The Daily Mirror - Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Inspired from Mark C and the Pinefox's comments on the Dumbing Up thread. So, the Daily Mirror's much-trumpeted post-9/11 reincarnation as Bush-bashing leftist organ. Is it a welcome introduction of anti-war, pro-Euro values into the tabloid press? Or are you, like me, annoyed and mistrustful of its "LOOK AT US! WE'RE LEFTIE!" stance?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Or alternatively, it's "LOOK AT US! WE'RE A SERIOUS NEWSPAPER AND HERE'S A PHOTO OF GWYNNETH PALTROW IN AN UNFLATTERING DRESS TAKEN BY THE 3AM GIRLS" stance.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:37 (twenty-three years ago)

both.

i cant help feel that the 'left' could do with a lo-com-denom self-aggrandizing paper to counter similar on the right. so, the mirror is not for me personally, but i welcome its presence

gareth (gareth), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:38 (twenty-three years ago)

I am all for. Massively flawed in places but to return to its roots as a left wing tabloid is at least a definite shift in trying to move away from being seen as a Sun copycat. It also nicely distances itself from the Maxwell years.

Piers Morgan does not convince at all as a left wing editor, but his adoption of John Pilger has been - well almost sweet. They have also easily had the best covers of all the tabs for the last few years - employing the massive over the top photo-manips of the Sun with sloganeering which is hideously simplistic but nevertheless cheery to see on the morning news-stands.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:40 (twenty-three years ago)

No, I'm not annoyed by it at all. I'm glad to have some tub-thumping populists on my side. My blood stirs with pride and affiliation when I read their barnstorming front covers and editorials. I just wish there were more like them.

the pinefox, Monday, 17 February 2003 12:41 (twenty-three years ago)

destroy it purely for the 3 am girls, especially the one who wrote about the streets being rubbish when she'd obviously never listened to themm, preferring her Celine Dion cds.

possibly only redeemed by the general knowledge crosswords

chris (chris), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:42 (twenty-three years ago)

General Knowledge Crossword = classic. Especially good for dirtying.

IS Harry Harris still doing sport there? He's a knob.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:43 (twenty-three years ago)

I can't help but be cynical about the Mirror's Blacktop revolution. This cynicism is mainly engendered by the 3am girls and the detritus that surrounds the actual news.

I always though that, when the independent still was and still had some readers and some journalists, that it should have gone Tabloid and been the UK equivalent of La Republica or El Pais. Maybe that's where the Mirror is heading but I doubt it.

The covers recently have been brilliant but its hardly a great crusading socialist paper, but then then Morning Star no Gwynneth and no readers.

Ed (dali), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:43 (twenty-three years ago)

the left needs populist papers as well as broadsheets. the lefts problem has tradtionally been too narrow a focus about how to get message across, the right fights on all fronts

gareth (gareth), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Whoever wrote about the Streets being rubbish without having listened to them sounds like my kind of chick. Leave her alone.

the pinefox, Monday, 17 February 2003 12:45 (twenty-three years ago)

she wouldn't like Mr Cole either PF, you mark my words

chris (chris), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I think the 3am girls etc are fine: even people very against the war are mostly not thinking about the war all the time. If anything there's not enough of them, or rather they're not sharp enough - the Mirror's shagging and drugging coverage is always a little too distanced and unsalacious, it's boring compared to the Sun's. If I pick up a copy of the Sun or Mail I can get a strong gut feeling about the kind of person who would read and like it, even if they're pretty alien from me. I don't get that yet with the new Mirror.

The covers have been great though not as uniformly great as some are making out - sometimes they're a bit too wordy.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:49 (twenty-three years ago)

i like the mirror currently bcz it can't be defended moralistically or idealistically, hence has actual real political energy (unlike the fkn independent, which never had ANY energy)

also i like the idea of pilger or pinter gritting their teeth every time they read it

pinefox is a geezer

mark s (mark s), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I have been having a *great* time sending Mirror cover grabs to gung-ho American relations..

PF: you like ugly, patronising, illiterate hackettes whose clothes, regardless of expensive origin, look like they're from New Look sale rail? 3am have about four other people actually working on the desk and seem to spend all day reading/copying Popbitch.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:53 (twenty-three years ago)

The highest-impact recent Mirror cover was "IT'S HERE" which was also the least defensible.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Sweet Lord their journalists are badly-dressed? I'm never buying it again.

Tim (Tim), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:57 (twenty-three years ago)

(Trans - Suzy wishes she was a 3am girl).

I'll admit not all of the covers work, but again the clumsy ones are as energising as the good ones, you want to disagree, you want to enter into a debate.

How long til they have a Ms Dynamite column?

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 February 2003 12:58 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't really share the enthusiasm over the covers, some have been good, but on the other hand things like the ricin cover, with the huge skull and crossbones over Britain and "IT'S HERE!" in big letters was crap scaremongering and its jumping on the Cheriegate bandwagon was misjudged. I also feel that what Mark S terms its "real political energy" is its biggest failing - it seems so desparate to force its point of view in the readers face. I think that left/liberal politics need to acknowledge subtleties and conflicts and grey area, and the Mirror doesn't do that. Maybe you can't do that in a British tabloid, maybe you can. I'd like to see someone try.

I'm also with Tom - who is it aimed at? What sort of person does Piers Morgan think is going to buy the thing?

On the other hand, I wonder how much of the massive turnout at Saturday's demo was down to the Mirror's anti-war stance.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, they had to use Cheriegate to further Morgan's Brownite stance, surely?

I'd say classic, definitely. Even if the ABC figures show barely any difference since the revamp. Best horse racing tips in the British press, as well.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:02 (twenty-three years ago)

I thought it was superb scaremongering (if v dangerous).

I thought the other tabloids missed a beat with the demo* - the biggest demo ever in Britain is massive news whether for or against - big coverage by The Sun/NoW (focussing on the Hyde Park speakers or on the militant elements, say) could have galvanised the pro-war opinion among their readers. Instead grumpiness towards the Mirror (I assume) meant the #1 national story got 3 pages in the News of the World.

*(I am not unhappy that they did, obv.)

Tom (Groke), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:05 (twenty-three years ago)

its real political energy is that its position is not carefully presorted for bobbed and tailed so as not to annoy or confuse or just be wrong sometimes: it exactly reminds me of the kinds of political argument you overhear in a pub — or involved with when yr with ppl you don't know very well — and get annoyed about bcz they jump abt all over the place and have strong opinions w/o much detailed knowledge

well, good: democracy is about everyone being involved, not just ppl who wear sandals or can quote bucky fuller

broadsheet political coverage basically says: "yes you can join in provided you totally strictly obey our rules of etiquette"

cf all the letters complaining abt glen newey in the lrb, and how his style of writing is "trashy" and "tabloidy" — ie (they say) he belches at the vicar's tea-party and must be shut up

the mirror is a loud mess currently: that's what i like

mark s (mark s), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:08 (twenty-three years ago)

ps i don't read it obv: i don't read any newspapers — the mirror annoys me a lot less than the guardian or the observer bcz it's obviously on the move

morgan is a total fraud and hypocrite: probbly that makes him a good editor?

mark s (mark s), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:11 (twenty-three years ago)

I think that left/liberal politics need to acknowledge subtleties and conflicts and grey area, and the Mirror doesn't do that

no!

some of the left must do this, and some of the left must do what the mirror does. as i said abouve, the lefts failing is in only working on limited ways, on limited levels. we need this kind of stuff as well.

mark s is correct in saying that the broadsheets etc have this "you are only with us if you observe xyz protocols", which is exclusionary and self-defeating, or at least it is if that is the only method

gareth (gareth), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:12 (twenty-three years ago)

''If I pick up a copy of the Sun or Mail I can get a strong gut feeling about the kind of person who would read and like it, even if they're pretty alien from me. I don't get that yet with the new Mirror.''

Isn't that a good thing?

(I don't read any papers bar an article or two in the sunday time: Bryan appleyard on the current Iraq crisis yesterday was 'funny').

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Christ yes, I hate to have an editor who actually believed everything he put in his paper. The idea of an all pervasive editorial stance has been an obsession in the UK press for the last thirty years, and is also why the Metro is the best NEWSpaper.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:13 (twenty-three years ago)

brit papers suck shit

dave q, Monday, 17 February 2003 13:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I've got friends who don't like Morgan's style and his relentless self-promotion.

Personally, I couldn't give a crap whether he's a tosser (sure he is in many respects, as I've been reading his stuff since he started on the Sun with the Bizarre column) and I'm pretty sure he's not one of nature's socialists.

All told though, as a result of his editorship, there's a mass-market tabloid that isn't right wing. That's got to be a massively good thing in my book. I like the fact that 1-2M people raed Pilger's stuff a few weeks back. I like the fact that they have a columnist in Brian Reade who is left-wing and populist and occupies the same niche as Littledick in the Sun but doesn't conclude that deportation and sterilisation are the answers.

Maybe Morgan will be seen by history as an editor in the Cudlipp tradition. Maybe he'll be seen as an egotistic charlatan. As I say, I don't give a monkeys, as long as British political culture has an alternative view to counter the Sun and Mail etc. All power to his, and their elbow. And he got rid of Harry Harris.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I disagree about Glen Newey. I thought his piece was rubbish. But rather than getting into disagreeing about that, let's just agree that we like the Mirror.

the pinefox, Monday, 17 February 2003 13:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't know whether it's a good or bad thing from the point of view of a paper - my gut instinct is that it's a bad thing in sales terms. Newspapers, like other cultural products, have to create audiences for themselves if they are to succeed. With the Sun and the Mail each issue carries the imprint of its ideal reader, which acts as a kind of invisible pole by which you judge how suited you are to reading/buying the paper. I don't think the Mirror quite has that yet, any more than there was a 'typical' protester on Saturday.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:16 (twenty-three years ago)

(Trans - Suzy wishes she was a 3am girl).

I will become a 3am girl on the day when you, Pete Baran, are found in flagrante delicto with Rebekah Wade.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:17 (twenty-three years ago)

suzy you mean phil mitchell surely!!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Wrong Mitchell, Mark, it's Grawwwwnt who married gingerbeest.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:20 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't even know who Rebekah Wade is. Maybe I already have! She's not that cute button nose girl I met just before Christmas is it? Or Virginia Wade's daughter?

Getting rid of Harry Harris = godlike genius.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:21 (twenty-three years ago)

pete has had all the above

except pinter ew ew and possibly glen newey whose looks i know nothing of

mark s (mark s), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:22 (twenty-three years ago)

I've had Pinter too.

I got very worried when he did a pregnant pause right after.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Re Sun v Mirror - isn't left populism worse than right populism in that Sun readers maybe have lower attention spans (ie will forget fulminations 30 min after reading) and are apathetic anyway, whereas leftists use these headlines as yet more grist for their ENDLESS (public) bitching and moaning and whining and calls to change everything and spoiling ppls fun etc? (esp. students)

dave q, Monday, 17 February 2003 13:28 (twenty-three years ago)

I will become a 3am girl on the day when you, Pete Baran, are found in flagrante delicto with Rebekah Wade.
http://www.whirlybird.org.uk/petebekah.jpg

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:30 (twenty-three years ago)

Spoiling students fun is a good thing surely. The big beef that the left have with populism is that they think their ideas are deeper (for which read more correct as if complexity leads to correktness) than those of the right. Hence it should be impossible to encapsulate them in a populist form properly.

Buying a copy of Socialist Worker after all is not a million miles away from a recruitment point of view to taking a personality test on Tottenham Court Road.

Ah, me and Rebbkah - throwing shapes.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:33 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't know how to break it to you Jerry, but that does not count as sex.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Harry Harris - what a C***

chris (chris), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:34 (twenty-three years ago)

I hate to break it to you N, but "flagrante delicto" does not mean "having sex".

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:35 (twenty-three years ago)

IT DOESN'T??

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:36 (twenty-three years ago)

I hate my education.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Wow.

I don't know what it really means either.

Baran is on form.

Q: for once I disagree with you. Anyway, the Boss is a left populist!!

the pinefox, Monday, 17 February 2003 13:38 (twenty-three years ago)

flagrante, ablative of flagrans, blazing + delicto, ablative of delictum, offence. = Rebekah Wade's haircut

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:38 (twenty-three years ago)

But he is not in her haircut!

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:40 (twenty-three years ago)

You can't see what his left hand is doing!

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:42 (twenty-three years ago)

the right wing press also hates fun, as their endless demonization of drugs or any youth culture shows

gareth (gareth), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:42 (twenty-three years ago)

You can't see what his left hand is doing!

Stop making me think the unthinkable.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah you can, behind the glasses. You can't see what her right hand's doing though.

Graham (graham), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes you can, it's behind the glass of coke.

Which part of East Side West Side South Side Backside is Pete making?

Tom (Groke), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:45 (twenty-three years ago)

(the idiomatic translation is "caught red-handed")

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Everyone likes fun.

the pinefox, Monday, 17 February 2003 13:46 (twenty-three years ago)

'youth culture' isn't fun tho, just a lot of bloody hard work impressing ppl who aren't worth it

dave q, Monday, 17 February 2003 13:49 (twenty-three years ago)

That is Rebekah's hand behind the glass of coke (unless Pete has two right hands)!

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 17 February 2003 13:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Examination of the evidence shows JtN to be OTM.

Graham (graham), Monday, 17 February 2003 14:03 (twenty-three years ago)

No, Tom's right. That's my hand behind the coke- unless Rebbekah twisted her entire wrist around.

Anyway, this is the kind of photo exclusive the Daily Mirror is crying out for. BTW - when did it revert back to the name Daily Mirror from The Mirror which is toyed with for a couple of years. Does the BlackTop make a statement? What is the politicalposition of the Sunday Mirror (and by extension the Sunday People).

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 February 2003 14:14 (twenty-three years ago)

The Sunday People has a politicalposition?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 17 February 2003 14:18 (twenty-three years ago)

(No, if you look through the pint glass in the other picture you can see two of Starry's adorable fingers curled up. I think)

Graham (graham), Monday, 17 February 2003 14:21 (twenty-three years ago)

The Mirror, now, is at least distinctive from the other red tops. In terms of finding an audience it will appeal to those who want tub thumping, but don't agree with where the Sun/ Star/ NoW are coming from.

I also think distilling any kind of complex opinion into 400 piece with an amusing headline takes far more skill than allowing for a certain level of reader knowledge and having 1000+ words to explain yourself.


Re: The Three AM girls. Look, even if you hate them, you have to give whoever came up the idea some credit. Dominic Mohan may have started the Nigel-Demptser-with-the-cast-of Eastenders style, but Three AM took it to another level. Of course three attractive young women are going to gain more attention than fat bloke with bad haircut. They've created star columnists from people without any previous track record.

(The day I even express a desire to be a three AM bird is the day I start stubbing fags out on my eyeballs for fun.)

Anna (Anna), Monday, 17 February 2003 15:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I agree with everything you say Anna with the exception of your use of the word attractive.

I also think that them gossip girls should form a band with Louise Nurding. They could then call it.....

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 February 2003 15:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Ha Ha Ha

alext (alext), Monday, 17 February 2003 15:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Anna, you probably have better stories than the 3AuldMingers, you DO YOUR OWN WORK and your clothes do not look like they come from Etam.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 17 February 2003 15:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Attractiveness is all about context. This context is Dominic Mohan, think about it.

you DO YOUR OWN WORK

I have heard worse about the remaining B!tches and about another red-haired ex-Emap employee who has a 'column' in a red top. But thank you Suzy.

Anna (Anna), Monday, 17 February 2003 15:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Does that mean that Anna's clothes do come from Etam and she just wears them so well that it doesn't look like that, or that she doesn't buy her clothes from Etam at all?

Still it would be good if 3AM was replaced by 3tAM - with your hosts the Tammy Girls.

Good point re Mohan. You do know he lives very near you Anna. Often seen in Barbella's for Sunday brunch.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 February 2003 15:59 (twenty-three years ago)

I do not buy clothes in Etam, but have bought nail polish from Tammy Girl.

Damn, you've rumbled the reason I like Barbarella for Sunday brunch, that is, to look nice with a hangover.

Anna (Anna), Monday, 17 February 2003 16:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Anyone would look nice near a man with congenital face disorder like Mohan.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 February 2003 16:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Also my 3AM point was not so much about them, but props for whoever came up with the concept. I do get pissed off when people gain a high profile on the back of the work of other people, so in that sense I agree with suzy.

Anna (Anna), Monday, 17 February 2003 16:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Are there still only two of them? I seem to have moved into a proper student house now the only paper about is the Grauniad.

Graham (graham), Monday, 17 February 2003 16:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Does the concept pre-date Morgan, cos if not I'd probably put it near him. Celeb journalism is his patch after all, and he would probably be wellaware what was staid with his old column Bizarre (which at least uses its definition by having a picture of Mohan right next to the word which describes it).

How high profile are the 3AM girls anyway? They are a bit faceless, cf when they kicked one of them out last year.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 February 2003 16:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Anna, is the ex-Emap redhead in the red-top one who was recently sacked from job by Mrs. Grant Mitchell?

suzy (suzy), Monday, 17 February 2003 16:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Haven't there been, like, five or six 3AM girls? They seem to just rotate round Jessica Callum and then disappear after a couple of months never to be seen again.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 17 February 2003 16:13 (twenty-three years ago)

quiz time: what did one of the Gallagher brothers say about Jessica Callan?

DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 17 February 2003 16:22 (twenty-three years ago)

I dunno Martian, 'Liam and I had a bet you couldn't get powder up that strangely pinched nose of yours'?

suzy (suzy), Monday, 17 February 2003 16:56 (twenty-three years ago)

It was something offensive and boorish as I recall.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 17 February 2003 18:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Nick goes for the long-odds guess.

I've not read the Mirror in years, but I can only see it as a good thing when one of the biggest papers lurches significantly to the left. The Guardian's style suits me pretty well, and there's a place for that, but there's surely a very vital place for a more populist, loud, genuinely lefty paper.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 17 February 2003 20:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Mark S describes the current Mirror very well. The sight of "Blair should not get away with turning Britain into the 51st State" on the same page as something about Britney and Justin infuriates me BUT ONLY BECAUSE I AM A STICKLER FOR IDEOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY and I know damn well that most people in Britain aren't. A paper which ***doesn't make sense*** from an ideological perspective actually makes far more sense than a "positioned" broadsheet, it greater reflects the ins and outs, the universal uncertainties and paradoxes of the age (and the Mirror has been ploughing this furrow for a long time; in the 1950s its BIG IDEA was that there was no contradiction between political leftism and cultural Atlanticism - the greatest heresy of the old Hoggartist left, only really seriously politically accepted in the Wilson era, and now the new orthodoxy of the Blair age - well before any "serious-left" journal would have dared to suggest such a thing).

What Gareth says is very true. It is why Labour lost the 1959 election so badly: desperately crying to the working classes that they must be Ewan MacColl when, in reality, it was Lonnie Donegan who'd excited them and created the urge to become the Beatles, to make the 1960s possible, to break out of the Mass and the Collective of the Attlee years, except that the "natural party of the working classes" hadn't understood that yet. The Mirror was showing the way at the time, puritan socialism was conquered with Wilson's coup d'etat of 1963, and within five years they were back in power. It could well be that the Mirror is showing the way again. Certainly it will surely have had some sort of influence if, five years from now, we have a more "Labour" Labour government than the Blair administration is, even if it has a smaller majority.

robin carmody (robin carmody), Monday, 17 February 2003 23:55 (twenty-three years ago)

"within five years" - within five years (well, and one week) of 1959, not within five years of 1963, obv

robin carmody (robin carmody), Monday, 17 February 2003 23:56 (twenty-three years ago)

flagrante delicto also means "in the midst of sexual activity" (Webster's)

what's a 3 am girl?

Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 18 February 2003 05:18 (twenty-three years ago)

3 am girls

rosemary (rosemary), Tuesday, 18 February 2003 05:37 (twenty-three years ago)

ten years pass...

Tributes poured in for the legendary songwriter and guitarist.

Mick Hucknall wrote: "RIP Lou Reed 71. You defined New York City. Too f****** young. Wayy too young. Berlin one of my most loved albums.

The official Twitter account of The Who said: "R.I.P. Lou Reed. Walk on the peaceful side."

Author Irvine Welsh wrote on Twitter: “Sad to hear about Lou Reed passing. Such a star. RIP Lou, and thanks for giving us Perfect Day for Trainspotting.”

Danny Baker reflected: "Curiously perhaps, I never cared for the Velvet Underground. But I really, really liked a lot of Lou Reed."

Comedy writer David Quantick tweeted: “RIP Lou Reed. This, by him with John Cale, is one of the most beautiful things ever made.”

Musician Darren Hayman added: “It’s a long rough haul being a Lou Reed fan. Many troughs, beautiful peaks. Push comes to shove though, he was my favourite. Never boring.”

Paraoxonases in Inflammation, Infection, and Toxicology (nakhchivan), Sunday, 27 October 2013 17:59 (twelve years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.