simple minded happiness vs. tortured brilliance

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
as much as I hate shallow philomosophical shite, I came across the following in Dostoevsky's Notes from the Underground -- "which is better, cheap happiness, or noble suffering? Well, which is better?" FITE --

divya noguchi (divya), Monday, 31 March 2003 05:45 (twenty-three years ago)

surely one of them is just a BIT better? < ali g >

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 31 March 2003 05:49 (twenty-three years ago)

cheap holiday in other people's misery

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 31 March 2003 05:51 (twenty-three years ago)

what's better, handjob from a true love or really good oral sex from a stranger?

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 31 March 2003 05:52 (twenty-three years ago)

"which is better, cheap happiness, or noble suffering? Well, which is better?" FITE

which is worse -- a false dichotomy, or actually living yer life (which, unless yer life really sucks or yer bi-polar, will be somewhere in between these extremities)?

and that such a cheap, false dichotomy was in notes from the underground only underscores why i've come to hate Dostoyevski and his literary offspring so much.

Tad (llamasfur), Monday, 31 March 2003 06:05 (twenty-three years ago)

lobotomies for everyone!! this round's on me!!

geeta (geeta), Monday, 31 March 2003 06:12 (twenty-three years ago)

i'll bring the icepick

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 31 March 2003 06:13 (twenty-three years ago)

ooh it's all gold that's nice *crunch* d'oh!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 31 March 2003 07:24 (twenty-three years ago)

how about tortured mediocrity

gabriel (gabe), Monday, 31 March 2003 08:34 (twenty-three years ago)

I guess everyone just thinks a happy genius is just totally showing off and rubbing everybody else's noses in it.

jel -- (jel), Monday, 31 March 2003 08:37 (twenty-three years ago)

  Cher No Longer a Michael Jackson Fan
The Associated Press
Mar 31 2003 3:40AM
RADNOR, Pa. (AP) - Cher is no longer a Michael Jackson fan.

``I don't really care what he does to his face. He could just erase it as far as I'm concerned,'' Cher told TV Guide for its April 5 issue. ``But I don't like him anymore. And it's because of his children. I cannot imagine putting my children through what he put his children through,'' Cher says.

Though she once considered Jackson a ``great artist,'' she said she has been turned off by all of the negative publicity about him. She said she was also disappointed by his behavior last year at American Bandstand's 50th anniversary show, in which she also appeared.

``He had this child rolled up in a blanket, and I was thinking, 'What kind of life is this?''' she said.

``Then I saw the recent documentary on him, and I thought, 'This guy is nuts. He shouldn't have these children,''' Cher says. ``As an artist, I can't fault his art because he was brilliant ... I wouldn't buy anything now.''

03/31/03 03:37 EST

Vik, Monday, 31 March 2003 09:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Ignorance is bliss.

Someone give me a lobotomy.

ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Monday, 31 March 2003 14:45 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.