Decapitating Americans

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Note the title play - any one else got thoughts on
http://marc.perkel.com/archives/000233.html
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2004/5/15/22827/0477

Are yanks yanking yanks?

Mohammed Ali Queen G, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 09:32 (twenty-two years ago)

wow

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 14:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not generally keen on conspiracy theories, but, OMG.

Johnney B (Johnney B), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 14:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Seconded. OMG WTF. HAs anyone checked the chair isn't photoshopped in, etc?

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 14:44 (twenty-two years ago)

My girlfriend was telling me about the conspiracy theory stuff a couple days ago. Apparently there were some stories on less nutty-looking sites (like, CNN).

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Considering that's one of the most common and typical plastic chairs you can find anywhere, I wouldn't lead off that first link with that observation.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)

My assumption was that commonly available chairs in the US != commonly available chairs in Iraq. Ditto orange prison suits.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 14:48 (twenty-two years ago)

not to be all The Mass Media Is Masonic or anything but CNN is as nutty as any black-ops blogger

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)

That chair is all over the world -- I have seen chairs like it in Africa, Asia, and Greece -- it's a cheapo folks sell off the back of trucks.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)

there are many things fishy concerning the video (see 50 points in kuro5hin thread above) but the fishiest from my pov is the identification of zarqawi as the killer by the cia. for a start:

The tape of Berg's killing, entitled, "Abu Musab al-Zarqawi slaughtering an American," showed five masked men. The CIA believes one, who read a statement and carried out the beheading, was al-Zarqawi. (source)
the title gives away the name of the butcher. some reasoning worthy of a genius there.

mainly gathered from the kuro5hin thread:
1. zarqawi is supposed to carry an artificial leg. the guy with the knife in the video seems to be rather fit for a one-legged fellow.
2. zarqawi is jordanian. the guy in the video apparently doesn't have a jordanian accent. of course his declaration could have been dubbed by someone else. in which case i ask myself what the cia was analysing anyway.
3. zarqawi is an expert in poisoning and chemical weapons and is not known for cutting off heads of people.
4. he is supposed to be the missing link between al-qaeda and iraq as powell said in february. german officials who have been investigating zarqawi for a while doubt this. zarqawi has also been blamed for the madrid explosions and yesterday's killing of the head of the iraqian governing council. without any proofs whatsoever as far as i know. this man is build up as the new bin laden by bush&co if you ask me.
5. zarqawi has a tatto on the left hand. no tatoo in the video though you can see his left hand.
6. why did he cover his face? he is widely known. because it wasn't him?

either the guys at the cia are totally dumb or they think the american people are f*cking stupid. or a mixture of both.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)

The programmes of the Two Minutes Hate varied from day to day, but there was none in which Goldstein was not the principal figure. He was the primal traitor, the earliest defiler of the Party's purity. All subsequent crimes against the Party, all treacheries, acts of sabotage, heresies, deviations, sprang directly out of his teaching. Somewhere or other he was still alive and hatching his conspiracies: perhaps somewhere beyond the sea, under the protection of his foreign paymasters, perhaps even -- so it was occasionally rumoured -- in some hiding-place in Oceania itself.
George Orwell
1984

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 17:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, i heard the second half of a story that we could have gotten zarqawi and a terrorist camp in Kurdish Iraq earlier, before the war started - but the Whitehouse blocked the action because it would undermine the case for war against Iraq. (Because if the terrorists were removed from Iraq, we'd have less reason to attack them.)

.. As I say, I didn't hear all of it, so it requires additional substantiation .. but look for more of that story to surface ...

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 17:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Here's more:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4431601

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 18:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Nick Berg was held for nine days by Iraqi police (who are under CENCOM) and questioned by the FBI. His family was petitioning the government to discover his whereabouts. He had planned to leave - his detention is what made him a victim.
Violence in Iraq escalated dramatically during those nine days. he probably made some mistakes himself, but wtf...if the FBI and Cencom are holding this guy for nine days, and then releasing him into an ever changing and growing quagmire, who is responsible?
Think about it - Nick Berg probably wanted to get AWAY from his jailers.
We may never know exactly what happened in terms of his abduction, but we do know that his life would be far different if he had not been detained. I watched the video. Thankfully, it stopped before the display of Nick Bergs head.
The conspiracy is obvious.

aimurchie, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 18:10 (twenty-two years ago)

strangely enough both the iraqi police and the us military police now deny that they have ever arrested berg. though berg's mother got an e-mail from a us consular officer on april, 1st that he was in custody of the us military. the fbi admits to have interviewed him three times. berg himself said to someone (forgot the name, see metafilter) he met several times in his hotel that he was arrested for two weeks by the american military police.

conspiracies are never obvious, aimurchie. but there are many questions here and they haven't been answered yet. neither by the press which never analysed this case in depth nor by bush&co.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 18:34 (twenty-two years ago)

though berg's mother got an e-mail from a us consular officer on april, 1st that he was in custody of the us military.

April Fools!

NA (Nick A.), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I was chilled by the video (I didn't watch all of it) for more reasons than one. Berg just doesn't move after the weird editing -- when the actual decapitating begins. I have to echo the "why?" of these websites.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 18:52 (twenty-two years ago)

alex in manhattan: Stranger still, Bush tries to link this to Sadaam Hussein.
Nick Berg's family (specifically his father) is/are not getting a lot of face time. His father is very composed and eloquent when he speaks. But nobody is listening to him, because he is speaking out against the occupation.

aimurchie, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)

well, I watched the video last week, and I have to say that, even before I read any of the blog commentary about it, I thought there was something really strange about the guy standing on the left. He's in that military at-ease position with his hands behind his back, and he keeps shifting his weight from foot to foot, and looking down at his feet and then back up again. I dunno, I just remember thinking to myself that he ... didn't fit somehow...

Other strange things - the sound non-sync up, and yeah, hate to say it, but the blood ... just didn't seem right..

Broheems (diamond), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 19:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah I read how Bush tried to tie this to Saddam Hussein, in another ploy that any intelligent non-partisan person will see through.

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 19:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Um, how often do you see blood spilling on the floor after a decapitation that you feel qualified to make that judgement?

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 19:06 (twenty-two years ago)

"dude, man, Kill Bill Volume One!"

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)

There was a video on Ogrish that showed Chechens decapitating some Russians that they'd captured in this way though with a smaller knife. Even tightly bound the Russians thrashed about quite a bit and there was a lot of blood. The Berg video just looks odd. I thought it was fake or doctored right away but who knows.

Bryan (Bryan), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 19:13 (twenty-two years ago)

well Dan I didn't want to get graphic. Hmm.. not sure if I want to now, either. Well anyway, when the head is held aloft .. it's basically clean. It just struck me as odd, that's all.

It's really not any one thing, though - just the confluence of multiple little details - that leaves me wondering. To be clear, I didn't approach the video LOOKING for signs of conspiracy, I'm NOT saying I've determined for myself that it IS some kind of conspiracy. Merely, still wondering. That guy on the left weirded me out more than anything.

Broheems (diamond), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 19:13 (twenty-two years ago)

and yeah, I've seen that Chechen video, too. Unfortunately.

Broheems (diamond), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I could ask my brother for an approximate amount of blood in the average human male's head, if we really wanna get technical.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)

NO JOKES DAN.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)

I know what it looks like when veins are cut.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 19:24 (twenty-two years ago)

I really didn't intend for that to sound quite so Conor Oberst. What I mean is -- it's less of a slow, creeping ooze of blood than a geyser-like spurting.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Incidentally, I'm pretty sure that tattoos are also haram (forbidden) in Islam. Maybe al-Zarqawi got his tattoo during a younger, wilder phase?


*I am wondering if there are any facts about him at all.

Rockist Scientist, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 20:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Besides the act itself , there is little or no follow up to this story. Meanwhile, his family publicly denounced the occupation forces and asked for answers. These brave people want to speak in the wake of their sons - beheading? - their sons head getting sawed off from both sides.

aimurchie, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 21:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Re: tattoos: Reference

Rockist Scientist, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 21:05 (twenty-two years ago)

"little or no follow up to this story"???????

cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 21:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Many of these posts = idiotic.

Debito (Debito), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)

they come from the land of people who get their news from television

cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)

"little or no follow up to this story"???????
yes. there has been no national press about the story of Nick Berg;s last days. I read the papers diligently, and I don't get my news from TV. The situation in Fallujah (and Najaf) and the Abu Ghraib images have been enough to shock and awe and horrify both us and the entire Arab world.
My point is: follow up should have started with his family. I don't see any follow up in this regard. I see only press releases that are meant to paint Nick Berg as some ne'er do well who suddenly decided, on a whim, to go to Baghdad. And the FBI and CENCOM tried their damndest to show him a path out.
He was held for nine days. He had no access to the outside world - no phone, no lawyer. Read his emails - he jokes about being targeted as a Jew.He told his parents that he was leaving a month before his body was found.
I have seen NOTHING in the press that dignifies this man and his family. I have only seen the US reaction to his death, and the typical response that "they" are animals, killers, terrorists.]
We are not winning any hearts and minds. The gruesome deaths that Iraqi civilians suffer is never aired. As of last week, 75 of the 600 killed in Fallujah were children under the age of five.
Nicholas Berg walked out of custody and into a bizarre and tragic history.


aimurchie, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 21:53 (twenty-two years ago)

(um)

x Jeremy (Atila the Honeybun), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 21:55 (twenty-two years ago)

So Cinniblount, where HAVE you seen followup, if you're so sure Aimurchie is wrong? I sure haven't seen any myself, and get *none* of my news from TV, because my TV's broken. Except, yep: "the typical response that 'they' are animals, killers, terrorists." Which response has come across as the most predictable horseshit possible, and which response makes all those wacko conspiracy theories ring *more* true, not less.

chuck, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 22:07 (twenty-two years ago)

The media is just not doing its job on this one, not questioning the official story at all, even though there is no evidence at all that the official story is true, except for the mere fact that it exists. And there are enough big pieces of the puzzle that don't add up that somebody *should* be investigating the story further. But again, if I've missed something, by all means say so.

chuck, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 22:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Is it possible that the media are investigating, but "all signs point to true" isn't a very newsworthy story?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 22:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Um, how often do you see blood spilling on the floor after a decapitation that you feel qualified to make that judgement?

Dude, Forensic Files, The New Detectives, and Cold Case Files

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 22:26 (twenty-two years ago)

>"all signs point to true" isn't a very newsworthy story?<

actually, that WOULD make for a good story. but i've yet to see a piece that investigates the signs one way or the other, or that even acknowledges that there SEEM to be holes and incongruities in what we've been told. i mean, nick berg was doing SOMETHING in between the time he apparently spent in that iraqi prison (which we already know the government has contradicted itself about) and his alleged beheading, right? has anybody even tried to find out what that something might have been? or whether his oklahoma al quaeda e-mail connection MIGHT have been something other than mere coincidence? has anybody done a in-depth interview with his dad? have people harassed his dad at all since his statements last week? these really aren't far-fetched questions. (though again, maybe somebody has delved into them, and i just missed it. if so, i'd really like to know where.)

chuck, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 23:12 (twenty-two years ago)

have people harassed his dad at all since his statements last week?

I think that in due time that is a good idea, but allowing time for a parent to grieve for their murdered son is probably a healthy thing to do.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 23:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, that occured to me, and I agree. But his dad did seem pretty willing to talk right away. (And I think you mean asking about harrassment would be a good idea, not that harrassing would be a good idea, which is how I first read your post! But hell, who knows, maybe people are just letting him mourn *before they start harrassing him..)

chuck, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 23:15 (twenty-two years ago)

dad will die in a freak accident within a year's time

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 23:22 (twenty-two years ago)

or killed by "terrorists".

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 23:25 (twenty-two years ago)

or killed by "conspiracy theorists"

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 23:27 (twenty-two years ago)

or killed by "Al Sharpton"

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 23:30 (twenty-two years ago)

dad will die in a freak accident within a year's time

while riding in Seymour Hersch's car.

Rockist Scientist, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 23:48 (twenty-two years ago)

dad will die in a freak accident within a year's time

While being driven home by John Kerry, when the car goes off a bridge into a river/lake.

nickn (nickn), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 01:03 (twenty-two years ago)

If there is a story, the media pursues it.

Debito (Debito), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 01:34 (twenty-two years ago)

pursue = misconstrue

cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 01:35 (twenty-two years ago)

even if all this conspiracy stuff is total bollocks i think the current us administration is asking for it. most of what they ever said about iraq were either plain lies or half-baked statements. at this point of time i prefer any far-fetched conspiracy theory to the official line which is clearly trying to hide the truths about the iraq war. there was no islamistic terrorism in iraq before the us arrived there. now there is. and they exploit this by saying, see iraq is linked to al-qaeda. the war in iraq is war against terrorism. but in reality it just has created new terrorism.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes Alex, we all agree with that.

But it's quite different than saying that the CIA executed Berg and released a videotape of it.
And offering plastic chairs as evidence.

Debito (Debito), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Other strange things - the sound non-sync up

i only saw it on the net and assumed that this is to do with crap internet video format... is it the same on TV??

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 06:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I assume we all saw it on the 'net Ken, I don't think any TV station has aired much of it other than stills or brief clips pre-beheading.

I don’t like talking about it, but I suppose this thread is the only place to, so I will admit that I watched most of the video too (unfortunately). I also thought something technical was amiss, and I saw it before reading any of this cover-up hoopla. I have worked with streaming video for the last 5 years, and the weird time sync has nothing to do with it being online. The source tape has definitely been edited in some way (overdubs, edits), and these changes are just harder to notice in the compressed/reduced quality of online video.

I’m not saying this makes it a fake, though. I don’t really buy any of these chair/tattoo/fat arguments to prove that “these are US troops in disguise!”. My guess is that this is a video made my Islamic extremists of some sort (although maybe not Abu Musab al-Zarqawi). And if he was indeed well-dead by the time of the beheading (which does seem to be the case, but I have no medical proof of this), then he might have just been killed in some other way and then decapitated later on video. I mean, even people as extreme as this might not have been able to stomach doing it while he was alive.

All that said, something here is still a bit fishy, and I can tell you that I am the last person to buy into conspiracy theories and all that…

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 08:42 (twenty-two years ago)

(p.s. you're pretty sick for choosing to watch that video, y'all)

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 09:33 (twenty-two years ago)

really?

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 09:42 (twenty-two years ago)

It took a big leap of faith for me to watch it. I have to admit that I skipped part of the end and turned the sound off when it looked like it was about to get horrific (which, of course, it is). I don't think I'm a sick person - if anything I'm guilty of being obsessively curious about political events and the sad state of mankind.

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 09:47 (twenty-two years ago)

"(p.s. you're pretty sick for choosing to watch that video, y'all)"
-- Markelby

Watching it was a difficult choice. I am still, in my mind, debating why I chose to watch it. I have many friends who basically agree with you. I guess I just wanted to make sure that something so horrible and stupefying actually did occur. It's not like I want to see countless images of death and destruction, but the crazy way the war and occupation has played out has been very controlled. The US government won't allow pictures of COFFINS to appear!
I don't have to live with daily carnage, so maybe I do need a reminder that other people - all over the world - deal with these things on a day to day basis.
Sudan. Right Now.

aimurchie, Wednesday, 19 May 2004 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)

oh Mark just leave the high moral ground for once in your life.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 19:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I assume we all saw it on the 'net Ken, I don't think any TV station has aired much of it other than stills or brief clips pre-beheading.

They showed the thing in its entirety on the news.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Hell, I didn't watch it. I read the description and that was enough. I don't suspect bad morals for everyone who did, though.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 19:13 (twenty-two years ago)

"high moral ground"!!!

"Dude, that is TOTALLY disgusting that you watched that. I mean, think about the synapses that you've scarred by watching that; you might have used them to trap fairies. Oh man, I'm WASTED..."

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)

I actually was tipped on the shoulder by a friend watching it on the net and began watching without having considered whether I wanted to see it. I doubt I'd have sought it out but don't feel extremely guilty.

x-post, I have no idea what Dan means.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)

"high moral ground" = "the moral ground of the high"

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 19:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Is "high moral ground" a UK only phrase?? weird!

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 19:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Is "humor" a US-only concept? Weird!

NA (Nick A.), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 19:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Considered responses

1. "FUCK OFF"

2. "Thankfully not"

3. *do not post, ignore*

4. "FUCK OFF!"

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 19:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry, Ronan..."humour." Is that better?

NA (Nick A.), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)

In the US, one would say "moral high ground" because "moral" is an addition to the phrase "taking the high ground".

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 19:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Mark, you can't say that (and I haven't watched it, fyi).

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 20:01 (twenty-two years ago)

so far on this thread neither US or UK have shown any of this "humo(u)r" concept that was claimed to have been showing.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)

"i only saw it on the net and assumed that this is to do with crap internet video format... is it the same on TV??"

My understanding is that no video has surfaced OTHER than that which was shown on the net -- that is, the tv stations that show it are all showing crappy Real Video.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 20:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I was supposed to graduate from Moral High but I failed the gothic anus exam and had to...

...drop out.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 20:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Ken, sorry this thread about people being decapitated didn't brighten your day.

NA (Nick A.), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 20:07 (twenty-two years ago)

this thread couldn't brighten up my day even if it were about me getting multiple blowjobs from britney spears whilst buffy is feeding me curry.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 20:10 (twenty-two years ago)

No moral high ground (it's that way round, Ronan) at all. I can't understand anyone choosing to view the murder of another person. But then maybe that's just a phobia of mine - the few times I have witnessed footage of people actually dying in real life it's profoundly and fundamentally upset and disturbed me. My problem, then.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 20:16 (twenty-two years ago)

oh i can understand rubbernecking and ghoulish voyeurism, i just can't condone it or buy into excuses of 'i was just trying to get to the truth, maaan' (riight).

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 20:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Sudan. Sudan. Sudan. Sudan. Mogadishu. Sudan.

aimurchie, Wednesday, 19 May 2004 20:52 (twenty-two years ago)

i can't really say i was shocked when trife told me about his co-workers watching it and then just going back to work as if it was some keerazy animation.

i'm a bit sensitive about all this since there have been reporters in town all week camped outside the berg house, and the dad actually taught some people i know. i actually told one of them to "fuck off" when he asked me for a quote, which i was surprised by.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)

So, a few hours ago, the BBC site had one of those scrolling headlines that said, "Latest: Two being questioned over the beheading of US hostage Nicholas Berg," but it seems to have disappeared, and I haven't seen any full article following up. Does anybody know what it's about? Who are the "two being questioned"??

Also, not sure whether anybody has linked to this very good piece by Berg's dad, so here goes:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1221515,00.html

chuck, Friday, 21 May 2004 17:01 (twenty-two years ago)

CNN has this story up:

Coalition forces apprehended four people in connection with the beheading of U.S. businessman Nicholas Berg, a military coalition official said Friday, but have since released two of them.

The senior official said the two remaining might be released after more questioning. He provided no further details.

An Iraqi security official said the four men who decapitated Berg and videotaped it were members of Saddam Hussein's Fedayeen paramilitary organization, according to The Associated Press.

The AP reported the official believes the men were led by a nephew of Saddam Hussein, Yasser al-Sabawi. The nephew was not among those arrested, the official told the AP.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 21 May 2004 17:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't understand anyone choosing to view the murder of another person

I prefer to know the full extent of humans; ability to do evil to others. This doesn't mean it doesn't disturb or sicken me, quite the opposite. But I'd prefer to see and know rather than turn my back.

FWIW I hadn't watched this video yet b/c I just wasn't interested. I caught enough of what had happened from the news clips I saw. But I'm going to try and watch it now b/c of the controversy over whether it's legit or not.

Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Friday, 21 May 2004 18:23 (twenty-two years ago)

i would recommend if you haven't seen it yet, don't.

i almost puked afterwards, and i have had trouble watching with tv/movie violence ever since viewing it.

maybe that's a good thing.

cutty (mcutt), Friday, 21 May 2004 18:28 (twenty-two years ago)

nine years pass...

http://i.imgur.com/BdxaVul.jpg

Maggishos soyfriend. Wins. (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Tuesday, 22 October 2013 00:37 (twelve years ago)

need a thread for listing who we think a thread was most likely to be bumped by

乒乓, Tuesday, 22 October 2013 00:41 (twelve years ago)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24608499

Facebook lets beheading clips return to social network

blended haircrut (sarahell), Tuesday, 22 October 2013 06:30 (twelve years ago)

Surely we have revives vmic non?

champagne supernovella (darraghmac), Tuesday, 22 October 2013 07:01 (twelve years ago)

censorship is bad, mmmmkay?

chimped the keeper (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 22 October 2013 07:49 (twelve years ago)

The charity's leader Stephen Balkam told the BBC he was surprised by the latest development.

"I would have expected a heads-up on this," he said.

Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Tuesday, 22 October 2013 08:05 (twelve years ago)

People are sharing this video on Facebook to condemn it. If the video were being celebrated, or the actions in it encouraged, our approach would be different.

"if exactly the same thing was happening but with some slightly different text underneath it this wd be a totally different situation"

i dunno, maybe add some koan about the difference between freedom of speech and not making your public discourse straight douchery

chimped the keeper (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 22 October 2013 08:13 (twelve years ago)

i am not exercised about this really, i just struggle with the mindset that wants to share videos of people being murdered on Facebook, presumably trawling for "Like"s

chimped the keeper (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 22 October 2013 08:14 (twelve years ago)

you still can't have nudity on there, right?

blended haircrut (sarahell), Tuesday, 22 October 2013 08:22 (twelve years ago)

nudity will corrupt our youth, decapitation vids will make us strong

chimped the keeper (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 22 October 2013 08:22 (twelve years ago)

wasn't there a line about this in a Kipling poem?

blended haircrut (sarahell), Tuesday, 22 October 2013 08:33 (twelve years ago)

"If you can keep your headless videos
When all around are losing theirs"

if i could just chimp in for a moment (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 22 October 2013 08:35 (twelve years ago)

eleven months pass...

Ice cream flavors

This is an incomplete list that may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by expanding it with entries that are reliably sourced.

Bacon ice cream[1] – a modern invention, generally created by adding bacon to egg custard and freezing the mixture.
Black and Tan (ice cream)
Blue Moon (ice cream)
Bone Marrow with Bourbon Smoked Cherries[2]

the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Friday, 10 October 2014 19:36 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.