Well just read the link.
― Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Monday, 20 January 2003 11:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Monday, 20 January 2003 11:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Monday, 20 January 2003 11:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― robin (robin), Monday, 20 January 2003 12:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― zemko (bob), Monday, 20 January 2003 12:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 20 January 2003 12:14 (twenty-three years ago)
From what I could gather of the plot is seemed pretty self-indulgently tricksy.
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 20 January 2003 12:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 20 January 2003 16:19 (twenty-three years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Monday, 20 January 2003 16:24 (twenty-three years ago)
https://64.media.tumblr.com/c00039e0638770f4603a29c2962f21a4/94c1fc42465dc546-21/s500x750/62ec99987969a9b230bede531fe0b0eae826a0af.gifv
― pplains, Saturday, 20 August 2022 15:14 (three years ago)
left: THAT'S INCREDIBLErIght: THAT'S INCREDIBLEcenter: YES, nnnnnghhhhmmmmm
― Bruce Stingbean (Karl Malone), Saturday, 20 August 2022 15:23 (three years ago)
- "Can... we get just one more take?"
- "No, I think we're good."
- "Cathy?"
- "We should be ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
― pplains, Saturday, 20 August 2022 15:30 (three years ago)
- "Can... we get just one more take?"- "No, I think we're good."
Thought this was in response to the original subject of the thread, Russian Ark!
― Halfway there but for you, Saturday, 20 August 2022 15:44 (three years ago)
that would be incredible since it was famously shot in one take - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Ark ?
― StanM, Saturday, 20 August 2022 16:00 (three years ago)
It was shot in four takes, as the Wikipedia notes. (Though if they’d needed just one more, would have had to reconvene.)
― Vance Vance Devolution (sic), Saturday, 20 August 2022 16:54 (three years ago)