Prisons

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
1 in 143 americans are in prison and that number increases every year
why do so few people care ?

anthony easton (anthony), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:38 (twenty-two years ago)

out of sight, out of mind.

phil-two (phil-two), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:39 (twenty-two years ago)

They are all in prison because they derserve it. Do the crime, pay the time!

fletrejet, Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Exactly.
What are most of them in jail for?

Sarah MCLUsky (coco), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)

pulling the tags off mattresses

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)

or being poor

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)

ilx in middle class priv'lege shocker

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:41 (twenty-two years ago)

1/3 of America's inmates are held for non-violent drug-related convictions.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh no, nickalicious! Your people!

Sarah McLusky (coco), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Keeping them in prison reduces the unemployment rate by 0.7%

fletrejet, Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)

1/3 of America's inmates are held for non-violent drug-related convictions.

That, or they didn't run fast enough.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)

A lot of them are in jail on minor drug offenses, which is just stupidity.

The "best" is the jail in Arizona, called "Tent City". Tent City is exactly what it sounds like: a pile of tents in the middle of the desert, obviously not air conditioned, with a huge fence around it. The conditions are just barely on this side of brutality (it gets to be around 130F out there, and there is no shade sans inside the tents). Food is overheated balony sandwiches. There have been a lot of battles as to whether or not this is cruel and unusual punishment; Sheriff Joe Arpaio says no, prisons are overcrowded, this is what these people deserve, they are criminals.

Keep in mind that, for obvious reasons, Tent City cannot contain actual violent hardcore criminals being as it is not exactly the highest level of security. Who is in Tent City, then? Mostly petty thieves and drug offenders.

It fucking makes me sick to be honest.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey man, your drug purchases fund terrorist activities, so there's no such thing as "nonviolent drug-related convictions"!

Note: I have been locked in a dank basement for the past 23 years, with only a television set playing loops of government-funded antidrug commercials to keep me company and teach me to read and speak, so my opinions may be biased.

NA (Nick A.), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha meanwhile Fife Symington lived his prison days in the lap of luxury and won a goddamned pardon for ripping off people to fund his fortune. Streets are named after the man. Mexicans smoking weed though--TENT CITY WITH YOU.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)

>Keeping them in prison reduces the unemployment rate by 0.7%

0.7% + the number of people employed to run prisons, which is a mjor industry in some places. The Fast Food Nation guy wrote an article about this.

fletrejet, Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Keeping them in prison reduces the unemployment rate by 0.7%

And every year every inmate costs US the tax-payers $30-60K each.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Am reading Vonnegut's Hocus Pocus where he imagines that all prisons are privately-owned by the year 2001 (by the Japanese no less). This is happening in the States, no? Privately-run prisons. That's nuts.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)

(that's $30-60K per prisoner, in case I weirded that wordly)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)

when those mexicans get a name as good as fife symington, then we'll talk

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Food is overheated balony sandwiches.

Urgh. I am fairly hardline when it comes to prison treatment but this skeeves me out beyond words. Sell a dimebag in Tempe and get three years of scalding hot balony sandwiches and vicious heat poisoning. YEAH THAT'S FAIR.

when those mexicans get a name as good as fife symington, then we'll talk

Hey, wasn't he in A Tribe Called Quest? FIFE-DAWG!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Honestly though, my only major qualm with the justice/prison system is stuff like TEN YEAR mandatory minimum sentences in some states for LSD possession with no chance of parole, meanwhile rapists & murderers getting out in 2-5 for "good behaviour"? What a country!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, that's kind of the problem, the name thing. They need names more like Fife Symington or Rudolph Giuliani, not names like Jose Lopez, it really doesn't instill confidence the way the prior names do.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:50 (twenty-two years ago)

In a related statistic:

Who are these people? One of every 15 inmates is a woman. Forty- six percent of those behind bars are African-American, 36 percent are white and 16 percent are Hispanic. Nearly one in every 10 black men between the ages of 25 and 29 is in prison, compared to 1.1 percent of whites and 2.9 percent of Hispanics in the same age group.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Nickalicious = Yakoff Smirnoff.

Sorry to keep ruining this perfectly good thread. I'll go back to my basement now.

NA (Nick A.), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)

There are a few privately run prison companies, some of which are public traded even.

fletrejet, Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually Nick, when I typed that I heard it in Yakoff's voice!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Forty- six percent of those behind bars are African-American
meanwhile among the general US population, they're what??? around 12-15%?
It's even worse in Saskatchewan where First Nations make up a similar proportion of the general pop., but up to 75% of the prison pop.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)

in soviet union, review watches you!

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Is this a race issue or a class issue?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Urgh. I am fairly hardline when it comes to prison treatment but this skeeves me out beyond words. Sell a dimebag in Tempe and get three years of scalding hot balony sandwiches and vicious heat poisoning.

I'm not just talking scalding hot here--you'd often see sandwiches that were turned green being served. Arpaio was proud of this: "We aren't wasting the tax payer's money, if they don't want to eat it, then they don't eat at all."

I really wish I was making this up. I could talk for hours about the horrors of the Maricopa County Police Department. The most disgusting, stomach turning story I ever heard about cops involved a teenager who stole a car and took it joyriding. Cops follow him down, not a chase mind you but just followed at distance. Kid pulls into a Circle K and suddenly is surrounded by cops--we're talking eight or nine squad cars for this ONE truck. Which is, you know, whatever, but obviously the kid freaks, tries to back out, taps one of the cars.

The cops proceed to blow away the car, 116 shots total. Most of the shots, inexplicably, were focused on the passenger side.

Passenger side was kid's pregnant girlfriend, who by all accounts had no idea her boyfriend stole the car.

One of the cops ended up getting a fucking medal a year later, something else. None disciplined. Local reaction? Mexicans shouldn't joyride, and girl was a slut anyway.

This is nothing about prisons since they didn't really have a chance to make it there but anyway. US justice system ain't fo' shit.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:56 (twenty-two years ago)

There are a few privately run prison companies, some of which are public traded even.

In that case, wouldn't most of them have shut down by now, being that the privately run companies are being liquidated by the recession?

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:56 (twenty-two years ago)

The two are perma-linked in the US, sadly. (re: dan's post)

Texas Sam (thatgirl), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Do you think they'd make me a vegetarian dish in tent city? I don't much prefer bologna.

Sarah MCLUsky (coco), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Inasmuch as race and class are tied in the American hive-mind, both.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Jesus Christ. Thak you for reigniting my all-consuming hatred for humanity, Ally. I wish I had the right to crucify people.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Is this a race issue or a class issue?

I think the fact that a similarly disproportionate number of minorities live in poverty has more to do with it than out-and-out racism.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:58 (twenty-two years ago)

NO SOUP FOR YOU, SARAH. Or, erm, mouldy bologna.

Dan, trust me, it's a good thing the right to crucify is denied most of us.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Three people line up to yell "BOTH!" to Dan (including me). The hive-mind keeps on working.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I was expecting that answer, actually.

A very cynical portion of me thinks that as long as the US conflates racial issues with class issues, the far right can continue to denigrate minorities from behind a safe smokescreen while the moderate left can continue to patronize them by organizing awareness seminars and sensitivity-raising exercises as opposed to actually funnelling money into their communities. (The far left is too busy worrying about animal rights to give a fuck about other human beings of their own ethnicity, let alone "others".)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)

HOw is it hive mind milo? It's just fact, I think.

Texas Sam (thatgirl), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Dan, please do not bring up animal rights, while you're right the last thing we need is CERTAIN PEOPLE coming in and having a go over nothing.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 19:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh and I've seen a documentary on the prison Ally's talkign about. Truly horrid.

Texas Sam (thatgirl), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 19:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I used to live pretty close to it. My mom was terrified of it (because of HIGH breakout probability being as it is a prison made of fabric and chain link fence), until we realized that no real criminal was actually being stored there. Then it just became amazingly sad--child molestors get 5 years in a "swanky" prison while someone with an ounce of weed gets stuck in Tent City for 5 years.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)

I was just kidding about the hive-mind. I didn't think enough people were on in the middle of the day to have several basically-the-same answers at once.

The moderate and radical left aren't known for their ability to funnel money anywhere, much less specific communities. And it's all so capitalist...

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)

The yahoo who runs that place used to appear on Politically Incorrect every couple of years, before it got too sad to watch (aka Maher just started screaming for the entire show).

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 19:13 (twenty-two years ago)

>In that case, wouldn't most of them have shut down by now, being that the privately run companies are being liquidated by the recession?

Last I heard one fo them was on the brink of bankruptcy, which brought up the isssue of what you do with prisoners if the company keeping them goes belly up.

fletrejet, Tuesday, 29 July 2003 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)

(Dan's naive, unresearch political theory follows. JOY!)

The left has resources, just as the right does. The main issue is that there is more overlap in the various special interest groups who make up "the right" than there is amongst "the left" and "the right" can therefore come to compromise positions faster and present a unified front when election time comes. Also, the right appeals to the rich much more than the left because a cornerstone of the right's message is "use government to save you money" while the left says "pay more now for a brighter future for everyone tomorrow". Competing appeals between greed and compassion will usually swing towards greed because people are by nature self-involved and self-interested.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 19:20 (twenty-two years ago)

people are by nature self-involved and self-interested.
but what does this have to do with ME?

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)

(Dan's naive, unresearch political theory follows. JOY!)

Might be naive, Dan. Shame you have to be frigging right, too, though.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 19:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Why does one man, and a sheriff at that, have so much control over human rights? Shouldn't there be some (higher) federal standards for prison conditions?

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)

You're right, I'm not saying it is an impossible thing but I do think it could be possible that there are some people who just aren't right--who says that dealing with Jeffrey Dahmer as a child will result in a different behavior pattern as an adult?

There is also the issue in deciding whether or not someone who commits an act like that should be given the right to re-enter society.

You've destroyed someone else's life. Fuck you, why do you get another chance?

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 20:59 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.corpun.com/

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 21:01 (twenty-two years ago)

for perspective

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 21:01 (twenty-two years ago)

i do not know what to do with the genuiunely evil, only that they can be contained if we work in a larger system--that system that needs to perserved, and cannot be if we keep working with the paradigms of revenge.

anthony easton (anthony), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 21:07 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not sure what we are talking about here. I agree with you about dealing with psychological disturbances from an early age; too often a blind eye is turned. This being said, I don't care how rehabilitated a rapist or child molester claims to be: I don't think they should get off lightly. How do you prove they're rehabilitated? Because they didn't do it in prison? Because they say they are?

I don't think rehabilitation is the right word here? I don't think those people should be in society.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)

i am a bit torn because a. i have been absued and frankly i would like to see the fucker involved with his balls hooked up to tep's brother's hotplate and b. i really do believe that the american prison system has turned into a play-doh fun factory churning out worsened criminals.

i live (for the next two days anyway) by the county courthouse and prison, and on my daily bus rides i often hear people talking about how they've just got out, their cousin/brother/dad/lover is doing a bid. there is no shame in it, anymore. the young girls who talk about their boyfriends inside are proud, if anything. this isn't even making them worse: it's just "the way it is."

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)

"either way we're set for life"

- raising arizona

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 21:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Me & Jess having the exact same thought process shockah?? I still need to send yr goddamn mix CD, oops.

I've noticed that too, the "my man is doing time" phenomenon, I'm like why is that something you'd even want to deal with?

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 21:23 (twenty-two years ago)

(yo ally it's all good cuz in two days i won't live there/here anymore.)

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 21:28 (twenty-two years ago)

(did you get mine from luna?)

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 21:37 (twenty-two years ago)

There is no known treatment for some problems that might leave someone in prison. If someone is a psychopath who has not become socialised and has found themselves in circumstances where they have ended up hurting people, there is no way at present of treating this that makes things even the tiniest bit better.

But having said that some cases are not susceptible to rehabilitation, as things stand now, I do think that there should be loads more emphasis in that direction. And far fewer people in prison for things that aren't hurting others.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 21:40 (twenty-two years ago)

you mean directly hurting others, not vaguely contributing to 'societal ills', right?

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 21:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Ally, about Tent City...

If the prison is supposed to be so disciplinary, is it actually achieving the goal of deterring more crime? (asking half sarcastically, half earnestly)

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 21:48 (twenty-two years ago)

This is not about Tent City, but to repeat what I said above: disciplining criminals and deterring crime are two separate goals. Discipline is sometimes justified on the logic that it deters crime, but only sometimes: there are plenty of prisons which have discipline as the goal, not just the method.

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 22:09 (twenty-two years ago)

the problem with prisons is that they're not panoptic ENOUGH vis-a-vis discipline that will actually work in the real world: they're still on some old-skool Repressive State Apparatus shit, and hey, we're post-modern now, baby, we DON'T NEED NO STEENKIN SHACKLES

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 22:13 (twenty-two years ago)

so in that sense the TVs and Nintendos are a step in the right direction

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 22:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, the TVs and Nintendos were in the well-behaved-prisoner wing of a minimum security prison -- which is as representative of American prisons as Tent City is. People keep talking about prisons in generalized terms which imply a lot more unity among them than exists -- it's like talking about "high schools" that way, or "local restaurants."

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)

So many of the stories on this thread just make me want to punch walls. No wonder I'm a blithe bastard on so many things, otherwise I'd fall apart.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 23:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Most discipline only works if you have something to lose. Most prisoners have very little to lose, especially in a place like Tent City.

Military discipline of the old-school sort (see 18th, 19th, most 20th century navy methods) might function to an extent in 'deterring' lots of undesirable behaviors, but that didn't exactly produce model citizens, either - just subservient troops and sailors.

Not to get all Starship Troopers on everybody, but there's a sense of entitlement on this thread that bothers me somewhat. What has anybody done to earn all these 'rights' we keep talking about? A rapist or a murderer hasn't done shit but put holes in society and fuck up people's lives. Why does he deserve another chance? He certainly doesn't deserve the same chance as somebody who hasn't committed a violent crime.

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 23:48 (twenty-two years ago)

re: Tent City, the percentage rate of crime in metropolitan Phoenix is higher than most cities in the U.S. Take as you will.

(jess email me yr new place and I'll send you immediately)

I agree about second chances for the criminals Millar mentioned.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 23:53 (twenty-two years ago)

but there's a sense of entitlement on this thread that bothers me somewhat. What has anybody done to earn all these 'rights' we keep talking about? A rapist or a murderer hasn't done shit but put holes in society and fuck up people's lives.

Millar is deep. Someone who puts holes in other people's lives doesn't have the right to anything. I agree.

Orbit (Orbit), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 23:55 (twenty-two years ago)

That's exactly what I said, too

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 23:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I think to a certain extent it's important to uphold rights for everyone, because a society that's not founded on some sort of ideals seems unsustainable. But I don't think that everyone is born automatically entitled to a second chance if they kill someone in cold blood.

The biggest problem with the prison/justice system, in a way, is the burden of proof and our limited means of solving crimes. Whereas a kid with a glovebox full of pot is very easily convicted, it can be almost impossible to track down and convict a killer or a rapist who goes on the run. Even then, the evidence may be so unclear that they get away with a much lighter sentence than they might receive if the DA had a more solid case. And innocent people are constantly being convicted of shit they never did (which is why I can't ever agree with the death penalty).

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 00:04 (twenty-two years ago)

If we had a more watertight method of catching and convicting criminals, I think a great deal of the problems in the prison system (and the problems we have with the way sentences are carried out, eg tent city) would largely dissolve away. At least for me.

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 00:05 (twenty-two years ago)

i think that we are born with rights towards dignity, etc.
also, more practically, if we treat prisoners like humans, they often act like it.

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 00:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I was the victim of a violent crime, and I don't think particularly harsh treatment does anything for me. That's partly why I feel passionate about this - I just want the person to not hurt other people anymore, I'm fine with the idea of due consideration of his rights. If he were in prison, any sort of cruel / unusual treatment wouldn't do anything for me, and would make me feel more helpless. I would love nothing more for the guy to reform himself and lead a productive life. The desire for vengeance and control can be so poisonous.

Kerry (dymaxia), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 01:20 (twenty-two years ago)

(The only thing about this thread that makes me smile is the System Of A Down song that talks about this very subject. It smokes.)

donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 03:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Not to get all Starship Troopers on everybody, but there's a sense of entitlement on this thread that bothers me somewhat. What has anybody done to earn all these 'rights' we keep talking about? A rapist or a murderer hasn't done shit but put holes in society and fuck up people's lives. Why does he deserve another chance? He certainly doesn't deserve the same chance as somebody who hasn't committed a violent crime.
He deserves another chance because he might be able to become a functioning, productive member of society.

If you ignore the idea of rehabilitation, then the 'justice system' becomes purely a question of revenge - he fucked up their lives, so let's fuck his forever! - which tends to work against the concept.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 03:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Revenge is the driving concept behind "justice" in the first place. If you and Kerry can find a suitable means of replacing that sentiment for every other person on earth, fine. Otherwise, practice what you preach and maybe we'll follow.

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 04:02 (twenty-two years ago)

http://koti.mbnet.fi/~denzo/images/feebles.jpg

Dada, Wednesday, 30 July 2003 04:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Dada, shut up.

Millar, how can revenge be the driving concept behind justice. They're two very different words. Maybe that's what our justice system has morphed into, but surely there are some higher underlying ideas that we should maybe try to get back to.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 04:09 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.proctolog.ru/images/clyster.jpg

Dada, Wednesday, 30 July 2003 04:14 (twenty-two years ago)

From the very beginnings of society, "justice" as we call it nowadays has been little more than a socially acceptable (non-duel based) form of revenge. The court system and its common law beginnings are rooted in early forms of tribal ass-kicking. The higher underlying ideas you refer to are all fairly new concepts, ones which we should probably aspire to, but which don't necessarily fit what our instincts tell us is right (EG you raped my daughter = I will kill you slowly motherfucker)

xpost Dada stick to threads where you might be slightly welcome, like not this one

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 04:18 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.jcu.edu/CampusMinistry/absolve.jpg

Dada, Wednesday, 30 July 2003 04:20 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm really starting to picture Dada as this individual who does not have the capacity for spoken langauge and is trying to desparately otherwise commuincate with us.

Re: this topic - overall I think our "penal" system is a joke. No one is rehabilitated. We just train them to be better criminals. As many of you know my father has been in prison for 16 years now for violent sexual crimes. The Texas penal system, although no tent city, is still among the worst. He has recieved no counseling or treatment for his crimes and probably won't get any before he's released. Obvioulsy this is not good.

Part of me feels sympathy for anyone in prison over the long haul b/c it hurts the people who love them more than anyone AND it turns them into completely useless members of society. Another part of me, the victim maybe, could really give a shit. Ultimately I think the former sentiment, the sympathy, should carry more weight b/c as a society we are only as strong as our weakest member. If we are churning out useless, resentful shells of human beings due to our ideas of "justice" we should all be worried.

Texas Sam (thatgirl), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 07:42 (twenty-two years ago)

'I've noticed that too, the "my man is doing time" phenomenon, I'm like why is that something you'd even want to deal with?'

I thought that was the dream situation for most chicks! ie, having an SO (which chicks seem to REALLY NEED for status purposes or whatever other fucked-up issues they have) - except without having the guy messing up your house, monitoring your activities etc! What could be better from a chick point of view? Except being a widow of course! (No wonder so many chicks write to death row inmates)

dave q, Wednesday, 30 July 2003 08:38 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think I should post to this thread anymore but I'm going to anyway.

I'm all for humane conditions; in no way do I believe prisoners should be tortured. However, I don't think that serial killers, 1st degree murderers, rapists, and child molesters deserve more chances in society. It's not a video game, you don't get a power up and restart the game and go about like nothing happened. Your victim lives in a mental prison for years, quite possibly forever; why do you get 5-10 years, if that (specifically talking about rape/child molestation, obv. serial killers don't get this benefit)?

These types of crimes are a small segment of the people who are in jail, so the cost of locking them up forever really isn't the issue; if we reformed the laws about stupid ass crimes it'd cut down on the prison overpopulation/overspending issue tenfold. So fuck it: you don't have an inalienable right to a second chance. It's not in any constitution I've ever read--"Hey, here's your get out of jail free card, one really massive affront against society is ok."

Sam, I'm really sorry about your father. I know the Texas system is really horrific and I don't think anyone deserves to be treated the way the Texas/Arizona systems treat people.

But like you said, the victim part of me don't give a fuck which sometimes is a really horrible feeling in my stomach but it's really not as bad as the feeling I had 8 years ago.

I wanna go back to talking about Tent City! Maricopa County also reinstituted chain gangs!

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 13:10 (twenty-two years ago)

"I heard on the radio recently that some state is starting a program of 4-month sentences for several nonviolent offenders to keep costs and prison population down, and it appears to be working rather well. 4 months isn't long enough to completely ruin someone's life and create an atmosphere conducive to recidivism and just long enough to put the fear of God into the sort of person who ends up in jail out of [bad luck + dumb] more than criminal intent"

I really shouldn't post here and I know this is more a USA based thread but OH YES IT FUCKING IS - anymore than a week in prison is enough to f*ck up somebody for a very very long time.

smee (smee), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 13:41 (twenty-two years ago)

but which don't necessarily fit what our instincts tell us is right (EG you raped my daughter = I will kill you slowly motherfucker)

Erm...that is a male "instinct" (I don't think it's an instinct, but...). In fact, some women and girls don't even report rapes because of this overreaction on the part of men who want to protect "their" women. Don't forget why, in the past, men got so upset when women were "violated".

If that's an "instinct", then so is a lot of other nasty patriarchal BS from the past.

Kerry (dymaxia), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 13:45 (twenty-two years ago)

"All these men want to protect me! I can't imagine from what" - Mae West

dave q, Wednesday, 30 July 2003 13:56 (twenty-two years ago)

It's part the reaction, it's part shame, it's part fear...the male "instinct" seems to be of two things: 1) murder murder murderous Brook-Brook-a-Brooklyn shit, furthermore ma... 2) "OMG damaged goods shun shun shun".

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 14:08 (twenty-two years ago)

if i can take this back briefly re: paying police better so we get better police...
there's (obv.) a bunch of tests you take to become a cop, what people don't tell you is that they actually don't want you to do *too* well.
why that is, we can only speculate. maybe they're afraid you'll outsmart the system and become a corrupt cop?

praying mantis (praying mantis), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 17:44 (twenty-two years ago)

My being in favour of rehabilitation has almost nothing to do with anyone deserving it, and as I said I don't believe that everyone can be rehabilitated. But I am against the death penalty (largely because of our imperfect ability to get the right people, maybe particularly on high profile cases demanding that someone is caught), and I don't particularly want to lock millions of people up for life, partly because it's sometimes disproportionate and partly because it's expensive. That means these people are back in society at some point, and society will be better off if they are no longer violent, if they can learn better ways of interacting, if they can cope with life without mugging people or whatever. That makes some attempt at rehabilitation and retraining and the like useful to the rest of us. That it might benefit the criminals is secondary, but I'm in favour of that effect too, generally.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)

four years pass...

i mean not surprising i guess. but still amazingly depressing.

max, Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:52 (eighteen years ago)

one year passes...

great article about joe arpaio in this weeks NYer

rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Tuesday, 14 July 2009 21:59 (sixteen years ago)

casts him as less of an evil scumbag and more as an insecure subliterate old man with a pathological need for attention

rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Tuesday, 14 July 2009 22:00 (sixteen years ago)

hmmm

harbl, Tuesday, 14 July 2009 22:05 (sixteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-prison10-2009aug10,0,2160318.story

max, Monday, 10 August 2009 14:05 (sixteen years ago)

fifteen years pass...

With the large number of foreign nationals at Klong Prem, the prison is able to hold a football World Cup. Teams of 10 are chosen by prison staff to represent Nigeria, Japan, the US, Italy, France, England, Germany, and Thailand. Games consist of two 20-minute halves on a half-sized pitch. The winners are given a replica of the real World Cup trophy, which is made of wood in the prison workshop.

brimstead, Sunday, 6 October 2024 15:29 (one year ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.