How long will the war with Iraq last?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 13 February 2003 23:13 (twenty-three years ago)

your assuming there will be one.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 13 February 2003 23:16 (twenty-three years ago)

and when will it start? it seems to be coming to the boil for blair and bush, can it really be as soon as next week?

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 13 February 2003 23:20 (twenty-three years ago)

b-b-but...

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 13 February 2003 23:27 (twenty-three years ago)

it's incredibly difficult to speculate - at least with the Gulf War and invasion of Kuwait you knew there was a specific objective (get Iraq out of Kuwait essentially, with the ousting of Saddam a bonus) and you could envisage that objective being attainable within a year or so.

this time the objective(s) are far more intangible given that Allied forces will have to locate Saddam before they can attempt to dispose of him...although I suspect that all significant military installations could be destroyed by Allied weapons within weeks surely?

the 'war' with Al-Qaeda and other extreme anti-West terrorist factions could last a LOT longer obviously, we're talking a lifetime given the tenuous definition

stevem (blueski), Friday, 14 February 2003 00:01 (twenty-three years ago)

The get-rid-of-Saddam-and-occupy-Iraq phase of the war will be very short, just like Afghanistan. I do not think Saddam's troops are loyal enough to put up an effective resistence.

The battle to actually *control* Iraq will take much longer. We are actually losing the battle to control Afghanistan right now, not that we put much effort into it in the first place.

fletrejet, Friday, 14 February 2003 00:08 (twenty-three years ago)

The first Gulf War took about six weeks.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 14 February 2003 00:14 (twenty-three years ago)

6-8 weeks, but taking care of the damn place for the next fifty years will cost a lot.

Dave Beckhouse (Dave Beckhouse), Friday, 14 February 2003 01:04 (twenty-three years ago)

if we don't " take care of the damn place" then there's no reason to go in, Wolfowitz and company have a grand plan.

esquire1983 (esquire1983), Friday, 14 February 2003 05:36 (twenty-three years ago)

I figure that the actual combat phase of the Iraq War will be over with pretty quick and will surprise everyone, press and military.

Like fletrejet said above, the battle to control Iraq will be much longer and may never resolve.

Chris Barrus (xibalba), Friday, 14 February 2003 07:24 (twenty-three years ago)

I reckon - bombing campaign of a few weeks.

Then - panzer legion drives to Baghdad (takes a week, say)

Then - street fighting in Baghdad, maybe a week or two.

DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 14 February 2003 10:12 (twenty-three years ago)

There was a good article (for once) by Paul Andersen in this weeks' Tribune; in it he discusses what the anti-war left should do if war starts.

He discusses three possibilities:

1) Call for immediate cessation
2) Hope it's all over quickly and the US win to minimise casualties
3) Hope it's drawn out and nasty and the US imperial adventure becomes a nightmarish Vietnam redux

Obv. 3 is one which results in lots of death, so not a good position. Leaving 1 or 2; 1, whilst consistent with being Anti-war is unrealistic in the uber-extreme, so he argues that to remain consistent once it starts, the left have to back the US for a speedy outcome.

I didn't like the conclusion, but I can't dispute the argument at this moment.

In response to the problems I was voicing regarding the war stuff here, I've decided that a problem with the left is that it needs it's own theory of regime change and how military force can be used; it evacuates the argument by becoming all 'not in my name' at the drop of a hat and leaves the running to the militarists. Jaw-jaw is certainly better than war-war, but the left need to come up with a set of criteria about when war-war remains the only option left.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 14 February 2003 12:45 (twenty-three years ago)

a Vietnam style bloodbath might be best in the long-run, if it deters similar adventures. Not so good for the Iraqis or US troops, mind.

DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 14 February 2003 12:52 (twenty-three years ago)

or for any of the troops from other nations (i.e. Our lot)

The street fighting will take longer than a couple of weeks, what's the betting that half of Baghdad is wired up and ready for the tripwires to be set?

chris (chris), Friday, 14 February 2003 12:56 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not sure the fighting in Baghdad will take that long... I don't think the Iraqi army will fight to the death for Saddam Hussein (and I'm speaking as someone who is against the war). But we'll see.

I foresee US-UK troops in Iraq for a good while after the war, though, as they'll be needed to keep in "power" whatever bozo Bushi decides to make President of Iraq. I'm looking forward to US-UK arms being used against the cheeky secessionist Kurds and anyone who starts demanding actual democracy in Iraq.

DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 14 February 2003 13:27 (twenty-three years ago)

i have my CA$H MONĀ£Y on it rivalling vietnam. once those koreans get involved and nuke haiwai it's all GO GO GO

david_, Friday, 14 February 2003 13:44 (twenty-three years ago)

If you believe this, then possibly forever.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:15 (twenty-three years ago)

That animation justifies the internet.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:23 (twenty-three years ago)

under a week.

andy, Friday, 14 February 2003 15:24 (twenty-three years ago)

From Reuters:

15:30 14Feb2003 RTRS-BLIX - NO CONVINCING EVIDENCE IRAQIS KNEW IN ADVANCE INSPECTORS WERE COMING 15:32 14Feb2003 RTRS-BLIX: INSPECTIONS EFFECTIVELY HELPING TO BRIDGE GAP IN KNOWLEDGE OF IRAQI ARMS 15:35 14Feb2003 RTRS-BLIX - IRAQ ACCEPTS SOUTH AFRICAN OFFER OF EXPERTS ON HOW TO DISARM 15:35 14Feb2003 RTRS-BLIX - "MANY PROSCRIBED WEAPONS AND ITEMS ARE NOT ACCOUNTED FOR" 15:37 14Feb2003 RTRS-BLIX - IRAQ MUST SQUARELY ACCOUNT FOR STATUS OF ANTHRAX, VX AND LONG-RANGE MISSILES 15:38 14Feb2003 RTRS-BLIX - IRAQ'S AL SAMOUD 2 MISSILE EXCEEDS U.N. RANGE, IS PROSCRIBED SYSTEM

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:42 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not sure but the Bush regime is promising that an afterwar occupation of 2 years would suffice to bring Irag into the glorious age of democracy. Also, while the Pentagon estimates $100-200 billion spending merely for the cost of fighting the war, a tax *stimulus* is sure to return mad $$ to Americans. There's an intersting article on this coming up in next week's Voice.

Mary (Mary), Saturday, 15 February 2003 03:04 (twenty-three years ago)

one month passes...
Revive with this. Spotlight on Syria:

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/14/international/worldspecial/14CND-CAPI.html

Mary (Mary), Monday, 14 April 2003 23:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Spotlight on Syria

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 14 April 2003 23:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh I did see that other thread, I was trying to put this under that other thread of Gareth's that asked who we would attack next, but I got confused.

Mary (Mary), Monday, 14 April 2003 23:29 (twenty-three years ago)

two years pass...
revive!

'you' vs. 'radio gnome invisible 3' FITE (ex machina), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)

I doubt the war in Iraq will end in my lifetime, tbh.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 16:52 (twenty years ago)

If you define the "Iraq War" as occupation of Iraq by the US and the conflicts therein, then not far past January 15, 2009.

Alan Conceicao (Alan Conceicao), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)

most U.S. troops out/pulled back to permanent bases before october 2006.

insurgency/civil war lasting until 2011 at the earliest...

(assuming the figure given as accurate for the life of most insurgencies as lasting no fewer than 9-10 years)

Oh and it starts back up again w/in a generation.

kingfish hobo juckie (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 16:54 (twenty years ago)

If you define the "Iraq War" as occupation of Iraq by the US and the conflicts therein, then not far past January 15, 2009.
-- Alan Conceicao (deadandrestles...), November 30th, 2005.

= longer than ww2. hot poop!

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 16:55 (twenty years ago)

I'm more curious about how long the UK troops will be there

kingfish hobo juckie (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 17:03 (twenty years ago)

I'm looking forward to US-UK arms being used against the cheeky secessionist Kurds and anyone who starts demanding actual democracy in Iraq.

how wrong I was. It's interesting the extent to which the Kurds in Iraq are playing a blinder - quietly setting up an independent state without rocking the boat by actually mentioning this out loud.

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 19:31 (twenty years ago)

Until the next major terrorist attack or otherwise convenient excuse to move on.

D.I.Y. U.N.K.L.E. (dave225.3), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 19:43 (twenty years ago)

I thought the point was that were staying there forever? Arent we still in Korea, Germany, Japan and Cuba?

Stuh-du-du-du-du-du-du-denka (jingleberries), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)

We're not losing 2-3 troops/day in those countries, though.

I do feel guilty for getting any perverse amusement out of it (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)

The U.S. government holds onto Guantanamo base lease like a New Yorker with a rent controlled apartment, they will have to kill them to get them out of there, which I am sure the Cuban Govt. has considered.

earlnash, Wednesday, 30 November 2005 20:38 (twenty years ago)

>I thought the point was that were staying there forever? Arent we still in Korea, Germany, Japan and Cuba?<

Well, like someone said earlier...no one is sending mortars into Rammstein Air Force base. Cuba's a whole different set of circumstances: we have a lease there that can only be broken if both parties agree to it. Obviously, we want it there, so they gotta put up with it. They could try to use force to get us to leave...but I don't think that would work that well.

Alan Conceicao (Alan Conceicao), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)

thirteen years pass...

We remember things so we don't forget them. On this day, the 16th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, we should remember the so-called experts who urged on the war. They have not withered away. They are still with us, still telling us what we should do.

— Peter Maass (@maassp) March 20, 2019

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 21 March 2019 00:58 (seven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.