― Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Sunday, 26 January 2003 13:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 26 January 2003 13:31 (twenty-three years ago)
― Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Sunday, 26 January 2003 14:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:17 (twenty-three years ago)
― Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Monday, 27 January 2003 00:08 (twenty-three years ago)
(ps don't look under the bed either)
― jones (actual), Monday, 27 January 2003 00:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:45 (twenty-three years ago)
-- that surely ain't just 'nother way of (not)saying, 'i merely have a mattress on me floor, me', no?;)
― t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:51 (twenty-three years ago)
― Eugene Speed (Eugene Speed), Monday, 27 January 2003 03:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― g-kit (g-kit), Monday, 27 January 2003 11:16 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 January 2003 11:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 27 January 2003 11:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 27 January 2003 12:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 27 January 2003 12:54 (twenty-three years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 27 January 2003 13:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 27 January 2003 13:27 (twenty-three years ago)
LRO photographs the Apollo landing sites in detail. Moon conspiracy theorists please find something else to complain about
http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0907/17lroapollo/
― Elvis Telecom, Friday, 17 July 2009 21:37 (sixteen years ago)
it's a shop
― velko, Friday, 17 July 2009 21:38 (sixteen years ago)
will cover any action from anybody who wants to bet that this will dissuade the conspiracy theorists
― worm? lol (J0hn D.), Friday, 17 July 2009 21:39 (sixteen years ago)
http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0907/17lroapollo/05.jpg
Oh, yes. It's all so clear now.
― http://i28.tinypic.com/4ux79e.gif (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 17 July 2009 21:39 (sixteen years ago)
That white arrow looks awfully fake and photoshopped.
― StanM, Saturday, 18 July 2009 03:57 (sixteen years ago)
pretty good look at the hoaxers. my favorite part is still buzz aldrin punching that one guy. who sounds like a real winner:
In an interview, Mr. Sibrel said that his efforts to prove that men never walked on the Moon has cost him dearly. “I have suffered only persecution and financial loss,” he said. “I’ve lost visitation with my son. I’ve been expelled from churches. All because I believe the Moon landings are fraudulent.”
― us_odd_bunny_lady (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:03 (sixteen years ago)
but i'm sure the timing and release of the new photos is just going to stoke the conspiracy theories more. not to mention this:
The original videos beamed to earth were stored on giant reels of tapes that each contained 15 minutes of video, along with 13 other channels of live data from the moon. In the 1970s and 1980s, NASA had a shortage of the tapes and erased about 200,000 of those tapes and reused them. That's apparently what happened to the famous moon landing footage.
― us_odd_bunny_lady (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:08 (sixteen years ago)
and i don't pay enough attention to these people to know, but do they make similarly exhaustive efforts to explain away all the documentation of the subsequent moon shots? and was apollo 13 all a hoax too?
but what the hell, i guess if people can deny the holocaust, denying a moon landing is small potatoes.
― us_odd_bunny_lady (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:28 (sixteen years ago)
Why would a church expel someone for disbelieving the moon landings? (XXpost)
(So he goes to church, because he believes something that is not true, but gets thrown out because he does not believe something that is true? Brane hurts.)
― StanM, Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:29 (sixteen years ago)
he probably got expelled for being a crazy dickhead -- which would explain everything else about him too.
― us_odd_bunny_lady (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:35 (sixteen years ago)
We've probably all seen it but it really needs to be in this thread. Some good slow-mo replay in this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOo6aHSY8hU&NR=1
― drunk shudder shades chick gets kicked out of mcdonalds totally (╓abies), Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:47 (sixteen years ago)
Of course Apollo 13 was a blatant hoax. Don't you think it was just a little suspicious that Tom Hanks, Ed Harris and Gary Sinise just happen to be astronauts AND actors?
― StanM, Saturday, 18 July 2009 04:50 (sixteen years ago)
I think "C rock" should be a thing meaning a piece of evidence that, in the mind of the arguer, is supposed to be some kind of smoking gun but in fact it could not be more clearly a false, ridic nonsensical conclusion that means nothing."But, but...the C rock!"
― kind-hearted, sensitive keytar player (Abbott), Saturday, 18 July 2009 19:52 (sixteen years ago)
The ep of Bullshit abt Moon Landing Hoax People is great – the main guy arguing it is also constantly drinking homeless-priced vodka straight from the bottle during the interview.
― kind-hearted, sensitive keytar player (Abbott), Saturday, 18 July 2009 19:54 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/10/28/lro-takes-closer-look-at-apollo-17-landing-site/
http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/apollo-taurus.jpg
― Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 29 October 2009 07:10 (sixteen years ago)
Smokin the C rock amirite
― i ? sauces (╓abies), Thursday, 29 October 2009 11:50 (sixteen years ago)
completely off your Face (on Mars)
― a gift from your mind in the form of the perfect beat (snoball), Thursday, 29 October 2009 11:51 (sixteen years ago)
Blatantly a 'Shopped photo on the moon that one. I had a look with a telescope and could see no signs of white Arial writing on the surface.
― Chewshabadoo, Thursday, 29 October 2009 12:31 (sixteen years ago)
I'm pretty sure also that the astronauts went poopie in their spacesuits, and not on the lunar surface.
― a gift from your mind in the form of the perfect beat (snoball), Thursday, 29 October 2009 12:33 (sixteen years ago)
Rudolph, the stone-nosed moonrock!
― StanM, Thursday, 29 October 2009 12:42 (sixteen years ago)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v356/kenjuggle3/moonshavin.jpg
― ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Thursday, 29 October 2009 15:46 (sixteen years ago)
Okay well done there.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 October 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)
I saw this tonight:
http://store.sacredmysteriesmarketplace.com/dvds/kubrick-s-odyssey-part-1-dvd.html
Believe it or not, the guy presents a reading of The Shining--that it's Kubrick wrestling with his conscience over his role in the faked moon landing--that doesn't seem completely crazy. I say that as someone who is not even remotely conspiratorially minded. They had the director on a Skype hookup for a Q&A after the film, and towards the end he got onto some theory about a secret pedophile ring that controls Hollywood that did seem a little deranged to me, not to mention reckless when he started throwing around names. But The Shining stuff was pretty interesting. (Irony: they were able to fake the moon landing 40 years ago, but these guys couldn't get a picture on the screen for their Skype hookup.)
― clemenza, Sunday, 21 August 2011 04:50 (fourteen years ago)
"Weidner produces devastating proof that the landing was shot in a studio on Earth."--David Icke
― thick-necked and hateful (latebloomer), Sunday, 21 August 2011 05:32 (fourteen years ago)
faking the moon landing wd have been an audacious conspiracy, faking another 5 afterwards seems like taking the piss a bit
― Countdown to Alma Cogan (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 21 August 2011 08:16 (fourteen years ago)