Using a newsbot like "google news", reading ile and scheduling specific times to go online would be obvious answers.
Do you limit your browsing into a routine?
Any favorite information curators? Are they part of a same (formal or informal) network? If so, do you find good aspects in this beside the opportunity to meet people you might have affinities with and does it cause you some problems other than information redundancy?
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Saturday, 24 April 2004 06:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Saturday, 24 April 2004 06:49 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't 'manage' the amonnt of information I get, as such. I just stop when I'm full.
― N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 24 April 2004 10:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Saturday, 24 April 2004 12:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Saturday, 24 April 2004 13:13 (twenty-two years ago)
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=index2&cid=964 (yahoo most emailed)http://blogdex.net/
If I need more political news, then I go for ABC's The Note: http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/TheNote/TheNote.html
I used to use Metafilter but it seems less useful these days. And of course ILX gives me interesting things.
― teeny (teeny), Saturday, 24 April 2004 13:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 April 2004 13:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 24 April 2004 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 April 2004 13:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― daria g (daria g), Saturday, 24 April 2004 20:10 (twenty-two years ago)
It analyses thousands of blogs and picks out each days 'bursty' themes, phrases, people and links.
Unfortunately, the links thing is not as good as it could be, as it looks like people are spoofing blogs just to make the tickets and posters they want to sell appear at the top of the list.
― N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 24 April 2004 20:26 (twenty-two years ago)
(This is my first post since April 12th, and my first use of a computer since then too)
― A Nairn (moretap), Saturday, 24 April 2004 21:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Saturday, 24 April 2004 21:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 April 2004 21:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Saturday, 24 April 2004 21:40 (twenty-two years ago)
Anyone tried these copernic products (the only working "search agents" that I could think of)? :"copernic summarizer" creates concise summaries of any document or Web page"copernic agent" search engine who also do filtering, grouping and summarizing"copernic tracker" software that monitors Web pages and notifies you when they change.
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Sunday, 25 April 2004 00:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― aimurchie, Sunday, 25 April 2004 00:54 (twenty-two years ago)
a flash animation proposing a future of media
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 03:54 (twenty-one years ago)
Who would want "objectivism" if it were there to be had, anyway?
― Aaron A., Wednesday, 23 February 2005 04:17 (twenty-one years ago)
"Whether Google or Microsoft wins, the implications of a single firm’s controlling an enormous, unified search industry are troubling. First, this firm would have access to an unparalleled quantity of personal information, which could represent a major erosion of privacy. Already, one can learn a surprising amount about people simply by “googling” them. A decade from now, search providers and users (not to mention those armed with subpoenas) will be able to gather far more personal information than even financial institutions and intelligence agencies can collect today. Second, the emergence of a dominant firm in the search market would aggravate the ongoing concentration of media ownership in a global oligopoly of firms such as Time Warner, Bertelsmann, and Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation."
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 22:15 (twenty-one years ago)
Hmm. (Though my advice above still applies.)
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 December 2010 05:13 (fifteen years ago)
I hate it when I visit an interesting, informative, potentially useful site, but when I try to return to it days or weeks or months later, I can't find it because my memory is so bad and the internet is so big. I tried to solve the problem by bookmarking everything that I could possibly want to access at a later date, but now I have about 5,000 unsorted, untagged bookmarks, so even when I remember having bookmarked a page, I can't find it in my bookmarks menu half the time, and I have to google it just like I would if I didn't have any bookmarks in the first place.
― lonely is as lonely does, lonely is an eeyore (unregistered), Tuesday, 14 December 2010 05:49 (fifteen years ago)
@unregistered... try using http://www.delicious.com/ for links like that.
― Stockhausen's Ekranoplan Quartet (Elvis Telecom), Tuesday, 14 December 2010 05:55 (fifteen years ago)
just bookmarked it, thanks ;-)
― lonely is as lonely does, lonely is an eeyore (unregistered), Tuesday, 14 December 2010 05:59 (fifteen years ago)
that delicious firefox add-on looks awesome, actually, and not just because of the organization aspect. I can't count the number of times I've lost all my bookmarks due to browser issues, so it'd be helpful to have a backup just in case.
― lonely is as lonely does, lonely is an eeyore (unregistered), Tuesday, 14 December 2010 06:02 (fifteen years ago)
i really like delicious and still use it almost every day but after a wile even with tidy usage of "bundle of tags" it gets sort of too big. same thing with my usage of a personal wiki. what motivated me to start the thread was also a question of method with processing information, like rhizomatic writing. maybe deleuze readers have something to propose about that writing style +web 2.0
― Sébastien, Tuesday, 14 December 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)