― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Monday, 20 January 2003 12:56 (twenty-three years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:03 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:10 (twenty-three years ago)
b-but you have to have teams! How else can you criticize your staff for not being "team players"?
― MarkH (MarkH), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― chris (chris), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:26 (twenty-three years ago)
TIPS FOR MEETINGS
Do you keep dozing off in meetings and seminars? What about thosefruitless, boring conference calls? Here's a way to change all that:
(1) Before your next meeting, briefing, or conference call, prepare acard.- 25cm by 25cm is a good size. Divide the card into columns-fiveacrossandfive down. That will give you 25 blocks.
(2) Write one of the following words/phrases in each block:
synergy
strategic fit
core competencies
best practices
bottom line
revisit
take that off-line
24/7
out of the loop
benchmark
value-added
proactive
win-win
think outside the box
fast track
results-driven
empower (or empowerment)
knowledge base
at the end of the day
touch base
mindset
client focus(ed)
going forward
game plan
leverage
(3) Check off the appropriate block when you hear one of those wordsorphrases.
(4) When you get five blocks horizontally, vertically, or diagonally,standup and shout "B*llocks!"
TESTIMONIALS FROM SATISFIED "B*LLOCKS BINGO" PLAYERS:
"I had been in the meeting for only five minutes when I won."- Jack W., London
"My attention span at meetings has improved dramatically."- David D., Manchester
"What a laugh! Meetings will never be the same for me after my firstwin."- Bill R., Edinburgh
"The atmosphere was tense in the last process meeting as 14 of uswaitedfor the fifth box."- Ben G., Reading
"The boss was stunned as eight of us screamed "B*llocks!" in unison,forthe third time in two hours."- Kathleen L., Ipswich
― smee (smee), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:41 (twenty-three years ago)
Wait until someone tells you that they'll revert to you later.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 20 January 2003 13:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― g-kit (g-kit), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:00 (twenty-three years ago)
The thing about English is that it is very easy to change the part of speech of a word into another. This is a blessing and a curse.
I personally hate "utilize". People who utililize the word utilize should begin to utilize the word "use", which means the exact same thing as utilize except that it utilizes two less syllables.
Also "guesstimate." It wasn't even that clever the first time someone came up with it, yet now it looks like it might compltetely replace the word "estimate"
― fletrejet, Monday, 20 January 2003 14:12 (twenty-three years ago)
ARRRRRGGGGHHHHH!
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alfie (Alfie), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alan (Alan), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alan (Alan), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 20 January 2003 14:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 20 January 2003 15:16 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:20 (twenty-three years ago)
pathbreakingaccessiblepoststructuralisthagiographyprovocativesodomyhistoricism
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean (Sean), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 20 January 2003 18:38 (twenty-three years ago)
Im work avoiding my deliverables.
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 20 January 2003 18:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 20 January 2003 18:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 20 January 2003 19:13 (twenty-three years ago)
can you join my lone-wolf sub's war on "attempt" in academic journalese viz "in this essay i attempt to show": say "in this essay i show"! if you DON'T show it, don't publish the bloody essay, or at least change to "in this essay i speculate timidly" etc etc
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 20 January 2003 19:17 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 20 January 2003 19:21 (twenty-three years ago)
Most academic books are predominantly intended for libraries, course adoptions, etc. Often specialist books get dressed up as "trade books," but don't sell accordingly.
― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 20 January 2003 19:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 20 January 2003 19:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I can't remember if we used "trangressive" or not but I'm guessing yes: there were a good half-dozen words specifically for queer-theory books, including a special bonus for "multiplicity" and "desire" used in same sentence.
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:11 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:24 (twenty-three years ago)
― g (graysonlane), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:51 (twenty-three years ago)
"in this essay i attempt to show exactly what the director mouths off abt endlessly in the promo material"
half of the entries in "the best 100 movies of all time" progs on channel 4 feature some nitwit pointing out the WORLD'S MOST OBVIOUS METAPHOR: as often as not the nitwit is actually the director or screewriter
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 20 January 2003 21:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 20 January 2003 21:03 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 20 January 2003 21:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 20 January 2003 21:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 20 January 2003 21:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 20 January 2003 22:17 (twenty-three years ago)
― Paranoid Spice (kate), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:20 (twenty years ago)
― officewally, Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:22 (twenty years ago)
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:22 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:26 (twenty years ago)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:29 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:30 (twenty years ago)
"going forward""risk manage""value add"
― moley, Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:33 (twenty years ago)
"Sarbanes-Oxley"
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:41 (twenty years ago)
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:42 (twenty years ago)
― beanz (beanz), Thursday, 20 October 2005 11:22 (twenty years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Thursday, 20 October 2005 11:26 (twenty years ago)
Also: "actionable analytics" WTF?
― quincie, Thursday, 20 October 2005 12:22 (twenty years ago)
― barbarian cities (jaybob3005), Thursday, 20 October 2005 12:28 (twenty years ago)
"THe image is over-optimized."
Meaning, rather counterintuitively, that it looks like crap.
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 23 March 2006 22:22 (twenty years ago)
A major British government department brings you "ground-truth" (verb). As in "We need to ground-truth this proposition". I.e. find out whether it's true in practice.
― ljubljana, Thursday, 12 February 2009 06:36 (seventeen years ago)
The constant use of "in terms of" or "with respect to." As in, "We have problems in terms of human resources." Why not say, "We have problems with human resources"?
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 12 February 2009 13:38 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, or to be coy and cowardly you can leave it trailing: 'So, er, in terms of your leaving date...'
― ljubljana, Thursday, 12 February 2009 21:02 (seventeen years ago)
I dunno, what if your company had forced labor chained in the basement? That would be a problem in terms of human resources, but a non-problem in terms of labor costs. Obviously one needs to be clear about such things.
― nabisco, Thursday, 12 February 2009 21:07 (seventeen years ago)
I mean, "we have a problem with slavery" just makes you look bad
Indeed - it's the use of the phrase when there are no such subtleties involved that is so bloody annoying. It implies the speaker can see subtleties there that you can't.
― ljubljana, Thursday, 12 February 2009 21:10 (seventeen years ago)
I hate jargon meant to replace perfectly good ACTUAL words. E.g.:
Most annoying client I have to deal with: the one who phones up to ask: "Have you actioned the changes I requested?" ACTION IS NOT AVERB, DAMMIT.
BUT ENACT IS!
How about "verify" or "test"?
My job really does not lend itself to jargon, but my favorite is "LP situation," which means "missing person" (usually a kid running around who we find within 5 minutes).
― Maria, Thursday, 12 February 2009 21:27 (seventeen years ago)
Currently in vogue:kilt v. to make cosmetic changes to documents prepared by English lawyers, so that they conform to Scots law. (e.g. "Links asked us to kilt Project Biscuits" "I kilted a couple of docs and billed 10 grand haw haw haw").
Also used often:cold towel adj. descriptive of a read-through of a large document, implying, well, I haven't a clue actually.
Hate hate hate:ping v. to send, esp by email.
― calumerio, Friday, 13 February 2009 14:37 (seventeen years ago)
"blue-sky thinking" and "catch-up" can both fuck off
(even though "catch-up" really isn't that bad, its ubiquity drives me up the cocking wall)
― N1ck (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 10:22 (seventeen years ago)
work harder then
LOL
(jk)
― Ant Attack.. (Ste), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 10:23 (seventeen years ago)
Heads up = telling you
I got this in an email the other day and had to ask the guy what he meant
― Sacco, Vanzetti, Passantino... (Tom D.), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 10:24 (seventeen years ago)
"fancy going downstairs for a coffee and a quick catch-up?"
no, you poncy winka, no i duzzn't.
― N1ck (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 10:33 (seventeen years ago)
something that's doing the rounds in our company
"sanity check"
HS
― Ant Attack.. (Ste), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 10:37 (seventeen years ago)
Everyone loves a Blue Sky Session!
― Blancmange Is Playing At My House (King Boy Pato), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 10:52 (seventeen years ago)
Or a Big Ideas Shower!
we have a nice one here, in a different vein from the above, more specific to us - ghostbusters. the broken image link is a red circle with a cross through it like the one on the ghostbusters logo (and english traffic signs etc) so if no images are appearing then it's ghostbusters.
― koogs, Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:08 (seventeen years ago)
That's a lot better than having to put up with people who turn nouns like 'feedback' into verbs.
― suggest bánh mi (suzy), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:16 (seventeen years ago)
You mean Americans? *ducks*
― Sacco, Vanzetti, Passantino... (Tom D.), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:17 (seventeen years ago)
No, it's definitely happening over here! Reading above, Americans hate this guff as much as anyone.
― suggest bánh mi (suzy), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:19 (seventeen years ago)
I don't work in an office, but we do have jargon.
KB's = knockbacks = items that we don't want from a collection being bought inSnip it & flip it = close the shop (said at the end of the day, meaning to snip the lock and flip the sign)Queue jumper = a small task with a specially high priority to be done suddenly in the midst of another longer job
― krakow, Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:29 (seventeen years ago)
quite like "queue jumper" actually, although i imagine it could evoke stabby urges if heard too often.
― N1ck (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:38 (seventeen years ago)
The latest one round here is "sense-check", which means "look at"
― NotEnough, Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:49 (seventeen years ago)
Yikes!
― Sacco, Vanzetti, Passantino... (Tom D.), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:51 (seventeen years ago)
yeah i think sense check is the same meaning as our sanity check
― Ant Attack.. (Ste), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 11:54 (seventeen years ago)
"Users were having trouble grasping how the new application would fit in with their day to day working so we came up with the term 'fairy dust' to refer to little bits of information we can sprinkle the help packs with to help them understand this".
― last night i dreamt somebody shoved me (ledge), Wednesday, 8 July 2009 09:55 (sixteen years ago)
"Accountable talk"--that's all we hear at staff meetings these days. That, and "collaborative inquiry." (Or "enquiry." Not sure which.) It's been that way for the past year. I have only the vaguest sense of what they mean. I've been teaching grade school for 15 years, and students have always been talking, and I've always been talking back to them, back and forth we go, but now the talk is supposed to be accountable. People get paid more than I do to come up with this nonsense.
― clemenza, Friday, 7 November 2014 02:18 (eleven years ago)
"Solutioning." OMG.
― Falconetti Pot (Leee), Tuesday, 16 June 2015 21:54 (eleven years ago)
yeah that one hit me like a brick when i first heard it too (told on a call that "this meeting is not for solutioning" no less!)
― got bent (mild cheezed off vibes) (s.clover), Tuesday, 16 June 2015 22:07 (eleven years ago)
Went to a meeting w/ upper mgmt and the union today.
"We will table this because x isn't here""This is a conversation that should be offline" x1,000,000
― naus, Friday, 21 July 2017 07:27 (eight years ago)
No "let's put that in the parking lot?"
― El Tomboto, Friday, 21 July 2017 12:39 (eight years ago)
at least you got some face time with them.
― Grandpont Genie, Friday, 21 July 2017 13:11 (eight years ago)
my favorite is 'sunsetting' a project or organization. sunsetting
― global tetrahedron, Friday, 21 July 2017 14:16 (eight years ago)
i've heard some really interesting uses of "double-click" recently
― call all destroyer, Friday, 21 July 2017 14:17 (eight years ago)
^ do tell
also 'circle back'
― global tetrahedron, Friday, 21 July 2017 14:26 (eight years ago)
sacking people = re-profiling now, apparently
― Shat Parp (dog latin), Friday, 21 July 2017 14:27 (eight years ago)
double-click has become a shorthand for getting into more detail on a topic
― call all destroyer, Friday, 21 July 2017 15:04 (eight years ago)