Which is greater? Only ilxor can decide...
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 19 January 2003 21:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 19 January 2003 21:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 19 January 2003 21:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 19 January 2003 22:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 19 January 2003 22:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 19 January 2003 22:52 (twenty-three years ago)
Baseball Furies would beat the shit out of the Bowery Boys. The Warriors would bop some Dead Rabbit ass but they couldn't beat all the Irish up in the Five-Points because of the sheer number of Dead Rabbits.
Warriors is what NYC kids did before the invention of hip-hop. I fuckin' love that movie and the leader of THE ROGUES. HOLY SHIT, THE ROGUES!!!
But I did enjoy Gangs of New York too. I like streetfightin' movies.
Daniel Day Lewis was great. He's the best actor of his generation. Fuck all his haters. They can suck my left foot. If Gangs of New York didn't have DDL and his establishment, Satan's ??? it wouldn't of been as good. Even though John C. Reily in a fur suit was cool too.
Warriors wins because it is the pinnacle of what its intent was. Remember that kids rioted in the cinemas and some cinemas banned it because they didn't want the kids to burn the motherfucker down.
Gangs of New York, though good, was no masterpiece. If Scorsese directed the film in 1977, it would possibly be the greatest American film of all-time.
― Polo Pony, Monday, 20 January 2003 05:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Monday, 20 January 2003 06:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― Polo Pony, Monday, 20 January 2003 07:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 20 January 2003 07:38 (twenty-three years ago)
fuckin' warriors, no contest!
― That Girl (thatgirl), Monday, 20 January 2003 07:42 (twenty-three years ago)
Gangs of New York...a great film I must say, but me & it just don't have the history that me & Warriors do.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 20 January 2003 16:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― tiny, Monday, 20 January 2003 19:24 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ally C (Ally C), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 00:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 01:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 28 February 2004 18:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Viva La Sam (thatgirl), Saturday, 28 February 2004 20:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― dean! (deangulberry), Saturday, 28 February 2004 21:04 (twenty-two years ago)
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000A6T1JU.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg77. The WarriorsWalter Hill, 1979Points: 34Total Votes: 3 First Place Votes: 0nickalicious: Warriors for the bottle-clanking 'come-out-to-play-ee-ay', for featuring a gang whose get-up was vests-with-no-shirts-and-ascots, and basically just for being DA SHIT and entertaining me on many a drunken not-getting-any-tonight-why-not-turn-on-USA-network?-night.
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 01:18 (twenty years ago)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 01:24 (twenty years ago)
plot= i'm gonna get revenge for my father, but i'm gonna take ages about it.
― not-goodwin (not-goodwin), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 07:00 (twenty years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 07:28 (twenty years ago)
That said, The Warriors wins because originals are always better than remakes.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 07:28 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 09:39 (twenty years ago)