― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:21 (twenty-two years ago)
*possibly contentious statement
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:23 (twenty-two years ago)
make an outrageous generalisation here
― Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sym (shmuel), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:25 (twenty-two years ago)
harsh, but true.
― colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― thing of thing, Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:28 (twenty-two years ago)
xpost
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sym (shmuel), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sym (shmuel), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:32 (twenty-two years ago)
1) People who are so afraid of commitment that carrying on relationships with two or more people at a time prevents them from ever having to make the emotional choice of committing to either of them.
2) The utterly insecure. Sex for this kind of person is more a kind of compulsion than anything else. They cheat because they need to prove *themselves* still attractive, rather than finding other people attractive.
― Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― LC, Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:35 (twenty-two years ago)
(Besides, relationships are problematic and comfort is cheaper (easier?) sometimes in the arms of a stranger.)
― Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:48 (twenty-two years ago)
Perhaps people get worried that not just physically -> not even physically, and are interested in proving that they can still pull?
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:51 (twenty-two years ago)
Other people might see it as a 'grass is greener thing' - all the things they perceive to be wrong with their partner, they project onto someone they hardly know; the person with whom they are unfaithful thus becomes the person they want their partner to be (hence the rapid closeness that can occur here; they are a stand-in for the real thing; an idealized perfect partner).
Others just can't keep their trousers together. Still others use it to signal that they should move on - a test for themselves. IN a simialr way, I always knew I was going to soon leave a job when I had a look at other jobs - the excuse of 'just looking' didn't wash, becasue soon, luck changed to 'hmm, maybe' turned to applying turned to leaving. Things could ahve changed that, but the base point is that you're dissatisfied enough with a job to ponder alternatives.
Difference between job and serious LTR - you don't leave it for a new one and new challenges willie-nillie - you try and make it work and explore way to do so in a way that one rarely does with jobs.
INteresting tangent - many things in life used to be for life - jobs, houses, living in a set location or area, political party supported, football team, and obviously, partners. All the others are breaking - is the rising divorce rate just another symptom of this?
― Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sym (shmuel), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sym (shmuel), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:59 (twenty-two years ago)
So are you saying that it is ok to 'explore other avenues' before you actually finish your current relationship? If this is the case, what would happen if the new relationship you were exploring didn't get off the ground? Would you (royal you) just happily go back to the current relationship, or would move on to the next potential relationship with your current partner still blissfully unaware?
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 11:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 11:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 11:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 11:34 (twenty-two years ago)
Best bit of graffitti in the grouting in the basement library toilets = "Girls bums are lush"
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 11:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 11:48 (twenty-two years ago)
I'd agree with that. Lots of people are just too lazy and/or have too many issues to break up in a straightforward way.
― El Diablo Curmudgeonbotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sym (shmuel), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anna (Anna), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chris 'The Velvet Bingo' V (Chris V), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:21 (twenty-two years ago)
OTM. I spent most of Uni being the Other Man (in my defence I rarely found this out until afterwards). I had trust issues for a few years because of this.
― Matt (Matt), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mr Mime (Andrew Thames), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:52 (twenty-two years ago)
WHAT'S UP WITH MARRIED MEN LATELY
― roxymuzak, Monday, 30 July 2007 20:26 (eighteen years ago)
Oh no, Roxy!
― marianna lcl, Monday, 30 July 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
For real.
It's awful. Even if they're someone you like, you're just like "Oh. All the reasons I liked you just went out the fucking window."
― roxymuzak, Monday, 30 July 2007 20:53 (eighteen years ago)
Aww hon, that's so fucked up. :(
― marianna lcl, Monday, 30 July 2007 21:00 (eighteen years ago)
one's not enough for em
― Heave Ho, Monday, 30 July 2007 21:08 (eighteen years ago)
libido
― Surmounter, Monday, 30 July 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)
original poster never met anyone who wanted to have their cake and eat it too
― mh, Monday, 30 July 2007 21:15 (eighteen years ago)
genital
― am0n, Monday, 30 July 2007 21:16 (eighteen years ago)
Cake/Eat it was discussed upthread, I believe?
― roxymuzak, Monday, 30 July 2007 21:18 (eighteen years ago)