McDonalds bad? Nah!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
ARCH ENEMY

By MEGAN LEHMANN

January 22, 2004 -- LAST February, Morgan Spurlock decided to become a gastronomical guinea pig.
His mission: To eat three meals a day for 30 days at McDonald's and document the impact on his health.

Scores of cheeseburgers, hundreds of fries and dozens of chocolate shakes later, the formerly strapping 6-foot-2 New Yorker - who started out at a healthy 185 pounds - had packed on 25 pounds.

But his supersized shape was the least of his problems.

Within a few days of beginning his drive-through diet, Spurlock, 33, was vomiting out the window of his car, and doctors who examined him were shocked at how rapidly Spurlock's entire body deteriorated.

"It was really crazy - my body basically fell apart over the course of 30 days," Spurlock told The Post.

His liver became toxic, his cholesterol shot up from a low 165 to 230, his libido flagged and he suffered headaches and depression.

Spurlock charted his journey from fit to flab in a tongue-in-cheek documentary, which he has taken to the Sundance Film Festival with the hopes of getting a distribution deal.

"Super Size Me" explores the obesity epidemic that plagues America today - a sort of "Bowling for Columbine" for fast food.

As well as documenting his own burger-fueled bulk-up, Spurlock travels to 20 cities across America, interviewing people on the street, health experts and a lobbyist for the fast-food industry.

Despite making dozens of phone calls, Spurlock fails to get anyone from McDonald's to agree to an on-camera interview.

A spokeswoman for McDonald's told The Post yesterday that no representatives from the corporation had seen "Super Size Me."

"Consumers can achieve balance in their daily dining decisions by choosing from our array of quality offerings and range of portion sizes to meet their taste and nutrition goals," McDonald's said in a statement.

Over the course of the film, Spurlock is regularly examined by a gastroenterologist, a cardiologist and SoHo-based general practitioner Dr. Daryl Isaacs.

"He was an extremely healthy person who got very sick eating this McDonald's diet," Dr. Isaacs told The Post.

"None of us imagined he could deteriorate this badly - he looked terrible. The liver test was the most shocking thing - it became very, very abnormal."

Spurlock has since returned to normal health. "The treatment was to just stop doing what he was doing," Dr. Isaacs says.

Spurlock, who says he ate at McDonald's only sporadically before his total immersion in the Mickey D's menu, says he even began craving fat and sugar fixes between meals.

"I got desperately ill," he says. "My face was splotchy and I had this huge gut, which I've never had in my life.

"My knees started to hurt from the extra weight coming on so quickly. It was amazing - and really frightening."

Spurlock's girlfriend, Alex Jamieson, was horrified - she's a vegan chef.

"She was completely disgusted by me, not happy at all," he says. "But she realized what my goals were in trying to educate people."

Spurlock, a film producer who grew up in West Virginia and studied ballet for eight years, was spurred to make his first feature film while watching TV on Thanksgiving Day, 2002.

"I was feeling like a typical American on Thanksgiving - very bloated and happy on the couch - and at some point on the news they were talking about two women who were suing McDonald's.

"People from the food industry were saying, 'You can't link kids being fat to our food - our food is nutritious.'

"I said, 'How nutritious is it really? Let's find out."

Not surprisingly, Spurlock has steered clear of the Golden Arches since filming wrapped.

"I have not had McDonald's for seven months, but yesterday, during an interview, I had a bite of a Big Mac," he says.

"I chewed it up, swallowed it and I said, 'You know what, I'm pretty much done after that bite.' "

El Spinktor (El Spinktor), Friday, 23 January 2004 00:50 (twenty-two years ago)

You can't link kids being fat to our food

For a second I read that as 'lick'

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 January 2004 00:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Perplexing.

pete s, Friday, 23 January 2004 00:57 (twenty-two years ago)

"Consumers can achieve balance in their daily dining decisions by choosing from our array of quality offerings and range of portion sizes to meet their taste and nutrition goals," McDonald's said in a statement.

This reads like an Onion article. What strange wording.

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 23 January 2004 01:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Its from the New York Post online. So, take it for what you will.

El Spinktor (El Spinktor), Friday, 23 January 2004 01:01 (twenty-two years ago)

I read this right after nearly making myself sick on McDonald's food.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Friday, 23 January 2004 01:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Um, yeah? Everyone KNOWS it's bad. That's why it's called junk food, you're not supposed to eat it all the time, whether they want you to or not.

(note: I am well aware that some people eat McDonald's far more than is healthy)

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 23 January 2004 01:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I think you could live on Taco Bell for a long, long time as long as you ordered the taco salad once in awhile, and cut out the sour cream, and drank Lipton ice tea instead of soda.

I once heard you could live indefinitely on Guinness and oranges, if you were on a desert island. So I called Dr. Dean Edell to find out what he thought... he said you would have to eat the peels to get oil, and that you would have diarrhea all the time, but you might go for awhile.

andy, Friday, 23 January 2004 01:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I dunno - he's a bit of an opportunistic jerk, methinks. It doesn't sound as if the guy was going in with a neutral approach, and if he was choosing the worst possible options at *every* meal (like chocolate shakes) I mean duh, it's hardly a surprise that he got fat and didn't get the proper nutrition. Does he think that the same thing wouldn't have happened if he'd chosen fries and shakes to eat at home? I'd agree that misleading advertising is a very despicable thing, but I don't think that I've ever seen a McDonald's ad go so far as to encourage anyone to eat all their meals there. How is a consistently poor consumer *choice* the fault of any corporation?

x-post

Kim (Kim), Friday, 23 January 2004 01:16 (twenty-two years ago)

True, but Mickey D's and other fast food places never admit that their products are unhealthy

(double xpost)

oops (Oops), Friday, 23 January 2004 01:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Fair enough - his approach is ass though. It makes about as much sense as if someone like Michael Moore were to go out on a spectacularly reckless shooting spree in order to prove that guns are dangerous.

Kim (Kim), Friday, 23 January 2004 01:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, it just seemed like he was proving a point that didn't really need to be proved. And I'm sure McDonald's could retort that you could put together a not-wholly-destructive diet if you just had, say, the salads, grilled chicken, iced tea, no fries, etc.

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 23 January 2004 01:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, there are plenty of people who've spent a lifetime eating the home-cooked equivalent of those "bad" McD's meals every day - say, coffee, eggs and hashbrowns in the morning and meat and potatoes during lunch and dinner, ice cream or pie for dessert - some of them may be overweight, but none of them are barfing all over the place either.

Poppy (poppy), Friday, 23 January 2004 01:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I kind of got the impression that the barfing was just a faily over-dramatic flourish.

Kim (Kim), Friday, 23 January 2004 01:55 (twenty-two years ago)

So they're saying McDonalds is bad, then.

It's not exactly the road to Damascus, is it?

Matt (Matt), Friday, 23 January 2004 01:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, it was indeed an overly-dramatic flourish, but it MAKES the article. Well, that and the toxic liver. VOMIT WITH FLAIR! Hee-yah!

Poppy (poppy), Friday, 23 January 2004 02:00 (twenty-two years ago)

The approach is none too subtle or the research "controlled" for that matter, but for what it's worth, it had to be done. I used to eat at Mickey D's every day, back when living in the Lone Star state, cuz I had no other choice, really. And between that and BBQ, it fucked me health up pretty bad, so it's kind of comforting that someone has taken the time and effort to become a living sacrifice in the name of science and expose the ills of luscious lascivious breakfast burritos. *drools*

Francis Watlington (Francis Watlington), Friday, 23 January 2004 03:13 (twenty-two years ago)

VOMIT WITH FLAIR! Hee-yah!

http://www.wrestleology.com/images/wwf/flair.jpg

Sounds like a hell of a time

nate detritus (natedetritus), Friday, 23 January 2004 03:31 (twenty-two years ago)

he shoulda eaten at a nice, healthy establishment like white castle or arby's.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 23 January 2004 04:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Then he'd probably be dead.

tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Friday, 23 January 2004 04:10 (twenty-two years ago)

only if ate nothing but white castle's fish fillet sandwich

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 23 January 2004 04:12 (twenty-two years ago)

i had mcdonald's last night. mmmmmmmmmmm

JaXoN (JasonD), Friday, 23 January 2004 05:34 (twenty-two years ago)

did you high five ronald?

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 23 January 2004 05:42 (twenty-two years ago)

he rimmed the hamburgler

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 23 January 2004 05:42 (twenty-two years ago)

i dunno, i eat more mcdonalds than anyone i know, and while far from the healthiest, i am still the skinniest... go ahead, eat that filet o'fish. its okay!

phil-two (phil-two), Friday, 23 January 2004 07:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Not to exonerate McDonalds or anything like that, because I do believe that they are evil and their food is crap, but...

It says his girlfriend is a vegan chef. Was he vegetarian or vegan before starting his ordeal? Because that alone would account for the barfing - your stomach loses the ability to digest or process meat after some time as a vegetarian.

Anyway, I am not surprised by his results, regardless of that. But it's not a question of ignorance - people know this shit is bad for them, they eat it anyway. People know that SUV's are dangerous and get poor mileage and they drive them anyway. Give the man a Darwin award.

the river fleet, Friday, 23 January 2004 12:43 (twenty-two years ago)

i dunno, i eat more mcdonalds than anyone i know, and while far from the healthiest, i am still the skinniest... go ahead, eat that filet o'fish. its okay!
-- phil-two (philtw...), January 23rd, 2004.

Your arteries are probably clogged!

F to the Dubya, Friday, 23 January 2004 13:45 (twenty-two years ago)

You gotta love them kerazy americans!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.