Moon landings conspiracy theories

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Did man really go to the moon?Or was it all a big yarn?I hear that NASA is getting a bit twitchy over China's Moon sattelite project,designed to go into low orbit around the moon and take very detailed photographs of the surface.If Uncle Sam's boys were really up there,then all their old kit should still be laying about the place and therefore will show up on the pictures.So what if they find nothing on the moon apart from moon rocks and Clangers?Mr Bush will probably start a war over it.

Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Sunday, 26 January 2003 13:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Ok, so lets get to grips with this whole "WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON" conspiracy theory then.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 26 January 2003 13:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Thank you,Mr N. I must have missed that thread somewhere along the line.But I still find it amusing that the Chinese are saying that they are sending a satellite up to take pictures,and the US is getting narked about it!Maybe China has no intention of launching said satellite,but is going to pull off a huge practical joke on the States by releasing 'authentic' pictures of a McDonalds Drive-Thru on the Sea of Tranquility.

Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Sunday, 26 January 2003 14:33 (twenty-three years ago)

I think they filmed Bonanza on the moon and are fearful of the re-emergence of Dan Blocker.

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Or maybe they just don't want us to know that it really IS made of cheese,therefore plunging the world's cheese markets into a recession.

Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:20 (twenty-three years ago)

It could be Old Alkmaar. Mmmm.

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:33 (twenty-three years ago)

oude goude!! the moon is dutch!!

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Conspiracy theory to Dutch moon cheese in six posts!

Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Monday, 27 January 2003 00:08 (twenty-three years ago)

(aka "of course there are no monsters under your bed, eugene, haha look teddy is doing a little dance for you - weeee - think nice thoughts". i'm telling you: ilx = agents of The Man)

(ps don't look under the bed either)

jones (actual), Monday, 27 January 2003 00:26 (twenty-three years ago)

They'd have to be bloody thin to fit under MY bed,I can tell you!

Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:45 (twenty-three years ago)

" They'd have to be bloody thin to fit under MY bed,I can tell you!"

-- that surely ain't just 'nother way of (not)saying, 'i merely have a mattress on me floor, me', no?
;)

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Are you hiding in my wardrobe?

Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Monday, 27 January 2003 03:22 (twenty-three years ago)

dinosaurs hide in my wardrobe at night.

g-kit (g-kit), Monday, 27 January 2003 11:16 (twenty-three years ago)

They never went there. PR scam.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 January 2003 11:29 (twenty-three years ago)

like columbus and that america rubbish: it (= hollywood and CNN and stuff)) is all filmed in west london ppl, bush is played by a guy who used to be in emmerdale!!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 27 January 2003 11:38 (twenty-three years ago)

yes. whenever people fly to "America", the plane just lands in a disused military airport in Yorkshire and the people are brough inside a giant hangar with loads of things projected on the wall to look like american scenery. that's why Americans are so weird - they're all actors.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 27 January 2003 12:43 (twenty-three years ago)

elvis never left heckmondwyke!!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 27 January 2003 12:54 (twenty-three years ago)

that's Elvis Costello.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 27 January 2003 13:14 (twenty-three years ago)

both elvises are played by the same person (he also used to do johnny thunders)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 27 January 2003 13:27 (twenty-three years ago)

six years pass...

LRO photographs the Apollo landing sites in detail. Moon conspiracy theorists please find something else to complain about

http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0907/17lroapollo/

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 17 July 2009 21:37 (sixteen years ago)

it's a shop

velko, Friday, 17 July 2009 21:38 (sixteen years ago)

will cover any action from anybody who wants to bet that this will dissuade the conspiracy theorists

worm? lol (J0hn D.), Friday, 17 July 2009 21:39 (sixteen years ago)

http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0907/17lroapollo/05.jpg

Oh, yes. It's all so clear now.

http://i28.tinypic.com/4ux79e.gif (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 17 July 2009 21:39 (sixteen years ago)

That white arrow looks awfully fake and photoshopped.

StanM, Saturday, 18 July 2009 03:57 (sixteen years ago)

pretty good look at the hoaxers. my favorite part is still buzz aldrin punching that one guy. who sounds like a real winner:

In an interview, Mr. Sibrel said that his efforts to prove that men never walked on the Moon has cost him dearly. “I have suffered only persecution and financial loss,” he said. “I’ve lost visitation with my son. I’ve been expelled from churches. All because I believe the Moon landings are fraudulent.”

us_odd_bunny_lady (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:03 (sixteen years ago)

but i'm sure the timing and release of the new photos is just going to stoke the conspiracy theories more. not to mention this:

The original videos beamed to earth were stored on giant reels of tapes that each contained 15 minutes of video, along with 13 other channels of live data from the moon. In the 1970s and 1980s, NASA had a shortage of the tapes and erased about 200,000 of those tapes and reused them. That's apparently what happened to the famous moon landing footage.

us_odd_bunny_lady (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:08 (sixteen years ago)

and i don't pay enough attention to these people to know, but do they make similarly exhaustive efforts to explain away all the documentation of the subsequent moon shots? and was apollo 13 all a hoax too?

but what the hell, i guess if people can deny the holocaust, denying a moon landing is small potatoes.

us_odd_bunny_lady (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:28 (sixteen years ago)

Why would a church expel someone for disbelieving the moon landings? (XXpost)

(So he goes to church, because he believes something that is not true, but gets thrown out because he does not believe something that is true? Brane hurts.)

StanM, Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:29 (sixteen years ago)

he probably got expelled for being a crazy dickhead -- which would explain everything else about him too.

us_odd_bunny_lady (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:35 (sixteen years ago)

We've probably all seen it but it really needs to be in this thread. Some good slow-mo replay in this one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOo6aHSY8hU&NR=1

drunk shudder shades chick gets kicked out of mcdonalds totally (╓abies), Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:47 (sixteen years ago)

Of course Apollo 13 was a blatant hoax. Don't you think it was just a little suspicious that Tom Hanks, Ed Harris and Gary Sinise just happen to be astronauts AND actors?

StanM, Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:50 (sixteen years ago)

I think "C rock" should be a thing meaning a piece of evidence that, in the mind of the arguer, is supposed to be some kind of smoking gun but in fact it could not be more clearly a false, ridic nonsensical conclusion that means nothing.
"But, but...the C rock!"

kind-hearted, sensitive keytar player (Abbott), Saturday, 18 July 2009 19:52 (sixteen years ago)

The ep of Bullshit abt Moon Landing Hoax People is great – the main guy arguing it is also constantly drinking homeless-priced vodka straight from the bottle during the interview.

kind-hearted, sensitive keytar player (Abbott), Saturday, 18 July 2009 19:54 (sixteen years ago)

three months pass...

Smokin the C rock amirite

i ? sauces (╓abies), Thursday, 29 October 2009 11:50 (sixteen years ago)

completely off your Face (on Mars)

a gift from your mind in the form of the perfect beat (snoball), Thursday, 29 October 2009 11:51 (sixteen years ago)

Blatantly a 'Shopped photo on the moon that one. I had a look with a telescope and could see no signs of white Arial writing on the surface.

Chewshabadoo, Thursday, 29 October 2009 12:31 (sixteen years ago)

I'm pretty sure also that the astronauts went poopie in their spacesuits, and not on the lunar surface.

a gift from your mind in the form of the perfect beat (snoball), Thursday, 29 October 2009 12:33 (sixteen years ago)

Rudolph, the stone-nosed moonrock!

StanM, Thursday, 29 October 2009 12:42 (sixteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v356/kenjuggle3/moonshavin.jpg

ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Thursday, 29 October 2009 15:46 (sixteen years ago)

Okay well done there.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 October 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)

one year passes...

I saw this tonight:

http://store.sacredmysteriesmarketplace.com/dvds/kubrick-s-odyssey-part-1-dvd.html

Believe it or not, the guy presents a reading of The Shining--that it's Kubrick wrestling with his conscience over his role in the faked moon landing--that doesn't seem completely crazy. I say that as someone who is not even remotely conspiratorially minded. They had the director on a Skype hookup for a Q&A after the film, and towards the end he got onto some theory about a secret pedophile ring that controls Hollywood that did seem a little deranged to me, not to mention reckless when he started throwing around names. But The Shining stuff was pretty interesting. (Irony: they were able to fake the moon landing 40 years ago, but these guys couldn't get a picture on the screen for their Skype hookup.)

clemenza, Sunday, 21 August 2011 04:50 (fourteen years ago)

"Weidner produces devastating proof that the landing was shot in a studio on Earth."
--David Icke

thick-necked and hateful (latebloomer), Sunday, 21 August 2011 05:32 (fourteen years ago)

faking the moon landing wd have been an audacious conspiracy, faking another 5 afterwards seems like taking the piss a bit

Countdown to Alma Cogan (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 21 August 2011 08:16 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.