Bloody hell, *I* fancy you!!!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
OK, males (and perceptive females) of ILE, please explain this behaviour to me:

Dirty Dronerock boy lying stretched out on my bed, complaining about his love life and how girls just don't fancy him.

What's going on?

1) He has forgotten that I am even female, does not actually even consider me as potential partner and is just looking for ego-stroking and reassuring.

2) He is shy and wants me to make the first move by saying something like "HEY!!! you are wonderful, you are mind-bogglingly talented, you are unbelievably brainy, and so pretty that my eyes actually hurt to look at you, bloody hell, *I* fancy you like crazy!" and pouncing on him.

I would have thought that if you were lying in a girl's bed at 7 in the morning having sat up all night talking, it's pretty *obvious* she fancies you like mad. But sometimes boys just crave company and sympathy. I've learned this the hard way, and I don't want to fuck up a potentially wonderful friendship with an amazing guy.

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 17:53 (twenty-three years ago)

*sings* There may be trouble ahead.

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 17:57 (twenty-three years ago)

for gods sake just *fuck* him.

thuddd (thuddd), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Alongside thudd's post, mine now seems mean. That wasn’t intended.

This chap obviously likes you but doesn't *like* you. He is probably looking for ego-stroking and reassurance but that doesn't make him bad. Sounds like you are both experiencing similar emotions that are complicated by the fact that your feelings are for him. I would advise to STEER WELL CLEAR. you'll only end up looking like a fool or getting upset.

Perhaps I am too proud though?

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Most likey #2, but you don't want to reward such poor pickup skills with action, on to the next dronerockboy!

Mary (Mary), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:08 (twenty-three years ago)

You have a boy you fancy in your bed. Do you:

1. Make a serious pass at him?
2. Get on the Internet and ask some people if they think he might fancy you?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:14 (twenty-three years ago)

The second option. Pounce on him.

Andrew (enneff), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I agree with Mary, don't reward that kind of thing. Unless you really really really adore him he sounds just annoying.

Maria (Maria), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:18 (twenty-three years ago)

But it just felt so much like a gender reversal of that scene from Bedazzled...

He: I have such terrible luck with girls!
She: I really don't understand men!
He: Do I scare them off by being too intimidating?
She: So do I! I scare them off by being too honest!
He: But girls *hate* honesty! They like to play games!
She: I hate playing games. Why can't we just be free from social convention?
He: Why is it so difficult to just say "I *LIKE* you!!!"
::silence as possibly potentially meaningful looks are exchanged::
She: Perfect Prescription is over, shall we put on Playing With Fire next?
He: It's so unfair, girls never fancy me!

However, in the movie, he pounced on her and she beat him off with a stick. I've had this scenario end with disasterous results if I actually attempt to pounce. Sigh. I don't fancy him in a threatening scary way, I just want to make beautiful free jazz with him. I just want him to know how groovy I think he is.

Oh, this is the confusing, sickening, fun, wonderful, nailbiting awful part of the crush. Where it's all wonderful potential and no hurt or disappointment of non-reciprocation, or the awkwardness of actually trying to blossom into A Thing. Why can't we just stay this way forever?

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Jazz? Ewww! Euch! Euch!

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, but we had such a wonderful conversation about whether free jazz was evil or good.

He: Free jazz! jazz is innocent!
She: Do not free jazz. Put jazz back in jail, 'tis evil!

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I will listen to jazz FOR NO MAN.

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Love DDB's and you have to put up with Free Jazz. It just goes with the territory. Blame J. Spaceman.

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:28 (twenty-three years ago)

You have a boy you fancy in your bed. Do you:

1. Make a serious pass at him?
2. Get on the Internet and ask some people if they think he might fancy you?

3. Knowing that he reads Freaky Trigger and sometimes lurks on ILM, post thinly veiled dilemmas which make reference to his immense shaggability in the hopes that it will boost his self esteem?

Bear in mind that I'm not entirely sure that the desired end result is us getting it on. The last thing I want right now is a relationship. Maybe I just want to let him know that he's lovely in a way he can't discount. :-)

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Kate, I envy your agony.

Amateurist (amateurist), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:44 (twenty-three years ago)

We can change the FT tagline to "HEY DRONEROCK BOY KATE FANCIES YOU" if that would help!

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Send him an email (don't address him personally) and if he doesn't respond favourably, feign shock and pretend it was meant for someone else.

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:53 (twenty-three years ago)

No, that's nowhere NEAR specific enough. I mean, DUH, Kate Fancies DDB, shock horror, no one could have seen that one coming. But if Tanya Headon could maybe say something to the effect ::hrmmm, what shall we call him in thinly veiled land?:: "HILTON BETELGUESE IS A HOTTIE!!!" I think that would make his dirty dronerock day.

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Ohhhhhhhhh....him! I'm not sure he's Tanya's type. But I'm not sure anyone is. Still the suggestion has been noted!

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 26 January 2003 19:22 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm willing to take a punt that Tanya hates dronerock.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 26 January 2003 19:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, Tanya hates his band. He's so chuffed about this. He loves Tanya, he wants to marry her. No! Don't marry her, have me... (Beautiful South, beGONE!!!)

OK, I'll stop being so obvious.

Oh fuck it, who cares? He's lovely! And if he doesn't realise that I think he's amazing, then he's stupid.

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 19:52 (twenty-three years ago)

He may know that you think he's amazing but that's not going to change anything, is it?

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 19:54 (twenty-three years ago)

free jazz roxx no question abt it!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:11 (twenty-three years ago)

You could always say something like "you know what drives me BATS: beautiful dirty dronerock boys who don't know how to make a clear distinction between complaining that girls don't fancy them so that they can get sympathy from their platonic buddy-girls and complaining that girls don't fancy them so that they can test the waters to see if their platonic buddy-girls would be willing to fuck them, instead of just asking them outright."

Douglas (Douglas), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Might that not be a bit subtle?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 26 January 2003 21:05 (twenty-three years ago)

the luxury of having such ..problems

Vic (Vic), Sunday, 26 January 2003 21:26 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't want to fuck up a potentially wonderful friendship with an amazing guy

That's always the problem, isn't it?

Jen (nstop), Sunday, 26 January 2003 22:17 (twenty-three years ago)

It's so easy for a woman to pull a man though, any woman at all. All you have to do is buy him a pint of his favourite beer and then touch his willy and he's yours.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 26 January 2003 22:39 (twenty-three years ago)

just put my hands on your ass, it's that easy!

Radisson Mars (tracerhand), Sunday, 26 January 2003 23:10 (twenty-three years ago)

It's so easy for a woman to pull a man though, any woman at all

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 27 January 2003 00:19 (twenty-three years ago)

If it were me...I would think it's probably not worth the trouble. He just sounds like one of those types who just wants someone to make a fuss over them and feel sorry for them, and wouldn't be able to handle someone dealing with them directly and honestly (what would he have left to whine over?).

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 27 January 2003 00:22 (twenty-three years ago)

what nicole said.

di smith (lucylurex), Monday, 27 January 2003 00:52 (twenty-three years ago)

What di said.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 00:56 (twenty-three years ago)

That's because men conveniently classify some women as non-women.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Monday, 27 January 2003 01:03 (twenty-three years ago)

...but of course there are no women classifying men as non-men.

jot eff pe, Monday, 27 January 2003 01:07 (twenty-three years ago)

God jot, paranoid much? What didja want Melissa to say, "That's because people conveniently classify some members of their respective opposite genders as not part of that respective opposite gender."?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 27 January 2003 01:12 (twenty-three years ago)

No, I'm just tired of men-are-like-this rhetorics. It's so goddamn dull.

jot eff pe, Monday, 27 January 2003 01:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Women classifying some men as non-men shocker. [Warning! Barbara Ellen penned article] (it make me so sad that this woman has a career)

N.B. I am not sympathising with jot eff pe's weird hyperdefensive post - it just reminded me of reading this drivel today.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 01:24 (twenty-three years ago)

B-b-b-but an overwhelming majority of males *does* share some similiar behaviour patterns, as does the overwhelimg majority of females. Why is it "dull" to point that out?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 27 January 2003 01:26 (twenty-three years ago)

...but of course there are no women classifying men as non-men.

I didn't deny this.

I just hate that men always say "Oh, it's so easy for you girls, you can get laid/find a guy any time."

It's not true. The reason guys say this is because they conveniently exclude a large portion of the female population when they think of "women".

I think women are more honest about having standards, whereas guys seem to like to perpetuate the myth that they'll fuck just about anything.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Monday, 27 January 2003 01:29 (twenty-three years ago)

B-b-b-but an overwhelming majority of males *does* share some similiar behaviour patterns, as does the overwhelimg majority of females. Why is it "dull" to point that out?

If they do, it's dull because it's a cliche.

If they don't, it's dull because it's sexism.

(Grrr... this would be so much easier if I knew the English word for Schubladendenker.)

jot eff pe, Monday, 27 January 2003 01:42 (twenty-three years ago)

"schubladendenker" = a gigantic urge to classify people as part of a certain group, ignoring any other sorts of traits they might have and thus effectively disowning them as an individual (can't think of a single English word fer that, either.)

I hardly think that what Melissa said was a cliche; pointing out a general weakness that is present in many men or women (more due to social conditioning than due to their gender itself) might alert some of 'em to this weakness and give them the possibility to work on it, so it's useful even if it is dull. Sure, we are all individuals, and what Melissa said doesn't apply to *all* men, but she's hardly putting us all in one schublade (so to speak) by pointing out a weakness that many men might have. There's a difference between saying "men tend to..." and saying "ALL MEN tend to...", you know.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:00 (twenty-three years ago)

There's a difference between saying "men tend to..." and saying "ALL MEN tend to...", you know.

OK, my mistake. Saying "MOST MEN I KNOW OR HEARD OF tend to etc." every time would be really fucking PC but let's try to think it, please. At least once in a while. Thank you.

jot eff pe, Monday, 27 January 2003 02:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, any man who says this: "It's so easy for a woman to pull a man though, any woman at all. All you have to do is buy him a pint of his favourite beer and then touch his willy and he's yours."

Melissa W (Melissa W), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:13 (twenty-three years ago)

that comment must have been joking! i mean if a man says that and MEANS it then it reflects badly on him as caring only about alcohol and sex right? so no self-respecting man would say it seriously. i do know what you mean about that general stereotype being harmful, but i doubt that nick believes it.

Maria (Maria), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:18 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, any man who says this...

...it's still not what "men always say", for christ's s... oh wait, I'm getting into a loop here.

(Don't argue, kids, you're both wrong.)

jot eff pe, Monday, 27 January 2003 02:22 (twenty-three years ago)

>I just hate that men always say "Oh, it's so easy for you girls, you can get laid/find a guy any time."
It's not true. The reason guys say this is because they conveniently exclude a large portion of the female population when they think of "women".
I think women are more honest about having standards, whereas guys seem to like to perpetuate the myth that they'll fuck just about anything.


Melissa, I think that most any woman can get laid most any time. Just go into any bar. I am not saying that she would necessarily want to have sex with any of the men there, but it is highly likely that at least some of the men would be more than willing to have sex with her. (After all, why are there so few male prostitutes who serve women? There just isn't that much of a market when it comes to women wanting to get their rocks off. And yes, there are male escort services, but those tend to cater toward women who actually want an escort/companion for some stated reason - sex may be involved, but it's usually after attending some function where he poses as her date.) BUT there is a big difference between someone finding a sexual partner for a one-night stand or for a fuck-friend and finding someone you want to spend your life with.

For either gender, the search for a mate can be a long and tedious and frustrating and lonely process. It is not easier for one gender or the other, I don't imagine, to find someone with whom they are compatible in things other than sexual interests.

I do believe that men can be sexually manipulated easier than women, but that is a generalization and varies depending on age/sex drive at a given time. (I've seen some older women do some really stupid shit because of their sex drive.)

Okay, that's my piece.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't want to fuck up a potentially wonderful friendship with an amazing guy

Oh, Kate, get over it. Pounce on the boy. If he's an amazing guy but somehow not interested in you, he'll brush you off and it won't destroy the friendship. Worst case scenario, you have a few awkward weeks and then get over it. (Well, OK, the worst case scenario probably involves a white picket fence and the pitterpatter of little feet, but you see what I mean.)

Chris P (Chris P), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:30 (twenty-three years ago)

[Warning! Barbara Ellen penned article] (it make me so sad that this woman has a career)

Gah, that was horrible. I mean, god forbid a man actually care about his appearance! That instantly makes him a gurl.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:31 (twenty-three years ago)

No, an 'almost man' or PROBABLY GAY.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Depends why you want sex. If you want sex to assuage a low self esteem and reassure yourself of your own worth/attractiveness, well, even bad sex serves its purpose. Hell, that's been most of the reason that I've had sex most of the time.

What other reason is there to have sex? Cause it feels good? Most of the time, a decent wank is just as good. The only reason to have sex with someone else is to see your own validity reflected in their eyes. I'll be your mirror, reflect what you are, in case you don't know.

Yeah, I'm aware of how sick and fucked up that is. It sure explains a lot of my attitudes, doesn't it? Maybe things would feel different if I was in love. But that's even scarier than being in bed with a near stranger...

So what is bad sex, under those conditions?

Anyway...

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 22:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I really feel like I have a clear thing I am failing to communicate here. Once again, it's not to with 'emotions getting in the way' or anything. To give a silly but concrete example, I mean the worrying about whether she'd be OK with just saying 'goodbye' afterwards. I guess I could only cope with it if it was some seedy contacts mag way where it was all understood. Even then..

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:45 (twenty-three years ago)

N., do you have a magic willy that the ladies can't leave alone?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:48 (twenty-three years ago)

God, yes (no the post doesn't end there) I see how it might look like I was implying that. No no - I just meant who knows, she *might* really like me. Do I have to be so self-effacing as to preclude that possibility? Gosh, that must be how some people with low self-esteem say they are so promiscuous, isn't it? Like, 'Well s/he couldn't possibly like me as a person so it's OK to fuck off in the morning".

Anyway yeah. The other less flattering take is that I wouldn't really care about their feelings, it's just that I wouldn't want myself moaned about as another man who just fucked and went.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:52 (twenty-three years ago)

(Dude, I was joking. You've made a bunch of valid points which are really the main reason why I didn't have casual sex.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:55 (twenty-three years ago)

You're MARRIED - isn't that reason enough? Wait till Joei hears about this. Were your vows a *joke* to you?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:58 (twenty-three years ago)

What you do in practice and the philosophy you adhere to are two separate things. I thought that was evident from what you were saying?

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Remind me what I was saying?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:02 (twenty-three years ago)

I gave you no window for that joke! There's a difference between "didn't" and "don't", you know...

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:05 (twenty-three years ago)

My interpretation of your posts was that this is what you thought about things rather than what you go about doing on a regular Saturday night. I may have been deceived.

And what Dan said.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Thankfully Dan, I misread.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Lara - I don't *do* these thing on a Saturday night but my reasons for not doing so are real and experienced and not hypothetical. Of course if I am already seeing someone then it's quite different. I WAS ONLY JOKING ABOUT DAN SLEEPING AROUND.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Erm, can we go back to talking about how beautiful Hilton is, please?

Which is exactly what I was doing on Saturday night, thank you...

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 23:10 (twenty-three years ago)

How are we supposed to do that?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:13 (twenty-three years ago)

So you would actually *like* to do these things but you are reluctant due to bad experiences?

Are you curious or wanting?

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:13 (twenty-three years ago)

"Cause it feels good? Most of the time, a decent wank is just as good"

uh, no.

g (graysonlane), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I so should have written 'wanton'.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:14 (twenty-three years ago)

See how an ill-crafted joke can just boomerang back on you, N.?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Say "Yes, Kate, Hilton is beautiful and talented and wonderful and you are brilliant and perceptive for appreciating his beauty and his talent and his wonder."

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 23:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I stayed in a hilton in phoenix...it was OK, nice pool.

there's one by the motorway in glasgow but I've never been inside. there's one at the end of byre's road...earlier this month, as the last resort, we went in there for a drink and it was very expensive and they had on tori amos the whole time. it was nice, though.

RJG (RJG), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't know, Lara.

[...thinks...]

IT'S NOT A BINARY QUESTION.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:16 (twenty-three years ago)

"Are you curious and wanting?"

Is that better?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:17 (twenty-three years ago)

111000?

001100?

010101?

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:17 (twenty-three years ago)

"Tag Team, back again/WHOOMP THERE IT IS!"

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:18 (twenty-three years ago)

Are you curvaceous and wanton?

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:19 (twenty-three years ago)

That would be.. bewildering and wrong.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:20 (twenty-three years ago)

Dammit, if you don't get back on topic NOW, I am going to google like the wind until I find pictures of Hilton!

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 23:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Is the topic Hilton-worship or having an unrequited crush on someone oblivious and self-pitying?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Both.

And why have I only found ONE photo of him on the internet, and that one is totally shite and you can barely see him for psychedelic stuff?

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 23:30 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.ushandicapable.org/Hilton-1G_small.gifhttp://www.vialattea.net/hubble/1996/9604.jpg
[I am not doing this to annoy anyone]

RJG (RJG), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:33 (twenty-three years ago)

RJG is my hero.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes! yes!!! Thank you, Jazz Butcher, for dropping the secret of his real name. I mean, his birth name, rather. Heh.

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 23:41 (twenty-three years ago)

It's also easy for men to get laid. Pick up a guitar or laptop and get on a stage. End of story.

OK, so I just got back from my first tour. What went wrong?

Chris P (Chris P), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 00:57 (twenty-three years ago)

What is wrong with you people? Hilton also tried to claim that he never got groupies. (apart from the scary one who tried to rape him, obviously.)

Or rather, what am I doing right? I couldn't get laid in a meat market if I wasn't in a band. But when we're on tour, I have to beat off boys with sticks. I wouldn't stay in a band otherwise!

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 01:04 (twenty-three years ago)

I guess I have to start playing the kind of music that would land me an article in Guitar Player. Then the sex would be flowing my way. (Though it probably would be female groupies, anyways. Bah.)

Chris P (Chris P), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 01:20 (twenty-three years ago)

"Yes, Kate, Hilton is beautiful and talented and wonderful and you are brilliant and perceptive for appreciating his beauty and his talent and his wonder."

luna (luna.c), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Thank you, Luna. That's what I needed, really. :-)

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:05 (twenty-three years ago)

I do what I can

luna (luna.c), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:08 (twenty-three years ago)

I give up googling. I've just accepted the fact that Hilton's band is the only band in the world without a website, and that there are no pictures of him anywhere on the web. :-(

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:17 (twenty-three years ago)

"Yes, Kate, Hilton is beautiful and talented and wonderful and you are brilliant and perceptive for appreciating his beauty and his talent and his wonder."

"And Hilton is a total dick for not noticing how much you fancy him, and not appreciating your loyal affection."

j.lu (j.lu), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:22 (twenty-three years ago)

why don't you draw a pic kate?

That Girl (thatgirl), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not sure how much loyal affection you can show for a man you've known 48 hours. IF, in the remotest chance that there was any actual mutual lust going on, considering the circumstances, I think either of us is exhonerated for not pouncing/appreciating/whatever.

I'm trying to have perspective here, but it's hard when you're bored and manic and can't sleep. I've blown this whole thing way out of proportion. Why? Because it's fun.

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:25 (twenty-three years ago)

What's the best approach? To only complain about no-one fancying you to people you don't find attractive, or complain about no-one fancying you to people you do find attractive. In the hope that they say "Bloody hell, *I* fancy you!!!". Both these options could narrow down how many people you could have this conversation with, but would make life simpler when it came to luv. I think.

fractal (fractal), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:27 (twenty-three years ago)

You know, I was going to say that I only complain about not getting laid to people that I wouldn't mind sleeping with, but then I realise that I often complain to other women, and to men that I think of as women. In fact I'm more likely to complain to someone I wouldn't sleep with. If there's someone I'm interested in, I find it's much better to represent myself as "Wow, I'm so well adjusted and fun to be around I bet you only wish you were half as glamourous and exciting as me, but if you hang around with me, you might be able to capture some of the glamour and excitement by association..." Which actually works in a way that moaning about not getting laid doesn't.

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:32 (twenty-three years ago)

I tend to go really monosylabbic(sp) and speak in really simple sentences like a not very bright person. When approached by someone I really fancy. I really should do something about changing this method. It rarely works. :)

fractal (fractal), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:40 (twenty-three years ago)

I am curvaceous and wanton.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 09:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Whatever.

Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 09:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I usually get brainsuck and cannot speak at all. Which is why it's all the more amazing that I was able to carry on an actual intelligent (for 7am) and articulate conversation with Hilton for so long. While staring in his big brown eyes and thinking "god, you're fucking gorgeous."

OK, last post about Hilton and now I will make an attempt to control my mania and not get this way about some boy. Even though I REMEMBERED THE SONG!!! I REMEMBERED THE SONG!!! I'm so proud. I wrote a song about him yesterday morning, but then in all the excitement about my job, forgot to write it down. And when I went to play it in the evening, it was wiped from my memory. But I woke up with it stuck in my head this morning. Complete. Arranged. Middle 8 and everything. Beautiful! Just like him!

ENOUGH! Slap me if you catch me perving on Hilton. This is to stop.

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 10:36 (twenty-three years ago)

But I woke up with it stuck in my head this morning. Complete. Arranged. Middle 8 and everything.

I originally read this as "Middle 8 Mile", so I thought Kate had started doing rap!

Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 13:33 (twenty-three years ago)

No way man, avante guarde bubblegum free jazz, dude. HAR HAR HAR!!! Captain Groovy and his Bubblegum Army are coming to take me away...

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 13:36 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.