"Women (in general) are less obsessed with music than guys. "

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Wha a- -a -a -a???

(Taken from another thread - nathalie's remark)

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 27 January 2003 17:28 (twenty-three years ago)

So will I grow out of it sometime soon?

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 27 January 2003 17:28 (twenty-three years ago)

No. That's what in general means.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 27 January 2003 17:31 (twenty-three years ago)

I think the question is maybe better phrased -- do women obsess in general over hobbies (or interests or whatever you want to call it) less than men? I'd say no.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 27 January 2003 17:31 (twenty-three years ago)

no, there are some women i know who are equally obsessed.

Chris V. (Chris V), Monday, 27 January 2003 17:34 (twenty-three years ago)

It's an interesting thing. I read in a book once (I suspect it was by Neal Stephenson, but I could be wrong) an interesting discussion that theorised that men are much more prone to becoming excessively focused on a particular subject, whereas women have a tendency to remain fairly broad in their interests. Obviously there are many exceptions to both sides, but I think this idea holds pretty accurately in general.

Now, whether this is a biological/chemical/evolutionary thing or whether it is a societal thing is, I think, well out of the scope of our collective expertise. (prove me wrong!)

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 27 January 2003 17:36 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd say yes because we're not brought up that way. Of course that means that education is the keyfactor. And it is. But not always. Just look around in a record shop, club or whatever music related place: There's less women than guys. And if there are, exclude the girlfriends. As my father said "You'll grow out of it." I of course HATED that remark. But sadly (?) in many cases it applies. Sarah, maybe you will, maybe you won't. Is it bad/good if you do? *shrug* I dunno.
Andrew, I hate that point of view. It's biological predestination. hehehe How come we are less obsessed? Anyway, it applies to me (to some degree). I never really viewed myself as exclusively music-obsessed, I preferred to be labeled "interested in (contemporary) culture".

nathalie (nathalie), Monday, 27 January 2003 17:39 (twenty-three years ago)

spooky Andrew mindmeld! IE he posted exactly what I would have said as a non-irritable follow-up. Aren't the vast majority of people Asberger's syndrome male?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 27 January 2003 17:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Well it doesn't apply to me at all really, as I'm (male, and) equally obsessed in Technology as I am in each of Music, Film, and Mathematics.

So there you go.

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 27 January 2003 17:47 (twenty-three years ago)

And nathalie, while I don't particularly like the idea of biologically determined personality traits, I'm not knowledgeable enough to rule it out.

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 27 January 2003 17:49 (twenty-three years ago)

That's what in general means.

Sure. I guess I'm just sort of annoyed with this notion that women are less interested in music as it makes me feel rather alone as a woman that is extremely interested in music. And the idea that some people - not referring to people on the board but in general - don't take my interest in music as seriously because I am female.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 27 January 2003 17:49 (twenty-three years ago)

On this topic, I can remember once being at a friend's house party when one of my close friends said to me as I walked past "Andrew, you have to meet this girl, she has really excellent taste in music!" At which I started discussing a whole lot of bands and stuff with her, and I remember thinking it quite novel for a girl to know so much about music.

Obviously this was a few years ago, and is somewhat related to my attending an all-boys school, but I believe it has some relevance in that it indicates the existence of widely-held beliefs that women aren't really as interested in music as men.

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 27 January 2003 17:56 (twenty-three years ago)

...men are much more prone to becoming excessively focused on a particular subject, whereas women have a tendency to remain fairly broad in their interests. Obviously there are many exceptions to both sides, but I think this idea holds pretty accurately in general.

I can think of plenty of obsessive hobbies in which there are hardly any men...knitting, scrapbooking, beanie baby collecting for example. Maybe it's just chance and society that make the hobby a 'male' or 'female' pursuit, and it's like a snowball effect, attracting more members of that gender as it goes along because part of the appeal to such a hobby is the non-sexual companionship, getting to bond with other men/women.

Music actually seems like one of the more gender-balanced obsessions that I can think of. Sports (tho it tends male depending on the sport) could be another.

teeny (teeny), Monday, 27 January 2003 18:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I have girl friends who are obsessive as me about collecting, so they're definitely there. But that just flies out the window anytime you step into a smaller record fair here in the UK. Before you will be a sea of anorak-clad list-bearing blokes and the only woman in sight is the one running the door. I'm a bit of a novelty at those, and often find I get a discount just by being polite and smiley.

The big fairs at Wembley etc. are probably more balanced!

I was brought up to obsess - my father is a total audiophile who is also big on ham radio, collecting random bits of electronics in the shed and buying guitars/amps.

elisabeth k, Monday, 27 January 2003 19:46 (twenty-three years ago)

lol! i accused my girlfriend of being "such a girl" because she said she only knew songs by the sound and didn't really care about the artist or genre or album or songtitle etc. She has quite a large music collection, so one could easily say she liked (or loved) music. But for instance she mentioned she had a French Rap album. Intrigued, I asked who it was by and she said she didn't know, even though she owned the CD and listens to it a lot. This made me laugh as I don't think there are many CDs in my collection which I don't know what song is on what and who played rhythm guitar and blah blah blah. Obviously my bird reckons I'm a bit of an idiot for caring about all that bumf. So I think it's more generally a matter of blokes obsessing about trivia and wanting every album by a certain artist - like a thirst for knowledge and deriving pleasure from that (as well as enjoying the music no doubt), whereas girls can be just as obsessed but in a more aesthetic way.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 27 January 2003 19:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I think you might have something there, dog.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 27 January 2003 19:55 (twenty-three years ago)

I have wondered about this question a lot, and for many different reasons. There is the larger concern of whether women are being conditioned to act in a different fashion than males, which is problematic. My other concern is that, well, I would really love to meet a hott female DJ who is just as excited as I am about white labels ;-)

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Monday, 27 January 2003 19:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Dude, gender preconceptions suck. And what's more, they're wrong. I am more obsessed with music than 90% of the guys that I know. I know lots of women who are the same way as me. OK, they're not that rare, that I don't rejoice when I meet another (DJ'd on Saturday night with an amazing girl named Frances who knew so much about music that she made *me* look like a dabbler). But if you don't find them, you're not looking hard enough.

Women just obsess about music in different ways. Where men tend to get obsessed with catalogue numbers and white labels, women tend to get obsessed with personalities and will know who managed who and whom is related to whom in what ways. And women are more likely to obsess on one particular artist, while men will get obsessed with a genre. Women treat fan-communities in a different way than men, or rather, women build communities around their interests, while men engage in pissing competitions.

And women have the ultimate advantage in fandom. We can actually *fuck* our idols, while men can only masturbate over them. So hah!

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 20:07 (twenty-three years ago)

If gender preconceptions suck then why just throw out a glut of other ones at us?

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 27 January 2003 20:21 (twenty-three years ago)

There's something in what Kate says, but women tend to grow out of that phase more quickly than men grow out of theirs. *Tend* to, yes. If you can't see that there are more male music obsessives than women, certainly men in their 20s and 30s, then you're not living in the same world as I am. Which you're probably not, come to think of it.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 20:27 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not living in the same world as you, N. Thank fuck.

I know more female music types than I know men. Is that just because I have more female friends than men? Because I pick my friends because of their music obsession?

Maybe women are less likely to go to clubs or concerts or whatever, because you know what? It's a real hassle to be a single female standing in the front row of a specialist music gig. I can handle geeks staring at the Other Music logo on my tits. A lot of girls get disgusted with that and let it scare them off. Whatever.

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 20:32 (twenty-three years ago)

I probably have a roughly equal number of male and female friends. The women might love music but do not know so many facts about it or talk about or buy so many records as the men. That, combined with anecdotal experience, combined with the number of men talking about it on ILM and the rest of the internet leads me to my non-scientific judgement. I didn't really think about gigs' and clubs' gender balance. I'd say that's a lot more equal (esp. clubs) becuase you don't need to obsess to dance. In fact it probably doesn't help.

I don't disparage women such as you who do not fit the general pattern, nor do I make any claim for this kind of obsessing being a more 'true' love of music than a more relaxed approach.

And I wasn't trying be to be snarky with my different worlds comment. It was just an off the cuff end to a post.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 20:42 (twenty-three years ago)

N, you and I *do* live in different worlds. We just do. No snarciness inferred or implied.

But to counter your other argument, how do you know that just because your female friends do not "know so many facts about it or talk about or buy so many records as the men" that they aren't just as obsessed, but in different ways? Who's to say that one form of enjoyment is any better than another?

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 20:46 (twenty-three years ago)

listen, i think it's true. Women are less into hobby type stuff then men. In general. There are plenty of women into it, but less numebrs hten men. Go to any hobby event (vintage guitar show, record show, etc. I assume star trek conventions and stuff too but I don't go to those and wouldn't admit it if i did) -- will bear this out. Generally more boys at indie/rock/pop shows as well. I have no inkling of the reasons for this, just the belife that is objectively true.

g (graysonlane), Monday, 27 January 2003 20:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm talking about the numbers of peopel invovled, not the depth of any on e individual's personal involvement.

g (graysonlane), Monday, 27 January 2003 20:53 (twenty-three years ago)

I can handle geeks staring at the Other Music logo on my tits. A lot of girls get disgusted with that and let it scare them off. Whatever.

Whut!?

Mandee, Monday, 27 January 2003 21:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Kate, I answered your first point already. I don't think most women I know (and know of) are as obsessed with the 'relationships', personalities whatever part of bands much anymore either. The men are less obsessed too, but the reduction in numbers and intensity does not seem as marked. Maybe I'm wrong. But in any case, the qualitative difference in obsession that you describe is great enough to make the original statement a meaningful observation. If you want to fight for the plurality of obsession then that's fine. As I said, I think even with the widest definition, as we get older then the women *tend* to lose the obsessiveness all round.

As for the second point, I quite agree. That's why I said "nor do I make any claim for this kind of obsessing being a more 'true' love of music than a more relaxed approach" in my post above.

Now you've got me obsessing about this different worlds thing. Your life does seem glamorous in a way, though I don't envy it because you're always going on about band members and stuff and that doesn't interest me because I am *male* ha ah. Actually, I used to get pretty obsessed with the interpersonal stuff too. I still sometimes wonder about what it would be like if musicians X, Y and Z were locked in a room together etc. How they'd get on, not what awful supergroup they'd come out with. Though it never involved drone rock.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Why do some guys get so freaked out when they find out how much I know about music? That was one thing I liked about the lounge / e-z / exotica scene - they were mostly guys but they didn't freak out about having to share info with a girl. Come to think of it, a lot of hard core indie types didn't care, either. I have mainly had this problem with guys who really aren't as heavy into music as they think they are or who are really canonical like that High Fidelity guy.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:10 (twenty-three years ago)

I go out to shows all the time, sometimes on my own, which is no big deal cuz I'm there to see the band(s), duh. But twice now I've had the conversation with some guy I've met at a show where he was shocked -- shocked! -- that I was there by myself, and didn't I mind? etc. etc.

Jen (nstop), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:11 (twenty-three years ago)

does my life seem glamourous in a way, N?

RJG (RJG), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:12 (twenty-three years ago)

no

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:13 (twenty-three years ago)

what do I have to do?

RJG (RJG), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:14 (twenty-three years ago)

ha ha this thread is funny! i wish i could find someone who wz as into music as me

geeta (geeta), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:16 (twenty-three years ago)

RJG, if you have to ask..

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:16 (twenty-three years ago)

In my music/zine adventures, I've met too many music-obsessed women to think that they're anything out of the ordinary. (I'm not surprised to see Jen post here, for one thing.) Maybe I live in a bizarro world, but I've met more women than guys with whom I can talk music.

mike a (mike a), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Your life seems glamourous to me, RJG.. but then again, look at me. I don't even talk.

Mandee, Monday, 27 January 2003 21:27 (twenty-three years ago)

You don't? You used to - what has happened?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:31 (twenty-three years ago)

My life is glamourous? DUDE!!!

::swans about the flat grandly in her ratty cardigan and smelly corduroys::

This is the first time in my life that anyone has ever called me glamourous. I'm so happy.

I never said my life was glamourous. I just said it was different. Given that I live in a different city from you right now, I grew up on a different continent, I am a different gender, and I have a different occupation, it's to be expected that my life would be *different*. I often don't like my life at all. However, it's the only one I've got, hence thank fuck.

Funny, yesterday (was it only yesterday?) Hilton was saying something about how he wished that he could be normal and live in a big house in the country and have a nice wife and nice life and be normal, etc. etc. and I called him on it and told him it was bullshit, but sometimes I wonder. Not that I think that people like me and him envy the lifestyle, but perhaps the *ability* to be normal and well balanced enough to be happy in it. Or maybe I'm projecting...

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 21:33 (twenty-three years ago)

HILTON? Truly, we are from different planets.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:36 (twenty-three years ago)

You don't? You used to - what has happened?

I just stopped. What can I say? I do what I do.

Mandee, Monday, 27 January 2003 21:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Paris Hilton? Wow, you are glamorous.

Mandee, Monday, 27 January 2003 21:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Mute Mandee

)-:

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:39 (twenty-three years ago)

he actually said your life seemed glamOrous. maybe he's trying to close the continent-grown-up-on gap.

yesterday you were talking to a guy named after a hotel--G L A M . I cannot argue.

my life is made all the more glamourous by the simple fact that I know mandee. and mandee knows it. she should talk, though, if she doesn't.

[this was typed at the same time those-^ people were typing]

RJG (RJG), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Dude, he's named after a planet. *That* is so glamourous. Hilton oozes glamour from every pore of his dirty dronerock body. Mmmmm. I guess that makes my bed glamourous now. Maybe I should change the sheets to get rid of all that glamour...

(Actually, I should change the sheets. He sheds.)

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 21:42 (twenty-three years ago)

[this was typed at the same time those-^ people were typing]

I love it when that happens, it's like when you call someone and the phone never rings but then the person you were going to call suddenly is on the line and says, "Hello?" and you're all confused and like, "Wuh!?"

And N., I can really talk, RJG just said I didn't talk very much in Glasgow, which I didn't. I dunno why.

Mandee, Monday, 27 January 2003 21:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Dude, he's named after a planet. *That* is so glamourous.

It's all contextual.

"Uranus is on the phone."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:50 (twenty-three years ago)

a star!=a planet

you are named after a star!=you are a star [can't think of a good example]

RJG (RJG), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:50 (twenty-three years ago)

kate the reason your life is glamorous is that you make everything sound dramatic and interesting. even your unemployed ratty corduroy-ness.

Maria (Maria), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:01 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd say that ILM pretty much proves the initial premise as correct. I did a quick count on the introduce yourself thread and there's about 25-30 women and a couple of hundred (plus) guys.

Or maybe guys are more likely to hang around internet message boards while woman get on with doing something useful.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:13 (twenty-three years ago)

There are a lot more male internet users than female ones, so ILx isn't a fair basis for judgement.

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:24 (twenty-three years ago)

If you wear contact lenses you can put your finger on your eyeball and freak people out.

I'm sorry, what is this thread about?

Ally C (Ally C), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Is Ally C clothing?

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:30 (twenty-three years ago)

The only thing that looks good on you is me.

Ally C (Ally C), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:33 (twenty-three years ago)

And Gucci.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:34 (twenty-three years ago)

And you.

*swoons*

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Ally's door is always open for the ladies.

In the film of my life, I am played by Disco Stu.

Ally C (Ally C), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:43 (twenty-three years ago)

who wins?

RJG (RJG), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:43 (twenty-three years ago)

i will not let anyone tell me i am not as "obsessed" with music as your average music-obsessed guy. so i don't know every fucking thing about every fucking band and their label and so forth. i grew up obsessed with music, its been my main focus since i was two, i've been constantly singing and dancing since i was able to talk and walk. its my life, without it i may as well not exist. i don't really like to generalize about gender, but i get the impression that the male music-obsessives i know don't really have the same intimate connection with particular pieces of music as i do. they are more concerned with facts and figures. for me, the facts and figures take time, time which could be better spent dancing or singing or playing or just losing myself in a piece of music. does that make sense?

di smith (lucylurex), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:44 (twenty-three years ago)

I do because I play me and get to do it all again!

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:45 (twenty-three years ago)

generally, I agree with this thread in general and its general question.

RJG (RJG), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Your arguments are always so *tight*.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:48 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't do arguments, only disagreements. haha.

RJG (RJG), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Like Beckett to my ears!

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:50 (twenty-three years ago)

S.A.M.U.E.L.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Generally, you're an asshole.

Ally C (Ally C), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:50 (twenty-three years ago)

*aghast*

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:51 (twenty-three years ago)

he's right, I'm not an asshole the whole time.

RJG (RJG), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Can I remind everyone that this board is largely populated by people who are obsessed with music and so there are going to be a lot of people, male or female, who know a lot more people who are obsessed with music. But it really is a common fact that in real life (that is - at work or down the local boozer or in the street, not at alternative rock concerts or on the internet) you are more likely to find a bloke who is "obsessed" with music than a girl. It's true. I think some posters are saying that because they know a lot of females who are really into buying LOADS of CDs and playing guitar and religiously reading the music press, this must go for the entire population and this is simply not true. IN GENERAL boys are more likely to become obsessed with music than girls.
I read some old bull which I'm not sure whether to believe or not that it's a hunter-gatherer thing in males. Men need to have a larger musical knowledge to improve their status and the size of their music collection can often reflect this. Not sure about this particular theory but it does fit in some ways. I'll admit here and now that half the reason I like to brush up on my musical knowledge is so I can recommend something to a friend or impress them with my immaculate taste! It sounds shallow, but that's the way it is and I think girls prefer to do this in other ways, amongst these by wearing particular clothes or discussing soaps and celebrities etc. If they do not like these kind of things then it is likely that they will find alternative routes through these, admittedly cliched obsessions, and find other ones e.g. music.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 01:23 (twenty-three years ago)

If they do not like these kind of things then it is likely that they will find alternative routes through these, admittedly cliched obsessions, and find other ones e.g. music.

whu? That'll be 2am I suppose. Night night!

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 01:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Sick and tired of gender distinction threads! Lets see some CLASS distinction threads! I wanna know who's rich and who's poor!

Or HAIR COLOR distinction threads? Are brunettes smarter than redheads?

Are societal assumptions TRULY correct? Truly truly? Like, with no exceptions? Truly truly?

Gotta go play some Grant Lee Buffalo now.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:13 (twenty-three years ago)

for me, the facts and figures take time, time which could be better spent dancing or singing or playing or just losing myself in a piece of music. does that make sense?
Yes, perfectly.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:21 (twenty-three years ago)

That's brilliant. Who are you quoting, Sarah? That's just perfectly IT.

The difference between dissecting music and losing yourself in it, which we've discussed on the other board...

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:22 (twenty-three years ago)

but i get the impression that the male music-obsessives i know don't really have the same intimate connection with particular pieces of music as i do. they are more concerned with facts and figures. for me, the facts and figures take time, time which could be better spent dancing or singing or playing or just losing myself in a piece of music. does that make sense?

Facts and figures help me lose myself in the music! Like, the fact that Bo Diddley's "I'm A Man" was later covered by The Yardbirds and then became pretty much the blueprint for all Garage Rock blah blah blah blah...give me an additional layer of pleasure when listening to it, because apart from enjoying the song I'm also enjoying how wonderful it is that music can travel through all these boundaries and then mutate into all these fascinating diferent forms. Which is not to say that I wouldn't enjoy "I'm A Man" if I didn't know about all that stuff but I dunno, it makes it even greater!

I think both approaches are equally valid and "intimate" in their own way.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Kate, I was quoting di.

You might have something there, Daniel. Cuz I know my bf cares deeply about music and he has that sort of 'facts & figures' approach.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:28 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm with Daniel on this one. Trivia is just another gas. Sure, I know plenty of guys who get too hung up in the statisical stuff, but hell...and women didn't invent Losing Themselves in music. Eminem did. If all I cared about were facts & figures I couldn't actually listen to Limp Bizkit. I'd just "respect" them for admitting the influence of Ben Stiller on their music.

what's the point of all this shit? does one of the genders get to say they win? Besides, guys have made and recorded more music than women (maybe because they spent more time with facts and figures!). Bleh. We win. And if someone brings up the repression of women, nobody ever said we didn't cheat to win.

I hope the level of sarcasm in that was evident, but just in case I'll make it blunt here.

The only time I wanna see boys vs. girls are in silly intramural sports. Or on the Road Rules/Real World Athletic Challenge whatnot. Remember we all have to fight the true oppressors: the police.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Ha...When I was 11 I was like one of the only girls who liked X-Men comics. All the boys would hi-light the back of their Wizard magazine pricelists to see how much they were worth and I just wanted to role-play! ("Now...I am STORM and I fly into the air and throw lightning bolts at you!)

All this talk of obsessive collecting makes me think of nesting habits.

Genevieve, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:37 (twenty-three years ago)

sorry i didn't mean to imply that the facts-and-figures way was less valid, i was just defending the way i respond to music.

di smith (lucylurex), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:40 (twenty-three years ago)

also, I don't assume that people who enjoy "facts'n'figures" can't also lose themselves. That Tatu song would blow my mind even if I didn't know Trevor Horn had his finger on the project.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:42 (twenty-three years ago)

well i did say "the male music obsessives i know". i don't claim to speak for everyone.

di smith (lucylurex), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:46 (twenty-three years ago)

thing is you ARE right for the most part. Most guys I know are more likely to have "guilty pleasures" and bullshit reasons for not digging the shameless stuff I adore. Girls tend to me more open to music, though that's not to say I haven't run into crazy prejudices from them either.

Please forgive the crack-addled lunacy that boys THIS girls THAT crap inspires from me.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:59 (twenty-three years ago)

RJG and Lara own this thread.

mandee, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 05:44 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't want it anymore. You can have it back.

Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 08:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I used to pretend to be X-Men. Gambit, mainly, 'cos he got the chicks. My parents were away over the weekend, so Emma came round and we databased my record collection. And while I'm at work this week she's going to database hers. She tends to be more interested in the relationships and cultures that surround music, and in the emotional content, whereas I'm into sounds and ideas and why's and what's.

Women seem to be more obsessed with being women than men are with being men. But that's society's fault.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 10:14 (twenty-three years ago)

> Women seem to be more obsessed with being women than men are with
> being men. But that's society's fault.

Pah!

Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 10:28 (twenty-three years ago)

This thread is bleak.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 11:31 (twenty-three years ago)


Dude, gender preconceptions suck. And what's more, they're wrong.
Uh Kate, not always.
I am more obsessed with music than 90% of the guys that I know.
So my statement is wrong?!?
know lots of women who are the same way as me.
You base your opinion on YOUR environment. (Just like Freud by the way.) My statement isn't a preconception, but a fact. Just look at clubs/recordshops and whatnot. I mean COME ON do you REALLY think that? My statement may appear bleak to some, I don't really mind. It doesn't take away anything from my enjoyment of music.
Guys comes up to me and says "Oh you have great taste in music."
I go:"Oh whatever." hehehe

nathalie (nathalie), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 11:46 (twenty-three years ago)

i haven't met all women so can't judge whether this is a "fact" or a simulacrum. anyway, cut it out, the pair of you.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 11:53 (twenty-three years ago)

What's supposed to be so wonderful about being a music geek in the first place? I know about two female ones, and nearly every male I know's one.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 11:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah - in response to Anthony upthread, I don't think anyone was trying to turn it into a sex war. Being a music geek is not some kind of badge of honour. It's just this ..thing.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 12:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I am music geek! Hear me roar!

Sarah McLusky (coco), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 13:30 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think anybody so far has mentioned that this seems to be CHANGING, and changing rapidly. I mean, the near-absolute binding of young men and women of our culture to narrowly defined gender roles has only really started loosening up in the last 30 years or so, and it's an ongoing process.

Case in point: I've been going to WFMU's record fairs (i.e. collector-geek central) for about ten years now, and the M-to-F ratio at them has changed DRAMATICALLY in that time. Ten years ago, it was something like 95-to-5, not counting the dragged-along girlfriend effect; now it's more like 70-to-30, and I'm starting to see a dragged-along boyfriend effect too. I mean, that's not anything like gender equity, but it's a HUGE difference.

People who justify their own habits of which they are not proud or with which they are not happy as "that's just how men/women are" = dud dud dud.

Douglas (Douglas), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 13:33 (twenty-three years ago)

douglas! you've just posted the first thing worth reading in this whole thread. congrats.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 13:36 (twenty-three years ago)

People who justify their own habits of which they are not proud or with which they are not happy as "that's just how men/women are"

I hope I you don't think I was doing this.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 17:16 (twenty-three years ago)

andrew i think you know WAY more female music geeks than that.

di smith (lucylurex), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 20:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Then again, more girls read Smash Hits than boys so maybe age is a factor?

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:46 (twenty-three years ago)

They only buy it for the posters.

Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I bought it for the lyrics!

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually, I lie. I never bought Smash Hits. I bought Record Mirror cause it had the full top 100 with sales increase arrows!

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:55 (twenty-three years ago)

YOU USED TO STEAL SMASH HITS?

Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:57 (twenty-three years ago)

I read Smash Hits from the ages of 9-11. I thought it was a bit girly by that age so I stopped reading it. Actually I stopped listening to any music all the way through 1993 because pop music was "for girls". Then I went back to it when the girls in my class grew breasts ;-)

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 22:05 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.