(Maybe ILXers can generate a second printing, another 400?)
Below the Beltway
By Gene WeingartenSunday, February 16, 2003
I am on the phone with Robert Burrows, author of the recently published political novel Great American Parade. This book has sold only 400 copies nationwide, and Burrows seems flabbergasted to be hearing from me. The most prestigious newspaper to have shown any interest so far is the Daily Student at Indiana University.
I tell Burrows that if he is willing to submit to an interview, I am willing to review his book at length in The Washington Post. The only catch, I said, is that I am going to say that it is, in my professional judgment, the worst novel ever published in the English language.
Silence.
"My review will reach 2 million people," I said.
"Okay," he said.
I have said this before, and I'll say it again. I really love my job.
Burrows, a keen-witted 79, is a retired University of Wisconsin English professor. He published the book himself, printing 2,000 copies, scattershotting them out to America's media in the hope that positive reviews would turn it into a big seller.
Me: Why did you think that anyone would want to read a novel whose central point is that the Bush tax cuts are imprudent fiscal policy? Do you think that E.L. Doctorow would write a book like that?
Burrows: Frankly, other people wondered about this, too. My wife asked me that. So did Warren Buffett, when I asked him for a blurb. He wrote a nice letter back on the bottom of my letter, saying he didn't think a novel was a proper vehicle for my ideas.
Me: I think it might be because you write badly. The Daily Cardinal of the University of Wisconsin-Madison called this "simply an awful book." The Wayne State University newspaper calls you "unskilled," and says the book is "an agonizingly slow read" that is "naive," "dull" and "uneventful."
Burrows: I am not terribly depressed by the reviews. I am disappointed, of course. I was hoping that discerning people might find it, and it would begin to catch on.
Me: It is possible that some people might have found the plot a little improbable. They might find it hard to believe that, in order to garner political support for his tax cuts, George W. Bush would secretly arrange a giant parade in Washington honoring the richest people in America, who would march front to back in order of their net worth. Or that a cadre of earnest, teetotaling college students would get wind of this and, encouraged by Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, rise up to stage a heroic counter-parade honoring basic American values like morality and hard work. Was this perhaps deft satire, a nifty Swiftian touch?
Burrows: No.
Me: Ah.
Burrows: My idea of the novel is that the concentration of wealth among a small percentage of Americans is inimical to democracy. When primogeniture was outlawed in the Constitution, the Founding Fathers didn't foresee the development of colossal fortunes in stocks and bonds. You used to be able to see the accumulation of land among the wealthy, but you cannot see stocks and bonds. Cutting the tax on the wealthy from 39.6 percent to 33 percent was a terrible idea, even though Congress compromised at 35.1 percent.
Me: Your characters don't seem to have personalities.
Burrows: This was a novel of ideas. I didn't go into personal relationships.
Me: You have people speaking in paragraphs, using words like "indeed" in casual conversation. After your protagonist, Joan Milton, watches the planes hitting the World Trade Center, she turns away in horror and says to her friends: "What an almost unbelievable tragedy! It will take a great resolve to overcome this terrible blow." My question is, have you ever heard real human beings speak?
Burrows: This is the way I speak. In my circle, I am regarded as a fascinating conversationalist. I have a dinner group that has been meeting for maybe 30 years. I admit that may be a little limiting.
Me: Your only black character, who is named Jesse Jackson Jones, expresses his concurrence by saying, "Right on!"
Burrows: Yes.
Me: Okay! Well, do you think your book might be made into a motion picture?
Burrows: I never thought of that. That would be fun.
Me: Are you planning another book?
Burrows: Yes. It will be about Bush's plan to exempt stock dividends in perpetuity from taxes.
Me: As you know, I think Great American Parade is a wretchedly terrible product that shames the American publishing industry. Is it available in stores?
Burrows: People can buy it directly from me. I live in Whitewater, Wisconsin. I'm in the phone book. I appreciate this opportunity.
Me: You're welcome. Your book is printed on very white, shiny paper.
Burrows: They did a nice job.
© 2003 The Washington Post Company
― frank p. jones (frank p. jones), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:28 (twenty-three years ago)
I'm am having trouble typing this message because I'm laughing too fucking hard.
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jesse Jackson Jones (Dan Perry), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:31 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nick A. (Nick A.), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:38 (twenty-three years ago)
keith could buy five!
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:43 (twenty-three years ago)
from Indiana Univ. student newspaper:
BOOK REVIEW
It rained on this 'Parade'
By Brittany AusmusIndiana Daily Student
Published Wednesday, October 23, 2002
After reading Robert Burrows' The Great American Parade I can only draw one conclusion. He thinks I am stupid. I can think of no other explanation for this book. Why else would an author, who presumably writes for the college audience, continually beat me over the head with his mantra: "George W. Bush is the devil." While I did not vote for the Dubya, I certainly do not find it necessary to spout off about how I disagree with his policies or personal life at every opportunity.
This politically charged novel certainly held promise, offering a plot about college newspaper staffers fighting a great crusade. However, it quickly degenerated into a repetitive attempt to sway my political beliefs towards the author's.
The novel begins with the still touchy accusation that President Bush stole the election of 2000. Certainly an attention grabber, but it is also a great way to alienate about half of the people in this country. The political rhetoric didn't stop there.
The premise of the book is President Bush wanted to arrange a Great American Parade, a celebration of the wealth of our nation. The plan was to honor the top 1% of incomes in the country with a grand affair, including gigantic balloons and high-flying jets. The plan is lauded by the Republicans, yet the Democrats were not in on the plan. Burrows proceeded to give graphic examples of the amount of poverty in our nation, stating repeatedly that President Bush does not care about the common man, those below the national average income.
Student newpaper editors inevitably find out about the plan to honor the wealthy, and they are aghast. They want to see all Americans represented at this parade, and they take time out of their busy schedules to arrange a massive protest movement and topple the credibility of the Bush regime. All I ask is, is this a little far fetched?
Burrows characterizes student newspaper editors as liberal activists out to set the world right at any cost, personal or professional. I've worked for the IDS for a year and a half, and I have never heard the type of pontificating in the newsroom that the characters in the book engage in regularly. I also can't think of many students with the time to organize a massive protest parade, become close friends with multi-millionaires and still pull a 4.0 GPA, all while producing a newspaper.
If Burrows wanted to inform the public about the massive gaps in incomes in America he should have written an essay or an article. If he wanted to write a novel he should create characters that are not one dimensional crusaders for the common man. In short, skip this book if you don't want to be slammed with political rhetoric thinly veiled as fiction.
― frank p. jones (frank p. jones), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― frank p. jones (frank p. jones), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:49 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:59 (twenty-three years ago)
(sorry i wz confused by the it's-a-girl's-name joke i wz trying to make but didn't)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 20 February 2003 18:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 February 2003 18:03 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 18:03 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 20 February 2003 18:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 20 February 2003 18:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 20 February 2003 21:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― robin (robin), Friday, 21 February 2003 02:43 (twenty-three years ago)
ned, is that you?
― gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 21 February 2003 02:48 (twenty-three years ago)
They are ones to talk. I want to buy this book more than ever.
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 21 February 2003 02:50 (twenty-three years ago)
Unless there's a conspiracy vaster than...it's real. The orig. bit was in a digest of events, etc. for publishers. Google turned up the piece in Indiana student paper and couple more I didn't investigate, try "great american parade robert burrows." I'm going to track down a copy...if there are any left.
― frank p. jones (frank p. jones), Friday, 21 February 2003 02:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― robin (robin), Friday, 21 February 2003 02:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 21 February 2003 02:58 (twenty-three years ago)
― robin (robin), Friday, 21 February 2003 02:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― boxcubed (boxcubed), Friday, 21 February 2003 03:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 21 February 2003 03:28 (twenty-three years ago)
I do use 'indeed' a lot, but the first thing I said to anyone when I saw the footage on that day was to wake up my then-housemate and say, "You need to get up. The WTC looks like something out of Akira."
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 21 February 2003 04:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― boxcubed (boxcubed), Friday, 21 February 2003 04:49 (twenty-three years ago)
― boxcubed (boxcubed), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:31 (twenty-three years ago)
http://www.chick.com/tractimages24621/0069/0069_08.gif
― Tad (llamasfur), Friday, 21 February 2003 08:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― frank p. jones (frank p. jones), Friday, 21 February 2003 13:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― SittingPretty (sittingpretty), Friday, 21 February 2003 14:13 (twenty-three years ago)