Published: September 25, 2003
WASHINGTON, Sept. 24 — An early draft of an interim report by the American leading the hunt for banned weapons in Iraq says his team has not found any of the unconventional weapons cited by the Bush administration as a principal reason for going to war, federal officials with knowledge of the findings said today.
(emphasis mine obv)
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/25/international/middleeast/25WEAP.html?hp
Interesting article, if unsurprising, about the not-finding of [xx].
[xx]: but what is the NYT calling them again? They're not WMDs, they're "unconventional weapons"!! Does anyone else think this is significant? Was I just not paying attention, did the Times always stick with the older appellation and not the Bush rebranding of "WMD"? Coincidence? read-btw-the-lines editorial?
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Thursday, 25 September 2003 04:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Thursday, 25 September 2003 04:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 25 September 2003 04:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 25 September 2003 05:00 (twenty-two years ago)
and no it's not "bush coined," show me, where did I say that? < /you>
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Thursday, 25 September 2003 05:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 25 September 2003 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Thursday, 25 September 2003 12:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 25 September 2003 13:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Thursday, 25 September 2003 14:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Marcel Post (Marcel Post), Thursday, 25 September 2003 15:24 (twenty-two years ago)