― european son, Thursday, 13 May 2004 09:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Prude (Prude), Thursday, 13 May 2004 10:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 13 May 2004 10:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Hidayglo, Thursday, 13 May 2004 10:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 13 May 2004 11:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― the 'surface' 'noise' (electricsound), Thursday, 13 May 2004 11:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― reductionist, Thursday, 13 May 2004 11:39 (twenty-two years ago)
Surely that's obvious enough? If someone is taking photographs of a woman he can pose her with the sole thought of arousing the spectator. More artistic photographers will also start to concern themselves with form, composition etc - ie aiming for a formal beauty that has nothing to do with arousal but has to do with aesthetics. A talented writer can also become preoccupied with elements - elegance of prose style etc - that do not relate to arousal but aesthetics.
― Hidayglo, Thursday, 13 May 2004 11:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tag (Tag), Thursday, 13 May 2004 12:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:26 (twenty-two years ago)