T/S: Busted vs Debord (explained)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So, I was talkin'. With my dad.

The below is a conversational summary, hence the reading pretty awfully and also the being pretentious as hell - I apologize for both. I'd still like to know the answer though.

Henry A. (Gregory Henry), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 00:07 (twenty-two years ago)

G: For instance, one of the groups I'm really into at the moment are called Busted. They're completely open about being manufactured, and yet they play the instruments associated with "authentic" rock music and claim to hate manufactured bands. And their very (manufactured, selected) name openly points to, revels in the contradiction.

D: But why is that exciting? It seems like all that's going on there is pop disappearing up itself, and that entirely at the instigation of the market...

G: I think what I find so exciting is the collapse of the expectation of coherence in the song-as-work-of-art (this is what I always take the term rockist to mean, completely wrongly). Like, when you read, say, Chaucer, you're not sure if he added certain bits because they were important to the furtherance of an ultimate effect, or because, "hey, a song is better than no song, so what are you complaining about?". Whereas when you read, y'know, Henry James, you are. And when I listen to the tATu album, which starts out as this awesome incestuous-underaged-lesbians-on-the-run-from-the-law-RAWKMUSICAL, and then completely sabotages itself with ballads and needless Eurodisco remixes that seem to serve /no/ purpose, what's powering that, via the market or not, is an aesthetic that to a rockist like me is strange and alien and new.

D: But why do you want that? Isn't that totally negative?

G: No! It seems like it could be utterly the opposite, it could create a generation of listeners who are free to pick and choose from whatever is beautiful wherever they find it, who could just listen and appreciate sincerely the quality of one chord change from one White Stripes song, then one vocal from a reggae track etc etc, all without having to buy into the whole product, the artist-as-brand or genre-as-brand or any of that rubbish....

D: I think what I hadn't realised is just how utterly, comprehensively pessimistic your generation really is - you've completely lost hope in creating something that can be communicated without capitalism having vichified it to its very marrow, so all that's left is to be a kind of pirate, sifting through the rubble... everything Debord predicted in 'La société du spectacle' has come true. No wonder he killed himself.

So! Wise and Erudite ILE! Is he right? Should I read Debord? Should he read Heat and I Love Pop? Are we both missing a much wider point about pomo suspicion of all metanarratives, whether in politics or the novel or the song? How wanky was this? Answer me!

Henry A. (Gregory Henry), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 00:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Debord killed himself because he had terminal cancer.

To answer your questions: Yes, no, no, no, not so.

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 00:11 (twenty-two years ago)

[This thread has been closed by the moderator, as all questions have been answered.]

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 00:14 (twenty-two years ago)

who could just listen and appreciate sincerely the quality of one chord change from one White Stripes song, then one vocal from a reggae track etc etc

aka bootlegs, but that trend as such also died, then so should we.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 00:34 (twenty-two years ago)

jesus god let me outta here

Orbit (Orbit), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 00:54 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't to answer such cuntlike questions.

felicity (felicity), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 00:56 (twenty-two years ago)

your dad's (and debord's?) represents the comprehensive, crushing pessimism

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 07:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh my. Last conversation I had with MY dad:

Me: Yeah, so I'm going to do my MA, that's good isn't it?!
Dad: Uh huh.
[pause]
Me: Any news there?
Dad: No. Same old same old. Oh, [name of random step-aunt's sprog] has been taken away by social services.
Me: Oh.
Dad: And [name of random step-cousin] is pregnant and has been charged with being an accessory to car theft.
Me: Oh dear.
Dad: Well... I'll let you get on.

Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 07:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Mine:

Dad: Want me to hold that for you?
Me: Oh. Yeah, thanks.

thom west (thom w), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 08:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Nick: "Dad, this issue of Rail Magazine was in the scanner. It's from November 200, so it must've been there a good six months."

Nick's Dad: "Oh. Yes. It wouldn't scan."

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 09:33 (twenty-two years ago)

PS; Debord. If only cos Charlie Busted has revived the Noel Gallagher-monobrow.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 09:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh right the question. Busted, clearly.

Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 09:34 (twenty-two years ago)

November 2002, itf anyone cares.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 09:36 (twenty-two years ago)

eight months pass...
I am gratified to find that Busted's version of "Where Is The Love?" is very close to my own karaoke reading of it.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 6 April 2004 17:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Is it as psuedo-rubbish as the live version? because that was utterly classic.

My god, this thread is the greatest thread ever! How did I miss it the first time around?

Oh yeah, that whole "Getting sacked and not having internet access for several months" thing.

Busted are right and Debord and your dad are wrong, of course. The aesthetic tension between the "manufactured" and the "authentic" is part of what makes the whole package work as art, even moreso than the skillful songwriter. It is a new, post-Warholian artform which Debord never dreamed of.

Oh yeah, plus, James is hott.

Super-Kate (kate), Tuesday, 6 April 2004 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Revolution is not showing life to people, but making them LIVE.

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Tuesday, 6 April 2004 20:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks but considering the raw, nasty, awful, inhumane side of life that most revolutions entail, I'd rather not be live.

When the revolution comes, it'll be televised, but it's ratings will be negligible cause we'll all be watching Pop Idol.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 06:51 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.