to me...the other religions are fighting for their space there

in the uk though, christianity is something of an oddity, which doesnt really underpin anything anymore, we are only a christian country nominally, although protestantism has given us our form of capitalism, the work ethic and the 9-5, so, uk, thanks...

it does raise the question though, now that christianity is a minor religion here, does that make dislike of it different? also, its retreat from society has left open the gap for aggressive nu-christian cult type things like Alpha, which i despise a great deal, but then Alpha is a small vibrant heavily expansionist form of christianity rather than the dominant societal underpinning type stuff, so, should i really be able to be so denigrative?

gareth (gareth), Friday, 20 December 2002 10:41 (twenty-three years ago)

A lot of people mistakenly accept that the far right Christians represent the entire religon

including news producers, who have been calling the same six guys up for "the christian point of view" since te days of jessca hahn.

in the states there is reason to be wary of a certain strain (that's mostly far-right and southern-based) of christianity because of the way its values are trying to ingratiate themselves into american politics (and have been since their first attempts to add a 'christian amendment' to the constitution in the mid-19th century), and how rarely those attempts are commented on or called out. as a woman named leah pointed out earlier this week:


Routinely, when Pat Robertson is interviewed on any of the cable news shows, he is never asked any questions that even begin to explore the right wing radicalism that is on copious display on The 700 Club. On one show some years ago, while defending a Judge who likes to say a Christian prayer in court before a case is heard, Robertson insisted he'd have no problem with a Moslem judge reading from the Koran, though he was pleased as a nice cup of Christian punch to note there are no such judges anywhere in the US of A. A week later, there was a filmed "news" report on the show on the growth of Islam in America in which Islam was identified as a Satanic religion, the symbols of which Christians had to be on guard to avoid, including visiting mosques, or having Islamic art in the home. We sometimes forget, because of the Reverend attached to their names, how often these guys lie.

really it's the wholesale perversion of any ideas that might be christ-like in order to grab more power that gets to me. you have people like john "hey, i was a southern partisan cover boy too" ashcroft thinking that their consistent failing upwards is somehow divinely predicated. uh, no, dude, it's because you and your cronies are constantly looking out for each other at the expense of the populace ...

maura (maura), Friday, 20 December 2002 11:22 (twenty-three years ago)

although protestantism has given us our form of capitalism

I gather informed opinion does not believe that any more.

DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 20 December 2002 12:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Max Weber's 'The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism' is still extremely relevant.

Momus (Momus), Friday, 20 December 2002 12:47 (twenty-three years ago)

i would think that if anything, the equation of wealth with some sort of moral power is more entrenched today. i mean, look at the executive compensation reports that have been coming out lately, look at the increasing enshrinement of celebrities/the rich in publications targeted towards the lower classes ... this does result in a very strong feeling schadenfreude when these people are stripped of their power/wealth, but usually some sort of action that makes these people "deserving" of their loss is attributed to them.

maura (maura), Friday, 20 December 2002 13:12 (twenty-three years ago)

One can't compare Christianity to other religions ("If people said 'I hate Islam' it wouldn't be acceptable, how come it's acceptable for people to say 'I hate Christians'?") because no other religion has done nearly as much damage. There isn't a culture in the world that hasn't had the dubious pleasure of missionaries landing on its shores singing Kum-Ba-Ya and distributing bread & fishes all the while whining about the terrible peril in which these savage souls live daily so long as they haven't yet given their hearts to Christ. If Islam, or the Yoruba religion, or Eckankar, or any other religion for that matter should happen to effect an Inquisition, carry out "crusades," support the Third Reich, and actively conspire to deny the women of the third world decent resproductive health care, managing in the meanwhile to become an institution so dominant that it's impossible to go through one twenty-four hour period without somehow being reminded of its total ideological triumph over perfectly tenable systems whose adherents were perfectly happy without the vampire that rose from the grave on Easter, well, then I'll talk about how much I hate Moslems, or the Yoruba, or Eckankar.

But there's only one religion that's ever been so arrogant as to think that the whole world has to suffer its piety, and that's Christianity, and it's always cool to resent your oppressor.

J0hn Darn13ll3 (J0hn Darn13ll3), Friday, 20 December 2002 13:35 (twenty-three years ago)

I want to keep reading this thread, but can a moderator type please edit it so the words "I HATE THOSE FUCKING JEWS" don't come up in type big enough for my entire office to read, please?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 20 December 2002 13:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Historically, I believe that European imperialism would have happened in much the same way with or without Christianity as a "justification". Religion just provides a handy excuse for your power-crazed plunderings.

There are few things more annoying than being preached to by religious people. Being preached to by die-hard anti-religious people is one of them.

In the UK at least, most people I know don't really care one way or another about Christianity more than they do about Buddhists or Sikhs, bar mild annoyance at being preached to and Sunday closing hours.

It will be interesting to see how our new leftie Archbishop of Canterbury copes, as well.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 20 December 2002 13:53 (twenty-three years ago)

I imagine that most of the people who post here come from a Christian background themselves, so when they criticise it they're pointing at their own culture, not alienating other people.

I think of Christianity as playing a huge part in my growing up and coming of age. When I was little, my family went to church almost every single day. My dad was a deacon and my mom was a Sunday school teacher. But our house was very sterile. My mom kept the house and we rarely saw my dad who was pretty distant. I considered myself to be very Christian indeed and used to brag that I had been both christened (sp?) and baptised. I would get angry if someone spelled my name without the H because the Sarai in the bible without the H worshipped the wrong god. When the nurses would ask me if I needed an iron bib when being X-rayed, I would say, "No! I am a Christian!" (as if she was suggesting I was some sort of whore by asking)

Anyway, when I was about 11 we moved out of our suburban home to a farm. I was completely torn by the move (the first of several). In the midst of trying to restore the old farmhouse with our very conservative relatives, my parents had a really tough separation which involved lots of yelling. Then suddenly they both began confiding in me - and I had never really thought of them as real people with real emotions before - and questioning god in general. My mom started reading New Age books (total faux pas for the far right) and within a year my dad stopped going to church. And my dad's side of the family offered to pay for mom's exhorsism (she politely declined). As I've mentioned before, my relatives told my young cousins (along with my sisters and I to our face) that we would be going to hell because our parents divorced.

I could go on and on about my relatives and the struggle I had with them (and still have sometimes) due to their far right-wing beliefs and my lack thereof.

Anyway, I don't hate Christianity but I do tend to get stressed out about it sometimes. Lots of bad memories. Some good memories too - like singing in the choir and playing the bells and pretty churches and luncheons - but not alltogether heavenly.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Friday, 20 December 2002 14:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Although I am an atheist, I don't hate religion (although I would like to see religious belief systems "wither away," since I think it would be better for both individuals and society to function w/out religion). I also don't hate religious people in general. I do hate certain specific religious people.

I live in the U.S., so most of the certain religious people I hate are Xtians. For example, the chief justice of the Supreme Court of Alabama is a real putz. However, I also hate certain specific [sci-ent-olog-ists], jews, and muslims.

J (Jay), Friday, 20 December 2002 14:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I dont hate anyone for being a certian religion, but I really wish religion would be uninvolved with governmental affiars. When Bush and CLinton give money to "faith based charities", it seems wrong. WHy not just give the money to charity? I mean, you could argue the Al Quaeda is a "faith based charity".

Mike Hanle y (mike), Friday, 20 December 2002 15:08 (twenty-three years ago)

I think Tom Millar's comments above go pretty far in answering your question (or in other words, he is OTM), especially the bit about Christianity having been dominant in this part of the world, and the fact that many of us were at one time "insiders." (My father is a minister whose father was a minister. My sister is married to a minister whose father was a minister.)

"But now that you've got me started thinking about it, I really do rather resent the implication that there's something wrong with not celebrating a holiday that originates in a belief system I would rather see wither away."

I said that! I don't hate Christians. I guess I could say that I hate certain forms of Christianity, but I wouldn't normally put it that way. I have no desire to see Christians persecuted or prevented from practicing their religion (with the usual exceptions for rare cases where someone's belief about what their religion demands conflicts with the law, and even there, in some cases it might be better to waive the law). I think Christianity is based on false beliefs, and I would like to see those beliefs die out. (I don't think this is going to happen in my lifetime.) It's not even a matter of whether I think it does more harm or good overall. I think its claims are mistaken.

I believe in the value of worldviews, ideologies, philosophies, etc. battling it out, and not being treated with kid gloves. I think we can respect the individuals who hold the beliefs, without respecting the beliefs themselves. (To paraphrase the old saying "Hate the sin, but love the sinner"; "Hate the belief, but love the believer.") It's relatively uncommon for people in the western world to kill each other over religion anymore, and I think that's a good thing, but I don't think we should allow ourselves to become completely whishy-washy and not be willing to challenge one another's beliefs, at least in the public square, which this is. When it comes to dealing with friends and acquaitances, agreeing to disagree (and forget about it) might be the better policy most of the time.

I said (or attempted to say) some critical things about Islam as well in another thread. Judaism, Christianity, Islam: each one is worse than the other, to use a bit of middle eastern rhetoric. Judaism bothers me less mostly because it's a lot less interested in making converts than Christianity or Islam. It's had more time to become civilized (watered down?) as a religion. (On the other hand, for a minority religion it has managed to create lots of problems by providing the background for Zionism and the present Palestinian/Israeli conflict.)

Now let me read the rest of this thread.

Rockist Scientist, Friday, 20 December 2002 15:10 (twenty-three years ago)

I always get the last word on religion threads because I am a mentalist.

Rockist Scientist, Friday, 20 December 2002 16:38 (twenty-three years ago)

I am glad I didn't open this at work. Anyway, several good comments. Tom Millar and John Darnielle nail it well - it would be nonsense for me to claim that Islam has had 1% as much effect on my life as Christianity, and I don't know much more than 1% as much about it. I have repeatedly said that I think all religions are equally nonsensical, and a bad thing (Anthony's religious crisis thread, most recently), but I very much hope Anthony doesn't feel that any of that dislike carries over to him at all, because he's one of my very favourite people here.

Webber's would-be parallels fail because of these differences (leaving aside the odd bit of bad faith in phrasing). I've heard the same kinds of arguments when complaints are made about men or white people, and they don't work.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 20 December 2002 20:46 (twenty-three years ago)

If you change 'Christianity' to 'Judaism' in John's post he turns into Professor Griff.

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 December 2002 21:03 (twenty-three years ago)

"If Islam...should happen to effect an Inquisition, carry out "crusades," support the Third Reich, and actively conspire to deny the women of the third world decent resproductive health care..."

I was under the impression that Islam did (or still does) many of the things listed.

lawrence kansas (lawrence kansas), Friday, 20 December 2002 22:04 (twenty-three years ago)

yes but their dress sense is miles ahead

(i agree with geoff and sterling. christians have since their inception - at least the strand that became what we know as Xianity today in most of its guises - has been proactively conversionist, not an endearing quality 99.9999999999999% of the time)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 20 December 2002 22:13 (twenty-three years ago)

proactively conversionist

My understanding was always that Xianity, Islam and Buddhism were the three great 'conversionist' religions, at least in terms of lasting to the present.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 December 2002 23:01 (twenty-three years ago)

James: Judaism is an ethnicity, Christianity's a willful choice to join in with the block's biggest bully. I mean I see your point but you see the difference, right?

J0hn Darni3ll3 (J0hn Darni3ll3), Friday, 20 December 2002 23:11 (twenty-three years ago)

I was under the impression that Islam did (or still does) many of the things listed.

It would take Islam an extra five hundred years or so to catch up to Christianity's laundry-list of atrocities -- which incidentally are matters of historical record, not paranoid conspiracy theories like the one advanced by anti-Semites like Griff

J0hn Darni3ll3 (J0hn Darni3ll3), Friday, 20 December 2002 23:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Ned: that's where the dress sense comes in.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 20 December 2002 23:13 (twenty-three years ago)

John, I hope the irony of the extra five hundred years or so was intentional

RickyT (RickyT), Saturday, 21 December 2002 02:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I reckon the extra special irritation, to address Ned's post, comes in because it seems like in America the Christians come and knock on your door and ask you to join them and then tell you you are BAD if you say no, whereas other groups just wander the airports doing the same.

(In all honestly, aren't religions conversionist by nature? It's just the extremes of such conversion/anti-other behavior that causes ire to rise against Christianity and Islam)

(I mean JEWS FOR JESUS???!)

Ally (mlescaut), Saturday, 21 December 2002 05:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Those damn moderate a-rabs don't speak up enough either! Therefore they need a good roasting.

Again, criticism doesn't equal hate. I would love if there were moderate and liberal voices coming out of the middle east. Things like Arafat telling Osama to fuck off. (Even if it is just lip service.) More of that, please.

Also many people believe that Jews control all/a sizeable portion of the media, and use it to push their own insidious agendas. Generally these people aren't given an awful amount of respect by the rest of us.

So the point you meant here was that a few crazy people shouldn't be seen as representatives for an entire faith. (Which is what I said originally....) The problem with your comparison is the Jewish conspiracy doesn't exist and the Christian Coalition does.

bnw (bnw), Saturday, 21 December 2002 07:24 (twenty-three years ago)

as has been pointed out above judaism is an ethnicity, but its worth bearing in mind that islam is a 'created ethnicity', ie the religion is intertwined with race in quite a complex way. whereas, say, a danish christian. is danish AND christian, a syrian muslim is a muslim (this also must be related to the fact that borders in that part of the world are arbitrary and created by imperialist powers)

so, whenever you get into criticising judiasm or islam, its not something separate from race, whereas with christianity it is. i think the world would be a lot better off without all 3 (they are incredibly linked anyway), but you do have to tread carefully with such views (i guess this is the source of david blunketts anti-hate bill being extended to religion)

gareth (gareth), Saturday, 21 December 2002 08:09 (twenty-three years ago)

maryann i think i know where yr comin from but don't you think the christians you admire don't even hardly exist any more? like you mainly encounter them in 19th century novels?
i'm not suggesting modern real life is better or more important or whatever than 19th century novels, of course.

unknown or illegal user (doorag), Saturday, 21 December 2002 09:05 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm certainly not saying any religion should be beyond criticism or even that individuals be targeted for hate, but to people who say "I hate Christians" aren't doing either, and annoyance or obnoxiousness - which seems to be a primary complaint against evangelicism - seem pretty lightweight reasons for hatred. Since the only missionaries I've dealt with were Mormans is it okay to say 'I wish all Mormans were dead' or do I need to temper it with a simple 'I hate Mormans' (I don't by the way - I've had far more annoying things happen to me besides having a brochure handed to me). What degree of intolerance is tolerable? And isn't saying something like 'I hate Christians but not the good ones like, you know, Todd Edwards and Al Green.' a copout on the level of 'a credit to his race' or 'some of my best friends are Christian'? Is it okay to say 'I hate Catholics' unless you're in the KKK? Aren't they the same words?

James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 21 December 2002 09:17 (twenty-three years ago)

My general thinking is, and I know I'm apparently going out on a limb here, but hatred=bad, intolerance=bad, and saying 'but they're intolerant/hateful too!' hardly justifies it.

James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 21 December 2002 09:19 (twenty-three years ago)

This John dude is kinda what I'm talking about. While what he is saying is correct, he seems to have some sort of grudge against Christianity to the point where he will blatently ignore negative things other religions have been responsible for and simply focus on one. Implying it is ok to hate christianity, but not the other religions.

"It would take Islam an extra five hundred years or so to catch up to Christianity's laundry-list of atrocities -- which incidentally are matters of historical record, not paranoid conspiracy theories like the one advanced by anti-Semites like Griff"

The conclusion he seems to reach is that because the other religions havent done things as badly as christianity, then therefore that's ok. That's like saying well, hitler didnt kill as many people as stalin, so he's ok by me (or vice-versa, i'm not aware of the body counts). I mean it's pretty obvious they've all done retarded things and created a lot of suffering in the world, this is a negative thing about all religion, not just christianity.

So why are you simply singling out one? Additionally, how is the fact that Christianity has done (arguably) more harm to the world some sort of defense against the other religions' misdeeds?

"The problem with your comparison is the Jewish conspiracy doesn't exist"

That's what they want you to think.

webber (webber), Saturday, 21 December 2002 09:19 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.