Also, those of you with gender neutral names, do you have any interesting stories of gender mix-ups? How have people's perceptions of you/reactions to you changed when they find out the "truth"?
― kate, Tuesday, 14 January 2003 00:37 (twenty-three years ago)
-Not just on the internet, but "Fiona" was originally supposed to be a boy named Fletcher. That idea ended quite early when "Fletcher" started going on feminist rants and gushing about cute boys.
― kate, Tuesday, 14 January 2003 00:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― lyra (lyra), Tuesday, 14 January 2003 02:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― di smith (lucylurex), Tuesday, 14 January 2003 02:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 14 January 2003 07:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Tuesday, 14 January 2003 09:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― kate, Tuesday, 14 January 2003 09:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 14 January 2003 09:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Tuesday, 14 January 2003 10:05 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Tuesday, 14 January 2003 17:03 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martina Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 14 January 2003 18:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― Kerry (dymaxia), Tuesday, 14 January 2003 19:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― , Tuesday, 14 January 2003 19:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― , Tuesday, 14 January 2003 19:13 (twenty-three years ago)
Despite loving men dearly I have absolutely no idea how their minds work, so I really doubt I could I post convincingly as one.
― C J (C J), Tuesday, 14 January 2003 19:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― , Tuesday, 14 January 2003 19:30 (twenty-three years ago)
It is wise not to jump to conclusions.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 14 January 2003 20:09 (twenty-three years ago)
That was the only time I tried trolling.
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 January 2003 23:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― C J (C J), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 00:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 00:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 00:08 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 00:10 (twenty-three years ago)
Have I misunderstood the whole point of challenges? Is my life a sham?
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 00:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― kate, Wednesday, 15 January 2003 00:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 00:14 (twenty-three years ago)
Anyway, I like ambiguity. Occasionaly elderly people in real life think I'm a boy, despite the fact that I have breasts. When I was little many people thought I was a boy. - which was my intention as I was modelling my self on George from the Famous Five.
― toraneko (toraneko), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 01:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― spectra, Wednesday, 15 January 2003 05:50 (twenty-three years ago)
I think that's the question of the Century. I've been through two grad. level courses (rather unwillingly) on "gendered rhetoric." It is actually an interesting topic, so long as everyone is willing to talk openly and to accept other's viewpoints (ended-up with a rabid feminist in one course who believed that males had no business talking about gender and rhetoric). There are some interesting books on the subject, too.
I guess that the main things I remember as being at least stereotypically "gendered" are as follows: women tend to use more dramatic/stressing language (I REALLY like it; That's ABSOLUTELY perfect, etc.); women tend to use more hedges (I THINK, I GUESS, MAYBE, etc.); women tend to use more emotionally explanatory terms (I am feeling slightly depressed and also a bit unloved); women are more comfortable with descriptions than with dialogue; women tend to try to create cohesion and happiness through writing; women tend to be less directly confrontational and more likely to talk behind one's back) and so forth. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THESE ARE STEREOTYPES! There are also lists for men's stereotypes, too - mostly the opposite side of the dualities shown in the women's tendencies. Many have been disproven through tests, others are currently being explored. Also, many studies have shown that the significantly obvious differences between the genders in writing tend to be most apparent in youths, and the lower-educated. The more educated, traveled, and read a peson is, the less "gendered" their writing is, unless they are gendering their writing intentionally.
But, anyway, I think it might be possible to develop theories about someone's gender, based on their writings. However, if the writer knows about these marks, they might consciously use them to create a different impression. Also, I believe that people have tendencies along a gender spectrum, from female to male, and that we all fit somewhere along this line - and therefore our writings will reflect that position. But just because we identify along a specturm, that does not necessarily show our sex, sexual orientation, or dominant/submissive tendencies - it's important to remember that gender is more of an identification of roles/behaviors and that sex refers to one's genitalia (and when we get to transgenderism, things get really confusing - I'm actually finishing a paper on the topic of gendered language in the writings of post-operative transgendered persons.)
Sorry for the long-windedness. LCD
― LCD (Ms Laura), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 06:10 (twenty-three years ago)
But, i have been mistaken for the opposite sex when i'm using an internet nick. once when i was having quite a confrontational debate with someone, and loads of people on the board assumed i was a guy.
the other time was a few nights ago, on soulseek. the guy i was talking to assumed i was male, and i think it was because i was talking about music. i didn't correct him though, mostly because i was afraid he'd get all creepy if i told him i was a girl (ok, i have no proof this would happen, but it's happend enough for me to be cautious)
― sand.y, Thursday, 16 January 2003 01:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Thursday, 16 January 2003 04:28 (twenty-three years ago)
the anonymous posts on here are interesting because, generally, i dont assume either way, it actually quite hard to - mainly because on some of those threads yuo are speculating/sherlocking who it could be and often yu just cant guess...
― gareth (gareth), Thursday, 16 January 2003 06:54 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 16 January 2003 18:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― di smith (lucylurex), Thursday, 16 January 2003 22:08 (twenty-three years ago)
― di smith (lucylurex), Thursday, 16 January 2003 22:15 (twenty-three years ago)