Grammar/punctuation/etc things that just seem... wrong.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Like for instance when you end a sentence with something in quotation marks, supposedly you're supposed to put the final mark (period, exclamation, whatever) inside the quotes, leaving the last mark to actually be the closing quotation mark! I hate this, and I never do it even if it is correct.

Dan I., Sunday, 20 July 2003 18:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Was there already a thread like this? Oh, whatever.
And that you're not supposed to end a sentence with a proposition, leading you to make these crazy tangled incomprehensible sentences.
And that I should have used "one" instead of "you" in that last sentence.

Dan I., Sunday, 20 July 2003 19:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh and that one is supposed to use "his or her" instead of "their", when referring to a singular person of indefinite gender!

Dan I., Sunday, 20 July 2003 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)

dan the rule is actually slightly difft in US and UK — it is insanely more complicated in the UK in fact


mark s (mark s), Sunday, 20 July 2003 19:13 (twenty-two years ago)

How does it work in the UK? Actually, is there even a consistent U.S. style? Lots of places seem to use "his or her," which seems clunky and annoying. I'd vote for being old-fashioned and saying "one," but it often comes across as stilted, whereas "you" sometimes sounds much too chummy and unctuous.

Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Sunday, 20 July 2003 19:26 (twenty-two years ago)

not their for his and hers, that's wrong but too useful not to uuse: i mean the puncutation in or outside the quotemarks

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 20 July 2003 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I think that quoted punctuation sort of depends on how much is being quoted. I'd write: 'The word he used was "never".' I would also write 'He said "I would never do that."' If the quoted part needs a final mark, put it in and don't put another unless it is needed - as in 'Did he say "I would never do that"?' There I would be uneasy about omitting the period in the quoted sentence, but it would look too hideous to include it.

haha, "you're not supposed to end a sentence with a proposition" is a great typo. People do say that you shouldn't end a sentence with a preposition, but ignore them. Sometimes that "of which" kind of construction is too far from what it relates to, and is grotesque. Try both versions out in your mind - and if neither work, recast the sentence.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 20 July 2003 19:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, the punctuation. It looks wrong to me no matter which way you do it, so I usually chicken out and rewrite.

Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Sunday, 20 July 2003 19:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Ending a quote with a comma (that doesn't belong to the quote) inside the quotation marks, then going on to finish the sentence seems weird and wrong to me but I am told it is the 'correct' US style. Who decided this nonsense?

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 20 July 2003 19:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh and that one is supposed to use "his or her" instead of "their", when referring to a singular person of indefinite gender!

I use "their" all the time, myself, in this circumstance. As mark said, it's too useful a word for the situation, and unless I'm mistaken it's the way they do it in some other languages as well. (I seem to recall that German does this.)

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Sunday, 20 July 2003 19:57 (twenty-two years ago)

'His/her' is appalling and to be avoided at all costs unless you need to sacrifice style for legalistic unambiguity.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 20 July 2003 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)

hear hear

Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Sunday, 20 July 2003 20:05 (twenty-two years ago)

We do it in English as well, Sean. Think second person singular and plural.

RickyT (RickyT), Sunday, 20 July 2003 21:59 (twenty-two years ago)

i work as a sub-editor (read copy editor in the us, but a bit more involved), not that you'd ever tell from my appallingly written posts and as a senior bod, have the luxury of setting style for this sort of stuff... my grammatical style is to write as people say, spelt correctly, that way it reads easy. i know the rules but once you know that they're there to be broken. oxford-defined grammar evolves far slower than speech so don't feel bad abt breaking the rules - you are making language!

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Sunday, 20 July 2003 22:05 (twenty-two years ago)

seven years pass...

Called out on something--one thing among many things--I'm majorly, majorly guilty of:

http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2011/05/ditch-the-dash.html

clemenza, Thursday, 26 May 2011 14:18 (fifteen years ago)

Fuck the haters.

jaymc, Thursday, 26 May 2011 14:24 (fifteen years ago)

I don't get how it discourages efficient writing. If anything, I find it aids efficiency if I'm able to sneak a concise explanation or clarification in between em-dashes rather than devote a whole other sentence to it.

jaymc, Thursday, 26 May 2011 14:29 (fifteen years ago)

i like how the lynne truss quote is missing a comma

thomp, Thursday, 26 May 2011 14:33 (fifteen years ago)

lynne truss is a real, fucking, hack

remy bean, Thursday, 26 May 2011 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

I'm sorry, but that Noreen Malone article is utter bullshit.

remy bean, Thursday, 26 May 2011 14:42 (fifteen years ago)

my grammatical style is to write as people say, spelt correctly, that way it reads easy. i know the rules but once you know that they're there to be broken. oxford-defined grammar evolves far slower than speech so don't feel bad abt breaking the rules - you are making language!

booming post!

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 26 May 2011 14:43 (fifteen years ago)

yeah that's nuts, xxxp. i have no idea what the convoluted backstory behind the objection to dashes is, but to take issue with something so functional, something that's responsive to the human nature of reading and conversing - as in interjecting to clarify, rather than continuing apace while mystifying one's audience - seems purposefully prickly.

original post itt a total orthographical truth bomb anyway.

tamari teenage riot (schlump), Thursday, 26 May 2011 14:45 (fifteen years ago)

According to Lynne Truss—the closest thing we've got to a celebrity grammarian, thanks to her best-seller Eats, Shoots and Leaves—people use the em dash because "they know you can't use it wrongly—which for a punctuation mark, is an uncommon virtue."

I can't stand writers who insist on using awkward -ly adverbs just because they seem more proper than their more common, less clunky, perfectly grammatical variants.

wrongly vs. wrong
quickly vs. fast
slowly vs. slow

I don't always object to the word "wrongly", but this usage (poss. because the adverb follows the verb it modifies) just screams, "Lynn Truss is an asshole."

the proper role of prescriptive grammar is, of course, to call people out for being assholes.

gtforia estfufan (unregistered), Thursday, 26 May 2011 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

Perhaps wrongly, it didn't bother me.

Aimless, Thursday, 26 May 2011 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

I just dislike when people say "feel badly" because they think it's correct, and they're consciously trying to BE correct, and they're over-correcting but you can't tell them, because obviously they're the kind of people who care in the first place, so there's no way to avoid basically seemingly like a dick if you correct them.

Very happy this thread is pro-em dash because I adore them and so did Ursula Nordstrom. So there.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Thursday, 26 May 2011 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

lol somehow I worked an extra -ly in there anyway.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Thursday, 26 May 2011 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

Noreen Malone notwithstanding, I plan to keep on using lots of em dashes and semi-colons whenever they feel right. As a matter of personal taste, I don't like concise writing. I like writing that wanders, so long as the wandering's interesting or funny.

clemenza, Thursday, 26 May 2011 19:22 (fifteen years ago)

what the fuck is the tilda for??

~

Latham Green, Thursday, 26 May 2011 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

~ signifies 'not' in philosophical logic.

Neil O'Jism (Craigo Boingo), Thursday, 26 May 2011 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

I'm pro-em-dash, but I despises it when people use en dashes, or even hyphens, and don't put spaces around them, so you get things like

Now, I'm the first to admit-before you Google and shame me with a thousand examples in the comments-that I'm no saint when it comes to the em dash.

Goonhynhnms & YaHOOS (WmC), Thursday, 26 May 2011 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

I do ~ like it!

Latham Green, Thursday, 26 May 2011 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

I have seen the tilde used to signify "approximately" when used directly prior to a number (e.g. ~200).

Aimless, Thursday, 26 May 2011 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

well to me it looks like a Goddamned hyphen that got old and died

Latham Green, Thursday, 26 May 2011 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

And to an illiterate, printed pages look like hundreds of bug's legs, broken off and scattered over the paper.

Aimless, Thursday, 26 May 2011 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

The unspaced hyphen standing in for an em dash is a nightmare. That'll happen when cutting and pasting between formats sometimes--as much of a drag as it is going through and fixing them all, you've got to do it.

clemenza, Thursday, 26 May 2011 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

you know that sounds like a project - writing a book with all the words made of bug's legs - some guy in Brooklyn would do it - get 10 minutes of internet fame - then be forgotten- if only he could be remembered - I miss that old bastard!

Latham Green, Thursday, 26 May 2011 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

In the mathematical logic courses I took, we used ¬ for "not" instead (possibly an even more useless keyboard symbol), but ~ was used as a symbol for unspecified binary relations in abstract algebra, or something to do with equivalence after group operations or uhhh something

(hey, I flunked out)

but since you have a newly installed Ubuntu box, it may be more useful to you that entering ~ into file browser address bars should take you to your "home directory"

russ conway's game of life (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 26 May 2011 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

if I can get the launcher to get out of my face. I can't even see a key for thet hockey stick you made

Latham Green, Thursday, 26 May 2011 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

Weird that right before browsing this thread, I was feeling annoyed that a web page I was looking at has a tilde in its site title and the page title: "LAW.C0N CL3 C3NT3R ~ CL3 FOR F1rms"

Jesse, Thursday, 26 May 2011 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

Oh uh ¬ is on the key to the left of 1 on a British keyboard, I forgot that key was different on a US keyboard

I have never seen it used for anything except ASCII art (we may have written it by hand in maths lectures, but no programming language I've ever seen has used it for negation)

russ conway's game of life (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 26 May 2011 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

haha - it must be called a "nose"

Latham Green, Thursday, 26 May 2011 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

"touch a man with semenhands and you'll get pregnant, vagina hands!"

Latham Green, Friday, 27 May 2011 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

do ¬ and ~ break google for everyone or is it just me

thomp, Tuesday, 31 May 2011 00:06 (fifteen years ago)

¬_¬

dayo, Tuesday, 31 May 2011 01:33 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.