Back to the Future

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Like some sort of rule of 3 thing i reckon.

People are down on the second one. I love it. I think the 3rd is fun, but flags a little in places.

Alan (Alan), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:07 (twenty-three years ago)

the second one is definitely the best. apart from the first one, maybe.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:10 (twenty-three years ago)

First has too many Do You See???s. Second one is OK but broing. Third is bestest.

Graham (graham), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:10 (twenty-three years ago)

The second is probably my favourite; the last time I watched it I'd not seen it for ages, and was pleasantly surprised.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:15 (twenty-three years ago)

The one with the flying skateboard is the best. The one in the wild west is worst.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:22 (twenty-three years ago)

the flying skateboard appears in the second one and re-appears in the wild west one

Alan (Alan), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:24 (twenty-three years ago)

I prefer the second to the third, just cause the Wild West is a bit meh and introducing a love interest for Doc is a really bad idea.

I'm confused already. It's easy to think of the third one as just the Wild West, but there's quite a bit in the other periods too. Is it II or III that has Biff running the casino and ruining the town?

The second one is the most all over the place, conceptually.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:30 (twenty-three years ago)

II Nick. That's kind of the whole plot.

Graham (graham), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:31 (twenty-three years ago)

III is almost all Wild West, apart from a short bit at the beginning and end.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:33 (twenty-three years ago)

N, did you fall asleep during part III?

RJG (RJG), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:34 (twenty-three years ago)

It's confusing when you watch them back to back. The same thing happened for me with The Godfathers.

I don't know anymore. That 'Biff running the town' thing really upset me but I guess it is the better film.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:37 (twenty-three years ago)

II best then I then III

geeta (geeta), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:53 (twenty-three years ago)

they're all fantastic. i based by whole life on these movies. you diss them, you diss me. raar.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Let me make quite clear that I is obviously the best; fresh, teeming with ideas and relatively coherent. Call me a rockist, but to suggest that the others might approach it is just absurd.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 24 January 2003 13:56 (twenty-three years ago)

but II has all the good bits from II plus some of the good bits from I.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 24 January 2003 14:10 (twenty-three years ago)

III is rubbish. Too much moleskin and swash-buckling by far.

Lara (Lara), Friday, 24 January 2003 14:13 (twenty-three years ago)

But more important. What about the Back To The Future quiz machine.!!!!

Pete (Pete), Friday, 24 January 2003 14:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Was that part of the fridge idea that was shelved?

Lara (Lara), Friday, 24 January 2003 14:15 (twenty-three years ago)

surely the fridge idea would have to not include any shelves.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 24 January 2003 14:18 (twenty-three years ago)

all Zemeckis special effects movies are unbearably flashy and noisy - watching the "climax" to BTTF I when it was on telly recently was a painful experience. Roger Rabbit is equally bad in this respect. For God's sake man, stop bashing me over the head and entertain me.

Jeff W, Friday, 24 January 2003 14:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry. Should have said *compartmentalised*.

Lara (Lara), Friday, 24 January 2003 14:20 (twenty-three years ago)

Def. should not have said *put on ice*, obv.

Lara (Lara), Friday, 24 January 2003 14:21 (twenty-three years ago)

i watch them exactly in chronological order of action portrayed: viz
BttF3
bits of Godfather 2
Godfather 1
more bits of Godfather 2
BttF1 and Godfather 3 properly intercut
BttF2

mark s (mark s), Friday, 24 January 2003 14:22 (twenty-three years ago)

I then II then III

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 24 January 2003 16:30 (twenty-three years ago)

then the cartoon

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 24 January 2003 16:30 (twenty-three years ago)

''I prefer the second to the third, just cause the Wild West is a bit meh and introducing a love interest for Doc is a really bad idea''

why is the love interest a bad idea N?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 24 January 2003 16:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Scientists should not married. It removes their creative urges. Cast iron rule of cinema.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 24 January 2003 17:06 (twenty-three years ago)

oh, i forgot. sorry.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 24 January 2003 17:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Classic!

They don't make 'em like this anymore.

jel -- (jel), Friday, 24 January 2003 18:19 (twenty-three years ago)

I then II then III. The first one outshines the other two by by far.

Vinnie (vprabhu), Friday, 24 January 2003 19:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Anything with a western theme totally turns me off. I did not live out west in a past life as I have no affinity for any of it - and if I DID it must have been a horrible life and I've completely repressed it. That said, I did not enjoy III. Loved I & II. Original can not be beat, though I did love II for its futuristic theme. Thought it was exciting.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Friday, 24 January 2003 19:40 (twenty-three years ago)

even Shanghai Noon?

jel -- (jel), Friday, 24 January 2003 20:02 (twenty-three years ago)

There's an exception to every rule!

Sarah McLusky (coco), Friday, 24 January 2003 20:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Mary Steenbergen - euch!

Lara (Lara), Friday, 24 January 2003 21:38 (twenty-three years ago)

hullo, the train flies people!!

mark s (mark s), Friday, 24 January 2003 23:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Lots of II was filmed near where I grew-up. I was able to go and walk the set, and had some awesome pictures, but the ******* photoshop LOST my film!!! Two rolls worth!!! (Wow, I didn't realize I was still peeved over that.)

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Friday, 24 January 2003 23:04 (twenty-three years ago)

You should be, c'mon back to the future II pitcures would be AWESOME to have!

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 24 January 2003 23:56 (twenty-three years ago)

II is overrated. I was good. Haven't seen III.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 24 January 2003 23:58 (twenty-three years ago)

III was on yesterday. I thought I'd seen Little Mo somewhere before.

Graham (graham), Monday, 3 February 2003 19:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Fifth Anomaly

If there were a way for Doc and Marty to have gotten to this alternate 1985, there would be nothing to prevent them from going back to 1955.  They embark on a fool's errand:  they seek to change the present by changing the past and, as we discussed with Terminator, there are only three possible outcomes of this:  first, you can fail to make the necessary change, so that the past is intact and you still desire to change it, causing an N-jump; second, you can make the change, eliminating your reason for doing so, and so undoing the change, creating an infinity loop; third--the almost impossible result--you can make the change and create a different reason for yourself to know to come back in time to make the change, creating a sawtooth snap which will hopefully terminate in an N-jump (but might still result in an infinity loop).  Marty and Doc return to 1955 with the intent to alter history; furthermore, they are basing their efforts once again on information which they are about attempt to erase.  A disaster stands before us.

You've got to love this guy

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 13 February 2003 02:02 (twenty-three years ago)

no, actually, i don't.

g-kit (g-kit), Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Me neither.

Lara (Lara), Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:12 (twenty-three years ago)

in fact, judging by the way he tears into BILL & TED too, the guy is a bit of a dick.

g-kit (g-kit), Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Right. And he's anal, I have suspicions about his motivations and he doesn't write well. What's to love?

Lara (Lara), Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Love's a strong word, Mr Dastoor.

Lara (Lara), Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:19 (twenty-three years ago)

you're all crazy.

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:20 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.mjyoung.net/imgsrc/anom.jpg

this proves he is great, u r all gay (except N)

Alan (Alan), Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:21 (twenty-three years ago)

I fear for your unborn children.

Lara (Lara), Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:29 (twenty-three years ago)

am I gay?

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:29 (twenty-three years ago)

i'm not gay but.... i'm on the wrong thread.

g-kit (g-kit), Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Lol I have seen Rex tweeting, had no idea it was THAT Rex!

― Looking for Cape Penis house (Neanderthal), Sunday, January 17, 2021 4:16 PM

pplains, Sunday, 17 January 2021 22:23 (five years ago)

Wait, do people not know that part of the “act” for the entire trilogy is seeing how little changes in the past alter the future?

Punster McPunisher, Sunday, 17 January 2021 23:27 (five years ago)

wait BTTF has TIME-TRAVELING in it?

Looking for Cape Penis house (Neanderthal), Sunday, 17 January 2021 23:30 (five years ago)

every movie has time traveling in it imo

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 17 January 2021 23:50 (five years ago)

we’re traveling through time right now

mellon collie and the infinite bradness (BradNelson), Sunday, 17 January 2021 23:56 (five years ago)

Well, we were, but now we're in the future.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 18 January 2021 00:43 (five years ago)

i love how he points out that the replacement of one sign with a completely different sign they built for the movie is "not a mistake". do people think that they film movies entirely in sequence, striking each set after every scene and the rebuilding it again when there's a later scene in the same location?

nobody like my rap (One Eye Open), Monday, 18 January 2021 02:48 (five years ago)

i think some people think the film is being acted out live every time the dvd is put on

Looking for Cape Penis house (Neanderthal), Monday, 18 January 2021 02:49 (five years ago)

one year passes...

ME AND BTTF2:
"Oh man, Biff is so evil...can you imagine if the world was really like that? It would be hell...I can't believe Biff took over the world...it's so scary....Biff is so evil..."

― Abbott, Monday, September 15, 2008

Yes I can definitely imagine that.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Friday, 21 January 2022 07:04 (four years ago)

But why is 2015 Biff such a crusty asshole? He came from the timeline where Biff is a happy, meek friend of the family.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Friday, 21 January 2022 07:06 (four years ago)

biff is never happy and meek, only cowed in the presence of big george who terrorises him relentlessly

conrad, Friday, 21 January 2022 12:10 (four years ago)

Yeah they don't show it but I always imagined Biff seething after George goes back inside the house after the "Don't con me!" scene. Biff would be even more miserable in that timeline

Vinnie, Friday, 21 January 2022 14:42 (four years ago)

he came from an alternate timeline where only one-play was available

they were written with a ouija board and a rhyming dictionary (Neanderthal), Friday, 21 January 2022 14:54 (four years ago)

*one-ply

they were written with a ouija board and a rhyming dictionary (Neanderthal), Friday, 21 January 2022 14:54 (four years ago)

four months pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqQ6whOG-Pg

Punster McPunisher, Monday, 6 June 2022 02:42 (four years ago)

two weeks pass...

MJF is fucking hilarious in this…favorite part is the slow stare at dad coming into frame in the coffee shop

calstars, Sunday, 26 June 2022 18:04 (three years ago)

What a perfect movie. And it would have been perfect even without the "Johnny B. Goode" scene -- I mean, it adds nothing to the plot -- it's just a moment of pure elation. It rockets the film into the statosphere.

Sam Weller, Monday, 27 June 2022 08:49 (three years ago)

two months pass...

Tom Wilson (Biff) was asked the same questions by BACK TO THE FUTURE fans so often, he wrote a song answering them. This is great. pic.twitter.com/OTXN6UdwOI

— All The Right Movies (@ATRightMovies) September 10, 2022

Alba, Sunday, 11 September 2022 07:01 (three years ago)

four months pass...

I've often kinda wondered what happened to the other Marty seen at the end of the first movie, who seemingly is sent back to the 1955 of his timeline, which is the 1955 where the protagonist Marty changed the past. So I came up with silly fan theory...

This has bugged me for a long time, but my "fan theory" is that Doc Brown knew he couldn't send that Marty back to 1955 ('cuz he'd crash right into Marty-Prime arriving at that same spot); so instead he set the dial for 1055 or something. Sent that fool back to the Dark Ages, where he figured he couldn't cause any trouble and would die quickly. BUT! -- somehow Nu-Marty survives, claws his way back to the present (or, let's say, 2025 – for purposes of developing this into a new movie), and he's hella pissed... now he's a bad guy, coming for revenge! Watch Peacock for BTTF 4, coming in two years...

Vexatious litigant (morrisp), Monday, 16 January 2023 01:29 (three years ago)

So he's basically Khan? Sounds great/terrible.

got it in the blood, the kid's a pelican (Doctor Casino), Monday, 16 January 2023 13:28 (three years ago)

Yeah, or Superboy-Prime from the DC Universe

Vexatious litigant (morrisp), Monday, 16 January 2023 16:56 (three years ago)

three years pass...

https://i.ibb.co/jZDdXKHN/tumblr-d0037367dc5bb175d76f3dbcb5a80412-1750489f-1280.jpg

pplains, Monday, 26 January 2026 03:27 (four months ago)

three months pass...

Saw one of those cute posts where someone points out we are as far from 1996 now as Marty was from 1955 then. Fair enough. But having lived in 1985 and 1996 and 2026, I feel that traveling back from 1985 to 1955 would be more of a shock than traveling back to 2026 from 1996. My wife disagreed, and blamed overfamiliarity with 1996. Also fair enough. But what would be the things we take for granted in 2026 that you would miss in 1996, and what perspective or tech from 2026 would blow their minds in 1996? The first thing that came to mind for her were smart phones, but I sort of feel like they are just advanced refinements of things that existed in 1996 (cellphones, internet). I'm blanking on other hypothetical shocks to the system. Then again, my coffee hasn't kicked in yet.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 May 2026 12:25 (one month ago)

For example, what would be the contemporary equivalent of the puffy vest gag in "Back to the Future?"

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 May 2026 12:34 (one month ago)

Please god don't give film studios ideas

. (jamiesummerz), Thursday, 14 May 2026 12:41 (one month ago)

lol I recall reading that apparently this is one of the few IPs the owners won't allow to be rebooted, at least not as long as Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale are alive.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 May 2026 12:48 (one month ago)

a closely related question: If Marty McFly went back in time thirty years ago today, what song does he play at the dance to blow everyone's mind?

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 14 May 2026 12:51 (one month ago)

"Chuck! It's Marvin. Your cousin, Marvin Berry. You know that new sound you're looking for? Well, this ain't it."

Vast Halo, Thursday, 14 May 2026 12:54 (one month ago)

cellphones, internet

in 1996 these were still some way from being ubiquitous.

visiting, Thursday, 14 May 2026 13:50 (one month ago)

yeah no one I knew had a cellphone in 1996 (New England US)

Brenton Wood Conference (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 14 May 2026 13:54 (one month ago)

however, I was using my parents’ home computer and a slow dial-up connection to ~surf the web~ (look at low res porn pictures)

Brenton Wood Conference (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 14 May 2026 13:56 (one month ago)

iirc my boss was the only person with a cellphone that i knew in 1996. and only a select few people in the office had the internet on their pcs.

visiting, Thursday, 14 May 2026 13:59 (one month ago)

We definitely had internet and email in college (1993-1997), however rudimentary compared to now. Cell phones ... I don't remember when I got my first one, but I knew car phones were a thing, and those big brick phones. Nokia apparently had a mobile phone with a QWERTY keyboard in 1996, so they existed, and I assume I must have known they existed, but I can't remember.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 May 2026 14:15 (one month ago)

the quality of ready meals

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 14 May 2026 14:18 (one month ago)

all cars being a slight variation on the same car

andrew m., Thursday, 14 May 2026 14:19 (one month ago)

I knew about Minitel and networks, but I didn't really ~understand the internet~ (e.g. how to find low res pictures of helena christensen) until we had it at home in '97

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 14 May 2026 14:21 (one month ago)

Hmm, MP3s (and streaming) would have been a big deal in 1996, there's one, I think.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 May 2026 14:34 (one month ago)

I think having a speedy internet in your pocket would genuinely be wildly futuristic to someone in 1996.

My answer for the true mind-blowing technology, though: vapes.

emil.y, Thursday, 14 May 2026 14:40 (one month ago)

We had Prodigy at home in the early/mid-90s, so to an extent I'm with Josh on that.

In a way I think a tablet would blow my mind more than a smartphone? I don't know though, digitization just doesn't really have the wow factor, though if you showed 1996 me the, for example, homepage of the NYT with videos etc. it would be pretty impressive.

For example, what would be the contemporary equivalent of the puffy vest gag in "Back to the Future?"

This one seems easier since you could do stretchy, skinny jeans / jeggings. Regardless of whether that would genuinely blow the minds of '96ers, it would be the gag

rob, Thursday, 14 May 2026 14:40 (one month ago)

xposts: yeah a tablet streaming a hi-res movie would def work. Vapes is a good answer!

rob, Thursday, 14 May 2026 14:41 (one month ago)

Also I remember in 1996, being a teen who listened to music constantly, I wished somebody would invent wireless headphones - funnily enough, now they're here... well, I was going to say that I hate them, but I don't, I just mourn the loss of headphone jacks and will get outdated gear just so I can still have the jack for output.

emil.y, Thursday, 14 May 2026 14:46 (one month ago)

I have never used wireless headphones...didn't even think it was that antiquated

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 14 May 2026 15:05 (one month ago)

Of course, if you had a smart phone or similar with you back in 1996, it wouldn't work! But MP3s (and vapes) would.

Could imagine the plot of the reboot being a panicked Marty racing around, trying to find a way to charge his phone/vape.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 May 2026 15:18 (one month ago)

Lol, I just asked my daughter what she would bring back to 1996 to showcase the future and she said "covid." Then she paused a beat and clarified, "I mean, the vaccine."

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 May 2026 15:23 (one month ago)

a panicked Marty racing around, trying to find a way to charge his phone

Back to One Future After Another

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 14 May 2026 16:03 (one month ago)

Loads of people still smoking indoors would be one of the first things you noticed if you went back to 1996.

mirostones, Thursday, 14 May 2026 19:17 (one month ago)

IIRC, people were experimenting with nicotine nebulizers as a treatment for smoking as early as the late Seventies, so the idea for vaping did exist.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Thursday, 14 May 2026 19:20 (one month ago)

xpost No draconian post-9/11 security, too.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 May 2026 19:55 (one month ago)

CGLDI: Didn't know that! But still, "in the future, people inhale vapor from capsules inserted into sleek little pocket-sized devices" would absolutely play as miscellaneous world-building for a sci-fi movie, at any point from the 50s to the 90s really. There must be a Star Trek TNG episode that does it...

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 14 May 2026 21:03 (one month ago)

The doohickeys we have in our pockets are considerably more mind blowing than anything that anyone was carrying in Star Trek TNG or DS9.

In 2000 I had a Siemens phone in Italy with a tiny black and white lcd, you could browse the internet in a really limited way on it. ILX was one of the few sites that worked.

Ed, Thursday, 14 May 2026 23:06 (one month ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.