Do you still masturbate regularly even when you're in a satisfying sexual relationship with someone?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Yesterday, a propos of nothing in particular, my girlfriend asked me if I'd masturbated since we started going out. I said yes. She acted really, really upset. So I backpedalled furiously and said hardly ever, only when she's away etc. Which is not true, I've continued to do it as I always have done - I guess it serves a different function for me. But my girlfriend's reaction made me wonder whether I'm the freak, hence the question.

logged off, Thursday, 22 January 2004 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought people masturbated more when getting regular sex.

Bryan (Bryan), Thursday, 22 January 2004 14:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Get out clause "yeah, but I was thinking of you..."

Alright, maybe not.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 22 January 2004 14:55 (twenty-two years ago)

You're not the freak definitely, but girls tend to be funny about this subject. It's a bit of a cliche, but they can see it as it's them not being enough to fulfil their partner. Or that their partner doesn't find them attractive anymore. I guess it's down to security & how open & honest you are within the relationship.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 14:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, if you masturbate as well as sex, that's fine. If you masturbate *instead of* sex, then there's a problem.

the river fleet, Thursday, 22 January 2004 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Definitely, Ms Fleet is otm

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I see your point Pinkpanther, of course that's what she was upset about. I wonder if this is a bit of a gender divide because I don't think it'd bother me if my girlfriend told me she regularly masturbates. It'd probably turn me on!

I don't masturbate *instead of* sex, for me it's something different, maybe more selfish, just "I want to have an orgasm and that's it". Sex with my girlfriend is about sharing something.

logged off, Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)

"Aww, i was thinking of Ned Ragget.."
"Ah well that's okay then love, give us a kiss"

--------, Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:03 (twenty-two years ago)

also, it's good for your triceps.

seriously though, it's almost not even sexual, it's like a comfort thing. like eating a whole pizza.

Luigi Vampa (Horace Mann), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it can be different aswell, say if you used p0rn.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I was playing the game Scruples with some friends including my girlfriend at the time a few years ago and a question came up that went something like "Do you prefer sex with your partner or masturbating?" and my girlfriend without hesitation said masturbating, explaining (if I remember correctly) that she always hit the spot and liked not having to worry about me, IN A ROOM FULL OF ALL OUR FRIENDS!!! Anyway, I brought this up with her recently and she was absolutely mortified that she would've said something like that. I don't think I actually said anything to her about being upset but I'm pretty sure she was hitting her spot herself for a few days after.

wanker, Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread is SO WRONG already.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Sex with a partner & masturbation are different definitely.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I actually take the same view as Logged Off, that it's just different. It's not a substitute for sex, it's just to blow off steam or something. So I guess it's not going to be divided down the gender line - my first proper boyfriend was really upset when I confessed that I still masturbated. I was 19, I had hormones going crazy, of course I masturbated furiously! He was jealous and besides, he thought it was morally wrong or sick or something. Weirdo.

the river fleet, Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Tell her to look at it as snacking in between eating a main course.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

ie its fine as long as it doesn't ruin your appetite. A bit like Milky Way.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I am always so intrigued when ppl log off to post. I thought I knew who this was, but then maybe not!

Matt is scarily correct! ha!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I just have a problem with the idea of "snacking between meals" because so many people use this as a codeword for casual sex and affairs in the context of a long-term relationship. A person is not a meal.

However, I suppose my analogy is just as bad. I view masturbation the way that I view 4-tracking, or noodling about on the guitar by myself to see what comes up, and sex with a partner is like a jam session, a good rehearsal or a gig.

the river fleet, Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:14 (twenty-two years ago)

hey some of us can't even get a gig

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Awwww *ruffles stevem's hair*

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Yep, like a machine.

Chris V (Chris V), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:25 (twenty-two years ago)

A *sexy* machine.

omg, Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, is that what James Brown was on about?

the river fleet, Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:27 (twenty-two years ago)

*nods*

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)

"a gig" would imply that there is an audience.

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:34 (twenty-two years ago)

"I think it can be different as well, say if you used p0rn."

I think that's interesting too. I can't really see why it makes much difference if you wank with the aid of p0rn or not. If not, you're still going to have some fantasy running across your mind's eye, and it's unlikely (yet possible) to be about someone you're currently having sex with, because that's not generally how fantasies work. But I think you're right, if I said to my girlfriend: "not only do I masturbate, but I also use p0rn", she'd be even more upset. Why? (assuming one doesn't have a necessarily anti-porn attitude)

logged off, Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Maybe you should make her a part of it, l/o.

Luigi Vampa (Horace Mann), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)

it could well be a fantasy about someone you're currently having sex with, but not necessarily what you normally would do with this person. like, say, if you fantasise that the partner is actually enjoying the sex, etc.

if you explicitly told your girlfriend you used porn to aid masturbation of course it would be upsetting, it would sound like an insult. she didn't need to know this.

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:39 (twenty-two years ago)

p0rn opens another kettle of fish, not completely separate from masturbation, but related to it. It really depends on the kind of p0rn being used, to some extent. But mainly I would worry about the conditioning. If you learn to associate being turned on *only* with the kind of imagery in p0rn, you end up like Calum, rather than someone who is able to accept women as sexual equals, or someone who is able to have an actual relationship with a real woman, not an imaginary one.

But again, it's a question of proportion. Occasional p0rn use is not a problem, but reliance on p0rn is a problem.

the river fleet, Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:39 (twenty-two years ago)

i guess it would come down to the individual's attitudes towards p0rn. But it's prolly to do with the fact that it doesn't invovlve your g/f. You are looking at/thinking about another woman whilst doing what comes naturally, so your g/f isn't part of it. It could feel like cheating. (could!!)

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:41 (twenty-two years ago)

i agree with ken, if you pointed it out that you're using it, it's kind of rubbing her nose in the fact that you're thinking about someone else while doing something sexual. which is normal and everything, sure. but not nice to hear. i'd rather be an ostrich about this kind of thing. i don't ask, don't tell.

colette (a2lette), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree Colette, of course it's perfectly natural and all, but you certainly don't want to hear about it. It would only be a short thought process to 'he thinks about lady x whilst having sex with me.' Which let's face it, he prolly does!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)

What about going to a strip club while in a relationship? This was a question asked of me by No One In Particular a short while back.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

It's not the "cheating" aspect of it that bothers me. I mean, fantasy is important in a long-term relationship. If it remains fantasy, it wouldn't bother me. I mean, come on, I would be hypocritical to complain about that given my perving on Nigel Spivey, for example.

I looked up this quote in Time Magazine, because I found the whole article very interesting. Now normally, reading Time is like having Middle America in all its conservative right wing glory poured down my throat like cod liver oil, but this quote is interesting:

"(They)... say men who frequently view p0rn may develop unrealistic expectations of women's appearance and behaviour, have difficulty forming and sustaining relationships and feeling sexually satisfied."

Describe anyone we know?

Sex is such a deeply behaviourly thing. Orgasm is such a powerful positive reward response that people very quickly get sexually conditioned. In a way, this is good. Look at the myriad variations of human sexuality and what a wonderful diversity that is! It leads to better sex and a better relationship if you learn to associate your partner with an orgasm response. But if your orgasm response has been conditioned to respond only to a very narrow range of female appearance and submissive behaviour, or even worse, if your orgasm response has been conditioned to respond to demeaning and humiliation of women, or video nasties or the like, you are going to have problems with a *real* woman.

I say like I said about masturbation. If it is an addition to a mutually satisfying sexual relationship with your partner, it's fine. If it supplants it, or distracts from it, it is not fine.

the river fleet, Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)

x-post - strip clubs are just icky. I've been to enough of them to know. (Heck, I was curious. I wanted to know what the appeal was.)

the river fleet, Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:52 (twenty-two years ago)

tell yr gf that yr staying power would drop significantly if you didn't do yr calisthenics. Cuz that's the fringe benefit she hopefully enjoys.

Luigi Vampa (Horace Mann), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:52 (twenty-two years ago)

i wouldn't overly like it if my boy said he was going to a strip club, but aslong as he wasn't going to sleep with the strippers (or anybody else for that matter) it would be ok. I think! I wouldn't want any private lapdances to occur though!
x-post

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm not sure, actually. if it was a one-off or an occasional thing that he 'was dragged off to by the guys', i guess that's ok. regular visits probably not so much.

one of those things that i end up having long feminist debates with myself in my head when i try to make a call either way.

the last couple guys i've dated seem to be of the 'i find strip clubs weird and a little scary' school. which keeps me happy. even if they're exagerating a little, that's ok. (if they're saying this and going once a week, yeah, there's issues)
x-post

colette (a2lette), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)

To answer the question: Yes. I like to touch myself. It's as goddamn simple as that. Also, they're MY TOYS. I share them with X. But they're mine. Mine mine mine!!!

Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)

fair point!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:56 (twenty-two years ago)

(By "toys" I don't mean "sex toys" -- I mean "my body parts")

Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)

aw

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I like the "don't ask, don't tell" philosophy.

It's a tough question to answer. I've had male roommates when I was single, and although they were actively in a sexual relationship, they would jerk off daily. How did I know? If you've even had sex ONCE in your life, there's just 'sex noises' that can't be masked. Both of them jerked off each morning in the shower, so I don't know if they were sooooo happy with washing their willy or they were using Herbal Essense shampoo.

To me, jerking off more than one time a day, if you're over the age of 30 says that you're NOT doing it for sex, you're using it as an excuse. My male friends have said that they wank when bored, killing time, want to feel good about themselves, or meet some stranger on a bus/restaurant, etc.

Like anything, it can be abused. My EX (note: EX!) wanked off every chance he got, even though we had sex multiple times per week. He said that "It just felt good", and he saw no reason to stop. To me, that's like over-eating, saying that even though you're not hungry, the taste of food is too good to pass by.

It came to be a problem because he did it so often, he couldn't perform in bed, because there was nothing left to give to me.

On occasion, if your partner is away/sick/or too tired, then it's okay. If you wank as often as you brush your teeth, then NO!

Psychokitty, Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Only when I'm having trouble sleeping.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 22 January 2004 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Sex clubs/strip joints: If you're invited to a party, I can understand them. If you visit them every Thursday after Pay Day, BIG problem.

It's voyeristic, demeaning to your partner, and sets up a wall between what is 'normal' and what is not. Unless you have mirrored walls in your bedroom and a dance pole, (which would be COOL!), then how can your partner compete with "Pro's". The girls stay at the same age (under 25 years old) each and every year, while your partner, like YOU, gets older and less nubile each year.

I don't know many men who'd like their women to go to Male Strip clubs each week and then know that they are wanking off to them.

Psychokitty, Thursday, 22 January 2004 16:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Y'know, I've still never been to a strip club. Maybe I'll go to one this weekend.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 22 January 2004 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not much of a p0rn user, and when I do it's vanilla stuff not hardcore. But I remain unconvinced with the argument that p0rn use gives you unreal expectations that you then can't fulfil IRL. Do my non-p0rn stimulated fantasies give me unreal expectations? Because they're not the same as what I do in real life either. I think men can distinguish between fantasy and real life, and p0orn is just another form of fantasy. And besides a glossy photo is never, ever going to be the same as a real life naked woman in your arms. I know a lot of women are unhappy with the idea of men using p0rn, and perhaps they have good reason to be, but I don't think the conditioning argument really stands up.

logged off, Thursday, 22 January 2004 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

What would you think/how would you feel if your g/f used video p0rn?

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)

In what way? You mean watching videos by herself? I don't think I'd mind as long as it wasn't all the time or anything.

logged off, Thursday, 22 January 2004 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)

(this is just reminding me of the potential girl FAP at the strip club...)

colette (a2lette), Thursday, 22 January 2004 16:18 (twenty-two years ago)

What A Nairn said isnt all that twisted really, Andrew. Not if you look at ancient taoist and buddhist beliefs, where it was regarded that for men, their sperm was part of their chi energy, and to waste it was a bad thing, holding out gave them strength.

This thinking was also present in Ancient Greece, and is, frankly, wide of the mark. We know a lot more about the human body now than we ever have before. Firstly, partaking in masturbating regularly will lower the quantity of testosterone in a man’s body, and hence make him less competitive, unfocused, and aggressive. Secondly, it may provide great health benefits to the prostate gland. If one wants to abstain from sex, feel free, but don’t assume that you’re healthier morally, sexually or even physically.

Here are several links of note:

Here are several links of note:

Flesh
and the Devil.

BBC
Health on Masturbation.

Masturbation
and How It May Prevent Cancer.

Charles Hatcher (musenheddo), Friday, 23 January 2004 01:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Hooray for science!

Andrew (enneff), Friday, 23 January 2004 01:26 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.achewood.com/rsrc/img/sq_science_lg.gif

the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 23 January 2004 01:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Just to clarify about the chi energy thing, it wasn't about 'holding out' as such, the philosophy was/is that sexual energy is a mixture of personal + god-given/spititual and material power, and pure will.
Kundalini and other disciplines are meant to teach you how to channel this in order to increase awareness which you makes you more open to the energies you are recieving (from above and below) and giving out to the world, hence making you less selfish and unfocused.
It also balances the two main life-forces within a person those of contraction and relaxation.
In other words the same effect as an orgasm, but supposedly much greater in effect because the energies are controlled and channelled towards goals based on love and awareness rather than desire, which blocks spiritual growth.

That's the outline of it anyway.

pete s, Friday, 23 January 2004 01:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks Pete you put it somewhat better than I.

I should point out I wasn't necesarily suggesting the ancients had the right idea - just that such concepts have been around.

I guess its a bit hard for me to know how troublesome it is for guys - even for a female, I'm really quite err... undersexed for want of a better word. I could possibly go much of the rest of my life without any.

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 23 January 2004 02:05 (twenty-two years ago)

alternate thread:

Do you regularly masturbate someone that you're still in a satisfying sexual relationship with?

Kim (Kim), Friday, 23 January 2004 02:24 (twenty-two years ago)

fuck yeah

the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 23 January 2004 02:26 (twenty-two years ago)

awww yeah.

Andrew (enneff), Friday, 23 January 2004 02:47 (twenty-two years ago)

"I'm really quite err... undersexed for want of a better word."

This discribes me too. I don't nessicarly think it's bad thing, but when I see all these other people off playing in the sand box it gets me wondering what kind of holes there are digging.

(good links charles)

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 23 January 2004 06:05 (twenty-two years ago)

but the BBC is so unscientific. I'd like to see the Graham Giles research paper though.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 23 January 2004 06:14 (twenty-two years ago)

That particular BBC site is a little… lewd, to say the least, but they can be scientific enough if they want to. Look at BBC Radio 4, for instance (the greatest thing on the web, in my opinion!).

Charles Hatcher (musenheddo), Friday, 23 January 2004 06:24 (twenty-two years ago)

For me they're two different things - masturbation is merely a physical release. Making love is about the intimacy, in my experience.

I'm actually more curious about frequency of masturbation.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Friday, 23 January 2004 06:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Absolutely.

(Xpost - you have to work out which Q I'm answering...)

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 23 January 2004 09:09 (twenty-two years ago)

This thinking was also present in Ancient Greece, and is, frankly, wide of the mark.

Ah, yes, the ancient Greeks, responsible for such scientifically correct theories as "The sun goes round the earth" and "the earth is the centre of the universe" and "spontaneous generation of maggots from rotting meat".

I just don't want to know about any religion that denies the flesh, or tries to focus your attentions on some kind of otherworldly gain. Classic misdirection.

the river fleet, Friday, 23 January 2004 12:50 (twenty-two years ago)

My whole life is about masturbation--physical, mental, social, artistic, spiritual...wankety-wank, wankety-wank, Easter's on it's wankity-way!

See, I just proved my own wankety-statement! wank-wank!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:06 (twenty-two years ago)

You too can get a wankety-wank wankbook & pen!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:08 (twenty-two years ago)

i had a go at 4am this morning.

Chris V (Chris V), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:12 (twenty-two years ago)

*applauds*

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:12 (twenty-two years ago)

No. People become overweight when they eat despite not being hungry. I eat whenever I'm hungry, and I'm very far from being overweight

I sometimes masturbate even when my body isn't telling me i need an orgasm. that make me feel like my mind has full control over my body.

ken c (ken c), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:34 (twenty-two years ago)

erm, river fleet, i'm not going to let you get away with that shoddy calling-out of the Greeks (i have some greek blood), not when without them we'd be worshipping nameless deities and toiling under the subjugation of a god-king (i'm sure you know your stuff all about them, just objecting mildly)

pete s, Friday, 23 January 2004 13:37 (twenty-two years ago)

If you were to draw a graph of my s/o's libido, against time, it wd probably look like a 28-day-long sinewave, with the downward bits coinciding w/PMT. if you were to superimpose my libido-graph over it, it wd probably also look like a sine wave, but offset from the other one a bit. Where both are high = the happiest time. That mine sometimes = higher that her's = the reason why my answer to the thread question = "yes".

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Nairn is indeed fucked up. Being undersexed may make you wonder what all the fuss is about, but you surely have enough of a comprehension of sensual pleasures (fucking, eating, drinking, that feeling you get when you slip into a cool bed) to understand why it is both normal and great for most people?

Markelby (Mark C), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Dude, the Greeks were all about the flesh. Especially the young boy-flesh.

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 23 January 2004 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)

euw greek style lovin'!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 23 January 2004 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)

not when without them we'd be worshipping nameless deities and toiling under the subjugation of a god-king

Without the Greeks, we wouldn't have The Roman Empire. Or the Gnostification (is that even a word?) of Christianity. So I'd be living in a Celtic British Isles, under a Queen like Boudiccea (heck, I might even BE a Queen like Boudicea) and worshipping a lovely wonderful all-encompassing mother goddess and drinking mead and having orgies, so there, nyeah nyeah nyeah, evil greeks, feh.

the river fleet, Friday, 23 January 2004 14:49 (twenty-two years ago)

euw greek style lovin'!

kebab shop owner: "hey lady you like mint sauce on your doner kebab?"

loggedout, Friday, 23 January 2004 14:50 (twenty-two years ago)

river fleet in 'i hate civillization' shockah

pete s, Friday, 23 January 2004 14:52 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm sure I know who you are Mr Out!
x-post

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 23 January 2004 14:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Civilisation killed my dog.

the river fleet, Friday, 23 January 2004 14:53 (twenty-two years ago)

awww!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 23 January 2004 14:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Appropriate or inappropriate that an impromptu discussion of the ancient greeks is happening on a masturbation thread

(then again a quarter of threads are masturbation threads so the chances are increased)

pete s, Friday, 23 January 2004 14:57 (twenty-two years ago)

the ancient greek masturbated too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ken c (ken c), Friday, 23 January 2004 15:01 (twenty-two years ago)

(i'm sure)

ken c (ken c), Friday, 23 January 2004 15:01 (twenty-two years ago)

I've had far deeper, longer-lasting and generally more intense relationships with the people that I've made music with than I've had with almost (not entirely all, but close) everyone I've had sex with.

Bjork once said something to this effect. Something like writing a song with someone is more intimate than having sex with them.

Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Friday, 23 January 2004 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)

they masturbated each other dude

x-post

pete s, Friday, 23 January 2004 15:03 (twenty-two years ago)

but some of them surely must masturbate on their own regularly even when they're in a satisfying mutual masturbatory relationship with someone!

ken c (ken c), Friday, 23 January 2004 15:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Bjork once said something to this effect. Something like writing a song with someone is more intimate than having sex with them.

Evelyn Waugh went one step further in Vile Bodies, didn’t he? I believe Nina Blount said,

All this fuss about sleeping together. For physical pleasure I'd sooner go to my dentist any day.

Charles Hatcher (musenheddo), Friday, 23 January 2004 16:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Uh, no, that's not it at all. The Vile Bodies quote is about a woman who is disinterested in sex. I'm not disinterested in sex, sex is great. Just that there are more intimate and powerful connections in life. Going to the dentist is not one of them.

It's the difference between "Sex is so boring I'd rather go to the dentist" and "ohmigod, making music is so amazing, it might actually be better than sex!"

the river fleet, Friday, 23 January 2004 16:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Uh, no, that's not it at all. The Vile Bodies quote is about a woman who is disinterested in sex. I'm not disinterested in sex, sex is great. Just that there are more intimate and powerful connections in life. Going to the dentist is not one of them.

Yes, but you’re missing the point of the quote. She wasn’t disinterested in sex, per se, the sex she had simply wasn’t very good (presumably a lack of orgasm was implied -- isn’t it always?).

Charles Hatcher (musenheddo), Friday, 23 January 2004 17:17 (twenty-two years ago)

and she finds intimacy in going to the dentist?

ken c (ken c), Friday, 23 January 2004 17:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, at least she’s getting something out of the experience.

Charles Hatcher (musenheddo), Friday, 23 January 2004 17:36 (twenty-two years ago)

"Let me scrape your teeth."
"Soulmate."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 January 2004 17:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Regardless, it's still not the same as what I (and ESOJ and Bjork) are describing.

the river fleet, Friday, 23 January 2004 18:08 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.imi.org.uk/mar2002/Hand.jpg

Talk to the hand.

Charles Hatcher (musenheddo), Friday, 23 January 2004 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Mmmm. We clearly know your answer to the thread question now.

pete s, Friday, 23 January 2004 18:57 (twenty-two years ago)

is that dead skin peeling off or dried up bits of protein?

ken c (ken c), Friday, 23 January 2004 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)

"surely have enough of a comprehension of sensual pleasures (fucking, eating, drinking, that feeling you get when you slip into a cool bed) to understand why it is both normal and great for most people?"

You are assuming sensual pleasure is better than a nonsensual pleasure. I feel that sensual pleasure is very temporary and therefore not as good as something more spiritual or mental which is much less temporary. I would even think that too much sensual pleasure takes away from other pleasure.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 23 January 2004 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)

You aren't American, are you, Nairn.

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 23 January 2004 20:53 (twenty-two years ago)

well, I am. But I do see how what I'm saying is very unAmerican. I'm just basing what I'm saying from personal experience instead of from what I'm told or what I hear. I like it much better when my pleasure level is steady and fairly high (when it's just how I approach life) more then having it fluctuate so much. (when it's dependent on my senses)

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 23 January 2004 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Why can't you have and appreciate both types of pleasure? You seem to be operating under the 'what goes up must come down' assumption. You can have a base level of happiness ('steady and fairly high') AND then occasionally have bursts of sensual pleasure. It's not an either/or type thing.

oops (Oops), Friday, 23 January 2004 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.