alternatives to XP

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
There is mac and variations on unix, but it looks like there's a "user friendly" trend with OS like Desktop/LX, lindows, AmigaOS XL (?) .
On No hassle and no microsoft!
isn'it?

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 26 September 2003 00:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Good move. Microsoft are just a bunch of overrated smacked up fags with better than average networking skills.

Shaylo Pezflick, Friday, 26 September 2003 02:49 (twenty-two years ago)

it's a damn shame that, as you identified it:" better than average networking skills" aren't more popular among their competitors, from installation to daily usage: the average user don't care to focus on the OS as an end in itself, ve just want to use it to download pr0n and warez dab nab it!""1""

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 26 September 2003 03:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Replacements for Windows XP Home at MS boycott

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 26 September 2003 03:24 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread is bizarre. Windows XP is one of the best consumer-grade operating systems today.

Andrew (enneff), Friday, 26 September 2003 03:25 (twenty-two years ago)

ooooh--er I meant here's a list

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 26 September 2003 03:27 (twenty-two years ago)

bizarre ? how much they charge for this thing anyway?
have you heard of XP Anti Spy?
etc?

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 26 September 2003 03:31 (twenty-two years ago)

"smacked up fags"?

s1utsky (slutsky), Friday, 26 September 2003 03:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Heroin and Homos Rampant in Redmond!
http://www.ab-fab.nl/graphics/abgood.jpg

Aaron A., Friday, 26 September 2003 03:53 (twenty-two years ago)

like, "some people" imagine me as a girl when I'm not around!

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 26 September 2003 03:58 (twenty-two years ago)

my copy of xp pro cost $150 us OEM with my computer. home was $100. from what i've seen, linux distributions you'd buy at a bookstore are maybe $50. downloading the iso's for redhat 8 took me all weekend. and then i could never really get it working that great - getting my ethernet going was a pain. then i tried to do the kernel thing, which is where i got really messed up. so anyways, xp is somewhat more expensive, but for the vast majority of users i'm sure it's more appropriate.

i had a quick look at that anti spy (?) looks like some german program for disabling the more invasive xp features?? those things are pretty easily turned off through the gui, i don't see why you need a program to do it, but maybe i'm missing something.

one thing i remember being paranoid about was the activation thing. but i have by this time reactivated my copy of windows xp probably 5 times and have never had a problem. however, i am considering swapping out my motherboard and am again a bit nervous that it won't think it's the same computer... does anyone have experience with this?

ron (ron), Friday, 26 September 2003 03:59 (twenty-two years ago)

good question ron.

btw anyone have multiple boot pc with different OS like the one I mentionned or others from that ms boycott list?

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 26 September 2003 04:03 (twenty-two years ago)

i set up a dual boot with that redhat 8 but i haven't used the linux in months - the kernel fiasco really took the wind out of my sails :(

ron (ron), Friday, 26 September 2003 04:10 (twenty-two years ago)

right, to avoid fiascïï I skipped all those complicated flavors (redhat, mandrake etc) to go for de nû "user friendly".
I spend a good 2 or 3 hours looking for one OS that would be as easy to use as xp but it'not that obvious yet. My best bet is that Desktop/LX thing , (no yearly subscribtion) haven't tried it yet.

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 26 September 2003 04:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I never got this "windows sucks Linux roolz UR all gay" thing either. Mainly because, in my personal experience, something like XP which comes bundled with my system already installed (and therefore no cost and hassle to me) has worked fine, and XP Pro is actually a really nice OS (yes, I agree 95 and 2k had some shitty flaws tho).

However Red Hat and Slackware have proven to be difficult beasts, needing quite a degree of geekness to get yr head round, refusing to recognise quite common vid cards/sound cards on kernel compile, and frankly Xwindows is an ugly clunky pile o crapola.

Mind you I havent played with an X incarnation in a few years now, maybe things have changed. But with a decent firewall and virus scanner, and refusal to use MS mail products, I've had no hassles whatsoever. So like... eh?

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 26 September 2003 04:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not just talking out my arse when I say that Windows XP is a good OS. I've been using linux on all my servers for 5 years now (and use it daily), and ran Linux on my laptop (which I used every day at school) for two years. For about 6 months I ran Linux on my workstation, but found that I really missed a lot of audio applications which simply would not run under Wine (the Windows API layer for unix).

My distribution of choice has been Slackware, although I think they've dropped the ball in the last couple of years. The new ILX database server will be running Gentoo (so I can tune the fuck out of it).

Andrew (enneff), Friday, 26 September 2003 04:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Trayce, some of the new window managers (KDE 3, baby) are actually quite nice, and ultra-configurable. (so the only reason it'll be k-ugly is if you make it that way :)

Also I must mention that only in the last month have I stopped using Outlook Express as my mail client at home. (although I still use it on my laptop which I do all my work work on) It's great, security flaw aside. I switched to Mozilla Thunderbird shortly after changing browsers from IE to Mozilla Firebird (which is truly excellent, and I recommend it highly).

Andrew (enneff), Friday, 26 September 2003 04:42 (twenty-two years ago)

i had a quick look at that anti spy (?) looks like some german program for disabling the more invasive xp features?? those things are pretty easily turned off through the gui, i don't see why you need a program to do it, but maybe i'm missing something.

exactly. "invasive". what a werird way to go at things isn'it?

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 26 September 2003 04:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah Ive been using Eudora on principle for years, and I have to confess lately I've started to wonder why, because it often displays bizarre memory leaks that cause crashes in 2k and XP.

I also had an odd problem last night where, upon reload of a page, my browser was hijacking itself off to random yahoo, freehost and other pages, mostly 404s. All kinds of diff ones. It wasnt a browser hijack as far as I could tell, as I ran AdAware and an up to date virus scan and got nothing. But on a reboot, IE started behaving again, and just before it, Eudora, IE and then the whole system fell over in a big way. Left me wondering if I should use something else for mail... Eh.

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 26 September 2003 04:52 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not just talking out my arse when I say that Windows XP is a good OS.

ok. but it's not relevant to the question at hand that is : have you tried easy does it alternatives to XP.
(ps Andrew, when everything will settle down could you have a look at the problem I wrote you about, you know like I'm unregistered in the "Active Users" but I really am, maybe it's an accent thing or ?)

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 26 September 2003 04:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it's something to do with the accent, but I don't have time to track it down right now. I'm sorry.

I only mentioned the goodness of Windows XP in response to the overblown crisicism of MS earlier.

Andrew (enneff), Friday, 26 September 2003 05:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Mac OSX remains the best designed and easiest to use version of windows, but due to proprietary hardware it is the most expensive although it has to be mentioned that the hardware holds its value better than any other desktop or laptop computers, refurbed versions of my three year old laptop have only just dropped under £1000.

In the free *nix world you have several choices the main one between BSD and Linux (OK so there ar eprojects reviving BeOS, AmigaOS etc. but none are mature enough yet).

OpenBSD leads the free *nix world on security, SuSE is meant to be very easy to install, maintain and use. Lindows is good for off the shelf backwards compatibility with windows.

However its not just about the OS, it's about the desktop. This is where ease of use comes in. The choce here is really between Gnome, KDE and variations on these produced by SuSE, Slackware, RedHat, Sun, Lindows. which all to a greter or lesser extent try to emulate the functionality of XP, which I find far less friendly than OS X. The Sun offering is the latest and has been getting some very good write ups as an alternative to XP on an ordinary drone's desktop.

Also someone mentioned needing a book, this is so far from true, there is so much help and advice out there, a lot of it good even, that it's not too much of a challenge to get things going.

So if i had to choose a *nix

cost irrespective it would be Mac OSX
on a budget it would be OpenBSD or SuSE Linux probably with Sun 'java' desktop or SuSE version of KDE

Ed (dali), Friday, 26 September 2003 07:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Ed is pretty much OTM. Sébastien, why don't you try a Linux Live CD like Gentoo or Knoppix. You don't have to commit at all to wiping out your system and can play around with Linux until you're comfortable with it. Keep you XP for as long as you like, just boot up the Gentoo CD whenever you get an itch and *bam* -instant Linux.

User friendly is just about what you're used to. If I try to do anything w/ XP nowadays I'm not comfortable at all because I haven't used it in a while, and it's not very user friendly. Same thing with OSX. It took me a little bit to get comfortable with it.

Dale the Titled (cprek), Friday, 26 September 2003 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)

one thing i remember being paranoid about was the activation thing. but i have by this time reactivated my copy of windows xp probably 5 times and have never had a problem. however, i am considering swapping out my motherboard and am again a bit nervous that it won't think it's the same computer... does anyone have experience with this?

With a different motherboard it may ask you to call in, but generally it's not a problem. They don't ask you for any identifying information, typically, and as long as you tell them what is going on (motherboard go foom, had to buy a new one) then they're generally pretty cool about it from what I can tell.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Friday, 26 September 2003 13:43 (twenty-two years ago)

thanks sean. as long as i'm here i will ask: are there any boards which would support 400 fsb and 533/800? i am seriously doubting it but...

i would like to get an abit it7 max 3 but i'm pretty sure then that i'd have to get a newer processor. i should probably just get a bit older board that would let me keep my 1.8g p4 but get me into ddr ram and maybe a raid controller. then maybe someday build another computer with the fancy abit

ron (ron), Friday, 26 September 2003 14:10 (twenty-two years ago)

From what I can see it looks like it's split, either 400/533 or 533/800. It's been a while since I've seriously delved into mobos though so hard to say if there are any others out there that do all three. If you're planning to upgrade to a newer board...especially one with the specs of that one (I'm assuming you mean the IC7 max 3, since the IT7 seems to be max 2 only on the website)...you may want to seriously consider upgrading your processor anyhow, if only to take advantage of hyperthreading!

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Friday, 26 September 2003 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Sébastien, why don't you try a Linux Live CD like Gentoo or Knoppix. You don't have to commit at all to wiping out your system and can play around with Linux until you're comfortable with it. Keep you XP for as long as you like, just boot up the Gentoo CD whenever you get an itch and *bam* -instant Linux.

Gentoo is my favourite Linux, but you're better off using Knoppix for something like that. The best things about Gentoo are a) ease of package installation and updating - much better than RPM-based systems b) amount of configurable stuff b) very little distribution-specific customisation of packages - things work the way it says in the package's manual, not in whatever way the distributor has decided to mess around with it.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 26 September 2003 14:33 (twenty-two years ago)

(I have to admit, I haven't used WinXP enough to be able to suggest potential alternatives. Whenever I have used it, I've always just shuddered and run away in terror back to a nice, friendly Linux box.)

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 26 September 2003 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)

You're right about the Knoppix. Gentoo's just my favorite for all the same reasons above you've mentioned above. Gentoo has Linux LiveCD's w/ games on them... which sounds fun, but I've never tried this because my machines are mainly hobbled together from throwaway parts and would struggle with games.

Dale the Titled (cprek), Friday, 26 September 2003 14:53 (twenty-two years ago)

try Morphix as well. it's knoppix-like (no installation required) but is configurable - comes in a variety of flavours from mini rescue distro to one with everything in it, there's even a games-centric version. it also comes with kde, gnome and icewm options if you're keen on sampling desktops.

www.morphix.org

trayce:
>something like XP which comes bundled with my system already installed
>(and therefore no cost and hassle to me)

that is, of course, rubbish.

andy

koogs (koogs), Friday, 26 September 2003 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)

a bunch of them, explained in excruciating detail.
and here's one that might be kicking ass in a couple of years

Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Saturday, 27 September 2003 21:35 (twenty-two years ago)

the various Be derivatives should be good in the fullness of time. Apple should have bought Be, not Next, back when they had the chance. Be was truly revolutionary, especially the file system but for now, knoppix is a good choice for intel based systems and dabbling.

Ed (dali), Saturday, 27 September 2003 21:56 (twenty-two years ago)

new thread for Linux geeks

Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Saturday, 27 September 2003 22:10 (twenty-two years ago)

four months pass...
I got some good arguments here
"
In a recent article, Rishab Aiyer Ghosh shows just how expensive commercial code is for people living in the developing world, and what a barrier to access cost is:

"...Windows XP together with Office XP is US$560 in the U.S. This is over 2.5 months of GDP/capita in South Africa and over 16 months of GDP/capita in Vietnam. This is the equivalent of charging a single-user licence fee in the U.S. of US$7,541 and US$48,011 respectively, which is clearly unaffordable. ""

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 02:23 (twenty-two years ago)

that is, of course, rubbish.

I realise what you meant there Andy but in my case it was true, cuz I got a staff discount/salary sacrificed laptop that was not only tax-free, it was sold at reseller cost to me as well. So the possible 1-2 thousand dollars I've saved in taxes and loan interest has, I'm sure you can understand, negated any small OS costs :) Thats more what I meant.

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 02:31 (twenty-two years ago)

xpost: Hence 'alternative' markets...

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 02:35 (twenty-two years ago)

That would only be applicable if Microsoft charged US prices around the world. Obviously it doesn't.

The actual XP price in South Africa is ~R750, or $109USD. Average income is R11000, making XP a little more than one half of a month's salary - still exorbitant and Microsoft is evil, etc. - but leftists lose when they try to manipulate numbers and do it badly.

(x-xpost)

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 02:36 (twenty-two years ago)

those foreigners should make more money!

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 02:36 (twenty-two years ago)

good stuff miloauckerman, would you have the correct prices for vietnam or other third world countries by any chance?

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 02:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, I too would be interested to hear them.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 03:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually, I don't, I just did a Google search. I don't imagine Microsoft has distributors in most 'third-world' nations - the oligarchs who can afford computers would just bring them in from elsewhere, no?

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 03:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Heroin and Homos Rampant in Redmond!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH!

Dahling.

donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 03:44 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.kuci.org/~brianm/ile/patsygates.jpg

donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 05:49 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.