― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― colette (a2lette), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)
(I bags being the first Ilxor to say "flipflop'll")
― dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― toby (tsg20), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Monday, 17 May 2004 12:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Stuart (Stuart), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― sgs (sgs), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Stuart (Stuart), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:38 (twenty-two years ago)
I used to think the bit between my toes would bother me too but it really doesnt. Still I prefer slides (still rubber, just with a band across the top of your foot). STarting about this time of the year, these are the only shoes I'll be wearing through the end of September.
(btw, I have lovely feet and always have nicely painted nails.)
― Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:38 (twenty-two years ago)
YES! And stay inside!
― Skottie, Monday, 17 May 2004 12:41 (twenty-two years ago)
(Never flip-flops.)
― clive (Clive), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:48 (twenty-two years ago)
and when you see them shout "HOBBIT!"
― MarkH (MarkH), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:48 (twenty-two years ago)
They're more like the Vespa of feet.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― clive (Clive), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:51 (twenty-two years ago)
(I wear t-shirts and trainers to work, but flip-flops seem so... slovenly. They should be banned, although I shall go with S's suggestion and allow them to bo worn on 100 degree plus days. Which would mean that for one day out of the entire modern history of Britain they'd have been acceptable.)
X-post - okay, FFs are the micro-skooter of feet.
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:51 (twenty-two years ago)
Jack Purcell'sStan Smith's
Sandles are extremely problematic, not for beginners.
http://freakout.jp/sneaker/converse/JackPurcellW3F.JPGhttp://www.sneakerland.com/images/img/adi_034813_img.jpg
― Skottie, Monday, 17 May 2004 12:52 (twenty-two years ago)
xpost feet polarise people awfully, don't they?
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:54 (twenty-two years ago)
This statement perplexes me. Oh no! The instruction manual is missing! Oh no!
― MarkH (MarkH), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:54 (twenty-two years ago)
What?
― Sarah (starry), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:56 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm also sketchy on shorts for women unless you have legs like Betty Grable. I myself never wear shorts. (make what you will of the quality of my legs)
― Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:58 (twenty-two years ago)
Care to rephrase that???
― MarkH (MarkH), Monday, 17 May 2004 12:59 (twenty-two years ago)
lol
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 16 June 2011 01:40 (fourteen years ago)
for clarification purposes, shoes are not likely a make or break for humongous dude in tiny "I BEAT ANOREXIA!" t-shirt
i mostly wear black chucks or adidas
― And the piano, it sounds like a carnivore (contenderizer), Thursday, 16 June 2011 01:50 (fourteen years ago)
is there an adi dassler movie? there should be...
― And the piano, it sounds like a carnivore (contenderizer), Thursday, 16 June 2011 01:55 (fourteen years ago)
my flip flops are $5 ones I found at a random Asian market in SF. I like FloJos, might get some of those as my next pair. But $20, $25 is the most I'd ever spend...I mean, they're flip flops.
Those fucking toe shoes are the worst. I don't like toes much anyway, or feet really...but accentuating the toes like that really creeps me out for some reason.
― Janet Snakehole (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 16 June 2011 02:10 (fourteen years ago)
Feet are gross and terrible, basically
― blank, Thursday, 16 June 2011 02:12 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.bogoboo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/1ugly-feet.jpg
― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 June 2011 02:20 (fourteen years ago)
sb'd you for that
― arachno-misogynist (D-40), Thursday, 16 June 2011 02:21 (fourteen years ago)
Study the physiological harmony that steers the big toe nail towards the center.
― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 June 2011 02:35 (fourteen years ago)
NO
― Janet Snakehole (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 16 June 2011 02:45 (fourteen years ago)
why are havaianas so expensive? are they especially nice?
they are much tougher than $5 drugstore flipflops. (the downside is that they're kind of heavy in comparison)
― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 June 2011 09:06 (fourteen years ago)
like 10 years ago i was out strolling around w/my family and i bought a $40 pair of flipflops, they all totally made fun of me and thought i was a rube, of course I STILL HAV THEM FLIPFLOPS
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 16 June 2011 15:26 (fourteen years ago)
deal w/it family B-)
40% chill and 100% flip flop.
― $5.00 Footlongs (thebingo), Thursday, 16 June 2011 15:27 (fourteen years ago)
you got that right chooch
― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 June 2011 15:33 (fourteen years ago)
I like flip flops for indoor wear only - i find them stylish and tasty. I fee like a real gentleman in them, and what's more, the ladies approve. I feel quite better tha nother people when I wear them.
― coffeetripperspillerslyricmakeruppers (Latham Green), Thursday, 16 June 2011 16:43 (fourteen years ago)
i had havaianas once and wore them out a few times but they were kinda murder on my feet, better for the quick errand run imo
― badtz-maruizm (donna rouge), Thursday, 16 June 2011 16:49 (fourteen years ago)
it's raining and a key thing people have forgotten to mention is that flip flops are u+k in the rain
― british sb power (dayo), Friday, 17 June 2011 00:08 (fourteen years ago)
http://donkeyshines.com/donkeyblog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/dress.jpg
― coffeetripperspillerslyricmakeruppers (Latham Green), Friday, 17 June 2011 01:15 (fourteen years ago)
havaianas - I have 3 pairs and they're way more comfortable than other FFs.
― \(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Friday, 17 June 2011 01:18 (fourteen years ago)
saw a dude pull off flip-flops today -- he had kind of a former adventurer w/ swag vibe tho, like hed just gotten back from safari
― arachno-misogynist (D-40), Friday, 17 June 2011 01:31 (fourteen years ago)
Wait, so all you folks who refuse flip-flops and shorts, even when the temperature hits 90, are you just sweating bullets? I'd wear shoes and pants year-'round if it were temperate here, but it's not, and if I don't lighten up I'll be dripping and far more uncomfortable (and unsightly) than I would be in flip-flops or sandals.
Those who do wear shorts, what kind of shoes do you wear with them, if not flops or sandals? And then, do you wear socks? Low cut? Tube socks? I've never really looked at the footwear around me to learn answers that must be obvious to others.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 17 June 2011 02:21 (fourteen years ago)
i wear shorts fwiw ... 95.68% of dudes have aesthetically unpleasing feet tho, self included -- & i mean, this is aside from hygiene, which is another story -- but i generally dont have problem w/ breathable sneakers in summer
― arachno-misogynist (D-40), Friday, 17 June 2011 02:25 (fourteen years ago)
i wear super-low cut socks, or no socks, depending on the kind of shoe & how hot its likely to get
i also recommend runners' socks for summer to avoid blisters, they dont trap moisture
― arachno-misogynist (D-40), Friday, 17 June 2011 02:26 (fourteen years ago)
NEVER SOCKS EVER
― J0rdan S., Friday, 17 June 2011 02:26 (fourteen years ago)
thats crazy -- your feet will smell like mad in the wrong shoes -- thats why i said 'super low cut'
― arachno-misogynist (D-40), Friday, 17 June 2011 02:29 (fourteen years ago)
they are not visible
x-post But isn't no socks with shoes kind of ... gross?
Is it asking for trouble to even wonder what constitutes an "aesthetically pleasing" foot?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 17 June 2011 02:30 (fourteen years ago)
"The single-axis articulated unit has been manufactured longer than any other modern prosthetic foot. The foot is usually made out of wood with rubber or felt in the toe section and a vertical bolt joint connecting the foot and the leg. The joint along with an axle allows for dorsiflextion and immediate plantar flexion after heel-strike. However, rubber bumpers restrict the range of both flexions, which makes the articulated unit only affective on level ground. The rubber bumpers are adjustable according to the amount of walking the wearer does and are sometimes replaced by rough felt. Unfortunately, the single-axis foot is not aesthetically pleasing with a large gap between the bolt joint and the leg. The gap also allows water and dirt to enter the prosthetic that make it more prone to wear and hinder the prosthetic’s function. The metal parts and the heavy rubber add to the weight of the lower-prosthetic and, although it has been proven that weight does not affect stride, it is cumbersome to the wearer."
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 17 June 2011 02:33 (fourteen years ago)
"It has been proposed that the feral horse foot is a benchmark model for foot health in horses and can be used as a guide to optimise care of domestic horse feet. The adoption of this model by some groups has shifted the focus of hoof trimming away from the traditional farriery model with a tendency towards excessive removal of the bearing border of the distal hoof wall and sculpturing the foot in the shape of the popular hoof model.
It appears that the paradigm model for the feral horse foot was obtained from limited studies of desert dwelling feral horses and may not represent the general appearance of feral horse feet across a range of habitats. The external appearance of the typical desert dwelling feral horse foot appears aesthetically pleasing with little visible pathology. However, the foot morphology and foot health of feral horses has not been formally investigated in detail.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 17 June 2011 02:35 (fourteen years ago)
idk i dont have a foot fetish or anything but ive seen some women w/ sexy feet
there are men w/ feet that swag it out too no lie its just way rarer imo
― arachno-misogynist (D-40), Friday, 17 June 2011 02:39 (fourteen years ago)
Huh. There are gnarly, nasty feet, for sure, but I think most feet can be categorized by their anonymity.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 17 June 2011 02:46 (fourteen years ago)
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Pddab74UAAw/TgCkWi8pInI/AAAAAAAAAe0/tlV01IGw-Os/s144/flip%252520flops.jpg
― coffeetripperspillerslyricmakeruppers (Latham Green), Tuesday, 21 June 2011 14:02 (fourteen years ago)
The HR lady at my last job was trying to explain that flip-flops were unacceptable work shoes, but she kept using every word but flip-flop, and it eventually confused everyone deeply. "No communal shower shoes. No 'thongs' – I don't mean the garment that covers your private lady bits. No beach sliders. If it makes a 'Y' on the top of your foot, if it has straps that sneak between your wee little piggies, you can't wear it. If it doesn't connect to your ankle somewhere, it's a no-go." She brought in a drawing of a flip-flop but it didn't really look like anything.
― free inappropriate education (Abbbottt), Tuesday, 21 June 2011 17:04 (fourteen years ago)
unlike my aweseom draking
― coffeetripperspillerslyricmakeruppers (Latham Green), Tuesday, 21 June 2011 17:05 (fourteen years ago)
How has this thread not been revived in 8 years? Do people not hate flip-flops any more?
― doorstep jetski (dog latin), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 14:44 (six years ago)
I hate wearing them but like seeing them on people.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 14:48 (six years ago)
I wear pool slides every day, but will probably never wear a flip-flop again.
― peace, man, Wednesday, 27 May 2020 15:03 (six years ago)
been busy, poundin squak
― Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 15:12 (six years ago)
when I was young and stupider I once wore a pair of flip-flops as my everyday regular shoes and managed to give myself blisters, don't do this.
― Wuhan!! Got You All in Check (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 15:50 (six years ago)
The cargo shorts 'n' flip-flops look is the worst example of 2000s fashion.
― TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 16:27 (six years ago)
i have basically been wearing only flip flops since quarantine started. i'm lazy. i sit around in my house 90% of the time
― global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 27 May 2020 16:45 (six years ago)
i made this, i don't know why
i'm not proud
https://i.imgur.com/ONZeADR.jpg
― Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 16:54 (six years ago)
I hate seeing them and hate wearing them even more
― change display name (Jordan), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 17:01 (six years ago)
I'm wearing cargo shorts right now
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 17:02 (six years ago)
I have a pair that I wear around the RV park but nowhere else. They make my feet and back hurt.
― Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Wednesday, 27 May 2020 17:02 (six years ago)
Socks and slides are way worse, who tf came up with that?
― Maresn3st, Wednesday, 27 May 2020 17:04 (six years ago)
yall hate comfort
― Spottie, Wednesday, 27 May 2020 17:14 (six years ago)
I would genuinely rather be uncomfortable than wear cargo shorts and subject other humans to my legs
― Wuhan!! Got You All in Check (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 17:15 (six years ago)
socks n slides is very sports centric. like after a bball game you want to take your expensive hoop shoes off so you dont have to walk on the concrete/asphalt out to your car so you take them off and throw on some slides. convenience and comfort. flip flops are pretty essential for living in Arizona.
― Spottie, Wednesday, 27 May 2020 17:16 (six years ago)
yeah, was gonna say, basketball chic of the late '90s started the trend
― TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 17:19 (six years ago)