Office Jargon

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Nothing gets on my nerves like office jargon-people who need to dress up their jobs with silly, inflated terms that elevate what they do to some imagined level of importance. If you work in a technical field, sure, but if you're a friggin' post office or property company, why do you feel the need to "brief" people, have "teams", "flag" things for your co-workers, or even "outsource" (???) a card file or a cockfarming paperclip???? Sorry bastards.

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Monday, 20 January 2003 12:56 (twenty-three years ago)

So you've tasked us with answering this. I suppose we'll have to think outside the box.

MarkH (MarkH), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:03 (twenty-three years ago)

That wasn't tasking, it was briefing. I'm afraid we're going to have to let you go. It's not you, it's us. We've had a bad year. Nonetheless, thank you for all your hard work. No doubt you've got many irons in the fire and won't have trouble finding employment elsewhere.

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Most annoying client I have to deal with: the one who phones up to ask: "Have you actioned the changes I requested?" ACTION IS NOT A VERB, DAMMIT.

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:10 (twenty-three years ago)

have "teams"

b-but you have to have teams! How else can you criticize your staff for not being "team players"?

MarkH (MarkH), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Heads up = telling you
Going Foward = from now on
Leverage = steal or crib
Relationship management = bullshitting
Value Chain = ????????? (I've never met anyone who could explain this)
Collateral Generation = writing stuff
Synergistic = the same as or copied from
Feedback = having a go at someone
180 degree feedback = having a go at each other
360 degree feedback = a real ding-dong
Execute = do
Portfolio = stuff
Touch points = fellow bullshitters
Resources = people and stuff
Matrix management = no-one knows what the f@ck's going on
Product pipeline = stuff no-one can be arsed to make work
Strategising = MORE bullshitting
Customer intimacy = I once had a beer with one of our customers
Global Reach = we have a one man and his dog operation in France too
Right-sizing = firing people
Total quality = total crap with a certificate
Continuous Improvement = MORE pointless meetings
Opportunity = a problem
Recovery Plan = shit! senior management discovered our 'problem'
Integration = mass layoffs
Productivity = here, have three jobs!
Price Flexibility = discounting
Change Agent = loudmouth


Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:22 (twenty-three years ago)

let me scuba in your thinktank

chris (chris), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:26 (twenty-three years ago)

"Right-sizing"! I love it.

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:26 (twenty-three years ago)

You need to play Bollocks Bingo!

TIPS FOR MEETINGS

Do you keep dozing off in meetings and seminars? What about those
fruitless, boring conference calls? Here's a way to change all that:

(1) Before your next meeting, briefing, or conference call, prepare a
card.
- 25cm by 25cm is a good size. Divide the card into columns-five
across
and
five down. That will give you 25 blocks.

(2) Write one of the following words/phrases in each block:

synergy

strategic fit

core competencies

best practices

bottom line

revisit

take that off-line

24/7

out of the loop

benchmark

value-added

proactive

win-win

think outside the box

fast track

results-driven

empower (or empowerment)

knowledge base

at the end of the day

touch base

mindset

client focus(ed)

going forward

game plan

leverage

(3) Check off the appropriate block when you hear one of those words
or
phrases.

(4) When you get five blocks horizontally, vertically, or diagonally,
stand
up and shout "B*llocks!"

TESTIMONIALS FROM SATISFIED "B*LLOCKS BINGO" PLAYERS:

"I had been in the meeting for only five minutes when I won."
- Jack W., London

"My attention span at meetings has improved dramatically."
- David D., Manchester

"What a laugh! Meetings will never be the same for me after my first
win."
- Bill R., Edinburgh

"The atmosphere was tense in the last process meeting as 14 of us
waited
for the fifth box."
- Ben G., Reading

"The boss was stunned as eight of us screamed "B*llocks!" in unison,
for
the third time in two hours."
- Kathleen L., Ipswich

smee (smee), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:32 (twenty-three years ago)

haha, we played Bullshit Bingo in my old job - our boss would only have to say 'ostensibly', 'draconian' and 'industry in contraction' three times each within ten minutes and the game was up....it was just too easy

stevem (blueski), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Most annoying client I have to deal with: the one who phones up to ask: "Have you actioned the changes I requested?" ACTION IS NOT A VERB, DAMMIT.

Wait until someone tells you that they'll revert to you later.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:57 (twenty-three years ago)

make these your primary action items.

g-kit (g-kit), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:00 (twenty-three years ago)

>Most annoying client I have to deal with: the one who phones up to
>ask: "Have you actioned the changes I requested?" ACTION IS NOT A
>VERB, DAMMIT.

The thing about English is that it is very easy to change the part of speech of a word into another. This is a blessing and a curse.

I personally hate "utilize". People who utililize the word utilize should begin to utilize the word "use", which means the exact same thing as utilize except that it utilizes two less syllables.

Also "guesstimate." It wasn't even that clever the first time someone came up with it, yet now it looks like it might compltetely replace the word "estimate"

fletrejet, Monday, 20 January 2003 14:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Alan? Hiii, I just wanted to touch base with you...

ARRRRRGGGGHHHHH!

stevem (blueski), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:20 (twenty-three years ago)

"You want me to deprioritize my current reports, until you advise a status upgrade?"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:23 (twenty-three years ago)

"We need to think outside the box on this one."
"Why does it have to be a box?"

Alfie (Alfie), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:25 (twenty-three years ago)

i just ILE searched Dilbert. it appears to have never been C/Dd. I'd say dud - largely cos i get sent them all the time, and tho the odd one is amusing, most are the usual syndicated strip pulp "barely worth a mild grin" lame observational humour bollox.

Alan (Alan), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:28 (twenty-three years ago)

wank words

Alan (Alan), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:29 (twenty-three years ago)

but Dilbert on TV was great

stevem (blueski), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Dilbert is GREBT! It is my office right down to Wally and Catbert the evil HR.
API modifications = XML corrections = schema changes is the type of thing that gets me. I don't care what they call it just stick to the same name.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 20 January 2003 15:16 (twenty-three years ago)

'Managing Expectations' = Letting people know in advance you're going to disappoint them

Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:20 (twenty-three years ago)

My friend C and I once did some bingo along those lines, but as this was in academic book publishing the score words where things like

pathbreaking
accessible
poststructuralist
hagiography
provocative
sodomy
historicism

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:34 (twenty-three years ago)

This link OWNS this thread

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Nabisco, the weasel word around here is "trade" as in "that's a trade book!" (NB: no one here seems to know what a trade book is.)

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:43 (twenty-three years ago)

We'll pow-wow and get back to you.

Sean (Sean), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:46 (twenty-three years ago)

The worst ever business term is the made-up word 'incent' - since the correct term, 'incite', always connotes a riot.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:57 (twenty-three years ago)

oh and also "deliverables". aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:57 (twenty-three years ago)

oh no! away day! oh no!

jel -- (jel), Monday, 20 January 2003 18:38 (twenty-three years ago)

trade book = order book? or order fills?

Im work avoiding my deliverables.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 20 January 2003 18:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Im practising work avoidance on my internal deliverables I mean.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 20 January 2003 18:48 (twenty-three years ago)

"trying to recoup the accounts-receivable from this direct bill customer"..."what's the APR on that premium finance agreement?"..."the tortfeasor's insurer has gone insolvent"..."try to get this guy coverage in the non-standard auto market"...good god the things I have to say at work over the course of a day.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 20 January 2003 18:57 (twenty-three years ago)

did you take a intro to biz course in university? All are standard terms like CPU, RAM, ROM, TCP/IP in their world.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 20 January 2003 19:13 (twenty-three years ago)

nabisco did you not bother with "transgressive" as it rang to bingo bell too quickly?

can you join my lone-wolf sub's war on "attempt" in academic journalese viz "in this essay i attempt to show": say "in this essay i show"! if you DON'T show it, don't publish the bloody essay, or at least change to "in this essay i speculate timidly" etc etc

mark s (mark s), Monday, 20 January 2003 19:17 (twenty-three years ago)

"in this essay i speculate timidly" = "nn this essay i propose, provided you agree with me"

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 20 January 2003 19:21 (twenty-three years ago)

"Trade book" = a book designed to be sold in non-specialist bookstores.

Most academic books are predominantly intended for libraries, course adoptions, etc. Often specialist books get dressed up as "trade books," but don't sell accordingly.

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 20 January 2003 19:23 (twenty-three years ago)

I just found out Friday we use "trade execution" and "order fill" interchangably. Im developing finical software so I got the best of both worlds being tossed around the office. Combined with my inability to spell it makes for some great documentation.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 20 January 2003 19:27 (twenty-three years ago)

My boss is very good indeed in most ways that matter, but he is prone to a bit of this. I have taken to replying with things like "I'm not sure what your third sentence means. Does [jargon] mean [my plain version]?" I think I'm gradually disincentivizing his utilization of pleonastic nelologisms.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:00 (twenty-three years ago)

To be honest Mark I'd do away with "in this essay I blah blah blah" and just get on with doing it, already. But I am not in a position to get too picky about academic papers, as I don't really read many. Apart from the ones in Critical Inquiry, where someone might say "in this essay I attempt to demonstrate that the films Batman and JFK are in fact thinly-disguised parables of the Time/Warner merger" (actual CI piece) and you get to think "good luck, buddy, this'll be fun to watch."

I can't remember if we used "trangressive" or not but I'm guessing yes: there were a good half-dozen words specifically for queer-theory books, including a special bonus for "multiplicity" and "desire" used in same sentence.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:09 (twenty-three years ago)

We often get book proposals where the manuscript still contains lines like "In this section I will . . ." and where the footnotes allude to a dissertation committee. The correct response is, "Need tenure much?"

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:11 (twenty-three years ago)

PS for those who care: "I will argue that Batman and JFK are corporate expressions: the former an instrumental allegory contrived to accomplish corporate objectives, the latter a scenario that effectively expands the range of what counts as a corporate objective." For the record Batman = Warner, Vicki Vale = Time, and the Joker = federal regulatory commissions.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Let me guess: the argument rests not on any research into the intentions of the screenwriters, but some vague formulation whereby the corporate allegory in Batman is symptomatic blah blah blah.

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:24 (twenty-three years ago)

message me... another one of those awful noun/verb switches

g (graysonlane), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:30 (twenty-three years ago)

Well yes of course Amateurist, the [screenwriter] is dead. This is why I find CI articles entertaining. If everyday scholarship is like NBA basketball then certain CI pieces are like the Harlem Globetrotters, just big acrobatic exhibitions where actual useful scores and results for humankind or the history of ideas are sort of not the point.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:35 (twenty-three years ago)

I get a very Goebbels-like sensation when I read such things; I keep wondering whether most university English professors shouldn't be conscripted as bricklayers, or something similar.

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:51 (twenty-three years ago)

the jfk claim seems pretty dead-on for what oliver stone several times said the movie wz about (not allegory but documentary, of course) (in academoid: "not as allegory, rather as documentary")

"in this essay i attempt to show exactly what the director mouths off abt endlessly in the promo material"

half of the entries in "the best 100 movies of all time" progs on channel 4 feature some nitwit pointing out the WORLD'S MOST OBVIOUS METAPHOR: as often as not the nitwit is actually the director or screewriter

mark s (mark s), Monday, 20 January 2003 21:00 (twenty-three years ago)

that said, the power puff girls movie IS a triffic allegory of recent american foreign policy

mark s (mark s), Monday, 20 January 2003 21:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Mark such statements simply don't fly without oversimplified character analogies: Blossom = GWB, Buttercup = Wolfowitz, Bubbles = Powell? Professor = Kofi Annan? Mojo Jojo = Saudi monarchi? Fuzzy Lumpkins = Kim Jong Il, little readheaded girl who looks like Anna = Gerhard Schroeder? (I have not seen this film, obviously.)

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 20 January 2003 21:18 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm with nabisco on not having the "In this essay etc etc" line although I really wish I had used the "speculate timidly" line in some of my works.

rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 20 January 2003 21:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Does it really have a little redheaded girl who looks like Anna in it? Or do all little redheaded girls remind you of Anna? (I feel like I'm talking to Charlie Brown.)

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 20 January 2003 21:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Someone made an Anna joke, probably long ago, that led to my posting a picture of this Powerpuff redhead. She doesn't really look like Anna because she is evil and prissy and mean, not to mention which the aesthetic of the cartoon is a bit too simple for anyone to actually look like anyone else. But if you were to imagine an evil Powerpuff-style Anna this is basically what she would look like.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 20 January 2003 22:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Feeproccomm! ha ha! RAF not meaning planes.

Paranoid Spice (kate), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:20 (twenty years ago)

best practice
best practice
BEST FUCKING PRACTICE
AAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!

officewally, Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:22 (twenty years ago)

it's a real word that nobody here uses and is used all the time in the other (glasgow) office. hence i never hear it "in real life" EVER - only in the office. that's what i was saying

Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:22 (twenty years ago)

best practice is the worst shit. "best practice would be to". UNG, i hate the DIPLOMACY of it. 5 gets you 9 they are more direct in the actual fucking FO.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:26 (twenty years ago)

I *hate* when people say 'uplift' instead of 'collect' or 'pick up'.

Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:29 (twenty years ago)

as in 'collecting trance anthems'?

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:30 (twenty years ago)

Today at work:

"going forward"
"risk manage"
"value add"

moley, Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:33 (twenty years ago)

All these words and pharses appear in the Microsoft video I am currently suffering.

"Sarbanes-Oxley"

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:41 (twenty years ago)

Sarbanes Oxley is big time here and we're not even US really.

Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:42 (twenty years ago)

Oh yeah, 'value added' and 'revert'. And 'contestability' instead of 'competition'. And 'fulfilment' instead of 'envelope stuffing'.

beanz (beanz), Thursday, 20 October 2005 11:22 (twenty years ago)

omg yes Best Practise seems to be one of my ex bosses faves, and it's also written on the arm rest I'm using. 'defining best practice'. what the hell does it fucking mean? this is why i skive out of meetings.

Ste (Fuzzy), Thursday, 20 October 2005 11:26 (twenty years ago)

We have a senior manager whose sole role is to ask: "What's the value proposition?" Yak.

Also: "actionable analytics" WTF?

quincie, Thursday, 20 October 2005 12:22 (twenty years ago)

i have just been tasked with some actionable requests that need fulfilment by c.o.p. today.

barbarian cities (jaybob3005), Thursday, 20 October 2005 12:28 (twenty years ago)

five months pass...
I just got a note:

"THe image is over-optimized."

Meaning, rather counterintuitively, that it looks like crap.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 23 March 2006 22:22 (twenty years ago)

two years pass...

A major British government department brings you "ground-truth" (verb). As in "We need to ground-truth this proposition". I.e. find out whether it's true in practice.

ljubljana, Thursday, 12 February 2009 06:36 (seventeen years ago)

The constant use of "in terms of" or "with respect to." As in, "We have problems in terms of human resources." Why not say, "We have problems with human resources"?

The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 12 February 2009 13:38 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, or to be coy and cowardly you can leave it trailing: 'So, er, in terms of your leaving date...'

ljubljana, Thursday, 12 February 2009 21:02 (seventeen years ago)

I dunno, what if your company had forced labor chained in the basement? That would be a problem in terms of human resources, but a non-problem in terms of labor costs. Obviously one needs to be clear about such things.

nabisco, Thursday, 12 February 2009 21:07 (seventeen years ago)

I mean, "we have a problem with slavery" just makes you look bad

nabisco, Thursday, 12 February 2009 21:07 (seventeen years ago)

Indeed - it's the use of the phrase when there are no such subtleties involved that is so bloody annoying. It implies the speaker can see subtleties there that you can't.

ljubljana, Thursday, 12 February 2009 21:10 (seventeen years ago)

I hate jargon meant to replace perfectly good ACTUAL words. E.g.:

Most annoying client I have to deal with: the one who phones up to ask: "Have you actioned the changes I requested?" ACTION IS NOT A
VERB, DAMMIT.

BUT ENACT IS!

A major British government department brings you "ground-truth" (verb). As in "We need to ground-truth this proposition". I.e. find out whether it's true in practice.

How about "verify" or "test"?

My job really does not lend itself to jargon, but my favorite is "LP situation," which means "missing person" (usually a kid running around who we find within 5 minutes).

Maria, Thursday, 12 February 2009 21:27 (seventeen years ago)

Currently in vogue:
kilt v. to make cosmetic changes to documents prepared by English lawyers, so that they conform to Scots law. (e.g. "Links asked us to kilt Project Biscuits" "I kilted a couple of docs and billed 10 grand haw haw haw").

Also used often:
cold towel adj. descriptive of a read-through of a large document, implying, well, I haven't a clue actually.

Hate hate hate:
ping v. to send, esp by email.

calumerio, Friday, 13 February 2009 14:37 (seventeen years ago)

two months pass...

"blue-sky thinking" and "catch-up" can both fuck off

(even though "catch-up" really isn't that bad, its ubiquity drives me up the cocking wall)

N1ck (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 10:22 (seventeen years ago)

work harder then

LOL

(jk)

Ant Attack.. (Ste), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 10:23 (seventeen years ago)

Heads up = telling you

I got this in an email the other day and had to ask the guy what he meant

Sacco, Vanzetti, Passantino... (Tom D.), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 10:24 (seventeen years ago)

"fancy going downstairs for a coffee and a quick catch-up?"

no, you poncy winka, no i duzzn't.

N1ck (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 10:33 (seventeen years ago)

something that's doing the rounds in our company

"sanity check"

HS

Ant Attack.. (Ste), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 10:37 (seventeen years ago)

Everyone loves a Blue Sky Session!

Blancmange Is Playing At My House (King Boy Pato), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 10:52 (seventeen years ago)

Or a Big Ideas Shower!

Blancmange Is Playing At My House (King Boy Pato), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 10:52 (seventeen years ago)

we have a nice one here, in a different vein from the above, more specific to us - ghostbusters. the broken image link is a red circle with a cross through it like the one on the ghostbusters logo (and english traffic signs etc) so if no images are appearing then it's ghostbusters.

koogs, Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:08 (seventeen years ago)

That's a lot better than having to put up with people who turn nouns like 'feedback' into verbs.

suggest bánh mi (suzy), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:16 (seventeen years ago)

You mean Americans? *ducks*

Sacco, Vanzetti, Passantino... (Tom D.), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:17 (seventeen years ago)

No, it's definitely happening over here! Reading above, Americans hate this guff as much as anyone.

suggest bánh mi (suzy), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:19 (seventeen years ago)

I don't work in an office, but we do have jargon.

KB's = knockbacks = items that we don't want from a collection being bought in
Snip it & flip it = close the shop (said at the end of the day, meaning to snip the lock and flip the sign)
Queue jumper = a small task with a specially high priority to be done suddenly in the midst of another longer job

krakow, Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:29 (seventeen years ago)

quite like "queue jumper" actually, although i imagine it could evoke stabby urges if heard too often.

N1ck (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:38 (seventeen years ago)

The latest one round here is "sense-check", which means "look at"

NotEnough, Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:49 (seventeen years ago)

Yikes!

Sacco, Vanzetti, Passantino... (Tom D.), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:51 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i think sense check is the same meaning as our sanity check

Ant Attack.. (Ste), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:54 (seventeen years ago)

two months pass...

"Users were having trouble grasping how the new application would fit in with their day to day working so we came up with the term 'fairy dust' to refer to little bits of information we can sprinkle the help packs with to help them understand this".

last night i dreamt somebody shoved me (ledge), Wednesday, 8 July 2009 09:55 (sixteen years ago)

five years pass...

"Accountable talk"--that's all we hear at staff meetings these days. That, and "collaborative inquiry." (Or "enquiry." Not sure which.) It's been that way for the past year. I have only the vaguest sense of what they mean. I've been teaching grade school for 15 years, and students have always been talking, and I've always been talking back to them, back and forth we go, but now the talk is supposed to be accountable. People get paid more than I do to come up with this nonsense.

clemenza, Friday, 7 November 2014 02:18 (eleven years ago)

seven months pass...

"Solutioning." OMG.

Falconetti Pot (Leee), Tuesday, 16 June 2015 21:54 (eleven years ago)

yeah that one hit me like a brick when i first heard it too (told on a call that "this meeting is not for solutioning" no less!)

got bent (mild cheezed off vibes) (s.clover), Tuesday, 16 June 2015 22:07 (eleven years ago)

two years pass...

Went to a meeting w/ upper mgmt and the union today.

"We will table this because x isn't here"
"This is a conversation that should be offline" x1,000,000

naus, Friday, 21 July 2017 07:27 (eight years ago)

No "let's put that in the parking lot?"

El Tomboto, Friday, 21 July 2017 12:39 (eight years ago)

at least you got some face time with them.

Grandpont Genie, Friday, 21 July 2017 13:11 (eight years ago)

my favorite is 'sunsetting' a project or organization. sunsetting

global tetrahedron, Friday, 21 July 2017 14:16 (eight years ago)

i've heard some really interesting uses of "double-click" recently

call all destroyer, Friday, 21 July 2017 14:17 (eight years ago)

^ do tell

also 'circle back'

global tetrahedron, Friday, 21 July 2017 14:26 (eight years ago)

sacking people = re-profiling now, apparently

Shat Parp (dog latin), Friday, 21 July 2017 14:27 (eight years ago)

double-click has become a shorthand for getting into more detail on a topic

call all destroyer, Friday, 21 July 2017 15:04 (eight years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.