― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 16:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 16:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 16:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 16:08 (twenty-three years ago)
(and my brain is addled after that Transport Police thing last night with the guy that got hit by the train, eeeeeeurgh)
― Graham (graham), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 16:09 (twenty-three years ago)
Politically speaking it is business as usual, i.e. attack the least discrete forms of abortion as a road into attacking the whole. Note that that line provoked the only evidence of a two-party political system in the entire address, with instant ovation on the right and seated scowls on the left. Everyone cheered together through the whole Mussolini-on-the-balcony bit, though, and our entire government gave a standing ovation to a joke about killing people!
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 17:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 17:52 (twenty-three years ago)
― g.cannon (gcannon), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 18:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 18:01 (twenty-three years ago)
About partial-birth abortion - I'd read, somewhere, that most physicians considered them to be a significant danger to the woman and would prefer to perform them only when the woman's life is in danger. (Though, admittedly, this might be a wrong memory of whatever it was hat I read.) Basically, I think that Bush and his cohorts are working to dismantle abortion rights, one step at a time (like additional penalties when a criminal kills a pregnant woman - charge him [or her] with an additional count of murder - which then gives precedence in the laws for a fetus having rights, which then leads to destruction of abortion rights in all cases, as a fetus is considered to be a human and therefore protected by law) and I fear that they might well succeed if he is able to place more federal judges as well as conservative judges on the Supreme Court.
But I am not going to rant - I promised myself to be good today - gotta keep that blood-pressure down - so does anyone want to comment on the clothing of the spectators? Whether or not the audiences' palms iteched from all of the pseudo-clapping? How many calories were burnt with all of the standing and sitting and clapping and such? And just who did have the most half-hearted clapping style?
― I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 19:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 19:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 19:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 19:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― fletrejet, Wednesday, 29 January 2003 19:45 (twenty-three years ago)
The campaign to do away with them is obviously a thinly veiled first step, but it sure is a good way for Shrub to maintain hs right wing base without alienating everyone else too badly.
― Dave Beckhouse (Dave Beckhouse), Thursday, 30 January 2003 02:40 (twenty-three years ago)
Supreme Court Will Hear "Partial Birth" Abortion CaseSupreme Court Reopens Abortion Issue on Alito's First Day
― Hatch (Hatch), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 17:29 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 17:32 (twenty years ago)
― RoxyMuzak© (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 03:42 (twenty years ago)
ken c, blazing bold new trails in the field of haiku
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 03:55 (twenty years ago)
― Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 04:19 (twenty years ago)