Magic: The Gathering C/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (10014 of them)

what do you guys think of the guildmages after a bit of play? I had two of the orz and she was prob worse than a syndic of tithes in most situations.

iatee, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:34 (eleven years ago) link

red ones are good, simic is okay but really needs the full-on evolve deck to be great, black ones are slooow but reasonable wincons if you stall out the game fully

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:49 (eleven years ago) link

skarrg guildmage is probably my favorite of the entire cycle of 10, i've been trying to play it in standard even

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:51 (eleven years ago) link

"at the very least im quite certain boros isnt as strong as selesnya was in RTR" <----- I agree with this, Selesnya was a format-defining guild because it just had so many good commons AND a large share of the best uncommons. Plus it could play fast or slow grindy games equally well, while Boros doesn't seem to have much of a shot should your opponent still be at 20 after turn 5.

frogbs, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:52 (eleven years ago) link

when they talked about having a slow and fast strategy for each guild, selesnya is the only one of the 10 where both the slow and fast are fully fleshed out, deep in cards, and complementary to each other. dimir is actually the 2nd closest i think! but is missing the complementary bit which is a killer.

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:54 (eleven years ago) link

as for the guildmages I think they're worse this time around - Selesnya and Rakos mages could just take over a game and both Azorius and Golgari's were a nightmare late in the game. they all strike me as good, not great, and I can't figure out which is the best one other than that it's definitely not Dimir. Skaarg's second ability seems to come into play a lot since 4/4's are pretty tough to deal with. the Boros one is okay but it's slow and I think I'd rather have the Paladin that looks like a guildmage over it. Orzhov one strikes me as alright - the second ability is very nice but it fits in with what the guild pretty much does on its own anyway; it's a nice piece to have but not a necessity. With 9 mana it's a killer (since you can activate the second ability twice) but I think what you're saying is correct, you would rather have a Syndic (which is a first-pick common anyway, IMO). Simic's is awesome but takes a LOT of time to get going - very cool and fun design though.

frogbs, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:57 (eleven years ago) link

cider I think Azorius kinda fits too - the "fast strategy" is to just overload with flyers and detain the big ground dudes, while the long game was mostly throwing down bigger flyers. that guild played better than it looked.

frogbs, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:59 (eleven years ago) link

i didn't really feel like there was a distinct slow strategy for azorius, i guess fast was playing all the wind drakes and slow was playing armory guards and doorkeepers and trying to chip shot them out with a skywatch or something? it didn't feel different enough to me.

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:02 (eleven years ago) link

orz just doesn't have the free mana to be pumping into it, the opportunity cost is higher xp

iatee, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:02 (eleven years ago) link

azorius had the heavy-on-detain deck and the flyers+blockers route...but the speed ultimately just seemed related to how many flyers I had

iatee, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:05 (eleven years ago) link

as far as the block goes, my favorite guild I think

iatee, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:07 (eleven years ago) link

also having a way to deal with Towering Indrik and Tresle Troll was pretty key

frogbs, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:07 (eleven years ago) link

i'm starting to get a better feel for limited in this set and i feel like the big difference is that boros is simply able to apply early pressure more consistently with worse cards than any of the other guilds. both gruul and simic can be way more explosive and have better creatures, they're just simply a little slower and little harder to curve into. boros also some of the better rares in the set and that seems to give it an edge in sealed but my xp has been that i just need to keep my curve low, resist the urge to splash and i can run over much better decks. i beat a guy w/ a really strong simic deck last night with a boros deck playing no rares but sacred foundry on the strength of a double mugging hand on the draw.

i also feel like a lot of people are losing w/their boros decks because they don't trade enough on the draw and then put themselves in situations where they can't profitably attack either

kill yuppies (Lamp), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:24 (eleven years ago) link

kinda hoping dragons maze doesn't have fast w/r cards, otherwise a boros + splatter/chainwalker/etc. deck might be even more too-good-boring

iatee, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:29 (eleven years ago) link

like cutting red hard seems obv w/ the combined sets, cause even if you end up in gruul you now have shored up gruul's current slow start w/ rakdos dudez

iatee, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:31 (eleven years ago) link

also is populate even gonna be viable? I mean it'd have to appear in dm almost at the same rate as it does in rtr, no?

iatee, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:44 (eleven years ago) link

dragon's maze is going to slow the format way the fuck down just by virtue of not getting 3 packs of the same color combos. unless something weird/unexpected happens, i'd expect 3-color decks to become the default, so you'll end up with 2 RTR guilds and 1 gatecrash guild, or vice versa

as for populate all you really need is 1 or 2 common token-makers in DGM and it should be fine. gatecrash is a bit light on tokens but there's at least Knight Watch which is an obvious plant for full block in addition to being a battalion-enabler (very clever)

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:58 (eleven years ago) link

Populate an army of frog lizards

Moodles, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:03 (eleven years ago) link

i cant wait for the ogre slumlord + pack rat combo

kill yuppies (Lamp), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:05 (eleven years ago) link

also if that's really what the format is supposed to look like then it actually makes sense to run back some of the fan-favorite removals from old ravnica block (lightning helix, putrefy, mortify, etc) since they promote splashing and help combat fast starts better than the existing removal in the block. i don't know if they'd actually put lightning helix and boros charm in the same standard format though, that seems kind of insane, but whenever someone asks 'why isn't card X from old ravnica reprinted' the wotc people always give a 'the block isn't over yet...' answer.

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:06 (eleven years ago) link

I noticed that on Rosewater's blog too! They tend to go a little nuts on the 3rd sets sometimes (see also Apocalypse and Future Sight) and I would expect this to be no different.

My feeling now is that full set drafts pretty much will force you into three colors. Boros/Rakdos may become a thing but you're still in three colors and therefore your deck should stumble a bit out of the gate. I guess it remains to be seen. U/G/R with Frostburn Weirds, Lobber Crews, and Evolve seems pretty damn tight.

frogbs, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:24 (eleven years ago) link

yeah izzet w/ evolve and gatecrash's tempo stuff, gruul charm could be effective

iatee, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:28 (eleven years ago) link

plus bloodrushing for your teleportal/bluster turn

hmm I look forward 2 this deck

iatee, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:28 (eleven years ago) link

5th dawn and alara reborn are some more examples of nutty 3rd sets. saviors of kamigawa too, but that was in a bad way (hey, let's make the 3rd set mechanic reward you for not actually playing your cards! cool idea)

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:36 (eleven years ago) link

i'm already anticipating the full set draft to be amazing. kinda strange how 6 out of the last 7 draft formats have all been single-set (M12, INN, AVR, M13, RTR, GTC)

frogbs, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:46 (eleven years ago) link

also if you play MTGO it's a good reason to pick up some cheap RTR packs since they're pretty low right now

I actually cashed in a bunch of junk for Gatecrash packs, they were selling at 3.19 last I saw

frogbs, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:47 (eleven years ago) link

the new redemption policy is going to suppress gatecrash prices a bit, probably still worth it at under 3.3 though

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:58 (eleven years ago) link

new redemption policy?

kill yuppies (Lamp), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:59 (eleven years ago) link

its $25 handling costs to redeem a set now instead of $5

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 19:00 (eleven years ago) link

which means fewer sets redeemed which means slight bump upwards in paper prices and downwards in MTGO prices

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 19:02 (eleven years ago) link

i dont think it'll make a dent in paper prices but it definitely drives MTGO prices down 10% or so. so packs are cheaper but the cards you open sell for less and ultimately the 2 tix/draft fee is the same. so it's a net negative

frogbs, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 19:08 (eleven years ago) link

ok right - we even discussed this upthread

they always charged an additional $30 for sets redemption if you live in canada so i've never actually bothered to redeem anything

kill yuppies (Lamp), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 19:22 (eleven years ago) link

the $30 is per order. my friend who plays a lot of MTGO just accumulates sets and redeems them all in one fell swoop. i shipped him my digital DKA cards and he included the set in his order. should be getting from him p soon 8-)

cocktail onion (fennel cartwright), Thursday, 14 February 2013 08:29 (eleven years ago) link

yo cider is this your naya deck here? think you made the big time B-)

http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/pr/234

cocktail onion (fennel cartwright), Thursday, 14 February 2013 08:40 (eleven years ago) link

Good job dude!

Moodles, Thursday, 14 February 2013 13:14 (eleven years ago) link

yep that's me

credit for the deck goes to the guys from goodgamery forums though, i just tweaked a few cards and ran with it

ciderpress, Thursday, 14 February 2013 14:30 (eleven years ago) link

lol I didn't know that Emmissary was human, that's nuts

frogbs, Thursday, 14 February 2013 14:41 (eleven years ago) link

my picks for the fantasy pro tour facebook app thing:

Planeswalker: Domri Rade (might change to Jace Memory Adept at last minute)
Large Creature: Thragtusk
Medium Creature: Restoration Angel
Small Creature: Snapcaster Mage
Instant: Azorius Charm
Sorcery: Pillar of Flame
Enchantment: Blind Obedience
Artifact: Rakdos Keyrune (no clue on this one really, they're all bad)
Nonbasic Land: Sacred Foundry
Gatecrash card: Sacred Foundry

ciderpress, Thursday, 14 February 2013 18:59 (eleven years ago) link

i basically just took w/e cards overlapped the most with jund and naya decks:

Planeswalker: Garruk Relentless
Large Creature: Thragtusk
Medium Creature: Huntmaster of the Fells
Small Creature: Avacyn's Pilgrim
Instant: Searing Spear
Sorcery: Pillar of Flame
Enchantment: Detention Sphere
Artifact: Grafdigger's Cage
Nonbasic Land: Stomping Ground
Gatecrash card: Stomping Ground

kill yuppies (Lamp), Thursday, 14 February 2013 20:17 (eleven years ago) link

relentless is kind of a hedge against some potential bug/rouge strategies over domri/big garruk. detention sphere is probably wrong - i had forgotten about blind obedience/thought it was bad but its just playable in more decks than d-sphere is and thus probably a better card. i suppose that makes rancor a better choice as well but i did want to hedge away from only green-based creature strategies. i think cage is a better choice than keyrunes for the same reason. i may be underestimating the # of blue decks but i think azorious charm is a really bad choice - probably worse than boros charm and maybe sel charm?

kill yuppies (Lamp), Thursday, 14 February 2013 20:24 (eleven years ago) link

i've played garruk relentless in a lot of decks both in this format and the last one and he's always kind of sucked. i don't really understand it since he's got everything you want on a planeswalker

azorius charm is a 4-of in both the control decks and the tempo decks, and i'm expecting the latter (UWR specifically) to be the go-to deck for a lot of PT level players.

ciderpress, Thursday, 14 February 2013 21:07 (eleven years ago) link

I didnt know extort triggered off Ciphered copies of spells. So the 1/2 bat is actually quite good in Dimir.

frogbs, Friday, 15 February 2013 15:02 (eleven years ago) link

the 1/2 bat is quite good in any black deck! i really like him in dimir though, cuz he also serves as a good man to evade through cipher spells if you're lacking a good rogue.

cocktail onion (fennel cartwright), Friday, 15 February 2013 19:10 (eleven years ago) link

it's good that that card and the Syndic are both good in the other guild too b/c when Orzhov totally loads up on cheap extort guys it really, really blows (for the opponent)

frogbs, Friday, 15 February 2013 19:42 (eleven years ago) link

pitchfork is dumb (#34985859340293849494 in a series.)

kill yuppies (Lamp), Friday, 15 February 2013 22:07 (eleven years ago) link

^^ misplaced post all-star

kill yuppies (Lamp), Friday, 15 February 2013 22:08 (eleven years ago) link

kill screen falls under the "pitchfork is dumb" umbrella right? cuz among their all-star lineup of steaming turds they put out this questionable magic the gathering piece

http://killscreendaily.com/articles/its-your-move/

cocktail onion (fennel cartwright), Saturday, 16 February 2013 00:37 (eleven years ago) link

Boros Reckoner up to 25, holy shit

frogbs, Saturday, 16 February 2013 15:19 (eleven years ago) link

I played my Jund deck for the first time at my LGS last night and ended up going 2-2. Saw lots of variants on Boros decks. Boros Reckoner wasn't a very big deal for me, but Boros Charm was a real pain. Also, and I got vexed by Vexing Devils. I'm finding that I need more answers to fast red-heavy decks with lots of burn.

The biggest challenge I had was with my mana base. For starters, I need to be more willing to mulligan. But I've decided that I'm also running too many Rootbound Crags and Woodland Cemeteries, when I'm trying to play cards like Arbor Elf and Flinthoof Boar who need actual Forests and Mountains. So I pared those back in exchange for another Blood Crypt and more basics.

Here's the updated deck:
2 Deathrite Shaman
3 Arbor Elf
2 Experiment One
3 Flinthoof Boar
4 Strangleroot Geist
4 Dreg Mangler
2 Ghor-Clan Rampager
2 Deadbridge Goliath
2 Desecration Demon
1 Wrecking Ogre

2 Vraska The Unseen
1 Domri Rade

2 Searing Spear
4 Dreadbore
3 Rancor

4 Overgrown Tomb
2 Woodland Cemetary
4 Blood Crypt
2 Rootbound Crag
2 Stomping Ground
7 Forest
1 Mountain
1 Swamp

Sideboard:
1 Abrupt Decay
1 Ultimate Price
1 Rancor
2 Golgari Charm
1 Gruul Charm
1 Rakdos Charm
1 Tragic Slip
2 Pit Fight
2 Ulvenwald Tracker
2 Skullcrack
1 Arbor Elf

Here's a few changes I'm considering:
Sideboard Deathrite Shaman and replace with 2 more Experiment Ones.
Sideboard a couple Dreadbore for Tragic Slip and Abrupt Decay.
Scavenge was a non-factor and Desecration Demon was surprisingly strong, so I'm considering dropping Deadbridge Goliath completely and going 4-of with the Demon.
I'll eventually add more Stomping Grounds if I can get a couple more copies.

I'd love to get some constructive feedback on this. What are your thoughts? I'm open to making changes although I'm a bit restricted in terms of money, so Thundermaw Hellkite will have to stay out.

Moodles, Saturday, 16 February 2013 17:07 (eleven years ago) link

you know, Corpsejack Menace might be pretty neat in that deck

frogbs, Saturday, 16 February 2013 17:29 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.