I Love Mass Transit

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I love it like little else on this earth.

Subway systems of the world

teeny (teeny), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:21 (twenty years ago) link

That is so cool.

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:24 (twenty years ago) link

nice site! I saw some weird factoid the other day on tv that listed the percentage of US population who used mass transit by city, and Chicago wasn't in the top 5 (behind Los Angeles and Houston). That's got to be some sort of mistake.

hstencil, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:26 (twenty years ago) link

There is nothing else quite like mass transit, sez me-without-a-car. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:33 (twenty years ago) link

stence, believe it or not, I WOULD believe that L.A. uses more than Chicago, based on the bursting buses I was in during my thanksgiving trip there. Of course, doesn't mean the system is BETTER in L.A. or Houston for that matter, just that more people use it. Then again, Los Angeles has more people (in its greater metro area) than anybody in this country, so that makes sense.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:35 (twenty years ago) link

well 5th on the list was Houston, at 6% (I forget what L.A.'s percentage was). I just have a hard time believing that less than 6% of Chicago's population uses mass transit.

hstencil, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:37 (twenty years ago) link

The Moscow system is so simple and beautiful, like it was designed to be seen this way.
So does the S bahn conver a lot more area than U bahn cause I thought the Berlin system was huge.

Mitchell Wimbish (Mitchell), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:39 (twenty years ago) link

I've never been to the western burbs of the greater Chicago area... but looking at a map of those burbs, if they follow in the same pattern as most L.A. burbs, then I would still believe Chicago would barely trail L.A...

that chunk of Chi burbs looks humongous.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:40 (twenty years ago) link

this looks like autechre artwork.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:41 (twenty years ago) link

stence, could you link that list? I am ready to believe the people who put the list together are totally full of shit.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:42 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.bart.gov/images/quickplanner_map_sfo.gif

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:42 (twenty years ago) link

it was just a factoid, so I'm not sure what the criteria was for it, but I can't believe that if you factored in the CTA subway, CTA buses, and the Metra commuter rail lines that Houston would have more utilized public transit than Chicago. Does Houston have any public transit besides buses?

hstencil, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:42 (twenty years ago) link

"that chunk of Chi burbs looks humongous."

There Be Dragons there!
I never go West of Ashland, personally. Use the Blue Line and Brown Line Daily, as do all three roomies.

Psychokitty, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:43 (twenty years ago) link

Maybe it has to do with the fact that you can't get anywhere in Houston by walking. But you can in Chicago, right?

Mitchell (Mitchell), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:44 (twenty years ago) link

db - it was from this story on NY1:

Over Half Of New Yorkers Use Mass Transit To Get To Work

MARCH 02ND, 2004

A new survey by the Census Bureau shows that nearly one third of Americans who take mass transit to work live in New York City.

According to the report, 1.9 million New Yorkers use public transportation to get to work, or 55 percent of the working public. Statewide, 27 percent of New Yorkers use mass transit – also the highest number in the country.

New York is the only city in which a majority of people use public transit to get to work.

The next highest city is Washington, D.C., with 37 percent, followed by Boston, San Francisco, Chicago and Philadelphia.

Among the major cities with the lowest percentage of commuters are Houston and Los Angeles.

Overall, only 5 percent of the nation's workforce uses public transportation to get to work.

hstencil, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:44 (twenty years ago) link

the graphic they had onscreen didn't include Chicago. It was just NY, Boston, SF, Philly, LA, Houston. Must've been some sort of fuckup.

hstencil, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:45 (twenty years ago) link

it is humongous. coming in from the west in an airplane at 10,000 feet, it stretches from horizon to horizon.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:45 (twenty years ago) link

I never go West of Ashland, personally.

Chicagoans of this sort were the kind I always really hated when I lived there.

Maybe it has to do with the fact that you can't get anywhere in Houston by walking. But you can in Chicago, right?

Chicago's blocks are very long, longer than NYC blocks for instance. It's not that easy of a town to walk around in once you get out of the downtown areas.

hstencil, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:46 (twenty years ago) link

Here's the link to Chicago's Mass Transit. The map is too huge to display HERE.
http://world.nycsubway.org/us/chicago/chicago-track.html

Psychokitty, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:47 (twenty years ago) link

i bet more people on SF use public transportation, just without paying (if they're measuring by revenue).

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:48 (twenty years ago) link

I never go West of Ashland, personally.
Chicagoans of this sort were the kind I always really hated when I lived there.

But it's not as bad as someone from Naperville saying "I'm from Chicago"

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:48 (twenty years ago) link

Among the major cities with the lowest percentage of commuters are Houston and Los Angeles.

Ur, this sounds like L.A. and Houston were at the bottom of the list to me... assuming "commuters" means "commuters who use mass transit".

Chicago still rules over L.A. and Houston. We're back to Oscar alert on the Homeland Mass Transit Rating Security Department.. phew.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:48 (twenty years ago) link

this one boss I had always called it "Naper-vile."

hstencil, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:49 (twenty years ago) link

god bless BART.

they should show the la subway system. its fucking awful. and the worst slap in the face is that in one of the stations, they use cut up redline cars as fucking decoration.

most folks in la who use mass transit use the bus. and not just the la mta. theres lots of regional carries like santa monica, culver city, etc who probably take numbers off of the main la figures. assuming they do it by carrier.

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:49 (twenty years ago) link

yeah, db, Houston and LA were at the bottom of the list, Chicago wasn't included (on the graphic, but is in the story).

hstencil, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:50 (twenty years ago) link

If big fuckin vehicles like Hummers are considered mass(ive) transit, then maybe Houston could be up there...

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:51 (twenty years ago) link

In which case, in the immortal words of Emily Latella, based on my projection of L.A. topping Chi-town on mass transit.. "Never mind!"

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:51 (twenty years ago) link

depends on who that Naperville person is talking to. if it's someone else from Chicago, then that's just wrong. If it's somebody from a totally different part of the country, saying you're from Chicago gives them a better idea of where you live than saying Naperville, which they most likely have never heard of. I just say "chicago burbs".

oops (Oops), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:52 (twenty years ago) link

the L.A. map uses an attractive typeface!
http://www.mta.net/riding_metro/metro_rail/images/rail_map.gif

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:52 (twenty years ago) link

Here's an overall map of Seattle's high-tech mass transit systems:

...cool, eh?

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:52 (twenty years ago) link

"it is humongous. coming in from the west in an airplane at 10,000 feet, it stretches from horizon to horizon."

That's because we can't build to the East, as most cities can, because we're blocked by the Lake. So, Chicago itself stretches 70 miles long and 40 miles wide, curving around the Lake. This doesn't even include the suburbs!

"Chicagoans of this sort were the kind I always really hated when I lived there." My NOT going beyond Ashland Avenue is no more based on hatred than people from Schaumburg who NEVER enter "The City." You go where you're friends are located. Period.

Psychokitty, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:53 (twenty years ago) link

(that said, the buses here in Seattle pretty much do me well, and are at least adequate.. Portland's is better mainly because Portland is smaller and more grid pattern... Vancouver rules the Northwest on public transit though, easily)

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:54 (twenty years ago) link

Allegedly Orange County's bus transit system is one of the fastest growing in the country. I can see that, actually -- they've been adding more lines, finally started some 24 hour service a couple of years back, and have been slowly but surely improving many of the individual bus-stops, both for passengers and the vehicles themselves (replacing tar with concrete for the stop zones and so forth -- my local stop had suffered so much drainage/artificial sinkhole damage from the multitude of stops that they finally pulled their finger out and began repairs just this week).

god bless BART.

And you know what I love? That connection from SFO -- AT LONG LAST.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:54 (twenty years ago) link

my friends lived all over Chicago.

hstencil, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:54 (twenty years ago) link

There's a great Chinese restaurant just West of Ashland. You should try it.

xpost

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:55 (twenty years ago) link

yeah, if you never go west of Ashland to eat, you're missing out on a lot of great restaurants.

hstencil, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:56 (twenty years ago) link

"I never go West of Ashland, personally.
Chicagoans of this sort were the kind I always really hated when I lived there."
But it's not as bad as someone from Naperville saying "I'm from Chicago"

-- dave225 (adspac...), March 4th, 2004.

If I could give out an Award, I'd be sending one out to YOU, Dave! If you're going to live in Diaperville, than be proud of it; don't tell your out of state friends you live in "Chicago" when you have to pass O'Hare to get there!

Psychokitty, Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:56 (twenty years ago) link

Have you been there though? And you say "Be PROUD of it"?

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:58 (twenty years ago) link

so nobody who lives outside the city limits of LA should say they're from LA, then right? rrright?

oops (Oops), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:58 (twenty years ago) link

They should say they're from 'near' LA

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:59 (twenty years ago) link

haha, i am from naperville and also say that i am from there. i get dirty looks for saying it too. but whatev. i do hate when people from the suburbs say that they are from the city, because they are insulting the intelligence of the people they talk to and could create a lame situation. such as:

suburb kid: i am from chicago
city kid: oh, what neighborhood do you live in
buburb kid: oh, i dont actually live in the city per se, i am from naperville
city kid: you are a stupid fuck.

that being said, i know the chicago better than some of my friends who actually live in the city but dont really venture outside of their neighborhood. its sad really.

(xpost obv)

todd swiss (eliti), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:00 (twenty years ago) link

I sometimes tell people I live in Fort Greene because they don't recognize Clinton Hill. When I lived in Chicago, I told people I lived in Wicker Park because "right by that humongus Lexus dealership and Cabrini Green" didn't have much of a ring to it.

hstencil, Friday, 5 March 2004 00:01 (twenty years ago) link

My San Diego friends always called me their "L.A." friend, even though I lived almost as far away from L.A. county as I did from San Diego county.

donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:02 (twenty years ago) link

When people ask me where I lived in Chicago, I ask them "Are you familiar with the city?" And base the precision of my answer on their response.

dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:03 (twenty years ago) link

haha when i moved to LA, my SD friends would call me their "northern californian" friend.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:03 (twenty years ago) link

Those figures are percentage of work trips only, not total daily riders.

You could go here to get the number of actual riders.

http://www.ntdprogram.com/NTD/ntdhome.nsf?OpenDatabase

David Beckhouse (David Beckhouse), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:03 (twenty years ago) link

I ride the BART every day, most weekends included, and I have very little to complain about. It's like spending part of your day in Logan's Run.

andy, Friday, 5 March 2004 00:06 (twenty years ago) link

Logan's Run references are awesome.

dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:08 (twenty years ago) link

here are many many more subway maps from around the world:

http://www.reed.edu/~reyn/transport.html

gareth (gareth), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:10 (twenty years ago) link

that chicago map doesnt seem so big, 151 stations is around average for a biggish city subway network?

gareth (gareth), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:14 (twenty years ago) link

yeah, the chicago system really doesnt get too many suburbs either, skokie, oak park, and a few others iirc. its not that big.

todd swiss (eliti), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:16 (twenty years ago) link

there's a serperate suburban Chicago mass transit system, ie Metra

oops (Oops), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:21 (twenty years ago) link

map to the SEPTA system (train system for philadelphia and suburbs):

SEPTA

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:23 (twenty years ago) link

People always say how you NEED a car in order to live in the (Chicago) suburbs, and you most likely do if you also work in the suburbs, but my friend commutes to downtown every day. He only has to walk to the end of his block (about 100 feet) to meet the bus.

oops (Oops), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:24 (twenty years ago) link

well yes oops, but it is not really good for wide use, its really only good for people commuting to work and such. they are practically useless if you want to be downtown any time past midnight.

todd swiss (eliti), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:25 (twenty years ago) link

i'm also something of a mass transit/subway freak.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:26 (twenty years ago) link

haha i didn't even consider the possiblility that it has uses other than commuting to work. it's so engrained in my head that that is what's it's there for, and nothing else.

oops (Oops), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:27 (twenty years ago) link

well, a couple of my friends choose to take the train to concerts (i dont know why) and they have had to leave early on some occasions. i just drive because its easier and i will pay for parking if i need to.

todd swiss (eliti), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:31 (twenty years ago) link

Taxi?

dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:33 (twenty years ago) link

Given the huge size of metro Chicago, taking a taxi would almost always be ridiculously expensive. Unless maybe if you lived in, say, Oak Park, but then you'd could just take the CTA.

oops (Oops), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:36 (twenty years ago) link

yeah, if i wanted to take a taxi from naperville to downtown, i dont see it being cheaper than 30 dollars each way... i am 30 miles west of the lake.

todd swiss (eliti), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:37 (twenty years ago) link

Sorry. Tunnel Vision. I lived "East of Ashland". Everything was 5 minutes away. I forget about the rest of the city.

dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:40 (twenty years ago) link

And you know what I love? That connection from SFO -- AT LONG LAST.

when I was in college I was drooling for the approval to San Jose. They got it, slashed it, and I moved away anyway so I dont care anymore.

Thats what San Jose gets for pretending they dont need SF. San Jose sucks.

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:56 (twenty years ago) link

I received this book for Christmas. It is lovely.

(my usual pub quiz specialist subject, when I can't think of a better one, is "The London Underground")

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 5 March 2004 10:10 (twenty years ago) link

yeah, if i wanted to take a taxi from naperville to downtown, i dont see it being cheaper than 30 dollars each way... i am 30 miles west of the lake.

It'd be much more than that. Taking a taxi from O'Hare to my old place near Division Street (not even downtown) was like $29.

hstencil, Friday, 5 March 2004 21:54 (twenty years ago) link

I love the new L.A. MTA bus paint scheme!
http://www.mta.net/images/subheads_f01.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 5 March 2004 21:56 (twenty years ago) link

two years pass...
a list of noteworthy car-free areas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_carfree_places

freshest thing I have read today.

S. (Sébastien Chikara), Sunday, 6 August 2006 14:49 (seventeen years ago) link

one year passes...

Was reading about Gulangyu from that list just now

http://www.carfree.com/ has some interesting stuff about this also. Will be interesting to see if/how this kind of thinking becomes more prevalent when car usage has to reduce (not carfree places themselves but when newer towns/suburbs being to be denser again encouraging non-car journeys to save money)

Back to Metros - has anyone used Strasbourgs?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mytravelphotos/sets/72157602252579748/detail/

Kondratieff, Monday, 26 May 2008 15:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Sadly I dind't actually use the tram in Strasbourg but it looked pretty amazing.

ENBB, Monday, 26 May 2008 16:11 (fifteen years ago) link

Happy birthday, Laurel!!!

Sara R-C, Monday, 26 May 2008 17:01 (fifteen years ago) link

lol, god I REALLY must be out of it, as that is so obviously on the wrong thread. Apologies to mass transit lovers.

(I would be one, too, but sadly, Minnesota really has mass failings in this area).

Sara R-C, Monday, 26 May 2008 17:02 (fifteen years ago) link

happy birthday laurel!

s1ocki, Monday, 26 May 2008 18:27 (fifteen years ago) link

Which smaller US cities have good mass transit or light rail systems in your view?

Kondratieff, Friday, 6 June 2008 12:52 (fifteen years ago) link

I have no idea but it seems an opportunity to remind everyone that Seattle's tram system is called the SLUT.

Ed, Friday, 6 June 2008 13:02 (fifteen years ago) link

Singapores appears to be called the SMRT which is also pretty hilarious.

Trayce, Friday, 6 June 2008 13:20 (fifteen years ago) link

no-brainer that US cities have all but phased out phrase "rapid transit"

Dr Morbius, Friday, 6 June 2008 14:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Cleveland still calls their rail system "Rapid Transit." Don't see it going away any time soon.

Pancakes Hackman, Friday, 6 June 2008 14:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Which smaller US cities have good mass transit or light rail systems in your view?

Portland is pretty stellar.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 6 June 2008 14:45 (fifteen years ago) link

well, if yr syatem has Rapid in the name it'd be too transparent to change it.

Also NYC subway announcements using term "customers" stinks -- reminds you yer paying for this dreck. Prefer "suckers."

Dr Morbius, Friday, 6 June 2008 14:47 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, Cleveland's train system is part of the RTA (rapid transit authority). I take the train almost everyday and it's magical- ideally there should be at least two more lines to serve the city but obviously the US has other priorities.

brownie, Friday, 6 June 2008 14:53 (fifteen years ago) link

RTA is actually "Regional Transit Authority," but yah, otherwise RTA is pretty good all things considered. ("Voted Best Transit System in the Country!") I take the Green Line in in the mornings and love it.

Pancakes Hackman, Friday, 6 June 2008 14:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Er yeah, you're right it's Regional. haha, I get on at Shaker Square every morning.

brownie, Friday, 6 June 2008 14:56 (fifteen years ago) link

haha, I'm the guy asleep with sunglasses on and earbuds in if you're on the train that stops there around 7:25.

Pancakes Hackman, Friday, 6 June 2008 14:57 (fifteen years ago) link

And thus a friendship was born.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 6 June 2008 14:59 (fifteen years ago) link

Fuck that. Don't wake me.

Pancakes Hackman, Friday, 6 June 2008 15:05 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm a 7:45 type of guy. Your sleep is safe.

brownie, Friday, 6 June 2008 15:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Mainly asking because interested in smaller cities (or at least more compact cities) that have good transit systems that have good coverage of residential sections as well as central districts - ie which smaller cities are best equipped for a future less car-reliant - or with commutes more easily done without cars. Also more modern towns or cities that don't follow low density models.

I have used Portland's briefly but only in the center. How well does it cover the rest of the city in your view (I shall have a look at that myself now too)

Kondratieff, Friday, 6 June 2008 15:13 (fifteen years ago) link

http://faculty.washington.edu/jbs/itrans/japanese_dualmode.htm

Any thoughts on DMVs?

Kondratieff, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 11:09 (fifteen years ago) link

Mpls/St. Paul has light rail now and they're expanding but the line doesn't reach my mom's first-tier suburb or Uptown yet, which is...wrong. Up until the early '60s my mom says there were trams that left from 2 blocks from my house, either headed downtown or to Lake Minnetonka. She loved them and lamented their passing when in London being jealous of tubetrainbus.

suzy, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 11:44 (fifteen years ago) link

this term is used a lot in transportation planning circles:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_rapid_transit

also, los angeles' express bus system is called "rapid."

get bent, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh hay, birthday wishes for me!

Laurel, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:32 (fifteen years ago) link

There's some more stuff on DMVs on the rolling rolling thread. They only really work if you feed several bus services in to make one train. Because of headways it is much more efficent to have long trains on railways. Then you have the problem of getting the DMVs to the rail head on schedule and not having to wait around for the rest of the consist. It has potential, though.

Ed, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:48 (fifteen years ago) link

Anyone with any experience of Ann Arbor?

Kondratieff, Thursday, 12 June 2008 08:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Why the interest in the bus network of Ann Arbor?

Ed, Thursday, 12 June 2008 08:45 (fifteen years ago) link

Just plotting the AMG takeover.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 12 June 2008 14:03 (fifteen years ago) link

eight years pass...

mass transit under Trump/Ryan?

But most of these ballot-approved transit projects are also designed to rely heavily on matching funds from the federal government, and that may run counter to the priorities of a Republican-led House, Senate, and executive office. The GOP’s 2016 platform articulates a strong stance against funding transit, noting that “we propose to phase out the federal transit program.” It’s possible that when Congress’s current authorization of transportation spending expires in 2020, conservative leaders could create a highway/transit funding formula that’s less favorable to transit. And newer funding programs that have helped drive bus and rail projects under the Obama administration, such as the DOT’s TIGER grant program, could disappear.

http://www.citylab.com/commute/2016/11/on-tuesday-night-transit-was-victorious/507077/

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

two years pass...

i posted this on "too effing hot"

one more thing: while the fact that white people don't ride the bus is not of itself a problem for the solvency of metro or for climate change (because there aren't that many white people in LA county), it is a big problem because people who don't ride the bus tend to be opposed the measures that make the bus better for people who do. check out this BULLshit, for example https://laist.com/2019/07/16/eagle_rock_metro_rapid_bus_route_noho_to_pasadena.php.

― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, July 19, 2019 7:40 PM (two weeks ago) bookmarkflaglink

let's see how that is going...

My harasser, retired process server Caroline Aguirre of Highland Park, has become obsessed with me. Tonight she declared at an @EagleRockNC meeting that I "get an attorney for slander and lying." pic.twitter.com/GyBN5uHa48

— 𝐌𝐢𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐞𝐥 (@topomodesto) August 7, 2019

when the threat of faster bus service for people who are not you breaks your brain https://t.co/KXhiCjqdtn

— sahra (@sahrasulaiman) August 7, 2019

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 7 August 2019 19:28 (four years ago) link

wait till she hears about bike lanes

mookieproof, Sunday, 11 August 2019 04:33 (four years ago) link

There were gates in the middle of university grounds because cars weren't allowed through between prime student hours. The buses all had transducers at the bottom of the buses that would lift the gates. The amount of people that tried to tailgate through with the bus or try to drive through the gates and get their car damaged was very very satisfying.

Yerac, Sunday, 11 August 2019 14:18 (four years ago) link

three months pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cD3QlR98--A

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 5 December 2019 07:05 (four years ago) link

That is amazing

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 5 December 2019 07:29 (four years ago) link

three months pass...

oof

https://humantransit.org/2020/03/covid-19-what-if-transit-runs-out-of-money.html

then

.@Amtrak memo on grim outlook pic.twitter.com/KDh0G0v9S9

— David Shepardson (@davidshepardson) March 11, 2020

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 11 March 2020 21:17 (four years ago) link

one year passes...

Paris isn't magic. City leadership decided to do this, they pushed through the doubt & resistance, & now they've cut cars almost in half & everyone f'ing loves Paris all over again. Any US city could decide to follow suit. https://t.co/EmXYbS0JFX

— David Roberts (@drvolts) September 23, 2021

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 23 September 2021 17:59 (two years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.