So what opinion do you have on this ad campaign?
You can download the ad here: http://www.dove.co.uk/dove_tested.html
― Catty (Catty), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Catty (Catty), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)
HSA finds it really distracting, though.
― Super-Kate (kate), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Super-Kate (kate), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:33 (twenty-two years ago)
What I mean is, the chicks in those ads have bodies like mine. Not bodies like magazine adverts.
― Super-Kate (kate), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Super-Kate (kate), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Super-Kate (kate), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 16 April 2004 16:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Catty (Catty), Friday, 16 April 2004 19:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Catty (Catty), Friday, 16 April 2004 19:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Friday, 16 April 2004 19:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 16 April 2004 19:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― scg, Friday, 16 April 2004 20:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Saturday, 17 April 2004 07:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Saturday, 17 April 2004 08:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Catty (Catty), Saturday, 17 April 2004 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― winterland, Saturday, 17 April 2004 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)
Actually, of course, they're not enormous. I think perhaps that is what makes the photo sort of, I dunno, off-putting/catchy/different/provocative. If they were actually FAT, it would be a different thing altogether. It seems to be saying that even if you look like this, and these women look perfectly normal and not part. overweight, you're probably still not satisfied with yourself, even though most men would find these women attractive. But you know we don't usually show you women who look like this. So it's arresting.
― Skottie, Saturday, 17 April 2004 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Catty (Catty), Saturday, 17 April 2004 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Saturday, 17 April 2004 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Robbie Lumsden (Wallace Stevens HQ), Saturday, 17 April 2004 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Saturday, 17 April 2004 16:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Saturday, 17 April 2004 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)
I though this advert was slightly grotesesque. but then nothing wrong with grotesquerie.
― Robbie Lumsden (Wallace Stevens HQ), Saturday, 17 April 2004 16:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― ipsofacto (ipsofacto), Saturday, 17 April 2004 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)