― Mike Hanle y (mike), Thursday, 13 May 2004 02:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 13 May 2004 02:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 May 2004 02:05 (twenty-two years ago)
somewhere i read that l'engle, when asked what she thought of it, said, "oh, it's at least as bad as i expected..."
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Thursday, 13 May 2004 02:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Thursday, 13 May 2004 02:17 (twenty-two years ago)
+ Crummy CG+ Alfe Woodard being annoying.+ Overwrought digital compositing a la Lord of the Rings. + Crappy ThomasKinkadeian palette.+ Peanut Butter Sandwiches replacing the tuna fish ones.+ Meg not ugly enough+ Calvin not alpha-male enough+ Mother was kind of a MILF + Saccharine dialogue+ Boring, boring, boring pauses.+ The ugly hairy Wookies were embarrassing. + Ehh, fuck it. It just fucking blew.
― x Jeremy (Atila the Honeybun), Thursday, 13 May 2004 02:19 (twenty-two years ago)
The best part was seeing the creepy son from "The Ring" continue to be creepy and unsettling no matter how hard Disney tried to cute him.
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 May 2004 02:19 (twenty-two years ago)
b-b-but PEANUT ALLERGIES OH NO
― stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 13 May 2004 02:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 13 May 2004 02:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― isadora (isadora), Thursday, 13 May 2004 03:06 (twenty-two years ago)
NEWSWEEK: So you’ve seen the movie?Madeleine L’Engle: I’ve glimpsed it.
And did it meet expectations?Oh, yes. I expected it to be bad, and it is.
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 13 May 2004 03:20 (twenty-two years ago)
I wasn't even aware it was being filmed or screened. I think I am very glad of that fact.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 May 2004 04:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ian Johnson (orion), Thursday, 13 May 2004 05:01 (twenty-two years ago)
You can take the kid out of the creepy but you can't take the creepy out of the kid.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 13 May 2004 05:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Thursday, 13 May 2004 05:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 13 May 2004 13:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 May 2004 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Thursday, 13 May 2004 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 May 2004 15:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 13 May 2004 15:42 (twenty-two years ago)
the sets were uniformly awful as well... just way, way too busy and glaring. like camazotz for example... what the fuck were they thinking by using leftover set pieces from the batman movies?
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Thursday, 13 May 2004 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)
all i could remember was the biblical one with good and bad angels, which i think is the 4th one, many waters.
― g--ff (gcannon), Thursday, 13 May 2004 16:03 (twenty-two years ago)
THEY DIDN'T.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 May 2004 16:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 May 2004 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 May 2004 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm still trying to come up with a satisfactory (if moronic) reason why Disney would do this... I fear my head is close to exploding.
It... just... makes... no... sense...
At least with E.T. I could grasp that Reese's was willing to do product placement while Mars wasn't. Hence, the Pieces instead of M&Ms in the film. But how does tuna fish as a concept or product refuse to appear in a film?
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 May 2004 16:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Thursday, 13 May 2004 16:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 13 May 2004 16:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Thursday, 13 May 2004 16:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 May 2004 16:38 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.jrj-socrates.com/Cartoon%20Pics/Fox/Family%20Guy/Brian_300.gif
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 13 May 2004 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Thursday, 13 May 2004 16:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Thursday, 13 May 2004 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 May 2004 16:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Thursday, 13 May 2004 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 13 May 2004 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Thursday, 13 May 2004 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mike Hanle y (mike), Friday, 14 May 2004 01:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― x Jeremy (Atila the Honeybun), Friday, 14 May 2004 01:54 (twenty-two years ago)