― naked as sin (naked as sin), Thursday, 23 January 2003 01:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― naked as sin (naked as sin), Thursday, 23 January 2003 01:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― isadora (isadora), Thursday, 23 January 2003 02:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― jot eff pe, Thursday, 23 January 2003 02:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 23 January 2003 03:02 (twenty-three years ago)
― naked as sin (naked as sin), Thursday, 23 January 2003 03:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 23 January 2003 03:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan I., Thursday, 23 January 2003 07:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 23 January 2003 10:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 23 January 2003 13:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― Simeon (Simeon), Thursday, 23 January 2003 14:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Friday, 24 January 2003 04:54 (twenty-three years ago)
― naked as sin (naked as sin), Saturday, 25 January 2003 00:44 (twenty-three years ago)
the nu tv version of this was pimp.
― special guest stars mark bronson, Monday, 5 January 2009 00:19 (seventeen years ago)
Sending Subscription Emails...
i cant wait for some email. tell me more about this nu-tv version dude
― Lamp, Monday, 5 January 2009 00:25 (seventeen years ago)
- it starred rupert penry-jones from the incomparable 'spooks'- it cut out all of the novel's anti-semitism- made it directly about the assassination of franz ferdinand and start of ww1- NOT THE BAND LOL- he hooks up with this sufragette chick- to state the bleedin obvious, the hitchcock version is ridiculously studio-bound- this one wasn't- it was just self-parodic enough
― special guest stars mark bronson, Monday, 5 January 2009 00:28 (seventeen years ago)
watching now!!
― cozwn, Monday, 5 January 2009 01:43 (seventeen years ago)
Only movie to have a music hall sequence to rival it is Quai des Orfèvres. Well, whatever the French equivalent of music hall is.
― ilx chilton (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 5 January 2009 01:47 (seventeen years ago)
the book's a ripping yarn, what
― diafiyhm (darraghmac), Friday, 27 April 2012 16:23 (fourteen years ago)
I started it and got grossed out by something...anti-semitism maybe?
― how did I get here? why am I in the whiskey aisle? this is all so (Laurel), Friday, 27 April 2012 16:24 (fourteen years ago)
quite likely that, i'd say, tho tbh i went through it quickly enough that i can't really remember was it mainly in the view of the guy who started it all, our hero or the author. It's another discussion as to whether you can enjoy a novel that expresses the kind of views you'd find repugnant in eg an interview with the author (one i'm sure ilx has had a dozen times i'll bet)
I take it the movie's ilx recommended? Finished high in the decades film poll iirc
― diafiyhm (darraghmac), Friday, 27 April 2012 16:29 (fourteen years ago)
I watched the film when it was on over Christmas, it is a terrific adaptation of the book, very faithful.UNTIL 15mins from the end,
it really isn't.
it's good, but it's not even particularly recognisable in plot from the book.
― pet tommy & the barkhaters (darraghmac), Monday, 14 May 2012 00:48 (fourteen years ago)
a perfect movie
― flappy bird, Thursday, 31 August 2017 05:55 (eight years ago)