Eyeglass Fashion (and Taking Sides: Plastic vs. Metal!)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I need to score a new pair of glasses before my health insurance runs out. Obviously the selection process is more about complementing your own features and yadda yadda, but I'm also curious what ILX thinks about the fashion side of it.

The places I've looked so far are fully stocked on chunky plastic frames, which have gotten totally severe and rhomboid in their quest to still seem striking; if you have hair, fine, but if you don't, they wind up being really present and distracting, which is not what I want right now. Minimal wire-frame types are increasingly rare, it seems, and most of the ones available are k-boring -- all the design effort is going into these Scandinavian-looking Lego frames. I am disappointed in just about everything, which is doubly irritating considering the ridiculous mark-ups on frames.

What do you guys like?

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I prefer minimal wire-frames myself, but they always seem to loosen up all too quickly.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Back when I had them roundy gold-rimmed which when twinned with curly mop of hair and general thinness I had at the time made me feel like I ought to be in an alt rock band. Oh, hang on, I was. I miss my glasses.

Matt (Matt), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Exactly -- plus there's the nose-pad indentation issue. I would definitely lean toward plastic frames, except [a] it's not 1996, [b], they mostly look silly on me, and [c] when you're bald-headed, they really leap out there -- I try them on and I wind up looking like a deep house DJ.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)

ditto what ned said. though i always get the john lennon comments ...

(mini thread mutation: am i the only person who has an irrational aversion to contact lenses? i just can't stand the idea of something on my eyeball!)

Tad (llamasfur), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:40 (twenty-two years ago)

No. I hate contacts.

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:43 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe it's cos i'm a 33-year old fart, but the horn-rimmed thing is too dorky for my sensibilities -- too elvis costello/revenge of the nerds/british national health-care-morrissey-wannabe-clones-on-bikes for me.

Tad (llamasfur), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't even get contacts in. I'd need some Clockwork Orange style eye clamps.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I should get a new photo of myself with just the glasses. Well, the glasses on the eyes. I'm not Scott McCloud.

For normal glasses, I like ... what do you call them, elliptical lenses but not completely circular, you know? Grape lenses. Blast, I had them bookmarked so I could remember in case they broke, and that was lost in the Great Bookmark Implosion of Whenever. Black or dark grey frames, thin. High-strength plastic (this is partly a habit from having lost so many sunglasses over the years, and partly because it seems the wiser course with thin frames).

Need new ones, which is irritating since I've only been wearing glasses a year and these cost me (... okay, cost my mother, and thank God for that) a nice penny.

Sunglasses: dark as fuck, black or silver frames, grape lenses slightly more squished than the regular glasses because I want the lenses bigger so I don't get that "my pupils think they're in the dark but I'm getting a lot of sun over the tops of the lenses oh fuck I'm blind" effect going.

(You're not the only one, Tad -- I won't even consider contacts.)

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Well I can see this is going to be a thread like the Ballerina one, ie I'm going to want to kill myself afterwards. Not only am I useless, I'm an Elvis Costello dork!

Plastic frames can look very nice, wire-rimmed frames are not very "me". That being said, plastic frames are not very "nabisco" to be honest, you're right about that--they'd kind of overwhelm I think.

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:47 (twenty-two years ago)

elvis costello glasses wouldn't look right on me. they can look good on other people of course. women can get away with the "smoldering librarian" look, guys can't.

Tad (llamasfur), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I join Tad in fear of corneal intimacy.

I rilly need new glasses too. And I'm thinking about changing de stijl. The black plastic would be totally wrong for me. But what of the tortoise-shell plastic of my youth? The wire-rim is very much me at this point, but I'm not sure it would be a bad change.

(based on one photo, thinks wire-rims work for nabisco)

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I would still be wearing contacts if I could, but my left eyelid grew too irritated over time.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:51 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread reminds me that I have not quite accepted yet that I need glasses, much less that the first prescription is already obsolete. I haven't even looked around for local optometrists, much less considered an appointment.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm resigned to wire, but to paraphrase Tad, the wire frames available right now are a bit Franz Kafka / Road to Perdition / Restoration Hardware / 19th-century Russian clerk, too. I may have just had my present pair for so long that I can't feel comfortable with anything else. (It's been about 7 years, actually!)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:53 (twenty-two years ago)

If it makes you feel any better, Tep, one of the reasons I was glad to start at my job was that I'd have a vision plan and could get a new pair of glasses. That was three and a half years ago. I'm only motivated to do it now because I've stopped working and my insurance runs out at the end of the month.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:55 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.39dollarglasses.com/cgi-bin/store/index.html

Get the "Venice". That's what I got and get compliments all the time from random strangers who have black-rim glasses that aren't quite right. Close, but not as cool as mine. And mine were $39.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:55 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.39dollarglasses.com/cgi-bin/store/12000.html?id=ce3Zv4eX

Venice (and other black plastics) page.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Dammit, nabisco, you're right. I just went to the Modo site and they don't even make my glasses anymore. The plastic ones are all a lot thicker than they were last year.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Tep, click my fuckin' link!

Scaredy cat (Natola), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I was tired of buying glasses for hundreds of dollars since I never wear mine in public because I look very weird. So I bought some frames on ebay for 8 dollars (look under vintage frames) and they suited me as well as my 350 designer glasses ever had.

Carey (Carey), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I hadn't got there yet, Scat! Hmm. Those are still thicker than mine, but not so thick as I'd mind. The Milans are very much like the ones I have no, except my lenses are sort of .. tilted at an angle a bit. I think. Every time I take them off to look at them I realize I'm not wearing glasses and can't see them well. It's a damn conspiracy.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:05 (twenty-two years ago)

(You don't want to know how many times I did that before realizing the problem. "Goddammit, taking off my glasses has some kind of magical effect on the world whereby everything becomes blurry!")

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Tep, they have actual size pdf's you can download and compare to your glasses you currently have. That's what I did with my Armani's that cost $500+... I was afraid they might be too narrow, but they're a better fit sight unseen than any glasses I've ever owned and for once, I don't plan on buying a new pair ANYtime soon. For the price, you can't go wrong. Scratch and glare resistant lenses bring it up to like $70.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:08 (twenty-two years ago)

This is making my Modos sad, they were confident they weren't going to replaced for a long while (and still won't be, probably, but).

Oh, they're "Char," apparently, not black. There's all this writing on the frames, it turns out. Whatever.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Not only am I useless, I'm an Elvis Costello dork!

Me too, sweetie. I love chunky plastic frames. I'm automatically drawn to people wearing them. Even if they are played out.

I used to wear vintage cateyes all the time but this last time I updated my prescritption stupid lenscrafters said they couldn't fit lenses into my old frames. So I got these:

http://www.framesdirect.com/cdimages_lg/AUSTJoEL.jpg

They are kinda updated cateyes, a little more subtle than what I had before. Although I never hardly get "I *love* yr glasses!" the way I used to all the time with my vintage frames.

Texas Sam (thatgirl), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:15 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm a sucker for the black plastic. Mine are Christie Brinkley model glasses actually, ha (not like frames are too gender-specific these days).

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Thirty-nine dollars! Now I'm going to spend all night photoshopping their glasses onto pictures of me to see how they look.

That site has just reminded me of the ultimate eyeglass-fashion question. Rimless: abomination or maybe not so horrible in limited cases?

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:17 (twenty-two years ago)

nabisco da housecat

Tad (llamasfur), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:20 (twenty-two years ago)

I sort of hate all the connotations each style of glasses conveys, but if you need glasses, you need to make a choice and after about 5 pairs of glasses in 3 years, I decided black plastic looks best (and I had avoided them all along because I just didtn' want to be lumped in with that crowd).

Scaredy cat (Natola), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Rimless: abomination or maybe not so horrible in limited cases?

Weirdly annoying. You're not wearing glasses and yet you are. Nobody really knows what you look like and keeps looking away so that they don't appear to be staring at you. Therefore, rimless = friendless.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Rimless doesn't work for me. I don't have any hard and fast rules for glasses beyond the obvious What Wouldn't Elton Do, but rimless definitely wouldn't work for me.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:36 (twenty-two years ago)

scaredy, you hurt me in my heart.

I was gonna say rimless; I have a pair of Eyephorics. I did the clark kent thing for a long time, but I just got sick of it. I have a big roman schnoz, so it's tough fitting anything on me. You custom pick everything, color, lens shape, dimensions, and they're extremely light. For a little extra, you can get a little colored-in bevel around the rim of the lens, so they don't look too rimless. Also kind of pricey, but I was dating the shopgirl at the time, wahey, and since yr insured, so who cares?

there's a picture of someone's ass-ugly version here. Mine have squarer lenses w the bevelled rim and gray limbs.

and scaredy dammit i am so hot and i have many friends, i'm not gonna let you make me cry i won't i won't!!

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:43 (twenty-two years ago)

scaredy, you hurt me in my heart.

Aw, c'mon, I was just blabbing. Rimless glasses look good on that guy who does all those Radio Shack commercials with that chick (I think he's a sportscaster?). Rimless look stupid on a lot of people is all, certainly not everybody!

Scaredy cat (Natola), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, I'm thinking of rimless with wirey thin everywhere else. The ones you linked to are much less confusing to look at.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 03:02 (twenty-two years ago)

"Since you're insured?" Do I secretly have a crappy vision plan or something? I chose the plan that had the best vision coverage, which pretty much amounts to a free exam and something like $75-$100 toward glasses -- i.e., the cost of a basic non-designer no-frills pair of glasses from a chain like ForEyes, and not nearly enough to get very "who cares" with high-end stuff. I'm suddenly very curious: is everyone waltzing around with big muscly vision plans that offer so much more than this?

This reminds me: has anyone on here ever possessed and regularly used more than one pair of glasses? I can't tell if this sort of thing strikes me as sheer lunacy or a wonderful idea.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 03:24 (twenty-two years ago)

yes, I was using 2 until the screw popped out of my expensive ones. Cheap ones still going strong and look better anyway.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 03:26 (twenty-two years ago)

The last time I wore glasses (I mean prior to this time; I wear them for a different vision problem now, the previous one having more or less gone away) I had two pair: very very dark sunglasses and slightly less dark sunglasses purchased at my mother's insistence "so I can see your eyes in church."

Lunacy or wonderful idea, you be the judge.

I do have prescription sunglasses now, but since my glasses are reading glasses, I never use them and have no clue what I was thinking ("well, it might be very very bright and I'll be ... trapped outside ... waiting for a bus ... aaaand, I'll need to read the schedule, see ...")

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 03:27 (twenty-two years ago)

haha no I just paid for mine, abt $250 (a big big break, eyephorics start at abt 350 altogether; if your prescription is bad the lenses can be outrageous).

Having more than one pair seems to be a gender thing. But a professional and then a fun pair is a common sales pitch.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 03:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Contacts are awful for me in the dry dry air here, they are for sporting events only.

I have had the same ever-so-slightly hexagonal wire elipticals since forever, like 6 years. I am ready just to stick forks in my eyes and stop worrying about this issue. I like the way the plastics look ok, but the fact that every person under 40 on the street has them kinda makes me want to but a pair of huge metal aviators. Nabisco, show us what you choose, I live really far from you, nobody will know I copied you.

Hunter (Hunter), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 03:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Plus you'll be eyeglass buddies, like Chandler and Joey with their bracelets.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 03:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Um, and actually I don't know where you live, but I'm trusting it's not close.

Hunter (Hunter), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 03:37 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.soft-contact-lenses.biz/images/acuvue.gif

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 03:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I live in your cellar, dude. Stop making that horrible casserole thing, it stinks up the whole place.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 06:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm supposed to wear glasses (mild prescription), and I like them, but I've not found a pair that I like for about 10 years...

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 06:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I have thin(ish) wireframe burgundy frames and I want to try the chunky emo style black ones, as I think a very distinctive glasses frame would suit me. But I can't quite afford to buy new frames :( Oh well one day...

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 07:04 (twenty-two years ago)

What would Marcello Mastroianni wear in the early sixties? I think that's what I should get. All the cool emo glasses make me look like an architect or something which is just too much.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 07:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd like to have more than one pair. A server at work has about 3 differnt pairs of glasses.Stylish. My last prescription I had sunglasses and regular glasses. But I don't now b/c I haven't had the cash.

:(

Texas Sam (thatgirl), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 07:15 (twenty-two years ago)

I refuse to wear contacts. Ugh. My glasses are part of me.

For years and years I swore by little round(ish) gold-rimmed frames. I liked the big black, chunky plastic indiegeek style, but they just didn't suit me. But now they've started making big chunky plastic indiegeek style glasses in colours other than black, I pretty much wear nothing but. I'm wearing Aqua plastic ones right now. (I really wanted to get green ones but Ed beat me to it.) Before that I had purple, before that brown, and before that orange.

It's really important to try a wide variety before picking a pair of glasses - and I'd reccomend getting *two* pairs of glasses so you have options (I still keep an extra pair of wire-rimmed glasses, which are my "posh" glasses.)

Oh, and memory metal is excellent in idea, but poor in execution.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 07:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Definately plastic, (or endangered rhino horn if you like)

How about some of these (from my opticians)
http://www.cutlerandgross.co.uk/glasses/classic/full/cg7.jpg
http://www.cutlerandgross.co.uk/glasses/optical_2003/full/0668.jpg

Find an architect and ask him where he gets his glasses and go there. Architect know secret places where the motherload of incredible spectacles comes from.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 07:44 (twenty-two years ago)

that being, two pairs for under £35 total. I think they were £15 each at the time, plus whatever other fees.

Akon/Family (Merdeyeux), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 14:18 (sixteen years ago)

those are cool glasses

mark cl, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 14:22 (sixteen years ago)

yea ideally i'd like to have a pair of plastic and a pair of wires

Me too. Unfortunately the place where I like to get my glasses makes all their own frames and is kind of pricey so I probably won't be getting another pair any time soon which sucks esp since I have to wear my glasses almost all the time now. I really love the place though so I'm reluctant to go elsewhere.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 14:30 (sixteen years ago)

Mark I like both the ones you posted but it would really depend on how they look on.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 14:31 (sixteen years ago)

i get mine from this place - http://www.myspace.com/arckivcamden

you have to go there, though, no online ordering. the guy who runs the place is very nice and chatty and spends a lot of time in france and italy hunting through old warehouses full of forgotten glasses. he'll often find say 20 pairs of exactly the same style, never worn. costume designers are big clients cause they can buy like 10 pairs in case three of them break during an action scene. he said his glasses are in quantum of solace but he's still never seen the movie. he thinks they're bad-guy glasses based on what was bought. anyway what's crazy is that all his glasses are about the same price as what you'd pay at a normal optician! my wire specs are from ca. 1910 or so and they only cost 90 pounds, including lenses. my sunglasses are from this guy too, they're pierre marly glasses from the 70s. http://www.cofrase.com/triangledor/marly/uk/historik.htm

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 14:42 (sixteen years ago)

by the way, wraparound prescription glasses are..... really weird at first! i almost fell down twice and had a huge headache for two days. it was totally worth it though.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 14:44 (sixteen years ago)

I just bought two pairs at once for the first time. A normal pair and a very cheap pair. Both are plastic.

boring movies are the most boring (Eric H.), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 14:46 (sixteen years ago)

The cheap pair is so fantastically ugly. I love them.

boring movies are the most boring (Eric H.), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 14:47 (sixteen years ago)

Oh screw it. Maybe I'll just get a cheap pair online and go back to the awsome place when it comes time for a new "real" pair.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 14:51 (sixteen years ago)

yea it definitely depends on how u look in them. i've visited like 7 or 8 different shops since i got my perscription and have seen TONS of awesome frames, tho trying them on weeds out like 90% of them

mark cl, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 14:55 (sixteen years ago)

is the big thing right now those circular frames? i see these everywhere
http://www.eyeglasseswarehouse.com/1849.html

mark cl, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 14:58 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.framesdirect.com/cdimages_elg/lafont-alibaba-eyeglasses-100.jpg

mark cl, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 14:59 (sixteen years ago)

Oh man I hope those aren't the new thing!!!

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:01 (sixteen years ago)

haha!

mark cl, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:05 (sixteen years ago)

Seriously they're awful.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:06 (sixteen years ago)

that's probably an ugly example, but yea almost every place i've been to has this huge selection of interesting circular frames. but i barely see anyone wearing them

mark cl, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:06 (sixteen years ago)

Probably becasue they're generally not flattering on anyone. In and of themselves they're fine but I've never seen anyone really look good in glasses like that.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:08 (sixteen years ago)

http://tingilinde.typepad.com/starstuff/images/DrBunsenHoneydew.jpg

steamed hams (harbl), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:10 (sixteen years ago)

i need new ones. i hate how all the ones that fit me at the eye dr had designs or sparkly diamond shit on them. current ones are black but have weird flowers on the side. yuck.

steamed hams (harbl), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:11 (sixteen years ago)

yea, me neither. i admire them in some ways tho. in new haven CT, there's this refined thin english-looking guy w/ wavy gray hair who runs this tobacco/smoke shop/lounge (the owl shop), w/ wood panelling and brown leather chairs and old rugs. he has glasses like this and looks awesome in them

http://www.faceaface-paris.com/applications/faceaface/medias/pictures/catalog/big/ALLEN-100-01.jpg

mark cl, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:12 (sixteen years ago)

xp

mark cl, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:12 (sixteen years ago)

OK maybe on the right person but still def going for a look and not like actually flattering frames. you know?

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:17 (sixteen years ago)

yea def

mark cl, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:19 (sixteen years ago)

My cheap pair look almost exactly like the ones in this poster!

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTQyMjUzNTE0Nl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDI1MTk3Mg@@._V1._SX274_SY400_.jpg

boring movies are the most boring (Eric H.), Thursday, 24 September 2009 16:57 (sixteen years ago)

Wow, this is SO WEIRD that this has been revived, because I've spent the past week buying / obsessing over glasses and thinking about starting a thread about glasses fashion. (I had totally forgotten starting this one.)

Also I'm completely confused by myself. "I'm resigned to wire" = I wound up getting plastic frames, wearing them for the past six years, and then being unable to even think about getting anything besides plastic frames for a new pair. And then this, WTF:

I got two pair ... one pair is pretty much exactly like my old ones, except rimless on the bottom. (I don't get this one for a week, actually.)

I have no other pair and no recollection of such! Did I cancel the order? Did get confused and move to New York and forget to pick them up? Did I say I was getting them because I was thinking about getting them and then changed my mind during whatever week of waiting is being referred to? These alternate-reality mystery-glasses are totally bugging me out.

I'm currently scouring online sites for alternatives to my boring/disappointing new pair, and waiting for interesting light-blue glasses to arrive in the mail. Twenty dollars! I never thought I would turn out a multiple-glasses owner, but given the online prices I might wind up with three.

nabisco, Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)

I keep running into someone around town who has the big round Carrie Donovan-style black frames and they make her look like a complete twat, but that might be because she's a twat.

that stupid-ass cannibal pen-pal of yours (Laurel), Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:31 (sixteen years ago)

Carrie Donovan is not a twat!

boring movies are the most boring (Eric H.), Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:31 (sixteen years ago)

(was not)

boring movies are the most boring (Eric H.), Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:31 (sixteen years ago)

CD wasn't, but this girl is.

that stupid-ass cannibal pen-pal of yours (Laurel), Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:33 (sixteen years ago)

What's weird is that, umm, since I tend to settle on a pair of glasses and wear them for like 5-6 years, right now feels like an odd time to be purchasing, in terms of glasses fashion. The small plastic rectangular frames that read as a bit hip/stylish a decade ago now read as normal/standard and only "fashionable" in the very faintest sense, which seems to have started a size-of-glasses arms race leading to really chunky oversized and/or 70s-looking frames to maintain hipness (e.g., the horrible prop glasses they sell at American Apparel); I think this has reached its reductio ad absurdum point, but it's not yet clear to me which direction glasses-fashion will go next. (The bridge of my nose is not inclined to hop back in the direction of tiny steely wire frames, that's for sure.) For the time being I am sorta sticking with pretty conventional plastic frames with interesting colors/textures, especially anything that's lighter than my skin.

nabisco, Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:36 (sixteen years ago)

I'm shopping for new frames right now too. I'm pretty much restricted to plastics thanks to my prescription, and I've had the same pair since 1998 (I got some wire frames in about 2002 or so, but they've long since fallen apart).

Thanks to my enormously wide face, I have to shop online. None of my local shops carry anything over a width of 48 or 50. Who's got some good sites to check?

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:37 (sixteen years ago)

it's not yet clear to me which direction glasses-fashion will go next

http://purplegables.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/sally2.jpg

boring movies are the most boring (Eric H.), Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:37 (sixteen years ago)

^^ they have already gone there, around here!

nabisco, Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:40 (sixteen years ago)

Sally Jesse is my eyeglasses hero. I was totally looking for ones like that, but settled for more squarish architectural ones.

I Like Daydreams, I've Had Enough Reality (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:41 (sixteen years ago)

Oh screw it. Maybe I'll just get a cheap pair online and go back to the awsome place when it comes time for a new "real" pair.

DO EEEETT!! I <3 my Zenni glasses so very much. I have.. 4 pairs? One purple, one red, and two black wire framed ones. The blacks ones are so boring to me now that I end up wearing the purple ones all the time! Only problem I've had is a nosepiece fell off my fifth pair, cool silver and white ones.. but I caught the screw & nosepiece and just need to find the appropriate screwdriver with which to fix it. Love my cheap glasses & especially love not having to worry about destroying a $200 pair of glasses! My dog ate my last pair and I decided to go cheap until my dog(s) & future children are all over 15. ;)

she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, I was thinking of you and your Zenni specs when I wrote that! :-)

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:46 (sixteen years ago)

xp to Johnny - I have had good luck with ZenniOptical.com and Goggles4U.com. Note that when I keyed in the wrong prescription, I got about 80% of my cost back from G4U and only 40% or so back from Zenni - so make sure you have the right prescription (my optometrist entered a - where there should have been a +).

she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:47 (sixteen years ago)

Erica, I'm a ZenniWhore! I can't help it! I want more... :(

she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:47 (sixteen years ago)

I don't wear glasses, but increasingly feel like I could use some (things always seeming just a *bit* blurrier than they used to) and have been looking at something like these: http://www.eyeglass.com/metose.html
I don't like the increasingly sleek, squashed rectangle thing that's been happening to plastic rims over the past ten years or so (I think?), and would like to have something with a bit more roundness, though not *completely* round.

If I wasn't smart enough to realize that I really need to try on frames to find out how they *really* look on me, I'd totally just order those right now and then worry about getting the proper lenses later...
because I know nothing about glasses.

lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)

Q: have any online-ordering fans used prescriptionglassesonline.net?

nabisco, Thursday, 24 September 2009 19:21 (sixteen years ago)

Plastic and only plastic for the last decade and a half.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 24 September 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

Mostly it's cuz I can't stand the ubiquitous little nose-pad things on metal frames. So uncomfortable.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 24 September 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)

I didn't have enough money, then I did and had lasik surgery. Sparing the world more of this:

http://media-2.web.britannica.com/eb-media/60/85260-004-66758357.jpg
Uber-classic.

Drove away his head. (Derelict), Thursday, 24 September 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)

^^ that's what turned me -- not discomfort, but the slow development of visible nosepad indentations like my father's

nabisco, Thursday, 24 September 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)

they should just call those round frames "architect glasses"

lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Thursday, 24 September 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)

I associate them most profoundly with poet/translator/critic/professor Richard Howard, who has all different colors to match his outfits:

http://thebestamericanpoetry.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/09/27/r_howard.jpg

nabisco, Thursday, 24 September 2009 19:35 (sixteen years ago)

(one advantage of them would be that you could roll your eyes UP and still see through your glasses for a while)

nabisco, Thursday, 24 September 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)

by the way guys, if you're looking for some vintage Malcolm X style frames check this guy out, I ordered a pair and it was great (the actual cutting of the lenses was a different story though)

http://optometristattic.com/

baout.com (dyao), Friday, 25 September 2009 02:15 (sixteen years ago)

I'm looking for some big old-guy glasses at the moment, but all the shops now only sell trendy colored plastic rectangular frames now

baout.com (dyao), Friday, 25 September 2009 02:16 (sixteen years ago)

"Malcolm X style" = the Shuron Ronsir frame, available a decent number of places, though not quite as easy to get in off-brand/discount/knockoff style

nabisco, Friday, 25 September 2009 03:45 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.