they really need to sort out the law on spamming - surely it ends up as a colossal bandwidth hog and this would be the gov's motivation to sort it
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:28 (twenty-three years ago)
BUT people use the word 'spam' quite loosely sometimes. If you mean being on the mailing list of what looks like a legitimate company/mailing list etc. then unsubscribing might well work.
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:35 (twenty-three years ago)
http://www.mailwasher.net/
As a really neat anti-spam tool. I hardly ever use it, but it really does enable you to generate legitimate-looking bounces. (There's something else out there -- forget the name -- that produces really lame, fake-looking bounces. This is miles better.)
Mostly I ignore spam, really. In the last couple of days, I've received: teenage honeys in XXX pics (x3); penis enlargement; ordering drugs without a prescription; sundry loans and money offers.
So, really well-targeted stuff, then. :)
― ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:37 (twenty-three years ago)
Not always; some spammers have found spamhausen (pl. of spamhaus) that are willing to keep these addresses alive in spite of antispammers' efforts.
For my part, if a company I've previously dealt with sends me an e-mail, the first time I will use the unsubscribe procedure. If that doesn't work or they send me more mail they are spammers = they are treated accordingly.
― j.lu (j.lu), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:31 (twenty-three years ago)
SO I see very little unsolicited spam nowadays.
― Ed (dali), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ed (dali), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:49 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 10 March 2003 19:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Monday, 10 March 2003 19:40 (twenty-three years ago)
I really don't think I need a hand with this.
― Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 10 March 2003 20:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jon Williams (ex machina), Monday, 10 March 2003 20:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 6 April 2004 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― sean c via cell, Tuesday, 6 April 2004 14:39 (twenty-two years ago)