Serious Thread #3: Are you glad the pyramids were built?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Tom said once that N.’s pyramids question was a great one and if I’d asked it it would have gotten the serious responses it deserved. I could never decide if he was picking on me or not (plus my threads usually suck) but here you go.

I think where we left off on the original was basically: "the great monuments of early civilization were made possible through oppression ranging from slavery to hard feudalism" -- Tom has made some great comments in the past about democracy almost always arising as a result of some influx of wealth, usually one involving very one-sided transfer of labor or resources (Greeks = slavery, modern Europe = colonialism).

nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 25 January 2003 23:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, if the pyramids were built by Hebrew slaves (as has been suggested) and led to said slaves' revolt against the Egyptians, then they played a major role in the development of Judaism as a major religion, and thus have had a profound effect on society.

Curtis Stephens, Sunday, 26 January 2003 00:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Plus we wouldn't have that Steve Martin song.

Curtis Stephens, Sunday, 26 January 2003 00:24 (twenty-three years ago)

In 500 years will people look at our architecture and talk about how we oppressed the shit out of our laborer caste and forced them to construct massive monuments to bolster our pride in our commercial achievements?

I'm perfectly all right with the pyramids. I didn't build them. Obliquely, how the hell are you supposed to complain about the lack of social enlightenment in civilizations that disappeared millenia ago without appearing to be an attention-hungry left-revisionist prat?

Millar (Millar), Sunday, 26 January 2003 00:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Well it needn't be any big attack on the structure of civilization or anything: you could just say "boy oh boy a whole lot of semi-avoidable death and misery and labor went into the building of ... massive pointy things with a few corpses inside?"

nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 26 January 2003 00:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Minus the 'massive pointy things with a few corpses inside' you could say that about a whole lot of things. The easter island statues in my view cost a bit more than the pyramids in terms of really fucking things up for the people involved. During the time the statues were being built, the natives managed to cut down every single tree on the island, reducing it to an ecological disaster zone that could barely support life. Pyramids really don't have much on that.

Millar (Millar), Sunday, 26 January 2003 00:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Oi - stop hijacking my great questions. On the original thread, there seemed to be some people calling into doubt my conception that the pyramids were built by slaves (I think Brad missed off an 'nt, judging by the rest of his post).

Millar - I like your style but err.. what is wrong with being a left-revisionist prat? The Easter Island example is indeed maybe a better one.

Sometimes I think I wouldn't care if every beautiful building and piece of art was destroyed. It's all going to disappear one day anyway, so what does it matter?

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 26 January 2003 01:11 (twenty-three years ago)

I did it for Tom, Nick! And I credited you fully!

The one thing you can sort of say for Easter Island is that their process seemed more inspired by a collective mistake than by a top-down one; i.e. it was a big cultural disaster, whereas I get the sense with Egypt that a lot more direction and coersion was necessary.

nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 26 January 2003 01:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean, wasn't the Easter Island thing basically a case of oneupsmanship gotten way out of hand?

nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 26 January 2003 01:14 (twenty-three years ago)

do the easter island statues look better with their eyes&hats or without them? i say without (bcz i am an english simpleton)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 26 January 2003 01:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Are we limiting the discussion to the Egyptian pyramids, or are we looking at the buildings in Mexico and what about the "mounds" that are not necessarily pyramid-like in that they've the flattened or rounded tops, rather than those delightfully pointy things that the Egyptians worked with?

All of that having been said, I am fascinated by ancient architecture and sculpture and so forth, regardless of whether it was built for religious reasons, as graves, or whatever. I find it absolutely amazing to see what are considered to be "primative" people creating maginificent items that have lasted to this day. And I have even more admiration for the advancement of their cultures because we're so limited in our thinking that we cannot conceive how some of these architectural masterpieces were created.

Also, in reference to Millar's comment about people looking at this century's architecture 500 years from now and commenting about the labor caste and so-forth - what, realistically, is going to be standing, 500 years from now? And what state will it be in? Do we currently build thinking about bringing something into being permanently, or do we think of all buildings as being transient?

And, on a more personal note, I think I have finally decided that I want to see Angor Wat more than any other architectural structure.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Sunday, 26 January 2003 01:49 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm so totally down with the Angkor Wat. If there's any temple/tomb/palace/whatever on earth that actually looks like it was built as a monument to some truly evil shit that joint has to be the one.

Millar (Millar), Sunday, 26 January 2003 01:54 (twenty-three years ago)

God yes I'd love to see Angkor Wat but last I heard visiting Cambodia was still a fairly dicey proposition, at least once you ventured a kilometer or two outside Phnom Penh

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Sunday, 26 January 2003 01:55 (twenty-three years ago)

"some truly evil shit???" Okay Millar, I'll bite - what about the architecture of Angkor Wat makes you think it is so unattractive? Oh, wait, you didn't say unatttractive - you said "evil." Please elaborate.

J0hn - I've heard the same, but don't know how paranoid I am at this minute.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Sunday, 26 January 2003 02:08 (twenty-three years ago)

I think it looks bad ass. It just looks mean and foreboding to me in a way that similar monuments don't. It looks like I imagine Pandemonium ought to look.

Here's a great picture of it. Imagine the blue skies replaced with some blood-red armageddon sunset and the entire structure lit with numerous bonfires and torches. Eeeeevil.

Millar (Millar), Sunday, 26 January 2003 02:23 (twenty-three years ago)

I've been doing lots of reading about Cambodia for the past couple of months. The general wisdom is "it's all right to go as long as you don't strike out on your own" i.e. stay in the city and go with the biggest most well-established tour group you can find to Angkor. I'm glad I wasn't interested in travelling back when I was young & impetuous or I probably would have woken up one bright day & said "hiking in the forests of southern Cambodia, now there's a summer for me"

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Sunday, 26 January 2003 04:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay, I can see that image now, Millar. But it just looks more enticing to me - I like stuff that's so unfamiliar and foreign and forbidden - probably one of those female curiosity things/Pandora's decision stereotypes *sigh*

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Sunday, 26 January 2003 04:43 (twenty-three years ago)

how about macchu picchu?

Maria (Maria), Sunday, 26 January 2003 04:44 (twenty-three years ago)

J0hn, slightly off topic, but have you read "The River's Tale"? It's a modern travelogue about a man's decision to travel the length of the Mekong river. Pretty fascinating stuff, to say the least - really got me more interested in that area of the world. (Though my interest was slightly tempered by a couple of the incident's in "A Cook's Tour.")

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Sunday, 26 January 2003 04:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Macchu Picchu = overdone and more impressive for its location than actual architecture. Grass on top of mountain makes it look too goody-goody.

Angkor Wat = looks like people were probably tortured by demons living inside at some point, therefore totally cool place to visit

Also if you have a secret you can tell it to the walls there and they will keep it forever (see In The Mood For Love)

Millar (Millar), Sunday, 26 January 2003 04:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Manchu Picchu is another dream trip for me, Maria. My step-father did a Peruvian trip this fall - three weeks hiking/camping/backpacking for under $1200.00, including flights, meals, lodging, and so forth. He talked about illegally camping at Manchu Picchu (after arriving, on foot, late at night) and waking and meditating as the sun broke through the clouds and the site was revealed. (Of course, last year summer he did six weeks in India and did the same meditation/waking theme in front of the Taj Mahal - he knows how to make the most of his retirement. This summer it's Eastern Africa for two months, and the following summer it looks like Bhutan.)

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Sunday, 26 January 2003 04:50 (twenty-three years ago)

that sounds incredible. is terrorism a problem in peru? (i'm sure it's not to the extent in cambodia....) i'd love to go there.

Maria (Maria), Sunday, 26 January 2003 04:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Hmmm- so do you whisper the secret, or do you have to creep away from your tour group to do so? And if one is deaf, can one sign the secret? (Sorry, I couldn't resist being smart-assed.)

My S/O spent two months in the heart of Mexico at some recently discovered pyramid (wish I could recall the name of the site, but I'm drawing a blank). The whole thing sounded so remote and romantic - kind of like a dirties Indiana Jones adventure. He said that it was surreal to climb to the top of a pyramid, be looking around at the surrounding jungle, and then looking down at the lap-top he'd hauled-up to the top, with the cables running down the steep steps.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Sunday, 26 January 2003 04:53 (twenty-three years ago)

I hate to admit it, Maria, but my knowledge of the political situation anywhere in the Western Hemisphere seems to be pathetically limited to Bush et al. Now if you want to know about the colonization efforts in Egypt and the explorations for the source of the Nile, then I'm your woman (also can rant about the history of the fez in Turkey).

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Sunday, 26 January 2003 04:56 (twenty-three years ago)

The pyramids - both in the eastern and western hemispheres - were modeled after ancient Atlantean structures. (Angkor Wat is modeled after ancient Indian architecture, it is essentially a Hindu temple-palace).

Who can say for sure that the pyramids were built by cruelly overworked slaves? From what I've read, they were built by the occult powers of sound.

Vic (Vic), Sunday, 26 January 2003 06:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Are you saying that sound waves were exploited?

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 26 January 2003 11:53 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think the dangers in Cambodia are substantial these days. When my marriage broke up 18 months back, we had been planning a holiday which included a couple of days visiting Angkor Wat. Guatemala is becoming visitable these days too, and for the Americans here that's a shorter and cheaper trip to somewhere with plenty of fabulous ancient structures.

Accepting for the moment the high probability that pyramids were built by slave labour, we are talking about a symptom rather than the disease. That is to say, losing the pyramids (or parallel projects in other cultures) doesn't abolish slavery. If the question is recast to something like "Would you trade away the history of slavery throughout the world, bearing in mind that you also lose the pyramids and many other great artefacts?" I'd probably say yes.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 26 January 2003 12:31 (twenty-three years ago)

The pyramids may have been built at huge cost in human life terms,but at least they are still standing after thousands of years as a tribute to the amazing capabilities of the ancient civilizations.

The millenium dome was built at a huge cost to the British taxpayer.It is now disused,three years after its construction.And I bet it wont last past 2010.

Big up the pyramids!

Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Sunday, 26 January 2003 12:50 (twenty-three years ago)

(also can rant about the history of the fez in Turkey).

Yes, please.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Sunday, 26 January 2003 13:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Given that the dome was intended as a temporary construction, it is hardly a fault if it doesn't last for thousands of years.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 26 January 2003 14:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Agreed,but it was a bit pricey for a big tent.

Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Sunday, 26 January 2003 14:39 (twenty-three years ago)

I think it's a wonderful building, and have spent lots of timegazing at it. My problem with it was spending a fortune on building something when the government plainly had no notion what they were going to do with it, then filling it with crap. I think you should decide what a building is for before you design and build it.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 26 January 2003 14:46 (twenty-three years ago)

As N says, there's not much wrong with "left-revisionist" approaches to valuing historical times/periods. If we as society or individual have decided that, for instance, slavery is wrong and human life is valuable (neither of them ultra-leftist positions AFAIK) then what's wrong with pointing out that ancient societies were flawed because of slavery and a lack of respect for human life? The only question is in the timing: if somebody is saying "Ancient Greece/Egypt was wonderful, why don't we have that democratic culture/big fuck-off monuments now eh?" then it's timely and proper to say "B-B-BUT THE SLAVES AND DEATH". if on the other hand somebody is saying the pyramids are beautiful, reminding them of the human cost seems crass and unneccessary - after all, nobody would want the Pyramids torn down.

So the answer is - no, I'm not glad they were built; yes, I'm glad they now exist.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 26 January 2003 15:30 (twenty-three years ago)

How else would we keep fruit fresh?

Mark C (Mark C), Sunday, 26 January 2003 15:43 (twenty-three years ago)

nobody would want the Pyramids torn down

i bet Dubya does....or perhaps just move them to Vegas

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 26 January 2003 17:20 (twenty-three years ago)

At least the 'slaves' who built the pyramids, Angkor Wat and Bagan *knew* they were slaves. Isn't our liberty an illusion?

And, yes, I'm glad they were built. Where else would I go on my summer holidays?

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 17:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Slave #1: Fuck this sucks, let's revolt
Slave #2: Quit your fucking moaning, you should be grateful to have a job!
Slave #3: If moving huge rocks is good enough for us then it's good enough for you! What do you think #4?
Slave #4: Duh, I dunno about any of that! As long as I have some funny hieroglyphic tablets to read and get to bet on the mummified-dog-ball matches every week I'm happy!
Slave #3: Speaking of tablets gime that one, I wanna see what the gods are up to!
Slave #5: Hey I'll revolt - once I run out of malt beer! Damn that's good stuff [vomits]
Slave #1:(sigh)

dave q, Sunday, 26 January 2003 17:35 (twenty-three years ago)

I would like to dissociate myself from this thread, henceforth.

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 17:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Er, Daniel, I was kinda exaggerating. But one of my favorite book discoveries last year was called "A Fez of the Heart," and was basically a travelogue mixed with a history lesson all in the form of the author wandering around Turkey looking for someone wearing a fez. Odd fact that I seem to recall: No-oen seems to be able to agree where the fez originated.

On a totally different note, one of my all-time favorite descriptions (from "Tulipmania") dealt with a Turish sultan's (I think) party, where there were tortoises wandering around in flower beds filled with flowering tulips, with candles on their (the tortoises,not the flower - I need to be more careful about my grammar)backs, to the flowers were "underlit" by moving lights and the image was ever-changing (I do feel badly for the tortoises, though, being a tortoise lover and all - I imagine that the candles must have been permanently [somehow] affized to their shells, and that cannot be too healthy for the critters).

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm pretty sure that I remember seeing a fez when I was in Turkey: in a tourist/souvenir shop in Istanbul.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 26 January 2003 19:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Aww Lara I was gonna go off on a giant rant about that statement and now you've ruined it!

nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:06 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll keep you covered, sister. Go for it!

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Hang on, you're a boy, aren't you?

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:10 (twenty-three years ago)

He is, but I still think we should keep calling nabisco "sister"

rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 27 January 2003 00:35 (twenty-three years ago)

I am glad the pyramids were built. I am not necessarily glad they were built the way they were built.

however, according to casual conversation, working on pyramid building was a pretty handy number in ancient egypt. It was a job for life, and the bosses made sure the workers were fed enough to be able to do the job. The whips were just for show. Allegedly there are loads of ancient egyptian records about peasants running away to become slaves on the pyramids.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 27 January 2003 13:19 (twenty-three years ago)

casual conversation with who?!?

dirty vicar do you drink with the MUMMY?

mark s (mark s), Monday, 27 January 2003 13:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Dublin society is very culturally aware, Mark.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 13:53 (twenty-three years ago)

At Chichen Iza and Tulum, in Mexico, there are pyramids. There are also large sacrificial pits, where archaeoligists found many human skulls. Who you have rather been a slave, or a skull in the pit?

Speaking of which, standing on the top of those pyramids and surveying the surrounding jungle and other ruins is about the coolest thing ever, especially at night. Really, any situation where you're playing with old ghosts is good.

dleone (dleone), Monday, 27 January 2003 13:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Would you have rather been a slave, or a skull in the pit?

How about being a slave for years, then when you are incapable of working properly, you get sacrificed? (I have no idea if that happened.)

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 27 January 2003 18:36 (twenty-three years ago)

three years pass...
The Bible says the Hebrew slaves built the cities of Rameses and Pithom. Exodus 1:11. It does not say they built the pyramids. I wonder where that idea came from?

BJ Sullivan, Friday, 28 April 2006 04:05 (twenty years ago)

I don't care so much about the Pyramids myself. I get a bit annoyed at times by the tendency to worship cultures for building this sort of thing and assume that cultures that didn't were "less advanced." Maybe they just didn't feel the need to build a bunch of big crap.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Friday, 28 April 2006 04:12 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.