Flash websites - Dead or what?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Having just found practical ways of using Flash, finally, I've begun to warm up to it-- even consider it necessary-- and, then I remember: before I learned how to use it, I really hated Flash.

Looking at all the "old" places (like, 2 years ago) to find "cool" and innovative Flash websites, I see they are no longer updated or have very little new additions, while all the old stuff is a bunch of broken links.

Is Flash dead, then, save for a few blinking advertisements or a small corner graphic or two?

Scaredy Cat, Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:09 (twenty years ago) link

It's still pretty big in Hong Kong and Japan - countries with high levels of broadband connections. Which suggests it might come back into vogue again here.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:14 (twenty years ago) link

When is that wholly flash animated film coming out. Soon I believe.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:20 (twenty years ago) link

Flash has its place. We're still cooling down from the image obsessed era of the internet which deemed it neccessary to repeat "Content is king" as if it was some sort of paradoxical aphorism.

Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:24 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/lilpimp/

Its Lil Pimp. In cinemas near you soon.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:24 (twenty years ago) link

flash websites are absolute DUD, particularly as pagerank for these websites are often very low, and therefore don't generate much web traffic.

Flash often = design mad web techies, that piss about with about the latest graphics and have absolute no business sense/ acumen/ knowledge !

e.g the new official killing joke website launched a few months back

Killing Joke
http://www.killingjoke.com/

No Meta Tags
No Page Rank
No text on the front page
No google placing...on.. killing joke official website

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:31 (twenty years ago) link

I'll tell you one thing for sure, Flash sites don't feel "real" to me. Like, the KJ website you just mentioned; I went to it, got into the navigation and it looks and feels all buggy and shit. I wouldn't click the chat button, just on the assumtion that it's some herky jerky Flash message board. The rest of it appears to be 2 inch wide x 2 inch tall scrollable text fields that's an absolute pain in the ass to read. So I leave... as usual. But, there are ways to design Flash websites that don't suck complete dick.

Scaredy Cat, Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:35 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=killing+joke

Ahem.

DJ Martian I respect your opinion on a lot of things but web design is not among them. ;)

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:35 (twenty years ago) link

correct use of ...Meta tags ...would have picked up official website

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:38 (twenty years ago) link

Martian you lunatic how many people type in "official website" when they are googling a band??

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:38 (twenty years ago) link

ok, but 23rd is still pretty poor. Flash isn't SOLELY responsible for this though. as you say meta tags.

Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:39 (twenty years ago) link

Tom, the company Hildebrand that designed the website, use extensive flash to design their websites, and have done zilch to try and make the website search engine friendly.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:42 (twenty years ago) link

Yes except for the fact that when you type "killing joke" into Google their recently launched website is top of the list. That's a level of unfriendliness I'd be quite happy with.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:44 (twenty years ago) link

the "google dance" is going on at the mo, google uses multiple servers

just done another killing Joke - search and no top place.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:47 (twenty years ago) link

(Now I'm confused -- I'm absolutely sure it was 23rd 3 minutes ago. Now it's 1st. WTF?)

Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:47 (twenty years ago) link

its the Google Dance...


http://googledance.seochat.com/

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:49 (twenty years ago) link

DJ M - this is therefore an issue with Google more than the KJ site since it's obviously doing something right.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:49 (twenty years ago) link

I like the the second site (the first when I checked ten minutes ago) is dead-dead.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:50 (twenty years ago) link

I have just realised that I am spending a golden afternoon of my young manhood arguing with DJ Martian about the google placement of the Killing Joke website. I feel an existential crisis coming on.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:55 (twenty years ago) link

there are certain times of the month, were Google does a full index shuffle, and to try and spread this massive amount of change ...it uses multiple servers with different indexes.

Yes, Tom but the company has not implented any search engine optimisation strategies as I oultined earlier. [No Meta Tags, No typical keywords and information about Killing Joke on the front page]

another example

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=killing+joke+new+album

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 15:59 (twenty years ago) link

WE'RE ALL FLASH FOR THE SAKE OF BLEEDING EDGE TECHNOLOGY BIG DICK CONTEST sites are duds. Flash can still be used for extreme goodness, however, to a limit.

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 16:13 (twenty years ago) link

Flash sites are all dud, as I do not have a flash plugin on my computer.

caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 16:15 (twenty years ago) link

Prime example: http://www.2advanced.com

Yeah... 2 advanced... for me to poop on!

Scaredy Cat, Tuesday, 29 July 2003 16:15 (twenty years ago) link

flash has it's place, but mainly as an assist to regular web pages. There are two main problems with flash sites:

1. UI, often users coming to flash sites must learn navigation all over again because there are different design limitations on flash developers.

2. Development time is longer and more expensive (especially to maintain) for most flash sites.

Otherwise, I like the more low-key presense of recent flash stuff: banners ads etc. Also, flash sites for motion pictures don't bother me at all as far as labyrnthine navigation goes - part of the mystique of the picture I guess.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 16:31 (twenty years ago) link

internet flash nav must be kept subtle and low key!

i'd like to think it has a future. if not, then i've learnt NO marketable skill from my fine arts degree. i make animated films using final cut pro and flash. it's got it's uses, and if you're aware of its limits and strengths and work within and towards those, i think you can still produce some interesting results. that said, i intensely dislike most flash animation.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 16:38 (twenty years ago) link

its.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 16:39 (twenty years ago) link

i think the fischerspooner site is amazing and has the right combo of flash/non-flash.

lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 03:05 (twenty years ago) link

I hate going to the website for our local big movie theater chain (Santikos) because it has a slow Flash animation up on top of the site that it uses as a big banner, and I hate going to the VH1 Classic website because it uses way too many memory-hogging applications such as Flash. But I do agree with whomever those website critics are who said that the Flash on certain sites, such as the official "record label" Amy Grant site, is utterly lovely and tasteful and used well.

It's funny, though, how Flash is so much more of an annoyance to me than Java. I've never felt the need to turn off Java loading on my browser so my computer wouldn't go into crash mode, whereas Flash will occasionally make my computer do odd things that make me end up having to give my computer a long rest.

Just Deanna (Dee the Lurker), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 03:45 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.dccomics.com/directcurrents/comics/dcu/covers/fldeadh.jpg

Dada, Wednesday, 30 July 2003 03:48 (twenty years ago) link

Flash is very useful for standalone web apps that are meant to satisfy the concentration the user is about to give it, such as games, or online shopping, or other mini-application-like functions.

Flash that's used to be a clever substitute for a normal hyper-linked document and nothing more is so over.

donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 03:50 (twenty years ago) link

Flash heaven: www.homestarrunner.com (always lots of interesting stuff in the animations to click on, if you're fast enough).

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 03:53 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.beijing-olympic.org.cn/eolympic/ydy/mdmm/image/mdmm_lx1.jpg

Dada, Wednesday, 30 July 2003 03:54 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.homestarrunner.com/evolution1.jpg

Dada, Wednesday, 30 July 2003 03:55 (twenty years ago) link

http://store3.yimg.com/I/homestarrunner_1751_351470

Dada, Wednesday, 30 July 2003 03:59 (twenty years ago) link

six months pass...
this is the worst flash website i have seen for some considerable time:

http://www.triptych04.com/

DJ Martian (djmartian), Friday, 20 February 2004 16:28 (twenty years ago) link

i don't understand why people ever made dense Flash sites for lo-spec users i.e. sites like this would look okay on an 800x600 resolution but any higher and the text becomes a chore to squint at in order to read properly. i absolutely despise moving jpegs (script or tween) on a Flash site too.

stevem (blueski), Friday, 20 February 2004 16:52 (twenty years ago) link

as i mentioned on my blog:

On a side note, this is a prime example of a website that uses Macromedia Flash badly:

>> hideous split screen design
>> ghastly use of small text
>> a useless scrolling section for some sections
and the most inappropriate use of macromedia flash that I have seen for some considerable time.

This results in:

Bad information design, poor usability and due to the use of flash - poor performance for search engine optimisation, and finally there is no quick backwards navigation in the artists section due to flash.

This Triptych Festival website has set the benchmark - of how NOT to design a website in 2004.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Friday, 20 February 2004 17:02 (twenty years ago) link

two years pass...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctwo/

arggh. doesn't render at all well. takes an age to appear (hate to think how it would look on dialup). gives me javascript errors. scrollwheel no longer works. and all so they can put an animated background on it. hurrah.

koogs (koogs), Thursday, 23 February 2006 13:34 (eighteen years ago) link

I really hate it how so many sites are flash these days.
I am used to forex ample right clicking a link to open in a new tab (I've set firefox to open links that want to open in a new window in tab, though, but I cannot get over this habit somehow)
It is possible to make cool / amazing stuff with flash but sometimes it gets way to hard to access the content.

clodia pulchra (emo by proxy), Thursday, 23 February 2006 14:18 (eighteen years ago) link

I will accept Flash when someone makes a flash plugin that works on my home PC without forcing me to install a 32-bit browser.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Thursday, 23 February 2006 14:21 (eighteen years ago) link

three years pass...

how can i download flash content from the bbc website? in particular this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00j4bkq/Rob_da_Bank_and_friends_The_A_to_Z_of_the_Pet_Shop_Boys/

i've got that UnPlug plugin for Firefox, and DTA but neither of these do anything. i've even tried that 'view selection source' and looked for something downloadable but no joy, is it even possible? one option is to use totalrecorder to record the entire thing, but that means leaving it playing for the full two hours, is there an easier way?

NI, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 10:59 (fifteen years ago) link

get_iplayer

http://linuxcentre.net/getiplayer/installation/

koogs, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 12:09 (fifteen years ago) link

or iplayer grabber for os x -

http://fader.co.uk/post/iPlayer-Grabber-the-iPlayer-downloader-for-Mac-OS-X.aspx

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 12:29 (fifteen years ago) link

thanks koogs, im finding that program incredibly difficult to navigate though. what would i type in to find this PSB show? is there anything out there more userfriendly, like a firefox plugin that can do this?

NI, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 12:30 (fifteen years ago) link

ah thanks tracer, is there anything like that for windows?

NI, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 12:30 (fifteen years ago) link

ok found a blog with that show on: http://no-rockstars.blogspot.com/2009/03/rob-da-bank-and-friends-on-bbc-radio-1.html
but my original question still stands, is there an easyish-to-use plugin/program out there that can download embedded audio/video from the bbc site? or any other website out there that doesn't respond well to UnPlug or DTA

NI, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 12:38 (fifteen years ago) link

can't speak for the windows version (which is new to me) but the cygwin version goes something like

./get_iplayer --type=radio bank (which will download all the index and show you things matching 'bank')

then

./get_iplayer --type=radio -g xxxx (where xxxx is the number next to the result you got in the first place)

occasionally it won't find the iphone file and will try and download the actual stream. in which case i find it easier to add --raw on the end so i get the .ra stream and not a wav of the stream (too much space) or an mp3 of the wav (too much hassle). and just play the .ra in realaudio.

yes, it's a faff, but all my old realaudio stream bookmarks are now failing.

(am listening to it now, as it happens. not sure i'm enjoying it though...)

koogs, Thursday, 19 March 2009 09:43 (fifteen years ago) link

two years pass...

Can't stop watching Mr. Yellow Dancer: http://www.poolworld.com/

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 11 April 2011 19:16 (thirteen years ago) link

It was creepy/jarring when the whole thing went back to the beginning. I thought those kids were gonna go around in circles forever.

kkvgz, Monday, 11 April 2011 19:25 (thirteen years ago) link

six months pass...

RIP

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 17:55 (twelve years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/Lr0te.gif

markers, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 17:57 (twelve years ago) link

who's that

ASPIE Rocky (dayo), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:01 (twelve years ago) link

me irl

markers, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:03 (twelve years ago) link

I love Apple's stance on open web standards and not developing websites that depend on bandwidth-hogging, processor-intensive proprietary plug-ins like Flash, instead utilizing HTML5 to create a seamless experience that works in any browser on any operating system.

http://i.imgur.com/HrkAA.png

James Mitchell, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:04 (twelve years ago) link

You cynic

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:05 (twelve years ago) link

http://www.themaclawyer.com/uploads/image/Steve%20Jobs%20vs_%20Flash.png

buzza, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:09 (twelve years ago) link

*pats Flash on head*

dmr, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:10 (twelve years ago) link

http://images.wikia.com/marvel_dc/images/5/51/Flash_v.1_171.jpg

buzza, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:17 (twelve years ago) link

I had made so many Flash websites with Flash 5 and then a few years ago tried to load them up, and new Flash players wouldn't play them right. Buttons linked outside of the frame failed to work, navigation was a total disaster. I don't know why, i guess they changed the code or something, but none of my old websites work anymore and it really made creating a portfolio site showcasing my work into a non-deal.

Is there some kind of code or something you can put it in run the Flash player in classic mode or something? The idea of rebuilding these sites with the newer Action Script does NOT sound like a good time.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:26 (twelve years ago) link

maybe try http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/

am0n, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:33 (twelve years ago) link

thats assuming the problem is with the outdated embed code in the html and not the outdated actionscript in the file

am0n, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:37 (twelve years ago) link

Just to be clear, Adobe has axed Flash for mobile devices but is keeping on with development on the PC version. But I doubt there'll be much developers writing for Flash anymore given that smartphones and iPads/tablets won't be albe to access it.

Everything else is secondary (Lee626), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:08 (twelve years ago) link

five years pass...

[Removed Illegal Link]

Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 25 July 2017 18:58 (six years ago) link

(BBCode check doesn't like "javascript" in the URL)

Adobe ending Flash support at the end of 2020
[Removed Illegal Link]

Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 25 July 2017 18:59 (six years ago) link

BBCode otm

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 25 July 2017 19:00 (six years ago) link

three years pass...

[Removed Illegal Link]

Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Saturday, 2 January 2021 04:12 (three years ago) link

Flash will still work on the websites that still employ it as long as you don't update your browser... ... ... ... ... .. ... Right?

pplains, Saturday, 2 January 2021 16:52 (three years ago) link

Need to get Brian Blessed in to say "Flash is Dead!!"

Mark G, Saturday, 2 January 2021 16:55 (three years ago) link

xpost:

yes, it should; but pinning a browser is a real pain. I just oversaw a project at work that involved updating the UI of an internal tool to remove all the flash (they built it in flash/flex for some goddamned reason a few years ago) and one of the proposals to avoid doing this was pinning browsers for an entire internal team (which was deemed a security risk and also an incredible pain in the ass so we didn't do it)

akm, Saturday, 2 January 2021 19:04 (three years ago) link

Our banner ad service runs on Flash. Finally - like in November - they let us know they've got an HTML5 version going. Checked it out and it looks like Cyberpunk 1877. Emailed a dozen items wrong with it to them, and they were like, "say. Maybe keep an old copy of Firefox on hand just in case, dig?"

pplains, Saturday, 2 January 2021 19:24 (three years ago) link

gotta love it when "s/w of the future" is buried.
i used to work for a s/w house that decided to rebuild their main market leading product in silverlight.
no sooner was it good to go when MS pulled the plug.
a rewrite in HTML literally killed the company as replicating the functionality in HTML5 proved to be very costly
- and took years of development costs hence several takeovers/redundancies (hello) etc.
in fact, the HTML5 version i believe still has nowhere near the depth as the original silverlight version, meaning that there are customers still using old browsers just for their application.

mark e, Saturday, 2 January 2021 19:47 (three years ago) link

We had our entire training course for Pension on Flash. We knew about the deadline all year. Although we came close to creating a new Flashless version, we didn't quite finish in time.

Given that we have multiple partner sites who may have newer versions of Firefox since we can't control their software, really hope nobody needs to take the course til Feb

Looking for Cape Penis house (Neanderthal), Saturday, 2 January 2021 19:49 (three years ago) link

Thanks for using Adobe Flash Player. We're proud that Flash had a key role in evolving web content across animation, interactivity, audio, and video -- and we're excited to help lead the next era of digital experiences.

Dog Heavy Manners (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 4 January 2021 01:46 (three years ago) link

Flash spam, sorry.

Dog Heavy Manners (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 4 January 2021 01:46 (three years ago) link

Flash and the Spam.

Dog Heavy Manners (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 4 January 2021 02:19 (three years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.