Citizenship Query...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
At this point, with the behavior of the American government, I find myself thinking more and more seriously about seeking citizenship elsewhere. Canada would be the most obvious and easiest choice (just have to marry my S/O who has dual citizenship). But it appears that the Canadian government is standing with Blair on the Iraq issue and I am not so sure that leaving one country because of its stance on an issue and moving to another country with the same stance would make much sense. I've a best friend advocating for Iceland (he likes the literacy rate, music, climate, etc.) but I don't feel comfortable with the Whaling issues of that country.

So my question(s) is(are) this:

1. If you were to change your citizenship, which country would you choose and based on what factors?

2. And, if you don't mind, what country are you currently a citizen of/living in and what might cause you to leave that country?

LCD (Ms Laura), Friday, 24 January 2003 00:04 (twenty-three years ago)

1. I don't see why I would have to go to the trouble of changing my citizenship, there are plenty of countries that have unrestricted immigration policies where I could go, and most of the ones I'd really like to move to have such restricted immigration policies (Japan, etc.) that it's not worth the bother.

2. USA. Widespread persecution of people based on race, color, or creed would probably do it, but even then the Constitution informs me that in such a case it would be my duty as a citizen to overthrow the government, not become a refugee.

Millar (Millar), Friday, 24 January 2003 00:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Are you really serious? If I were in that position I would very seriously rethink whether it's at all logistically or morally defensible for people to try and select their nationalities based on the administrations of the nations they're choosing among, particularly when those nations are ostensibly democracies. I might also mentally compare the significance of a distasteful stance on whaling with the policies adopted by the nations in which the vast majority of the billions of people on Earth currently reside.

Note: I am neither anti-cosmopolitan nor anti-whale. Thus, in answer to your questions:

(1) I am not thusly inclined at the moment and (2) USA / finding some nation I'd rather be a part of, presumably for reasons a bit more concrete and based in deep experience than membership in whaling pacts, and hopefully motivated less by the comforts and perks of said citizenship than with some actual sense of connection with the nation and culture itself.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 24 January 2003 00:18 (twenty-three years ago)

Nabisco comes through with the harshness!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 24 January 2003 00:31 (twenty-three years ago)

I realize, in re-reading my original post, that I came across as being quite shallow about making such a decision. For clarification: I have thought, for many years, about leaving the U.S., not just because of political reasons/discomfort about the consumption-culture/ the "we are superior attitude of many fellow citizens, but because I feel that my particular skill-set and interests would be best used elsewhere. I am approaching a point in my professional and personal lives where it would be easiest/ most logical to move, if I am going to do so. I feel increasingly alienated from the U.S., in governing stance, environmental issues, health-care issues, and so forth. There are several countries to which I do feel a connection to the people and the culture, where I am not concerned with language issues, and where I think I would be able to create a home.

I am torn about a decision to leave. I can certainly understand an argument to the effect that it would be best to stay and work to correct the problems that I see in this country. And I do see where it could be perceived as being "morally [in]defensible" to abandon a country that has given me so much to seek refuge elsewhere, instead of remaining in the country and paying my dues for my education/ up-bringing, etc., and fighting to change the country toward what I see as being a better path. I am also torn about the idea of renouncing my citizenship to the U.S. in favor of citizenship in another country (provided that another country would allow me citizenship, but not dual-citizenship).

But I am also uncertain if I am currently capable of committing to such a decision and making any sort of a valuable contribution to such a movement.

I guess what I was looking for (and in retrospect obviously missed conveying), with the original post, was input on different countries, different cultures - ideas about what it's like to move to a new country - what are the challenges, rewards, and so forth. And, instead of going with basic stereotypes about cultures/beliefs and so forth, was hoping for more individual insight into the different cultures (something that I have seen in other threads on these boards).

And in regards to the whaling-issue - I see such a stand as being representative of the culture's attitude toward environmental conservation. I realize that this may not be an accurate representaion of the culture, but might rather be the one "environmentally-unfriendly" (my perception of the decision) decision that the government has made in recent years, and that therefore I might feel more comfortable/in-tune with the Icelandic environmental culture movement than I originally have presumed. I was hoping that posts in this thread would correct such a mis-understanding, if I have made one, and give me more/greater insight into some of the different cultures represented by the ILX community.

Here's hoping that I have clarified (and not additionally muddied) things a bit. I did not mean to offend with the inquiry.

LCD (Ms Laura), Friday, 24 January 2003 00:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Don't let Dan sway you, Laura, I really wasn't trying to be harsh. Only somewhat. There's still something about the whole proposition that rubs me the wrong way, but I certainly don't mean to browbeat you for it or anything: I think it's some pang of resentment at the idea that an American citizen, of all people, should think "I don't like this country and want to go anywhere else" -- not because this country is so wonderful, but because Americans are some of the last people on Earth with a legitimate claim for refuge. I realize completely that this is not at all your problem, but it does set off some sort of entitlement sensor with me to hear you wanting to go not to any particular place but just anywhere, anywhere that offers you more perks or better government than what you have here; this is an option that 99% of people on the planet do not have and in much more miserable conditions than yours don't even want, so something in me gets (completely unfairly) moralistic about the idea of treating citizenship as some sort of consumer product, something where those with the most resources can shop around and pick out the most attractive values and seize them.

That said, I'll repeat again that I understand the condition of the world is not your problem, and I hope you'll eventually enjoy living wherever it is you decide you'd like to live.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 24 January 2003 02:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Also re: Iceland you'll find that they are extremely eco-friendly, largely as a result of having basically no population and no heavy industry and living on a relatively small island that they can't exactly afford to mess with too much: the whaling thing is a hand-me-down insofar as whaling is not only a significant industry for them but has traditionally been a run-of-the-mill activity. (What else are you gonna do up there?)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 24 January 2003 02:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Inbreed like mad because you live in a country that has one of the most homogenized gene pools in the entire world (Genomists LOVE Iceland)?

Millar (Millar), Friday, 24 January 2003 02:42 (twenty-three years ago)

I like the United States very much but I'm suddenly having a desperate urge to move to Iceland. I think it's because of that story my dad told me about how they refused to move some boulder to build a highway because fairies lived in it. And "no population," "eco-friendly," and "island" all sound nice.

Maria (Maria), Friday, 24 January 2003 03:16 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't see why I would have to go to the trouble of changing my citizenship, there are plenty of countries that have unrestricted immigration policies where I could go

really, which are those? i mean the good ones, i'm sure sierra leone would welcome me with open arms, but ...

I like the United States very much but I'm suddenly having a desperate urge to move to Iceland

best of luck to you. iceland has restrictive immigration policies, otherwise i'm sure there'd be a lot more powerbook-toting refugees crawling the streets of rejkjavik.

fields of salmon (fieldsofsalmon), Friday, 24 January 2003 03:24 (twenty-three years ago)

well i could at least go visit

Maria (Maria), Friday, 24 January 2003 03:31 (twenty-three years ago)

I can't imagine anything happening that would really urge me to change my citizenship except for things that're unreasonably unlikely. I'd live in other countries, sure, but at least in the US I understand the process of how to fix things when they go wrong.

As an aside, though, from what I understand via a Canadian-born friend who moved here because of this -- getting Canadian citizenship isn't easy even if you marry a Canadian. There's still a lengthy residency requirement (three or four years, I think, after becoming a permanent resident), etc. etc.

Oddly, I've been around conversations where that's come up a lot -- this is nothing to do with Laura, now, the reasons are all different, but I'd run out of fingers counting the friends who've threatened to move to Canada and begun the process of doing so, because of American policies ... but have argued that moving to a different -state- for similar reasons (educational policy, etc.) is too much of a hassle.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 24 January 2003 03:40 (twenty-three years ago)

I thought it was Norway that was pro-whaling not Iceland. I think that Iceland just wants control over its fishing grounds.

Amarga (Amarga), Friday, 24 January 2003 04:31 (twenty-three years ago)

nabisco - actually, I was composing my reply to your post while Dan posted - didn't see his comments until after I hit that little "Submit" button and received the message about the additional posts...shoot, now I can't recall the wording. (I'll attribute the brain fog to the latenesss of the hour and the fact that I've just spent an hour wathing my hamster and tortoise interact - well, the hamster sat on the tortoise's back and bathed while she [the tortoise, that is] wandered around her habitat and sunned herself under her heat-lamp while baskin on her heat rock - it was really entrancing - maybe I need to set-up some sort of web-cam.)

Anyway, I wasn't offended by your comments - the points you've raised are quite appropriate and valid - and by making me think harder they've given me some new mental avenues to explore - and that's a good thing. I actually agree with your comments about your "entitlement sensor" going off when the topic is raised. And that, compared to many others who are in actual dire straits, Americans shouldn't need to seek refuge elsewhere. Your comment about citizenship being treated as a "consumer project" has struck a chord - after all, one of my motivations for desiring to leave is disgust at the blatant consumerism I see around me (not that it isn't prevelant in other countries, of course). Perhaps I have been more deeply influenced by that tradition of being able to purchase/own anything that I want more deeply than I had realized - I need to think that point through in more depth.

Thanks for the caveat (spelling?) that the condition of the world is not my problem - but I actually feel like I should argue that point - about how we're all responsible for the situations in the world and that we all are obligated to do what we can to improve life for our fellow inhabitants. And then, I can turn around and become slightly apathetic and say "Look, I've paid my dues, so far as I can see, and now I want to go find a quiet corner of the world where I can spend my days reading, hiking in the mountains, fishing in clean streams..." - basically that whole romantic notion of returning to nature and so forth. My S/O is fond of telling me that I am a born hedonist with a learned strong social conscience, so I am constantly conflicted between what I *want* to do and what I believe I *should* do. One would think that I'd have found that balance by now, but it is still elusive. Half the time I think I should give away everything, move to India, and work with the argiultural education programs. And the other half of the time I think that I should just go some place where I am not bothered by the needs of the world. So how and where is that balance found? Or do I just need to pick one end of the spectrum and throw myself in that direction and see where I fall? (Er, I think that those might well be rhetorical questions, now that I re-read them.)
I am still interested in hearing about other countries where people might think they'd feel at home - kind of going with that whole "world village" concept. Ta - LCD

LCD (Ms Laura), Friday, 24 January 2003 04:57 (twenty-three years ago)

I lived in Iceland for a couple of years! It's great! They have a KFC!

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 24 January 2003 04:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Tep - I've two relatives who went "over the border" to Canada to avoid the Vietnam draft - they've both become citizens, settled down, and are functioning and contributing members of the country. Perhaps that is some of the allure for me - some place where it is relatively easy to assimilate (at least in Western Canada - I'm thinking Vancouver) - and where culturally some things are familiar and others are not.

It's interesting that you mentioned your friends being unwilling to contemplate moving to another state to remove themselves from being under a policy that they view as being unacceptable. I actually think that may be part of my whole attitude problem. I was born and raised in Northern California - nice, liberal, eco-friendly, community-oriented, emphasis on education, culture, etc. And now I find myself, for the present at least (due to S/O being stuck in a job that will end-up with a great mark on the resume, but temporarily has us stuck in the bookdocks), feeling isolated in what I view as being an overtly conservative, segregated, heavily religious community. Yes, those words harsh, but I do feel isolated here - I've heard it said that Florida has pockets of intelligence along the coastlines and in certain in-land areas, but that most of the state is still, well, living at some point in the past (an exaggeration/generalization, of course). Perhaps if I were some place else in the U.S., where I was around more people who share at least some of my views and interests, I might feel differently about desiring to leave the country.

Out of curiosity - you said that you'd consider living outside of the U.S. Where do you think you'd go and why?

LCD (Ms Laura), Friday, 24 January 2003 05:07 (twenty-three years ago)

I can definitely relate to not liking where you live in this country -- I've had that problem, to varying extents, in the three places I've lived for any real length of time -- southern New Hampshire, western Mass, and now New Orleans (which I'll bet has a few things in common with Florida, at least in terms of ways-its-different-from-CA). Completely different problems in each place, but of course after awhile those problems become focal. It can be amazingly refreshing to shed those problems in favor of new ones :)

As for where I'd live ... I've always thought Thailand. Or Iceland, yeah, and I don't know why. It just seems like a place that I could live for a bit. The girlfriend wants to live abroad in Europe for awhile, and I wouldn't be surprised if that happened. Greece or Italy, more than likely -- she's a classicist.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 24 January 2003 05:20 (twenty-three years ago)

New Orleans, eh? At least you have a culture of music and decent food - I'll gladly trade with you (don't know how your girlfriend would feel about that, though).

Orlando really is an oddly horrid place to live - there is no sense of community here. The town is based on tourism and the theme parks and making money off of the snowbirds. There's a pocket of "education" around the two universities, and one small area (equivalent of about two blocks) of interesting bars/drag clubs/tiny art galleries.

But instead of bitching, I need to mention the good things - can't say much for the town, but I do like the wilderness of Florida - and the wildlife (can't get enough of the alligators, armadillos [one of my favorites], manatees [my other favorite], and sea turtles [my other, other favorite]). Also as a plus - the great "birding," especially during the winter and early spring. And, of course, there's the space program - being a rocket junkie here is like a chocoholic bathing in chocolate pudding all the day long.

Hmmm...that wasn't too much stretching - maybe I need to focus on the wild aspects of the state rather than the human end of things.

LCD (Ms Laura), Friday, 24 January 2003 05:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Bet you've got something in the way of public transportation, though :) New Orleans is incredibly lax about that (a few apartments ago, I was walking a mile and a half to Bus Stop 1 to take a bus to Bus Stop 2 to take a bus to campus -- which was six miles from my apartment). That laxness is pretty much the focus of my bitching -- from potholes to public education, it runs pretty deep.

But hey, Orlando -- you've got Epcot center. C'mon. It's EPCOT. Surely that's occasionally cool? :)

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 24 January 2003 05:37 (twenty-three years ago)

they refused to move some boulder to build a highway because fairies lived in it.

what a bunch of loonies. . .no offense to bjork.


hmm, wherever I go I always I come home so I'd never change citizenship. Texas is branded on my soul. But I wouldn't mind sending some of our prodigal sons to go live in a boulder in Iceland.

That Girl (thatgirl), Friday, 24 January 2003 05:43 (twenty-three years ago)

*laughing* We have one bus service, and it's horrid. And apparently we're getting Light Rail at some point, but there's no money and polls show that most people wouldn't use it anyway. And, of course, Florida has no state income tax, so there's no money for education, roads, etc. UCF currently has 46K + students, and on-site parking for 12K - you should see the lines of cars that follow you when you walk across a parking lot - it's called "Vulturing" - and many use it as an excuse to come late to class.

Okay, I shall conceed that Epcot is occasionally cool - way overpriced, but good escapism (and, with the Florida Resident's Pass, we can afford to go all the time, so long as we don't buy any thing). Actually, I like to go (if I am going to go to a park, that is) to Animal Kingdom - they've some beautiful animals there, especially the bats and the Galapagos Tortoises (I want to bring the latter home with me). But then I feel bad about the whole captivity concept.

LCD (Ms Laura), Friday, 24 January 2003 05:44 (twenty-three years ago)

I thought that it was gnomes, not fairies. Or am I mis-taking one for the other? Maybe I should consult the Pressed Fairy book.

Actually, I remember reading an essay about the boulder - apparently it was a cultural thing, but I can't recall the issues.

LCD (Ms Laura), Friday, 24 January 2003 05:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm actually curious how difficult it is to relocate to the U.K. and Australia, for reasons which aren't similar to LCD's tho.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 24 January 2003 07:58 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd really like to relocate to the Antarctic. Is this actually possible?

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 24 January 2003 08:03 (twenty-three years ago)

1. I have had the right to become an Austrian citizen since August 2002, and I intend to do so eventually so that I will have the rights of citizenship in the country I will spend the rest of my life in.

2. I am a US citizen currently living in Germany. I resent paying taxes to the United States government, because as an ex-pat I do not enjoy most of the privileges that US citizenship brings and because a large protion of my tax money is used to fund the military-industrialist complex and disastrous domestic and foreign policies (I would not say this of state taxes if I were a resident of any state, as much more of that money goes to improve the life of my fellow citizens). I also find myself increasingly alienated from American culture. I would have taken Austrian citizenship already but for two interrelated factors: 1. in the current climate, renouncing my US citizenship would mark me as a suspicious person, and I don't care to be on any lists at Homeland Security, or to have to undergo interrogation every time I want to visit my parents, and 2. dual-citizenship seems to be a sort of "don't ask - don't tell" option that might not be available with the current government running the INS.

I also cannot deny a strong bond with my home town and my home state (I feel much more a Marylander than a US American), and losing my US citizenship would make me no longer a citizen of my old home, which is weird.

Nabisco: I think that the idea of people wanting to emigrate from America need not be tied up with the idea of fleeing America and needing refuge, and I think that we will see more of it in the near future. My life in Europe is better than it would be if I lived in the US.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 24 January 2003 10:02 (twenty-three years ago)

I just want to be an EC citizen. UK, US & AU are the real axis evil.

toraneko (toraneko), Friday, 24 January 2003 10:08 (twenty-three years ago)

The great thing about being a british subject is that I am also an EU citizen and can enjoy citizenship rights in any EU nation. I don't see myself being in London in 5 years time, where I'll go I don't know, the shape of the EU will be very different.

Ed (dali), Friday, 24 January 2003 10:53 (twenty-three years ago)

I love being British! I also get sent Italian voting cards, but with the EU that's not really relevant any more. Except if I wanted to apply for the Green Card lottery - this year, being British meant you weren't eligible, but having an Italian parent made me so.

I can only realistically imagine permanently moving country for love. I'd be quite prepared to do so, too, particularly if it meant moving to the States...

Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 24 January 2003 11:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Isabel and I have talked about moving to Greece but in a totally unrealistic way - that said I wouldn't mind living outside Britain for a while at least, probably in some EU country. Doubt it would be Greece though.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 24 January 2003 11:34 (twenty-three years ago)

(Sorry, jumping back for a second):

I guess, Laura, I sort of cling to this notion that there's something "deeper" and more meaningful about any given nation or culture than just, let's say, its political administration or standard of living at any given moment -- don't you think it's possible that if you traveled widely and observantly you'd feel most connected or at home in a place or culture for reasons having nothing at all to do with the mechanics of the nation, and everything to do with the spirit of the people or the land itself? Just as a random example: I can't tell you how many Americans I've met who went to Ethiopia during the 60s and 70s -- as missionaries, mostly -- and very happily sort of became Ethiopians, from the surface cultural level to those who actually made permanent residence there. Obviously there is no compelling governmental reason to do such a thing (unless they were fans of really bad Marxist dictatorships).

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 24 January 2003 17:46 (twenty-three years ago)

So I get this cart-before-horse feeling: like yeah, such-and-such nations might sound good to me and theory, and hopefully I'll visit them at some point, but I think I'd require a deep appreciation of what Finns or Swedes or New Zealanders are really like to try and actually change my citizenship, and I think that appreciation would be more of a concern than those nations' political trends.

Ha: I realize what I'm saying here is "don't you want to date the country before you marry it?" That's precisely it, the question originally struck me as saying something like "I've decided to get married, can you recommend any nice men to get married to," whereas I suppose I'm more comfortable with "I went to X nation for Y reason, spent Z amount of time there, and eventually decided it was my home."

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 24 January 2003 17:51 (twenty-three years ago)

*laughing* I like analogy of "dating" a country, Nabisco. Really creates interesting imagery. I actually found myself thinking about this topic whilst trying to get to sleep last night. More and more I came to the conclusion that maybe I am reacting in frustration to my current situation/location as opposed to being frustrated with the country. That does not, however, mean that I feel any differently about the current leadership of the U.S., the Iraq issue, the North Korea issue, the environment issue, the...you get the idea. Fill free to fill in any additional issues.

But, I also still feel a strong desire to leave the U.S. - maybe the concepts of "fleeing/being a refugee" is inappropriate, but I do not feel that there is anything wrong in my desire to leave the U.S. But I would not give-up my citizenship until I found a place/country where I felt a connection to the people and the land and where I was not ashamed to acknowledge my citizenship.

I was in Barcelona while the whole Branch-Davidians melee was ocurring. I become so frustated at being grilled about the government actions (this was just before and then during the end of the siege), that I was tempted to say I was Canadian, jsut so I wouldn't be grilled so harshly. I didn't like being seen as a representation of the government that made such decisions. Some people seemed to make the assumption (kind of like we Americans are famous for doing) that because I was from the U.S. that I embodied all of the stereotyped beliefs (and since I was living in California at the time, I was also asked why I dyed my hair brown and how many surfboards I owned) about the country. I had people lecture me about how I should be ashamed to show my face, etc. The same lectures occurred with the topics of the death penalty, the environment, the consumerism, the frustration of the stereotyped American culture spreading and destroying native cultures...(again, fill-in additional topics as desired).

My S/O has dual citizenship w/the U.S and Canada - he became an American citizen two years ago (and still hasn't told his family, out of fear of angering them, but that's a whole other can o' wroms). His primary reason for becoming an American? He wanted to be eligible for security clearance so her could work on some specific spacecraft and spacebourne instruments. He says he would have just as easily moved to Japan to work for the NASDA, Europe for the ESA, and so forth. But the U.S. was closest and he likes the warm weather in Florida. So he didn't come here for political reasons, but for opportunities. Is it morally permissable to change one's citizenship based on something that appears to be so superficial?

Anyway, after all of this hooplah, I wanted to let you know that I've been in touch with a close friend from Ghana and have pretty much decided that once my doc. clears me for travel that I'll be heading to Ghana to teach English and History for a couple of years. It should be an interesting adventure, to say the least.

LCD (Ms Laura), Friday, 24 January 2003 18:59 (twenty-three years ago)

If you have Canadian citizenship it can make it easier to come to the UK however at the moment has no scheme that allows you to come in and look for work, you either have to have guaranteed work (and the company has to prove that no european can do that job) or bring more than £1,000,000 into the country. There are other ways and I'm sure and it varies from EU country to country.

Ed (dali), Friday, 24 January 2003 19:12 (twenty-three years ago)

I emigrated to the Netherlands six years ago, and now have double British-Dutch nationality (which meant I could vote in last Wednesday's General Election hurrah!).

Though EU law gives every EU citizen the right to live and work in another member state in practise the Dutch authorities are very draconian in their interpretation (you must have regular 'legal' work and health insurance).

stevo (stevo), Friday, 24 January 2003 19:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Italy has several hoops you have to jump through as well which involve several trips to the Questura (Carabinieri HQs in every comune). Its trivial to get a Codice Fiscale though as that give one the right to avoid paying tax like any pure blooded Italian. I can apply for an Italian ID card now, or at least if I returned to Italy, but there is not really much point, it would gain me nothing much really, I could vote in Italy if I ever returned. In theory you can vote anywhere in the EU you are resident but in practice it does vary. Its dead easy in the UK, for example.

Ed (dali), Friday, 24 January 2003 19:45 (twenty-three years ago)

"he didn't come here for political reasons, but for opportunities. Is it morally permissable to change one's citizenship based on something that appears to be so superficial?" - America is the land of opportunity.

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 24 January 2003 20:20 (twenty-three years ago)

Touche, James :) (Damn, can't get the " ' " to work.)

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Friday, 24 January 2003 20:41 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.